'FEMINIST' CLINTON: Women Voted For Donald Trump Because Their Husbands Told Them To.
By Emily Zanotti March 12, 2018

Hillary took part in the India Today Conclave over the weekend and really spilled her guts.

Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton let loose in a conversation with the India Today Conclave over the weekend, calling Trump voters and residents of heartland states 'backwards," telling the audience that Americans "didn't like black people getting rights," and "didn't like women," and claiming that white women only voted for Trump because they were told to do so by their husbands.

Clinton waited until she was well overseas to give the shocking speech, rehashing some of her greatest hits into a single, televised rant, delivered largely to an audience of Indians gathered for the innovation conference.

Asked about the 52% of white women who voted for Donald Trump in the presidential election despite being faced with the possibility of having the first woman president in American history, Clinton did not concede that women could have voted based on their own political preferences. Rather, the failed Democratic candidate claimed that white women were under the spell of their husbands, fathers, and sons, who forced them to pull the lever for Donald Trump.

"We do not do well with white men and we don't do well with married, white women," Clinton told the audience about the Democratic Party. "And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should."

Yep. That's right. A majority of white women in America are merely the pawns of their male betters, the willing tools of a massive Patriarchal conspiracy that sought to keep Clinton out of the White House because she happened to be a woman.

That's not all though. Clinton went on to claim that then-FBI director James Comey, now a liberal hero, destroyed her "momentum," and "decreased my vote" when he suddenly re-opened an investigation into her mishandling of classified information just days before the November election.

At some point, Clinton's habit of excusing her campaign performance simply becomes pathological. She no longer accepts any rational explanation for her loss that is at odds with her own carefully curated reality, and she'll likely carry these same explanations with her to her deathbed, always believing that America was too backwards, to brutish, and too misogynistic to see the paradise she promised.

• Saudi boss Mohammed Bin Salman is selling himself as a reformer
• 'Toxic, damaging, shameful': UK and Saudi Arabia sign huge arms deal
• 'Complete horror show': Saudi Arabia's spin machine and plan for 'humanitarian aid' in Yemen
• Saudi visit: The most dreadful creatures warmly welcomed by the British establishment

• Theresa May demands Russia prove it is not guilty of poisoning double agent Sergei Skripal
• 'Sort this out for yourselves first, then come talk to us': Putin responds to BBC journalist regarding Russian culpability in Skripal poisoning
• Investigators say Skripal may have been poisoned in his home, UK diverts 'enormous' resources to investigate poisoning
• Was British-Russian spy poisoned over his links to Chris Steele and the Trump dossier?

"The conclusion is obvious: this is another information and political campaign, based on provocation," said Maria Zakharova, commenting on the words of Theresa May.
...
"Before creating new fairy tales, let somebody in the kingdom tell us what was the result of the previous investigations into the Litvinenko, Berezovsky and Perepilichny cases," Zakharova suggested.

Zakharova's comments referenced three high-profile deaths which occurred in the UK and were blamed on Russia - despite zero evidence to this day.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov specifically addressed the case of Litvinenko on Friday, noting that the UK's finger-pointing at Moscow runs parallel to what happened in that case.

"I want to remind people that Litvinenko's death was also attributed to Russia, but hasn't been investigated, because court proceedings, which were called 'public,' were, in fact, closed. They were carried out in a very strange way, and numerous facts, which emerged throughout the investigation, haven't come into the public domain," the minister said.

"There are few precedents of such political pressure and blackmail, and all of them ended in one fashion - severance of diplomatic ties or their downgrade in the form of a recall of ambassadors," Russian Senator and intelligence veteran Igor Morozov said.

The accusations represent the "utmost disrespect" towards international law, since not even a trace of evidence, proof or fact was presented to link Skripal's case to Russia, Morozov said. Russia will wait to see the actions of London and will respond accordingly, the official warned.

"The British must realize that they will face a very stiff response from Russia, and our position will be restrained and adequate, but bold. We will see what the London move will be and respond to this challenge," Morozov added.

The head of the Federal Council committee tasked with protecting Russia's sovereignty, Senator Andrey Klimov, said that the whole situation around Skripal's case looks like a premeditated anti-Russia provocation. While the former double agent was of "no interest" to Russia, the incident is very convenient for foreign intelligence services, he stated.

"If the UK decides to expel Russian diplomats in connection with the Skripal case, Moscow's response will be adequate and swift, this situation as a whole looks like a well thought-out anti-Russian move," he said.