A major
theme here at the Daily Sceptic is the politicisation of the world's 'top' scientific journals,
Nature and
Science.
Over the last few years, both of these publications have handed over an increasing amount of editorial space to woke activism.In the summer of 2022,
Science ran a
piece about how astrophysics helped the author embrace her "non-binary" gender identity. Meanwhile,
Nature published an
article claiming that fat people contribute to "diversity".
Science has now run a
piece on "systemic racism", which has very much the same flavour. The author is Agustin Fuentes, who in 2021 wrote an
article on Darwin's
The Descent of Man, which described Darwin as "an English man with injurious and unfounded prejudices". Lest you doubted his credentials, Fuentes's latest piece comes under the heading 'Expert Voices'.
He begins by referring to "massive amounts of data" and "countless analyses" which "demonstrate unequivocally" that racism persists in the United States, including in higher education. Yet he laments that "six of the nine justices on the US Supreme Court recently chose to disregard these facts and argue for a "race neutral" approach in college admissions."
Where to start with this one? Even if racism does persist in the United States, why would that imply colleges shouldn't follow a race neutral approach to admissions?
After all, affirmative action is pretty much the
definition of a racist policy. It says that two students with the same grades and test scores should be treated differently because of their races.
For Fuentes, however, it's being neutral with respect to race that is racist - or at least tantamount to ignoring racism.
Comment: Footage and commentary of the strike/s: