Puppet MastersS


Quenelle - Golden

Clusterf*ck: Theresa May left red-faced as Brexit deal between UK, Ireland and EU is scuppered by DUP

Setback for British PM's hopes of agreeing deal to move to next phase of Brexit talks as unionists refuse to back Irish border plan
arlene foster theresa may
"You go there and tell them that I said: 'NO SURRENDER!'"
Theresa May's political weakness was brutally exposed to Brussels on Monday as an agreement struck between Britain and the EU to solve the problem of the Irish border and move to the next phase of Brexit talks was torpedoed by a last-minute telephone call with the leader of the Democratic Unionist party.

Confidence early on Monday that an agreement was within reach came to nothing when, during a working lunch with the European commission president, Jean Claude Juncker, May was forced to pause discussions to take a call from Arlene Foster.


Comment: Remember her? That's the leader of the DUP, the only reason Theresa May's Conservatives are still in power in London:

Meet the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), Britain's loyal fundamentalists in Ireland


The unionist leader, whose party currently provides the Tories with a working majority in the Commons, told the British prime minister that she could not support Downing Street's planned commitment to keep Northern Ireland aligned with EU laws.

Comment: The utter fecklessness of the Tories' EU referendum is the gift that keeps on giving.

The situation is currently as follows:

Whichever UK government is in power, the referendum result means the UK must leave the EU.

The UK must also - somehow - uphold the joint British-Irish Good Friday agreement, which it can't do if Northern Ireland leaves the EU while the Republic remains in it.

The UK's current leadership relies on a coalition with the tiny DUP party, sworn enemies of the Irish, to govern.

The DUP is so paranoid of even the potential for reunification of both Irish states that the phrase "continued regulatory alignment" between Republic and Province triggered them to fire the 'gun' they have pointed at May's head, thereby sinking, it appears for now at least, the deal reached between her government, the Dublin government and Brussels.

This in turn prompted the Scottish nationalists to hint that any precedent set whereby Northern Ireland acquires special 'EU' status within the UK could also be sought by Scotland. For good measure, the Mayor of London suggested as much for his city too.

What a complete clusterf*ck. The UK is threatening to come apart at the seams.


Question

Robert Mueller's firing of anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok doesn't make sense

Robert Mueller Peter strzok
Peter Strzok and Robert Mueller
Mueller's entire team hates Trump. What is the real reason for the firing?

The New York Times reported yesterday that special counsel Robert Mueller removed FBI agent Peter Strzok from his investigative team because Strzok was anti-Trump.

Joe Hoft examines the Mueller, FBI agent firing, noting that the firing of an anti-Trump agent doesn't make much sense given that Mueller's entire investigative team is anti-Trump.

Comment: And over at ZeroHedge:
A rabidly anti-Trump FBI agent who was fired from Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation relied on claims made in a largely unsubstantiated and highly salacious dossier provided by Washington DC-based opposition research firm, Fusion GPS - which enlisted former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to assemble the 34-page 'Dirty Dossier' in mid-2016.

Veteran FBI agent Peter Strzok - who headed up the Hillary Clinton email investigation, was dismissed from Mueller's Trump-Russia probe in mid-August and relegated to the FBI's Human Resources department, after the DOJ opened an inquiry into anti-Trump / pro-Clinton text messages Strzok sent to his Trump-hating mistress - FBI lawyer Lisa Page, while the two were working together on the Clinton probe. Page was also fired from the Mueller investigation into Russian meddling earlier this year.

Strzok's conduct in the Clinton investigation is now under review by the Justice Department, along with his role in a number of other politically sensitive cases, according to Fox News.
"While Strzok's removal from the Mueller team had been publicly reported in August, the Justice Department never disclosed the anti-Trump texts to the House investigators."

"Responding to the revelations about Strzok's texts on Saturday, Nunes said he has now directed his staff to draft contempt-of-Congress citations against Rosenstein and the new FBI director, Christopher Wray." -Fox News
Of relevance - Strzok concluded that Hillary Clinton was "careless," in her mishandling of classified information, yet found "no proof of intent," an opinion which former FBI director James Comey based his recommendation not to prosecute. Comey, as it turns out, drafted Clinton's exoneration letter long before the FBI had finished reviewing evidence in the case.

