Puppet MastersS


Star of David

Flashback Best of the Web: Why an Israeli newspaper wanted to 'flatten' a city of millions - Beirut

Moshe Yaalon
© ReutersFormer Israeli DM Moshe Yaalon
Earlier this month Haaretz, Israel's influential liberal daily, published a blood-curdling article. It openly argued for war crimes on a massive scale against the civilian population of a neighbouring Arab state.

"Should Israel Flatten Beirut to Destroy Hezbollah's Missiles?" the article's headline mused. It was written by Amitai Etzioni, a professor of international relations at George Washington University. He was also a member of the Palmach, a unit in one pre-state Zionist terrorist group, a forerunner of the Israeli military. He participated in the Nakba (or Catastrophe), Israel's 1948 ethnic cleansing of some 750,000 Palestinians.

After criticism by the journalist Belén Fernández, Etzioni later got Haaretz to edit the online version of the story, so that it now has a slightly less aggressive headline (but not before copies of the original were made).

But the substance of the article is still the same: this esteemed professor advocates the use of a weapon that "flattens all buildings within a considerable range" on Beirut, a city of some 2 million people. "There are going to be civilian casualties," he threatens;

Comment: Yaalon was brash enough to spread his venom, but at the end of the day, Israel is prepared to do all he said...and more.


Caesar

Best of the Web: Alexandr Lukashenko, a president with scruples

Alexandr Lukashenko
© picture-alliance/dpa/BelTA/N. PetrovBelarus President Alexandr Lukashenko
One day at the beginning of April this year I had an awakening. It dawned on me that Russia had been leaned upon to change its policy regarding COVID-19. By that time the virus had spread through the UK like wildfire and was reaching its peak whereas in Russia there had been few infections and very few deaths.

It disturbed me that Russia Today (RT), a favoured TV channel, had changed course. It had always been a safe harbour in which to dock alternative viewpoints and seek solace from the lies and dogma of our own major news broadcasters. With the exception of events of 9/11 Russia Today seemed to offer a refreshing and often incisively critical insight into world affairs, throwing new light on the Skripal affair and the alleged chemical attacks in Syria, among other worthy reporting.

When the viral spread of SARS-COV-2 hit the west, forcing lockdowns and facial masks, RT was praising Russia's efforts in controlling the spread and keeping deaths to a minimum. By all measures it looked like Russia had bucked the trend and everything was under control. Suddenly all that changed. News readers, regular anchors and reporters were pushing a totally different message. In essence the coronavirus rhetoric had gone east. Accompanying footage suddenly contained repetitive images of people wearing masks and RT's UK viewers were being advised to follow the guidelines on lockdown for our own safety and the safety of others. I might just as well have been watching the BBC.

Comment: It did appear that Russia changed Covid horses in mid-stream and questions arose regarding its abrupt turn. With its a-typical response to Covid-19 indoctrination and protocols, Belarus increased our understanding of the 'pandemic' along with the nature and agenda of the forces behind it.

See also:


Clipboard

China slaps sanctions on 11 US lawmakers, citizens, in retaliation against the Trump administration

Lijian
© ReutersChina's FM spokesman Zhao Lijian,
China is imposing new sanctions on 11 U.S. citizens, including a handful of lawmakers, in retaliation for the action the U.S. took against Hong Kong officials last week.

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian announced the new sanctions on Monday during a daily press briefing, according to The Wall Street Journal. The new sanctions will hit five GOP lawmakers who are considered hawks on China and have been critical of Beijing's actions in Hong Kong: Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Ted Cruz of Texas, Marco Rubio of Florida, Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, and Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey.

Also included in the list of sanctioned Americans are Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, National Endowment for Democracy President Carl Gershman, and Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz.

"In response to the erroneous actions of the U.S., China has decided to impose sanctions today on those individuals who behaved badly on Hong Kong-related issues," Lijian said at the press briefing. He did not specify the actions that would be taken. No Trump administration officials are being targeted.

China has previously issued sanctions on Cruz and Rubio for calling attention to Beijing's oppression of Uyghers and other ethnic minorities in the country's Xinjiang region.

On Friday, the U.S. Treasury Department announced sanctions on at least 11 Hong Kong officials that have been working closely with Beijing to reform and restructure Hong Kong's government and laws.

Comment: Sanctions are OK for the US to do, but not China.

See also:


Attention

New Iran envoy Elliott Abrams raises the risk that Israel will provoke Trump into conflict with Tehran

Elliot Abrams
© UnknownSpecial Envoy to Iran Elliott Abrams
The danger that Benjamin Netanyahu will provoke Donald Trump into attacking Iran is not over. In fact, the risk of conflict just increased — because the new U.S. special envoy for Iran is none other than Elliott Abrams, the defender of mass murder in the1980s in Central America who is also fanatically pro-Israel.

But you won't learn about this risk in today's New York Times. It appears that Times reporters David Sanger and Michael Crowley are secretly moonlighting for Brian Hook, the outgoing U.S. Iran diplomat. Their article only mentions Abrams once, and goes on to whitewash Hook's career and give a distorted view of U.S. policy toward Iran.

Let's turn to Eric Alterman for a recent, thorough look at Elliott Abrams and his criminal dishonesty about U.S.-sponsored crimes in Central America in the 1980s. Alterman provides facts to substantiate his view that Abrams was a
"cheerleader for murderous dictators, and the new Iran envoy's career was literally built on the defense of mass murder and genocide and his willingness to lie on behalf of those who carried it out and smear the reputations of anyone who sought to try and stop or expose it."

Comment: See also:


Better Earth

Agreement on Taliban prisoner release brings Afghan peace talks a step closer

Afghan  Mohammad Ashraf Ghani
© ARG (RFE/RL)Afghan president Mohammad Ashraf Ghani
The Afghan government and the Taliban are on the verge of starting peace talks aimed at ending almost two decades of war in Afghanistan after President Ashraf Ghani said that he will approve the release of 400 Taliban militants.

Ghani announced his intention to sign a decree to release the militants on August 9, shortly after the move was recommended by 3,400 prominent Afghans at a three-day Loya Jirga in Kabul.

Afghan government sources have suggested that Ghani is likely to sign the release order on August 10.

The decision came more than five months after Washington and the Taliban made the release of prisoners by both sides a condition for the talks between the militant group and Kabul.

The talks will start in Doha, Qatar, after the completion of the prisoner release, expected in the next few days, the U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, said on Twitter.

Khalilzad welcomed Ghani's decision and the declaration of the Loya Jirga, a traditional meeting of Afghan tribal elders and other stakeholders convened to decide on controversial national issues.

Propaganda

Zero self-awareness: Stelter claims left-wing media not dedicated to 'tearing down Trump'

brian stelter CNN
© Reuters/Andrew KellyBrian Stelter at a Media Literacy Week panel in Manhattan, New York
CNN chief medial reporter Brian Stelter beclowned himself yet again during Sunday's no-so Reliable Sources. Between raging at right-wing media and talk radio for questioning Joe Biden's mental lucidity, and claiming left-wing hacks like himself weren't dedicated to "tearing down" President Trump, Stelter was out to prove that he was willing to lie with impunity. And at one point, a guest floated the idea of weaponizing the Federal Communication Commission to target and presumably shut down right-wing talk radio.

Gaslighting his viewers from the get-go, Stelter hoped they wouldn't remember how he was among the first in the liberal media to demand the press start questioning Trump's mental health, as he railed against right-wing media for now questioning Biden's.

Suggesting his opponents lived in "a totally alternative universe," he warned CNN's gullible, lefty viewers: "What you are about to hear them say is mind-boggling. Look, whether you like Biden or not, this stuff is offensive and other-worldly."

After acting like it was some great mystery as to why right-wing figures were switching over to discussing the election instead of coronavirus (it's not like two conventions are coming up later this month and debates in September), Stelter argued that what we're seeing was hyper "negative partisanship" coming from right-wing media:
You know what this is? This is negative partisanship in action. So, what's negative partisanship? Well, these researchers from Emory University define it as a pretty simple content. They say in this article for Politico magazine that, "over the past few decades American politics has become like a bitter sports rivalry, in which the parties hang together mainly out of sheer hatred of the other team, rather than a shared sense of purpose."

The researchers showed that partisans, meaning strong supporters of a specific party, have grown to dislike the opposing party, quote, "more than they like their own party."

So, when the President, for example, says that Biden is against God, that's negative partisanship. It is so hateful.

Comment:




MIB

SOTT Focus: The Cambridge Four: Spies Who Hijacked America

General Mike Flynn
© Saul Loeb / Getty ImagesGeneral Mike Flynn
As a doctoral candidate at Cambridge working under "FBI Informant" Stefan Halper, I had a front-row seat for Russiagate

Global scandals now labeled Russiagate, Spygate, and what President Trump calls "Obamagate" shook the political world, but hit me closer to home. I'm the reason the so-called FBI "spy" at the center of Spygate, Stefan Halper, met Carter Page, the alleged "Russian Asset" in Russiagate's Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

On May 19, 2018, this realization blindsided me in London as I was about to fly out for my wedding. The New York Times, NBC News and other sources had outed my PhD supervisor, Stefan Halper, as a spy known to the UK's MI6 intelligence service as "The Walrus."

