The dishonesty and lying from these media titans has transcended even their shabby performance during the 2016 elections
The best evidence that Russia-gate is sinking beneath the waves is the way those pushing the pseudo-scandal are now busily covering their tracks.
The Guardian complains that "as the inquiry has expanded and dominated the news agenda over the last year, the real issues of people's lives are in danger of being drowned out by obsessive cable television coverage of the Russia investigation" - as if
The Guardian's own coverage hasn't been every bit as obsessive as anything CNN has come up with.
The Washington Post, second to none when it comes to painting Putin as a real-life
Lord Voldemort, now
says that Special counsel Robert Mueller "faces a particular challenge maintaining the confidence of the citizenry" as his investigation enters its second year - although it's sticking to its guns that the problem is not the inquiry itself, but "the regular attacks he faces from President Trump, who has decried the probe as a 'witch hunt.'"
And then there's
The New York Times, which this week devoted a 3,600-word
front-page article to explain why the FBI had no choice but to launch an investigation into Trump's alleged Russian links and how, if anything, the inquiry wasn't aggressive enough. As the article puts it, "Interviews with a dozen current and former government officials and a review of documents show that the FBI was even more circumspect in that case than has been previously known."
Comment: See also: