
© Austin SunFortress America, raising the drawbridge
While on the campaign trail, President-Elect Donald J. Trump made a range of statements suggesting
a shift away from a policy of interventionism, combined with a focus on safeguarding US borders and jobs at the expense of the dominant ideology of globalism. Can and will he deliver on these promises? There are many reasons to believe he will genuinely push US foreign policy in this direction, but at the same time he will face obstacles on his path.
One of the factors clearly helping him is the increasingly indisputable fact that
globalism as an ideology has been discredited, except, ironically, among the
liberal "creative classes" and among the
financial elites. The rest of the society and of the elite is increasingly skeptical of such policies if not downright opposed to them, which means they are willing to experiment with economic nationalism and even isolationism.
Trump also benefits from the fact that nearly all neo-conservatives have endorsed the Hillary candidacy, apparently convinced her victory was all but inevitable. Being on the losing side, they have
eliminated themselves from consideration for positions within the Trump Administration, and the early personnel choices reflect it. The early pick of the
former CIA Director James Woolsey is indicative of the gradual
shift toward the Fortress America model. While Woolsey did support the invasion of Iraq in 2003, he notably refrained from calling for a "no-fly zone" over Syria and he is also in favor of expanding US energy production in order to reduce the dependence on Middle Eastern oil, which is a prerequisite for the US political and military disengagement from the region.
Comment: More on the story of Fidel Castro: