Having said on the air that British Prime Minister Theresa May is hyping the scandal about the poisoning of former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury to divert public attention away from the Rotherham child sexual exploitation case and Brexit problems, Dimitros Lyacos, a foreign affairs columnist, was fired from Cyprus' state-owned television channel.
"I dared to say on the air in Cyprus, the former British colony, that the reason behind British PM Theresa May's brining up [the Skripal case] is - at least according to Moscow - the Brexit problem which she has yet to solve. In a year Britain should withdraw from the EU and pay a huge sum of money to Brussels. And the second reason is a scandal about the rape of more than a thousand underage girls in a [South Yorkshire] provincial town," Lyacos told Radio Sputnik.
The journalist specified that the rape incidents remain neglected due to the fact that some of perpetrators were "refugees" which makes the case highly sensitive for the British authorities.
It was previously reported that over 1,500 children had fallen victim to sex abuse on an unprecedented scale in the South Yorkshire town of Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. According to the 2014 independent inquiry into the child sexual exploitation in the town, the majority of abusers were individuals of "Asian" origin which prompted fears among local officials to be labeled as "racists" while tackling the problem.
"However, does the sexual violence issue really matter after Russia's sudden 'attack' against [Britain]?" Lyacos asked wittily.
"On Friday morning my colleague from London went on air and began to praise May, who made a general statement [on the Skripal case] along with [German Chancellor Angela] Merkel, [US President Donald] Trump and [President of France Emmanuel] Macron. And then they [Cyprus state-owned broadcaster] addressed me: "Dimitros, good afternoon. What's going on in Moscow?" And I began to tell them [about May's attempt to divert Britons' attention away from domestic problems]. While speaking to them I felt that they were about to say 'All right, Dimitros, good-bye!'"
A week later, Lyacos was replaced with another correspondent to cover the 2018 Russian presidential election. The journalist sent an official letter to the editorial office asking his colleagues to explain the situation, but received no response. At the same time, he believes that the editorial board ceased cooperation with him against its will.
"If I were a British ambassador in Cyprus and heard this report, I would react like this: 'Who allowed him to say such things?' Then you can speculate about what could happen. The only thing is that this is not an initiative of my colleagues and my direct supervisors," the journalist said.
On March 4, the police found former spook Sergei Skripal, 66, and his daughter Yulia, 33, unconscious near a shopping center in Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. The Skripals were reportedly poisoned by nerve agent А-234.
Sergei Skripal, a former MI6 agent, has been living in Britain since 2010 when he and three other individuals were pardoned by the Kremlin and swapped with 10 Russian intelligence agents, exposed in the US at the time.
Although the inquiry into the poisoning of the former spy has yet to be completed, British Prime PM May groundlessly claimed that it was Moscow who was responsible for the attempted murder of the Skripals. She severed top-level diplomatic ties with Moscow and authorized the expulsion of 23 Russian envoys from the UK which prompted a similar move on the part of Moscow.
Commenting on the British hysteria around the Skripal case, British journalist Rod Liddle dubbed London's response to the nerve gas attack as "an act of self-harm" in his recent op-ed for Spectator.
"Our response to the Salisbury nerve gas attack has been precipitous, shrill, petulant and an act of self-harm," Liddle wrote on March 24. "And already our European allies are - rightly - beginning to row back a little from their original stance of unequivocal support for the UK and refusing to attribute the attack directly to the Kremlin. That's because they don't know it is attributable to the Kremlin, and frankly nor do we at this stage."
"Why not, you know, wait a little? Gather a bit more evidence?" the British journalist asked rhetorically.
Meanwhile, 14 EU member states and the US have signaled their willingness to expel Russian diplomats "in solidarity with the UK."
"Fourteen out of 28 EU member-states have decided to expel diplomats from the Russian Federation as a measure of solidarity with London on the Skripal case," European Council President Donald Tusk told journalists Monday.
Reader Comments
Here is an excerpt from her address to parliament on the Skripal matter - slightly amended to make sense of what would otherwise be patent none-sense:
Semi-quote!
“Russia’s, Britain’s, the USA’s. France’s, Germany’s, Spain’s, Italy’s, India’s, China’s, Serbia’s, Andorra’s and Luxembourg’s records of conducting state-sponsored assassinations; and our assessment that they all view some defectors as legitimate targets for assassinations; the Government has concluded that it is highly likely that we can no longer state with certainty who was responsible for the act against Sergei and Yulia Skripal”
- with apologies to the parliamentary tea maid!
