OF THE
TIMES


[T]he IDF website continues to argue, incorrectly, that the Blue Line is a border, or a de facto border. It is not. Maybe, someday, it might become a border - or it might not. But for the time being, the Blue Line is nothing other than a demarcation line.Israel's done a nice job of spinning out this story to detract from Bibi's political woes.
What it demarcates, according to the UNIFIL statement above (confirmed in the internally-contradictory IDF statement, here, which was written with a great deal of imprecision due in part to a certain linguistic laziness, and in part to impatience with any other views), is "the line towards which the IDF withdrew upon conclusion of Operation Litani in 1978, according to UN Security Council Resolution 425".
This confused, contradictory and confusing IDF statement also says, however, that "The Blue Line is an international border between Israel and Lebanon which was determined by the United Nations after the IDF withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000".
But, the United Nations does not determine international borders.

None of this - of course - is NATO's fault: on the contrary NATO is concerned thatFor more than two decades, NATO has worked to build a partnership with Russia, developing dialogue and practical cooperation in areas of common interest. Cooperation has been suspended since 2014 in response to Russia's military intervention in Ukraine but political and military channels of communication remain open. Concerns about Russia's continued destabilising pattern of military activities and aggressive rhetoric go well beyond Ukraine.
Russia's military activities, particularly along NATO's borders, have increased and its behaviour continues to make the Euro-Atlantic security environment less stable and predictable, in particular its practice of calling snap exercises, deploying near NATO borders, conducting large-scale training and exercises and violating Allied airspace.
Comment: Reuters adds: