The
Guardian article from February 6, 2018, titled "
Biggest airstrikes in a year hit Syria after rebels shoot down Russian jet" claims that "Russian and Syrian jets have bombed up to 18 towns across north-west Syria, devastating civilian areas and forcing fresh waves of refugees to flee". According to the journalists Martin Chulov and Kareem Shahee, a series of devastating airstrikes have been carried out in the northwest of Idlib province. "Nine people were treated for symptoms of chlorine exposure after a bomb was dropped on the town of Saraqeb by a helicopter", they claim.
Inside Syria Media Center has tried to get to the bottom of the adequacy of this information and determine whether it is credible.
Fake No.1: Mission ImpossibleAccording to
The Guardian journalists, "as many as 150 airstrikes beginning on Sunday were recorded in 18 towns of Idlib province by Monday". Trying to imagine the number of attacks carried out without interruption for 12 hours we came to the conclusion that Idlib Governorate, in the view of
The Guardian, has suffered a saturation bombing. In fact, if these figures were accurate at least eight aircraft would have flown mission and dropped about 60 bombs at every town -
based on an average maximum loading of eight FAB-500 general purpose bombs per one Su-25 jet.
At the same time,
Business Insider reports that "the most recent
satellite images of the Russian-operated Hmeimim air base in Syria show Moscow has 10 types of aircraft in the war-torn country, 33 jets in total and a smaller number of fixed-wing aircraft." So, all the Russian aircraft are supposed to have taken off and landed 4 times, refueled, loaded weapons and once again set course for Idlib for the 12 hours.
If it really did happen, this military operation could be compared to the one-night air raid on London during WW2, which caused over, 500 deaths a night. But this has nothing in common with the casualties reported by
The Guardian.
Comment: It is easy to inflate numbers when you alter the parameters in an upgraded definition of anti-Semitism - the barometer for guilt-tripping to achieve a result. Don't we think it odd someone is specifically tracking and counting? What does this achieve except a manipulated perception by which to create leverage. If it was about hate, there would be an attempt to rectify the image through discernment, evaluation and reflection. While there are culture wars, religious differences, and real vandalism, 'anti-Semitism' has become its own movement.