
© Erik Lucero, Research Scientist and Lead Production Quantum HardwareLeft: Artist's rendition of the Sycamore processor mounted in the cryostat. (Forest Stearns, Google AI Quantum Artist in Residence) Right: Photograph of the Sycamore processor.
Physicists have been talking about the power of
quantum computing for over 30 years, but the questions have always been: will it ever do something useful and is it worth investing in? For such large-scale endeavors it is good engineering practice to formulate decisive short-term goals that demonstrate whether the designs are going in the right direction. So, we devised an experiment as an important milestone to help answer these questions. This experiment, referred to as
a quantum supremacy experiment, provided direction for our team to overcome the many technical challenges inherent in quantum systems engineering to make a computer that is both programmable and powerful. To test the total system performance we selected a sensitive computational benchmark that fails if just a single component of the computer is not good enough.
Today we published the results of this quantum supremacy experiment in the
Nature article, "
Quantum Supremacy Using a Programmable Superconducting Processor". We developed a new 54-qubit processor, named "Sycamore", that is comprised of fast, high-fidelity
quantum logic gates, in order to perform the benchmark testing. Our machine performed the target computation in 200 seconds, and from measurements in our experiment we determined that it would take the world's fastest supercomputer 10,000 years to produce a similar output.
Comment: These Google AI scientists seem to leave out the biggest reason their project is even being funded - and how it is likely to be implemented: for the technocratic subjugation of the domestic populace, and the powering of war against "adversaries" abroad; "and if a few cool quantum batteries can be produced for regular industrial consumption, well, that's fine too."