Puppet MastersS


Bad Guys

Best of the Web: Tulsi Gabbard: Democracy threatened by 'power elite,' mainstream media

tulsi gabbard
© Bill Pugliano/Getty ImagesFormer Democrat presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard.
Former Democrat presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard took to social media Friday morning to warn of the dangers presented "by the likes [of] Hillary Clinton and her cohorts in Deep State and mainstream media."

Gabbard, the former Hawaii lawmaker who ran for president in 2020, tweeted a snippet of her recent appearance on Fox News and commented on special counsel John Durham's investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe.

"Durham probe further proves that the greatest threat to our democracy is not some foreign country, but rather the Power Elite, led by the likes [of] Hillary Clinton and her cohorts in Deep State and mainstream media," Gabbard wrote.

Comment: See also:


Red Flag

Will Washington Launch a Mass-Casualty "False Flag" to Sabotage Nord Stream?

fire destruction
"American colleagues at the Pentagon told me, unequivocally, that the US and UK never would allow European-Soviet (re: EU-Russia) relations to develop to such a degree that they would challenge the US-UK's political, economic or military primacy and hegemony on the European continent. Such a development will be prevented by all necessary means, if necessary by provoking a war in central Europe." Christof Lehmann
February 16 has come and gone without incident. The information spread by US officials and the media proved to be wrong. Russia did not invade Ukraine nor did any of the unverified warnings turn out to be true. So far, neither the media nor the administration has produced a scintilla of evidence that Russia actually planned to invade Ukraine or that the presumed invasion was "imminent." The whole thing may have been a hoax concocted by Washington to advance their regional agenda; we just don't know for sure. What we do know, however, is that no one from the administration, the media or the intelligence agencies have offered any explanation, apology or retraction for their errant predictions. Of that, we can be 100% certain.

What are we to make of this? Why would the administration stake its credibility on a prediction that was so far-fetched? And why did the media participate in the ruse when they clearly had no hard evidence to back up the claims? Did they really think Putin is so cognitively-impaired that he'd order his troops into Ukraine just to follow Washington's loony script?

No, of course not.

Arrow Up

Ukraine crisis: Blinken and Lavrov agree to meeting as tensions reach 'moment of peril'

BlinkenLavrov
© Alex Brandon/AFP/Getty Images"Close and yet so far"
US Sec of State Antony Blinken • Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
Antony Blinken is to meet the Russian foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, next week, as the US secretary of state warned the crisis in Ukraine was a "moment of peril for the lives and safety of millions of people".

The US state department said on Thursday night that Blinken had accepted an invitation to meet Lavrov provided there was no invasion of Ukraine. The move provides hope that diplomatic channels remained open even as US warnings of an imminent invasion grow louder.

"If they do invade in the coming days, it will make clear they were never serious about diplomacy," said state department spokesperson Ned Price. Blinken said earlier on Thursday he had sent a letter to Lavrov proposing a meeting in Europe.

A fresh flurry of meetings between western leaders begins on Friday, with the US president, Joe Biden, hosting a call with the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, Britain, the European Union and Nato.

The US vice-president, Kamala Harris, is also due to arrive in Munich for several days of talks with global leaders including the German chancellor, Olaf Scholz, the UK foreign secretary, Liz Truss, and Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

Comment: Sound and fury signifying...the makings of a disaster.


Briefcase

'Legal standard not met': Two court challenges filed over Trudeau's use of Emergencies Act

Ottawa barrier
© Scott Olson/Getty ImagesBarrier constructed around the parliament buildings in Ottawa, February 17, 2022
Justin Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act 'has set a dangerous precedent,' the non-partisan Canadian Constitution Foundation said.

Two separate legal challenges were filed on Thursday against the federal Liberal government's invocation of the Emergencies Act by civil rights organizations accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of setting a dangerous precedent by invoking the act for reasons they say fall far short of the necessary legal thresholds.


Comment: Trudeau wants to bring an end to the protests? Remove the mandates and serve the people.


Question

Special Counsel John Durham is opening up about his Spygate investigation, but why?

Justice department
© Unknown
Durham is going public with more details of his investigation into the Russia Collusion Hoax, but will the courts will stop him?

Last Friday, Special Counsel John Durham filed yet another document with the federal court presiding over the criminal case against former Clinton Campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. Formally labeled a "Motion to Inquire into Potential Conflicts of Interest," the most recent court filing maintained that Sussmann's defense attorneys at Latham & Watkins held multiple conflicts of interest because of their previous representation of Sussmann's law partner, Marc Elias, and their former law firm Perkins Coie. Given those conflicts, Durham's team argued the court should require Sussmann to waive the conflicts on the record.

In making this argument, however, Durham's office included extensive details related to the purported conflicts that also exposed, more broadly, several aspects of the underlying Special Counsel investigation.

Comment: See also:


Bomb

Explosion hits capital of breakaway Ukrainian region - separatist leader says East Ukraine headed for 'full-scale war'

Ukrainian tanks near Debaltsevo
© Brendan Hoffman / Getty ImagesUkrainian tanks near Debaltsevo, February 19, 2015
A massive explosion in the center of Donetsk on Friday evening was the work of a car bomb that detonated outside the government headquarters, the authorities in the breakaway region in eastern Ukraine have said.

Multiple reports of the blast came shortly after both Donetsk and Lugansk, the two regions that seceded from Ukraine in 2014, announced an evacuation of civilians into Russia, fearing an attack by the Ukrainian military.

