OF THE
TIMES
"we have had contact with the US administration on the situation in the Donbass, and we have exhaustively explained to their side what is happening. Washington should be concerned about the consequences of this coordinated policy."He added that Western rhetoric over Ukraine is striking an increasingly belligerent tone.
The Ukrainian delegation to peace talks on settling the conflict in Donbass will refuse to attend any discussions if they continue to be held in Minsk. Kiev accused Belarus of "hostile rhetoric" and being "influenced" by Russia.Has Donbass become another 'forever war'?
The Trilateral Contact Group is made up of Ukraine, Russia and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and in September 2014, representatives from all three parties signed the Minsk Protocol, an agreement to end the Donbass war. Now, with worries that fighting may flare up again, there have been proposals to head back to the Belarusian capital for further talks.
According to Kiev's deputy prime minister, Alexey Reznikov, the Ukrainian side will refuse to attend."We said that we will not take part in the meetings of the Trilateral Contact Group if the Covid-19 quarantine suddenly ends and it is proposed to continue consultations in Minsk. To hold talks in real life, we will have to look for another country, another city."This is because Belarus is "under the influence" of the Kremlin, and Kiev has lost confidence in its northern neighbor, he said. As things stand, due to Covid-19, discussions between the three parties take place via videoconference. Before the pandemic, they met face-to-face in the Belarusian capital.
Reznikov's assertion that Kiev will no longer go to Minsk follows attempts by other Ukrainian officials to move discussions to another country. Last summer, Ukraine's former president Leonid Kravchuk, who now serves on the Donbass negotiation team, revealed that he tried to move talks from Minsk to Sweden.
In response, the Russian Foreign Ministry then noted that "the key to success in settling the Ukrainian conflict is not in the change of negotiating venues or formats," but simply the political will of all parties.
The conflict is taking place in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine, collectively known as Donbass, where a civil war has raged for almost seven years. Separatists now control large swathes of land and have declared themselves to be independent of Kiev. While Russia does not recognize these breakaway states, Ukraine accuses the Kremlin of supporting them.
"There is clearly a deliberate calculation to create a toxic atmosphere around Russian securities in order to reduce their investment potential. These possible new restrictions on government bonds are a double-edged sword, and they would clearly harm America's financial institutions. But we have long become accustomed to the fact that lovers of unilateral restrictive measures have ceased to care about their own loss of business, or their citizens.A number of Russian officials have said in recent weeks that the country is exploring the development of a system to rival the SWIFT international payment mechanism.
"Moscow is working to develop measures in case of any further hostile steps against Russia's sovereign debt. As always, we will react in a balanced and adequate way, starting with the principle of maintaining the stability of the Russian economy and the financial system."
Russia would be forced to defend itself if Western nations go through with plans to station short- and long-range missiles in Europe, a Moscow diplomat has warned, insisting they could be used to target the country's air defenses.
In a statement released on Monday, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that Washington was increasingly discussing proposals to deploy rocket launchers to the continent. Previously banned by the INF Treaty, research and development has reportedly resumed since the pact was torn up in 2019 by then-US President Donald Trump.
Citing British intentions to upgrade its missile launch complexes, the spokeswoman argued that"the British military has now joined in with the openly hostile and destabilizing rhetoric to make it possible to deliver deep missile strikes, in order to neutralize enemy air defense systems. We cannot help but notice the obsession of these Anglo-Saxon commanders on the task of defeating purely defensive units designed to ensure the security of the Russian Federation in the event of a military attack."She also said Russia disputes the officially declared ranges of the launchers, claiming that Britain was being "clearly and deliberately misleading" about its ability to strike targets at distance. The Foreign Ministry official added:"We aren't closing the door to dialogue, but we can't rule out that Russia will be forced to shift its efforts towards military measures in response to emerging missile threats."In her statement this week, Zakharova cited "cynical" US plans that she said had been put forward by US General John Rafferty "to test the prototype of the missile at the maximum range to see by how much it will exceed 500 km."

Iran has rejected US proposals to suspend its 20% uranium enrichment in return for unfreezing $1 billion of its assets, Tehran's chief negotiator has said after a first round of talks to reinstate the 2015 nuclear deal.
"Once again, all parties have come to the conclusion that there is no better alternative. Thus, we can hope for a renaissance of the Vienna nuclear agreement."The U.S. and Iranian sides have publicly clashed over the order of possible concessions on U.S. sanctions and Iranian nuclear activities before a new deal can be achieved.
Comment: See also: