OF THE
TIMES
"The American people voted to elect an outsider who is capable of implementing real, positive, and needed change - instead of a lifelong politician beholden to special interests," White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said in a statement to The Hill. "If they were interested in continuing decades of costly mistakes, another establishment politician more concerned with putting politics over people would have won."Touche.
In another statement reported by CNN, a White House source slammed the Bush legacy.
"If one presidential candidate can disassemble a political party, it speaks volumes about how strong a legacy its past two presidents really had," the White House said, according to CNN.
The preview of the new book also follows a speech by George W. Bush in which he said "bigotry seems emboldened" in the United States, and warned that Americans need to reject "white supremacy."Looks like Bush has gone full Hillary.
The younger Bush didn't mention Trump by name during the speech, and a spokesman said Bush's remarks were "a long-planned speech on liberty and democracy."
But in the new book, George W. Bush said his concerns about Trump's candidacy included the country's growing "nativism" and "isolationism."
Both Bushes offer their thoughts on the Iraq War in the book. George W. Bush says the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, "changed the equation" in Iraq and demanded a change in policy.
"I'm very comfortable that when people fully analyze my decisions in the proper context, they will understand why my foreign policy-not in the principles of U.S. leadership but in the application-was different," George W. Bush said.
But the White House said the Bush legacy "begins with the Iraq war, one of the greatest foreign policy mistakes in American history."
George H.W. Bush said in the book that Bush's decision on the Iraq War "will be seen as the right thing to do."
"Saddam Hussein was a bad guy," George H.W. Bush said. "I think history will be okay with it."



Comment: The Intercept is a joke. It has consistently provided biased coverage of the war in Syria in favor of the terrorists. In that regard, it is little different than RFE/RL or any other mainstream hack rag. Good job selling out, Greenwald.