Strzok's team and the Trump-Russia dossier...

In August, 2016 - nine months before Trump fired Comey which led to the creation of Robert Mueller's Special Counsel, the New York Times reported that Strzok was hand picked by FBI brass to supervise an investigation into allegations of Trump-Russia collusion.

The FBI investigation grew legs after they received the infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and decided to act on its salacious and largely unproven claims, According to Fox News:
House investigators told Fox News they have long regarded Strzok as a key figure in the chain of events when the bureau, in 2016, received the infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and launched a counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling in the election that ultimately came to encompass FISA surveillance of a Trump campaign associate.

The "dossier" was a compendium of salacious and largely unverified allegations about then-candidate Trump and others around him that was compiled by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS. The firm's bank records, obtained by House investigators, revealed that the project was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. -Fox News
Dead ends

Weeks before the 2016 Presidential election, Strzok's team agreed to pay former MI6 agent and Fusion GPS operative Christopher Steele $50,000 if he could verify his claims that the agency had already used to take action. Of note, Fusion separately paid Steele $168,000 to assemble the dossier which had the cooperation of two senior Kremlin officials


Allegedly, and highly unlikely.

The agent said that if Mr. Steele could get solid corroboration of his reports, the F.B.I. would pay him $50,000 for his efforts, according to two people familiar with the offer.

One report, filled with references to secret meetings, spoke ominously of Mr. Trump's "compromising relationship with the Kremlin" and threats of "blackmail."

He [Steele] provided the documents to an F.B.I. contact in Europe on the same day as Mr. Comey's news conference about Mrs. Clinton. It took weeks for this information to land with Mr. Strzok and his team. - NYT
After meeting with the FBI in October to deliver a 'stack of new intelligence reports,' the agency ultimately decided not to pay Steele because he could not corroborate the information he had provided.

Never let a dodgy dossier get in the way of a good witch hunt!

Despite such a low level of confidence in Steele's dossier that they didn't pay him, the FBI used the document to obtain a FISA surveillance warrant on one-time Trump foreign-policy advisor Carter Page - who was described as having a "secret meeting" with Putin associate Igor Sechin and Deputy Chief for International Policy, Igor Diveykin during a July 2016 trip to Moscow to deliver a commencement speech.

Not true according to Page

While Page did travel to Moscow to deliver a commencement speech, he told the House Intelligence Committee that he's never heard of Diveykin nor met with any of the men mentioned in the dossier.

Page did testify that he spoke with Russia's deputy prime minister, Arkadiy Dvorkovich, who was in attendance at the commencement ceremony. Upon his return, Page relayed their meeting in a memo to the Trump campaign, writing "In a private conversation, Dvorkovich expressed strong support for Mr. Trump and a desire to work together toward devising better solutions in response to the vast range of current international problems."

Page claims he hadn't spoken more than a few words to Dvorkovich, and had instead gained insight into the Russian's opinion from listening to the Russian's speeches.

Back on point

We now know that the original, pre-Mueller FBI investigation into Trump-Russia collusion was spearheaded by Peter Strzok - an anti-Trump senior FBI agent who was fired for sending anti-Trump / pro-Clinton text messages to his mistress during their investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information.

We also know that the FBI probe led by Strzok relied on the salacious 34-page Steele dossier, paid for in part by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, to launch their Trump-Russia investigation and obtain a FISA warrant on Carter Page.

This raises a multitude of questions about Strzok, the Clinton email investigation, and any other politically charged cases he's worked on - which are now under review by the DOJ's Office of Personnel Management.

And while Strzok is stapling cover sheets on TPS reports in the FBI's HR department, it is of particular interest that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes is also honing in on Rod Rosenstein and the new FBI director, Christopher Wray for their roles in the decision to withhold the reasons for Strzok's dismissal in August.