RT correspondent Roman Kosarev, who is on the ground in Donetsk to report on the evacuation, has also confirmed that he heard the explosion.

Images from the scene show a completely destroyed car in the parking lot about 100 meters or so outside the seat of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic, with significant damage to other vehicles nearby.


The targeted vehicle belonged to the head of the DPR People's Militia, Denis Sinenkov, who told Interfax that he was not injured in the blast.

Comment: The head of the DPR, Denis Pushilin, told Russian media today:
"Kiev can start a full-scale assault on Donbass at any moment, the situation is critical," Pushilin told Russian television, referring to the two self-proclaimed republics in eastern Ukraine.

Asked by the host if there will be a war, Pushilin responded: "Yes. Unfortunately, yes."

His comments came about an hour after an explosion outside the Donetsk government building, which turned out to be a car bomb targeting regional police chief Denis Sinenkov. He was not injured in the blast. There were no reports of casualties, only material damage.

Pushilin called the bombing a "sabotage" in preparation for an assault by Kiev. Every critical infrastructure building in Donetsk is under guard and prepared for potential terrorist attack, he added. Ukraine has been denying any plans for attacking the breakaway regions.
The U.S. and NATO have been itching for a war in Eastern Ukraine. All the fear-mongering about a "Russian invasion" has been prep work to condition the world to see any escalation as Russian aggression, not NATO or Ukrainian aggression. In reality, if a war breaks, it will have been started by Ukraine and their allies, who would like nothing more than for Russia to initiate the war. And they have their bases covered. A Ukrainian attack will be framed as a "Russian false flag" used as a pretext for Russia to get involved. Whatever ends up happening, however, you can bet that Western authorities will be lying through their teeth.


Alarm Clock

Anticipating government attacks, rebel leader in east Ukraine announces civilian evacuation to Rostov, Russia

ukraine tank war training
© Vadim Ghirda/APUkrainian servicemen walk on an armoured fighting vehicle during an exercise in a Joint Forces Operation controlled area in the Donetsk region, eastern Ukraine
Separatists in eastern Ukraine have announced they are evacuating civilians to Russia, as spiking tensions in the region aggravated Western fears of a Russian invasion of Ukraine and a new war in Europe.

It was the latest in a cascade of developments this week that have brought East-West relations to their lowest point in decades.

US and European officials, focused on an estimated 150,000 Russian troops posted around Ukraine's borders, fear the long-simmering separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine could provide the spark for a broader attack.

Comment: There is no need to persuade the people of Donbas and Luhansk that temporarily leaving for Russia would be prudent. The Ukraine government's shelling of those areas has intensified in the last weeks.








Yoda

Lavrov correctly labels Western 'Russia invasion' claims 'propaganda, fakes and fiction'

lavrov
© Shamil Zhumatov/POOL/AFPSergej Lavrov
"If they enjoy it, let them," the foreign minister told RT regarding claims from officials and media

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has lashed out at Western officials who have been peddling the purported threat of a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Apparently, they do it for the sheer pleasure of accusing Moscow, he told RT in an exclusive interview on Friday.

"I am certain that even casual observers of foreign policy have long confirmed to themselves that all of it is propaganda, fake news, fiction," Lavrov said of the accusations.

He suggested that Western officials making such claims simply like doing it. "If they enjoy it, let them take their time getting the pleasure," he said.

Comment: Russia will do whatever it can to keep the words flying instead of the bullets. But there will be a limit. We can only hope there are a few shreds of self-preservation instinct left in the fools that are promoting war. Russia will find a way for them to climb down without losing face.


Mr. Potato

US military has wasted 6 million man-hours on 'woke' training under Biden regime

mark milley lloyd austin department of defence
© Caroline Brehman-Pool/Getty ImagesDefense Secretary Lloyd Austin, left, and Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
The United States military spent nearly six million man-hours on an extremism "stand-down" and "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" (DEI) training since President Joe Biden took office, according to Department of Defense (DOD) data.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Mark Milley provided that data to Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) Republicans in response to an October 2021 request.

The data showed that service members spent a total of 5,889,082 man-hours on the "stand-down" — a day when all commanders in the military spoke to their troops about extremism, and on DEI, including critical race theory.

Comment: Trump saw the problem early on both with CRT infesting the military and with Milley in particular:


Cult

Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act is a desperate attempt to delegitimize the truckers

trudeau chrystia freeland presser convoy
© The Canadian Press/Adrian WyldPrime Minister Justin Trudeau, flanked by cabinet ministers including Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, announces that the Emergencies Act will be invoked to deal with protests, in Ottawa on Feb. 14, 2022.
I wonder. If you go to the bank now to make a deposit or, for the few who are not broke after the last two years, take some money out, do you have to phone Chrystia Freeland first? Or will emailing a copy of the transaction to one of her aides do the job?

After this week's clown show — I refer, of course, to General Trudeau's introduction of the Emergencies Act — that is no longer a ridiculous question. Among the tide of follies we have been hearing from our 31 percent minority Liberal government is — I'm paraphrasing, but only slightly — that "foreign monies," particularly American monies, being donated to the Canadian truckers protest is driving a movement for the "overthrow" of the government.

And this was not just some minor concern, but an immediate threat to the stability of our nation and its very rule. So now the banks are under orders, and must be on the watch, for suspicious accounts. After all if $25 shows up from some farmer in Arkansas in support of a peaceful protest by honest, blue-collar workers, that could tip our "peace, order and good government " into the Rideau, and 154 years of our beautiful Confederation comes to a halt.