The mind that hides in the world it made has only one problem; psychopathy. 'Sick' or conflicted thinking is a mind given to sickness and formed in worship of the self it grows. The world that worships sickness seen, assigned and targeted in the other is the mind that hides under the mask of personhood.
Giving to get rid off - in the targeting of the hated - is the way to keep it, while seeming to be righteous, protected and powerful. Victimhood is the secret love that calls upon vengeance. The worth-ship of attack is enshrined in the victim - forever to be held apart unhealed.
Do we teach (and therefore learn) to fish for the true thinking by which to release victimhood and vengeance of enraged self-vindication upon its 'failed world' or to we persist the dark religion of sacrifice in fear to mind-control?
The manipulative deceits fuel the fear that drives them. Your participation is by a conditioned reactive identity.
Is it true? Do you want it? No one can release what they are not the awareness of.
What we give is the measure of what we get back. What others seem to give us is still determined by all the meaning we give it - but to uncover this is an opening to insight in the peace of not holding personal grievance in substitute for true witness.
Freedom of association and the power that love is, are not denied by the acts or threats of another, though these can be given such power by virtue of what you give attention to and associate within. True thinking witnesses your acceptance of who you are in relation to. Dissociated 'thinking' is acceptance of who you are not as a divorce from.
The a-tempted divorce from being, is a mind apart in the wish to set itself over and act upon. It operates a sense of lack - believed real - as a basis from which to think a private masked agenda. Entranced in private self-imaged reflection and oblivious to the true Call of relational recognition and gratitude in truly shared being.
What we give, we also share or teach, and grow, strengthen and learn. If we seek to stamp out the evils in others, we make them real in ourselves. This is not to say we have no responsibility in our relating to the different or the deranged, but that if we are re-enacting our own shadow conflicts, they will never be resolved or reconciled. Such is the nature of oaths set in loathing that they will bind their maker to victimhood under the lure of power.
Learning the ways in which we set ourselves up to fall is the uncovering of the programmed defence against knowing.
This is more on the Quote of the Day than Skripted diversions or the masking intelligence to frame and direct narrative 'reality'. But we can only relate to what is as it is and not through the frame of what we wish and assert it should be.
But the wish to see something 'else' is the story of dissonance or conflicted self. In this story, exposure in light is defended against - as in the Emperor's new clothes - which is not limited to puppet dictators in the world but 'stories' the mind of fearful belief that guilt speaks truth. And is thus usurped by a lie and the father of it.
Awakening stories are resonant with a willingness to see differently, that arises from the unwillingness or indeed incapacity to persist in an illusory pretence - regardless it served as defence to who we thought we were.
To the denial of hidden guilt, must it be faced and owned for us to be reconciled in ourself and thus with one another.
To the denial of hidden fear must fears be felt and accepted without triggering guilt-reactions that shut down the mind in recoil from its own exposure.
I trust that we attract and are attracted to that which serves our true desire - even if temporarily seeming to feed the wishes of a false. How else would we come to recognize false as fruitless and futile but to succeed in it and find it hollow, meaningless and negatively self-reinforcing? Yet while we can blame it on another - we use it still... in secret – 'false-flagged' over our private parts.
Binra's only problem is: He only attracts the attention of brain-dead groupies like Anna1 and LindaMay, who he seems to have no interest in.
If that wasn't his intention, perhaps he should consider going back to the drawing board.
Albert Einstein quipped, “The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”
If I sought attention I would market disinfotainment to fear and derision. That's where the mind 'clicks' to keep its mask intact.
In your acceptance of what you experience is your freedom to be all that you are.
Including the false flagged accusations by which to seem to be who you are not.
Seems is a great word isn't it - you can insinuate while pretending not to.
But great advice is often missed while thinking to give it to others.
i know, HFL.
I try to read Binra but never understand the point of verbal diarrhoea.
Generally I take the view that if a person can't express themselves in simple, plain language, then this reflects a mind that is totally confused and basically doesnt even understand what they are trying to explain.
It's good for insomnia ... but each to his / her own
Albert Einstein quipped, “The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.”
S /he's welcome to post here ... there is a sort of fascination at the length s/he/ writes, but I can't penetrate it
If you are content in the world your core belief brings you - why would you open another perspective upon your beliefs?
But if anyone is listening beneath the presentations of false flag thinking, they may find resonance within themselves in the willingness of another.
The language or structuring of the mind-in-the-world is predicated upon a lie - hence these times are unveiling of such a world to your sight. While you think that THEY do it you 'escape' your part in it.