It didn't seem real. Could a former professor I once trusted as a mentor have betrayed his word, profession, and country to start these disasters? I had moved to England to pursue an academic career and leave DC's politics behind, only to have my PhD supervisor throw me back into the most outrageous political firestorms I could imagine. Just my luck. Then an even worse question began nagging at me. Did I unintentionally light the match that started it all?

Comment: Fox News reports:




X

Iran shutters newspaper after expert claims real number of Covid-19 cases is 95% higher

iranian woman mask covid
© EPA-EFE
Iran shut down a newspaper on Monday after it published remarks by an expert who said the official figures on coronavirus cases and deaths in the country account for only 5% of the real toll, allegations rejected by the Health Ministry.

Mohammad Reza Sadi, the editor-in-chief of Jahane Sanat, told the official IRNA news agency that authorities closed his newspaper, which began publishing in 2004 and was mainly focused on business news.

On Sunday, the daily quoted Mohammad Reza Mahboobfar, an epidemiologist the paper said had worked on the government's anti-coronavirus campaign, as saying the true number of cases and deaths in Iran could be 20 times the number reported by the Health Ministry.

He also said the virus was detected in Iran a month earlier than Feb. 19, when authorities announced the first confirmed case. He said they held up the announcement until after the commemorations of the anniversary of the 1979 Islamic Revolution and parliamentary elections earlier that month.

"The administration resorted to secrecy for political and security reasons," he said, and only provided "engineered statistics" to the public.

Comment: Here are the official death statistics from Iran. Either way, like most governments today, it looks like they're up to something with their data:
iran deaths
Back in March reports made it appear as if the country would fall to pieces, politicians were dying on a semi-regular basis, and along with Italy it looked as if Iran was one of the hardest hit countries on the planet. If the above graph were true, Iran would have been in an even worse position for all of July.

As for the above account, this criticism seems more believable:


Bullseye

Why shouldn't Moscow 'denigrate' doddery Biden and the xenophobic 'anti-Russia' establishment? In fact America should do so too!

biden
© Reuters / Jonathan Ernst
The US Intelligence Community (IC) issued a report that says Russia is not a fan of Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden and the anti-Russia 'establishment.' If true, what is so unbelievable about the Kremlin's stance?

The statement released on Friday says, in part, that Russia is employing "a range of measures to ... denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia 'establishment.'" It went on to say that this approach is consistent with Moscow's criticism of Joe Biden when he was Barack Obama's vice president "for his role in ... policies on Ukraine and its support for the anti-Putin opposition inside Russia." Perhaps the best response to such an accusation would be to ask: Does the Democratic Party really need the Kremlin's help in denigrating their top nominee for the presidential ticket when Joe Biden has been more than capable of denigrating himself? In fact, the day before the IC statement was released it was difficult to deny that the 77-year-old candidate's use-by shelf date may have already expired.

That realization came during Biden's latest interview smashup when he attempted some mental gymnastics by contrasting the Black and Latino communities. It didn't go down well. Once again, Biden wrapped his brain around a guardrail he never saw coming. "Unlike the African American community, with notable exceptions," he said, "the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things."

USA

Trump denies suggesting adding his face to Mount Rushmore, but calls it 'a good idea'

trump rushmore
President Trump claimed that a recent New York Times report that he had inquired about having his face added to Mount Rushmore was "Fake News," although he was not exactly opposed to the idea.

The Times reported on Saturday that in 2019, a White House aide asked South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem's office about how a president could get added to the famed mountain sculpture. CNN later picked up the Times' report, adding a reference to a 2018 Oval Office meeting where, Noem said, Trump asked her about it directly.

"This is Fake News by the failing @nytimes & bad ratings @CNN," Trump tweeted Sunday evening. "Never suggested it although, based on all of the many things accomplished during the first 3 1/2 years, perhaps more than any other Presidency, sounds like a good idea to me!"


Noem claimed, according to the Sioux Falls Argus Leader, that she had encouraged Trump to visit South Dakota, mentioning Mount Rushmore, to which Trump replied that it was his "dream" to have his face on there.

"I started laughing," said Noem, who was running for governor at the time. "He wasn't laughing, so he was totally serious."

Comment: "Trump wants to be on Mt. Rushomore!" Not a big deal, if true - at least, not newsworthy. Trump denying it, and saying it's a good idea. That's funny.