Puppet MastersS

Target

America's No.1 threat? Russia not even close, argues Professor Emeritus of Russia Studies Stephen Cohen

Moscow
© Natalia Seliverstova / Sputnik
The incessant attempts by the US establishment to portray Russia as America's greatest peril jeopardize national security by ignoring real threats and preventing a much-needed US-Russia alliance, argues Professor Emeritus of Russia Studies Stephen Cohen.

As the US political-media complex continues to saturate the American psyche with the bad seed of Russophobia, harassing anyone who dares deviate from the narrative, Cohen, of New York and Princeton Universities, is one of the few scholars bucking the trend.

In his latest contribution in a lengthy series of articles published in the Nation, Cohen argues that Russia fails to make it among the top-five threats facing the United States today.

Cohen begins by arguing that ever since the late 1940s, the single "existential duty" of every US president has been to avoid "the possibility of war with Russia." The reason is obvious: the risk of touching off a "conflagration that could result in the end of modern civilization."

Pirates

Mosul docs reveal how ISIS ran its caliphate - "like fascists"

ISIS flag in Raqqa
© REUTERS/ Erik De Castro
Documents from ISIL-held areas in Iraq have shed light on the armed group's tough rules of internal governance and the fate awaiting fighters who violated its code of conducts and laws.

Obtained by Al Jazeera, the files also provide further evidence about the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant's structure and level of organisation.

The documents were seized from al-Baaj district west of Mosul, Iraq's second-biggest city, following its capture by Iraqi forces in June.

One of them, which bears the logo of ISIL's "Authorised Committee", directs all of the group's governing structures in areas they controlled to punish those who fled or attempted to escape the fighting with Iraqi forces.

It also instructs ISIL, also known as ISIS, fighters to turn anyone they capture over to the group's "military court" and "army intelligence".

Hassan Abu Haniyeh, a Jordanian expert on armed groups in the Middle East, told Al Jazeera that the courts would mostly hand down death sentences because most of the violations had to do with fighters refusing to take part in a battle, or requesting to leave the group to go back to their country of origins.

Comment: The reason for the similarity between ISIS and nazism is that they are both pathocratic, totalitarian systems. The ideology - whether Islamist or fascist - is just window dressing.


Stock Down

Draining the swamp? 100+ career diplomats leave Tillerson's State Department, including chief of security

Tillerson
© Yuri Gripas / ReutersU.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
Back in Washington DC, more than one hundred senior Foreign Service officers have left the State Department since President Trump took office, in what appears to be a forced exodus carried out by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Among those to have departed was the State Department's chief of security, Bill Miller, who left after Tillerson repeatedly refused to meet with him. Miller is one of the most powerful people at the State Department. Yet he was reportedly forced to cite a law requiring him to be allowed to speak with the Secretary of State before Tillerson was willing to meet with him - for five minutes, leading Miller to resign.

Eye 2

Macron proposes new policies to punish 'gender-based insults' with fines

President Emmanuael Macron
Marking the International Day for Elimination of Violence Against Women on Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron proposed new policies that he's aiming to go into effect in 2018. Among these new ideas is that "gender-based insults" are now going to be "punishable by law." People who say these "gender-based insults" will face a fine.

From France 24:

"Let's seal a pact of equality between men and women," Macron said in a speech marking the International Day for Elimination of Violence Against Women.

About violence and sexual abuse, he said: "It is essential that shame changes camp."

"Gender-based insults will be punishable by law. Offenders will face a deterrent fine," he added.

Comment: See also: Is France Attempting to Normalize Pedophilia?


MIB

#TheResistance: Another front for the CIA?