Life Preserver

Cleaning up another American mess: Afghanistan wants Russian expertise in restoring infrastructure

Afghan water dam
© Wikipedia/ 10th Aviation BrigadeNaghlu Dam, located in Surobi District of Kabul Province in eastern Afghanistan
Emerging from years of war and internal strife, Afghanistan looks at Russia to help rebuild the country's ravaged economy.

Russian companies' vast experience in building major dams and other infrastructure facilities in Afghanistan makes them an ideal choice for continuing their work in the country, a senior Afghan Energy and Water Ministry official told Sputnik.

Earlier this year, President Ashraf Ghani said that Russia could help rebuild the country's war-ravaged hydroelectric stations and other facilities.

"Companies from Iran, Turkey and America are also interested in doing this, bur Russian companies have better chances because, on the one hand, they have a great deal of experience in building several big dams here. On the other hand, they are very well aware of our geographic conditions because our countries are close neighbors," Asaf Ghafuri told Sputnik Dari.

Comment:


Bad Guys

"Shut up and take it": European broadcaster says possibly Russian decision not to air Olympics would "hurt sport & industry"

European Broadcasting Union
© EBU / Facebook
A decision not to broadcast the Olympic Games if Russia's team is barred from them, mulled by several Russian broadcasters, would hurt the IOC and its sponsors and hamper "the promotion of Olympic values," according to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU).

"The Russian market is undoubtedly of substantial importance for the sports industry in Europe. A black-out of the Olympics 2018 would clearly have an impact on the exposure objectives of the IOC [International Olympic Committee] and the expectations of its sponsors who might count at least on a right of first negotiations for this territory," EBU spokeswoman Claire Rainford told Sputnik on Thursday.

Who would suffer the most from a possible plug on Olympics broadcasting in Russia is not quite clear, as it would be defined by the specific contracts, she added. "Whether there is a financial impact on the IOC or on the obligations by the Russian broadcasters to pay depends highly on contractual details," Rainford said.

Comment: If Rainford had any brains, she would have said this: "A decision not to allow Russia to participate in the Olympics would hurt the IOC and hamper the promotion of Olympic values." But no, Russia is expected to just sit down and passively accept political attacks in all areas of life. Then, when they threaten to respond, bash them again for not being a good sport.

See also:


Blackbox

Sen. Graham: 'Pentagon should move military families out of S. Korea' - But what about S. Korean allies?

Lindsey Graham
© Aaron P. Bernstein / Reuters
The Pentagon should begin moving spouses and children of active US military service members out of South Korea, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said, because the US is "getting close to military conflict" with Pyongyang.

"It's crazy to send spouses and children to South Korea, given the provocation of North Korea," Graham, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on the CBS program "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "So, I want them [the Pentagon] to stop sending dependents and I think it's now time to start moving American dependents out of South Korea."

"We're getting close to a military conflict because North Korea is marching toward marrying up the technology of an ICBM with a nuclear weapon on top that can not only get to America, but deliver the weapon. We're running out of time," Graham said, referencing North Korea's test of a new type of intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) on Wednesday. Pyongyang says the test was of a Hwasong-15 ICBM, which is capable of hitting the US mainland.

Not everyone agrees that all the provocations come from Pyongyang, though. The missile test was first after a two-month lull, and came just days after the US called North Korea a state sponsor of terrorism, promising more sanctions.

Comment: A war with North Korea would destroy large parts of South Korea and Japan. But they don't really matter to people like Graham, now do they? But seriously, North Korea has no plans to start a war - that would be the U.S.'s decision. North Korea is developing its nuclear arsenal as a deterrent. Their foreign policy is the original Trump: bluster. And it seems to be working.




Snakes in Suits

Debut speech: Kushner compares Palestine peace talks to 'real estate issue'

Kushner
© screen shotKushner speaks at Saban Forum in Washington.
President Donald Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner on Sunday gave a public speech for the first time in Washington, outlining how the Trump administration plans to deliver its "ultimate-deal" to facilitate peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.

Speaking at the Saban Forum, Kushner described Israel as a natural ally to Middle Eastern countries and claimed that both Palestinians and Israelis had learned to trust Donald Trump. "Both sides really trust the president, and that's very important," he said.


Comment: Jared Kushner is far from being impartial when it comes to Israel. How can he represent an unbiased position to the Israeli/Palestinian solution?