As long as you allow such a mind to frame your sense of self - it will mask over total confusion with narrative control.
Total confusion need put-downs and subjugations, conflicts and enemies by which to seem substantial in itself.
I'm not trying to explain anything and insofar as I find words and phrases, they stand under the wordless qualities they are sketching of or giving form to. In that sense I understand what I am saying - indeed I yield my thinking to receive it as a world made new.
While we build, defend and assert our 'suss' or handle on life or the world we are seeking control from a place of lack. The attempt to control life results in total confusion.
My sense is that what I say is protected in the open by only being obvious to a like willingness of listening. If you listen 'in your head' you are effectively 'hiding in your (thoughts that make your) world. This might seem safe - but I say it is the illusion of safety that not only costs the true, but attracts the manipulator-protector-stroker for your self-illusions. I don't put this as particular to your person - but as pertaining to our persona or self-masking presentation in the 'world'.
The beauty of life is i m lindamay and binra is binra. I agree that we pen a different shade of creativity
(And i didnt/dont mean any harm... with my 2 cacas )
Nor did i refer to 'your thinking' rather 'anybody's opinion'. There s a world of a difference between these 2.
I ve been open towards binra about personally not always being capable/making my way thru the entire read but i d be arrogant and totally self-absorbed to suppose binra is here purely for my positive entertainment and enlightenment.
I just find it so fascinating to follow such a lengthy golden silk thread and (speaking for me and safely stated, binra tambien) not get tempted by loads of distractionz.
No ill will meant Hash... nor Anna..... lutey neither
In the meantime i help myself to the tool of bookmarking.
What a continual astounding communication of human intelligence à la ABONDANCE!
Not being 'able to penetrate' does not equate valuelessness nor.... there aint being anything there... to penetrate
My sorry, didnt read as clearly as it was written.
... and yes my fangs are longer than binra's
binra is okay.
Some people write more than others, and take more time to 'think'.
It is not a problem.
Unless you're in a hurry.
And that (the need to hurry) might be YOUR problem.
ned,
out
The whole 'mental disease' is 'thinking-addiction'. Which is a variation on the idea of narcissism and of the parasitical imposture of life. The backwards mind seeks 'simple' evasion from complex inner entanglements - and makes society (a human world) out of some kind of lid or 'forgetting'. This is a 'language' to unlearn by not recycling hate packaged in complex financial instruments marketed as a simple worthy investment.
I am not experiencing life as a problem while sketching intuitive qualities of worthiness in true with-ness - and so I paint what moves me because I trust the movement. Otherwise I would have no desire or movement to alight in. My experience is mostly timeless and thoughtless - which is the reverse of what the world generally means because it is both empty and full and not a sense of lacking presence at all. I don't write this as part of a system of rules that require anyone else to move in a particular way.
Problems are unrecognized answers.
When people (any of us) false flag our own issues onto others, we not only deny them true with-ness, but put our 'problem' where we can NEVER resolve it, while running under the wish-believing we have 'escaped' it.
Whatever my life is - is mine to be and nothing another can judge without merely judging themselves and thinking they are 'right'.
Having is my qualification for giving and so I extend this to others who have their own particular quirks and talents, liabilities or strengths.
I know there is power in what speaks here and so I am content to let it come in the ways that it 'wants to' and not as any part of a personal claim at another's expense.
SOTT - Are you jumping to conclusions here?
Blaming it as a poisoning by a Russian state sponsored assassination attempt is clearly being done for reasons that are not substantiated.
But the veracity of the reports as to poison, the exact nature of the alleged poison and who exactly did it and for what purpose?
This is all made obscure by the very nature of the 'investigations' and reporting.
And this is for Banra... you might be a bit disco A FIFTH OF BEETHOVEN (1976) [Link]
Or You might be a bit punk
My brother knows Karl Marx He met him eating mushrooms in the public parkWhere's me jumper [Link]
He said: "What do you think of my manifesto?" "I like your manifesto, put it to the testo"
Took me down to meet the anarchist party Met a groovy guy, he was arty farty
He Said: "I know a little Latin, a kissen an a kai
I Said: "I dunno what it means", he said: "Neither do I"
Is it rude to ask you whether your screen name is an intentional anagram you chose for yourself?
Comment: Poisoning a British spy in order to blame it on Russia is reprehensible. Even more reprehensible is the British authorities refusal to adequately protect their own children from sexual abuse for the sole reason that they're afraid of being called racist. It just goes to show how inverted Western values have become. Racism is the supreme evil and must be fought, even if that means subjecting our children to rape and murder.