CIA logo
© AFP 2017 / Saul Loeb
In George Orwell's classic dystopia 1984, the mutability of the past is a lethal weapon in the arsenal of tyranny: if history can be molded into whatever shape is required, all the better to serve the Party and Big Brother. Quite a feat, believable perhaps only as fiction, and yet this is surpassed by what our "liberals" have accomplished in real life: the abolition of history, at least in their own minds. As writer Yasha Levine shows here, the editors of Mother Jones - a magazine that has published the most "out there" "Russia-gate" tall tales - have completely forgotten their own history as the victim of Russia-hating anti-"subversive" government witch-hunters:

"[O]f all the liberal media, Mother Jones should be most ashamed for fueling the moral panic about Russian 'disinformation.' It wasn't too long ago that the Reagan Right attacked Mother Jones for spreading 'Kremlin disinformation' and subverting America. There were threats and leaks to the media about a possible Senate investigation into Mother Jones serving as a Kremlin disinformation dupe, a threat that hung over the magazine throughout the early Reagan years. A new Senate Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism (SST for short) was set up in 1981 to investigate Kremlin 'disinformation' and 'active measures' in America, and the American 'dupes' who helped Moscow subvert our way of life. That subcommittee was created to harass and repress leftist anti-imperial dissent in America, using 'terrorism' as the main threat, and 'disinformation' as terrorism's fellow traveler. The way the SST committee put it, 'terrorism' and 'Kremlin disinformation' were one and the same, a meta-conspiracy run out of Moscow to weaken America.

"And Mother Jones was one of the first American media outlets in the SST committee's sights."

As Levine points out, Adam Hochschild, the founder of Mother Jones, "responded publicly to the threats coming out of the Senate" by pointing out that the accusations were short on facts, but long on the implication that anyone who criticizes our military buildup or US foreign policy was a Kremlin agent. The same thing is happening today - with the difference being that Mother Jones is now in the role of accuser.

Comment: See also:


Clipboard

New Russian foreign media bill introduces fines for violators

media cameras
© Global Look Press
A senior Russian MP has drafted a bill introducing large fines and administrative detention for violating a new law requiring foreign media to register as foreign agents and mark their product accordingly.


The draft law, prepared by the head of the Lower House Legislative Committee, MP Pavel Krasheninnikov (United Russia), states that initial violations of the law on foreign agents in mass media must be punished by fines of up to 10,000 rubles for ordinary citizens, up to 50,000 rubles for people in official positions, and up to 500,000 for legal entities. (roughly $170, $860, and $8,600 at the current exchange rate).

Repeated violations of the law would result in the fines increasing to 50,000, 100,000, and one million rubles respectively. If the offence is repeated within a one-year period, it would cost a citizen up to 100,000 rubles in fines or up to 15 days of administrative detention; officials would have to pay up to 200,000 rubles in fines, and companies would be fined up to five million rubles.

MP Krasheninnikov told RT on Wednesday that he expected the Lower House to pass the bill in the first reading in early 2018. He also said that the amount of the fines mentioned in the bill could be changed after lawmakers analyze similar laws in other nations.

Propaganda

Farcical hypocrisy: The US & European hysterics over Russia's foreign media law

mass media wall of monitors internet
© pinterest.com
It's so brazenly hypocritical, it could be a joke. The US and the European Union rushed to condemn Russia's new media laws restricting foreign entities. At the same time, they assume the unilateral right to hound Russian news outlets as "foreign agents."

Do as we say, not as we do, is the arrogant mentality here.

When Russian President Vladimir Putin signed new legislation into law last weekend, the Kremlin described the measures as a "symmetrical response" to moves in the US earlier this month forcing Russian state-owned broadcaster RT to register as a foreign agent.

Under Russia's new law, any foreign-sponsored news outlet operating in Russia may be required to register as a foreign entity, disclosing its financial details and journalistic activities, in the same way RT's affiliate in America has been compelled to do by the Department of Justice.

Eye 1

The Google approach to #FakeNews

Evil Google
© Isaac Lopez and Sarah Feinsmith
Apparently, the world's leading search engine (by a very wide margin) feels that we aren't capable of discerning the difference between news that is propaganda and news that is real. Recent developments that received almost no coverage by the western media show us the lengths that Google is willing to go to in its efforts to protect us from Russian-sourced fake news.