Snakes in Suits

Tom Fitton: We are going to find out the DOJ and FBI were ruined trying to protect Hillary Clinton

KIllary
© Infowars
Victoria Toensing, the lawyer representing the FBI informant says there is "on-the-record quid pro quo" surrounding the Uranium One scandal with Bill Clinton receiving a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian backed bank and the Clinton Foundation receiving millions of dollars from people involved on the deal.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the same time the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investments UNANIMOUSLY approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear company Rosatom, ultimately giving Russia 20% of U.S. Uranium.

Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton's State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secretary of State. (Via Breitbart)

Comment: The FBI was already ruined protecting Bill.


Stock Up

Venezuela's own cryptocurrency to counter Trump's financial blockade

Maduro
© alliance/dpa/Prensa Mirafloras/F. BatistaPresident Nicolas Maduro
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro announced Sunday that the country will launch its own cryptocurrency, called the "Petro," which will be backed by the country's vast natural resource reserves.

"Venezuela is announcing the creation of its own cryptocurrency. It will be called The Petro. It will allow us to innovate towards new forms of international finance for the economic and social development of the country," Maduro said Sunday in a statement on state broadcaster VTV, as cited by El Periodico.

Appearing on the weekly television show, Sundays with Maduro, the Venezuelan president announced the new cryptocurrency, whose value will be pegged to the country's vast reserves of oil and gas as well as its mineral wealth, including gold, and whose purpose will be to "to advance the country's monetary sovereignty, to carry out financial transactions and to defeat the financial blockade against the country."

Comment: Interesting financial twist for Venezuela. Shows there are other ways to deal with the Empire by 'virtually' sidestepping the problem backed by their own resources.


Snakes in Suits

Trump, comparing Flynn to Hillary - 'rigged system' or 'double standard'?

Trump
© Unknown
President Donald Trump again took up the cause of former national security adviser Mike Flynn Saturday night, complaining that Flynn's "life is destroyed" while Hillary Clinton escaped legal reckoning.

Trump tweeted: "So General Flynn lies to the FBI and his life is destroyed, while Crooked Hillary Clinton, on that now famous FBI holiday "interrogation" with no swearing in and no recording, lies many times...and nothing happens to her? Rigged system, or just a double standard?"

He then added: "Many people in our Country are asking what the "Justice" Department is going to do about the fact that totally Crooked Hillary, AFTER receiving a subpoena from the United States Congress, deleted and "acid washed" 33,000 Emails? No justice!"

Clinton was interviewed for more than three hours at FBI headquarters over the July 4 weekend in 2016. Because she was not in custody, her interview was not recorded. Former FBI Director James Comey has said that Clinton did not lie to the FBI during her interview.

Earlier Saturday, Trump argued that there was nothing improper in Flynn's conversations with Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak in December 2016. Flynn pleaded guilty Friday to lying to the FBI about those conversations.


Comment: The answer is there is no comparison and both qualifiers may apply.


Briefcase

Erdogan accuses US of trying to 'make Turkey kneel' by prosecuting his security guard for brutality

Erdogan4fingers
© Umit Bektas / Reuters
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has accused Washington of attempting to bring Turkey to its knees and discredit Ankara amid several lawsuits against Turkish citizens. "They can try as hard as they like but they will not succeed," Erdogan added.

Erdogan's remarks come less than a week after Reza Zarrab, a 34-year-old Turkish-Iranian gold trader, pleaded guilty to conspiring to evade US sanctions against Iran. He is set to testify against a Turkish bank official, Mehmet Hakan Atilla, charged with arranging illegal transactions involving US banks. While US prosecutors have charged nine people in the case, only Zarrab and Atilla are known to be in US custody, according to Reuters. The other defendants include Suleyman Aslan, the former head of Halkbank, and Zafer Caglayan, the former economic minister of Turkey.
Turk guards beat civilian
© Al MonitoTurk bodyguards injure US civilian protesters

Comment: Erdogan's bodyguards are well-known for their crude and punishing behavior. In this case, the US may be justified in pursuing legal action.