OF THE
TIMES

United States recognition of a Palestinian state would... clear the way for a Security Council resolution on the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Security Council should pass a resolution laying out the parameters for resolving the conflict. It should reaffirm the illegality of all Israeli settlements beyond the 1967 borders, while leaving open the possibility that the parties could negotiate modifications...The next day the State Department said it doesn't care what Carter says:
The combined weight of United States recognition, United Nations membership and a Security Council resolution solidly grounded in international law would lay the foundation for future diplomacy...
This is the best — now, perhaps, the only — means of countering the one-state reality that Israel is imposing on itself and the Palestinian people. Recognition of Palestine and a new Security Council resolution are not radical new measures, but a natural outgrowth of America's support for a two-state solution.
JOHN KIRBY: Well, obviously, we have great respect for former President Carter and for his tireless efforts to achieve peace while he was in office and certainly in the years following his presidency. He's a great American. Our view hasn't changed that we believe that the preferred path for the Palestinians to achieve statehood is through direct negotiations that will lead to a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace based on a two-state solution...
QUESTION: It's not expected to happen in the next six weeks, is it?
MR KIRBY: I'm not a fortuneteller.

Comment: Leave it to neoliberal ideologues like Obama (and Killary should she have been elected) to continue to sell globalist "reality" to people and try to sell them on why things could not possibly be better for them than they are.