Before we go any further in this posting, let's look at a study from 2009 that looked at users online behaviour. According to the study which looked at the internet behaviour of 109 subjects, 91 percent did not go past the first page of internet search engine results and 36 percent of subjects did not go beyond the first three search results. This means that any external "adjustments" to search engine results could be used introduce a significant bias from the perspective of users.

At the recent Halifax International Security Forum held in Halifax, Nova Scotia (Canada for those of you that aren't familiar with Canadian geography), during a question and answer session, Alphabet's (the parent company of Google) Executive Chairman, Eric Schmidt made some very interesting and telling comments.

Attention

Iran prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi gets two years for being 'accessory to murder' of protesters

Iran prosecutor Saeed Mortazavi
Saeed Mortazavi, a former judge and prosecutor in Iran, has been sentenced to two years in prison for the deaths at a notorious detention facility during the 2009 postelection protests. An appellate court in Tehran upheld the sentence for Mortazavi for "accessory to murder" in the death of Mohsen Ruholamini, the son of a conservative politician who was on the campaign staff for 2009 conservative presidential candidate Mohsen Rezaei. Protesters said the balloting, which saw Mahmoud Ahmadinejad re-elected to a second term, was rigged.

Mortazavi, called the "butcher of Tehran" for the large number of newspapers he shut down as Tehran prosecutor, became notorious for sending the 2009 election protesters to Kahrizak prison, where a number of them were beaten and killed. When the story broke that some of those who had protested in support of Green Movement presidential candidates Mehdi Karroubi and Mir Hossein Mousavi had been taken to Kahrizak and had died under mysterious circumstances, it caused a major crisis within the Islamic Republic and led to official investigations.

Comment: See also:


Info

Lebanese PM Hariri issues warning to Hezbollah, refuses to talk about his time in Saudi Arabia - President Aoun responds

hariri
A political standoff in Lebanon continues to intensify, with the country's Prime Minister yet to decide whether he will finally resign or not.

Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri has made it plain that he will step down if the Shia Islamist movement Hezbollah refrains from paramilitary activity.

Hariri pledged to remain Prime Minister in case Hezbollah "accepted to stick by the state policy of staying out of regional conflicts," according to the French news network CNews.


Comment: The above isn't clearly written. Basically, Hariri will stay PM if Hezbollah agrees to sit down and shut up. He's basically telling Lebanon it's him or Hezbollah. He might be disappointed with his people's answer...


"They know we have to remain neutral in the region. I don't want a political party in my government that interferes in Arab countries against other Arab countries," CNews quoted him as saying.


Comment: Say what? Which Arab countries, precisely? Syria, where they were invited, and where they have been helping to defeat ISIS and al-Qaeda? There's no evidence that Hezbollah is fighting in Yemen with the Houthis.


Comment: Apparently, what happens in Saudi Arabia stays in Saudi Arabia:
The prime minister was also quoted by Lebanese sources as saying that he would keep to himself what happened in Saudi Arabia, implying that he did not feel free to expose what had actually transpired in the Arab kingdom.
Hariri must still be a bit shellshocked from his time in the Kingdom, because his mind seems to have gone. Thankfully, Lebanese President Aoun is sane:
Lebanon's President Michel Aoun of the Free Patriotic Movement has met with European leaders in Rome and assured journalists that the situation in Lebanon is far more stable than reinstated Prime Minister Saad Hariri's statements would lead one to believe.
...
President Michel Aoun calmly explained this by stating that "when the war against terrorism is finished, their (Hezbollah's) fighters will come back to the country".

Aoun further explained that in spite of Hariri's hyperbolic statements,
"We have just finished deliberations with all the political forces in the country. There is a wide agreement".
Aoun remains confident that the current coalition government which includes Hezbollah, will remain in power and that Hariri will remain the Prime Minister. In this sense Aoun has effectively called Hariri's bluff by stating obvious facts which stand in the way of the more fantastical claims of the Prime Minister.