© DHSKevin McAleenan/ Homeland SecurityBill Binney • Seth Rich • Julian Assange
I do not think he is a fool.
I did not comment instantly on the
Mueller Report as
I was so shocked by it, I have been waiting to see if any other facts come to light in justification. Nothing has. I limit myself here to that area of which I have personal knowledge - the leak of DNC and Podesta emails to Wikileaks. On the wider question of the corrupt Russian 1% having business dealings with the corrupt Western 1%, all I have to say is that if you believe that is limited in the USA by party political boundaries, you are a fool.
On the DNC leak, Mueller started with the prejudice that it was "the Russians" and he deliberately and systematically excluded from evidence anything that contradicted that view.Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake.
He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things
renders his report worthless.There has never been, by any US law enforcement or security service body, a forensic examination of the DNC servers, despite the fact that the claim those servers were hacked is the very heart of the entire investigation. Instead, the
security services simply accepted the "evidence" provided by the DNC's own IT security consultants, Crowdstrike, a company which is politically aligned to the Clintons.
Comment: See also: