Puppet MastersS


Arrow Down

US to reduce military aid to Ukraine in 2024 - WSJ

delivery Jake
© Alex Brandon/AP/KJNNational Security Advisor Jake Sullivan
155mm shells bound for Ukraine • Dover Air Force Base
Washington will not give Kiev a second shot at its counteroffensive, the newspaper's sources have said...

The US is unlikely to give Ukraine "anywhere near the same level" of military aid in 2024 compared to this year, the Wall Street Journal has reported, citing officials in Washington. Meanwhile, President Joe Biden and his administration insist that they will continue to back Kiev to the hilt.

The US has supplied more than $43 billion worth of arms to Ukraine since Russia's military operation began last year, while leaked Pentagon documents indicate that NATO countries trained and equipped nine Ukrainian brigades to take part in the ongoing counteroffensive against Russian forces.

With the Ukrainian military failing to penetrate Russia's defensive lines after nearly three months of fighting, American military planners are advising their Ukrainian counterparts to stick to their NATO training and use what they've been given more effectively, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday.
"The American advice is based on the calculation that the surge of equipment the US has funneled to Ukraine...is enough for this offensive and is unlikely to be repeated at anywhere near the same level in 2024."
Washington's continued bankrolling of the Ukrainian military is a matter of political contention in the US. While almost all Democratic members of Congress back Biden's policy of arming Kiev "for as long as it takes," a group of more than two dozen Republicans are vehemently opposed. Moreover, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump has promised to force Kiev into a peace deal if elected president next November, as has Vivek Ramaswamy, who is currently polling third for the GOP's nomination.

Comment: Biden brilliantly doubles down on his mistakes.


Brick Wall

Moscow: Western countries 'not welcome' at BRICS

Deputy FM Sergey Ryabkov
© Russian EmbassyDeputy FM Sergey Ryabkov
Only nations that do not enforce sanctions against the group's members can be admitted, Russian Deputy FM Sergey Ryabkov has said

Western countries don't have a chance of joining BRICS as long as they pursue hostile policies against any of its members, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov said on Friday.

Speaking at a press conference following the BRICS summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, Ryabkov recalled that one of the key conditions for admittance to the group is "non-application of illegal sanctions against any of the members of the association."

He noted that all six countries that were invited to join BRICS at the meeting - Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates - fully comply with this requirement.

Comment: Welp, that's that, at least for Macron, who had tried to wangle himself an invitation to the summit.

BRICS should set up a kiddie table for Western leaders like Macron
There's no 'F' (for France) in 'BRICS' but that didn't stop French President Emmanuel Macron from trying to "F" it up.

It wasn't that long ago that Western leaders wouldn't give the BRICS the time of day, treating the economic bloc like the girl next door who didn't warrant even a second glance. But now that she's all grown up and has a massive purchasing-power-adjusted GDP that's set to beat that of the G7, according to the International Monetary Fund, it seems to have triggered Macron's seduction instincts. And probably his gold-digging ones, too, particularly given the richness of natural resources of the BRICS member states and their partners, notably in Africa, and at a time when France and Europe face a greater lack of resources, due to misguided policies on everything from cutting off cheap Russian energy over the conflict in Ukraine to having the welcome mat yanked out from under them in Africa, with stability operations that resulted in a proliferation of coups.

If any Western leader was going to have the audacity to try getting into a summit led by countries that they're constantly bullying - notably China and Russia - it makes sense that it would be Macron. The French President has a unique talent for speaking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time. On one hand, he caters to Washington's agenda by toeing its party line on Russia and China, while at the same time he occasionally brings up the need to maintain strategic autonomy from Washington. But whenever there's a choice to be made, Macron ultimately follows the Washington agenda, even when it's to France's and the EU's economic detriment.

But the mere fact that he'd asked for an invite to the 15th BRICS summit this week allows Macron to lay claim to open-mindedness. He can say that, hey, he tried to reach out, but that his hand was pushed away - which is like badmouthing a girl and then telling everyone that she won't go out with you when she turns you down. Anyone with half a brain would think that the best thing to do now would be to go away and start proving yourself through your actions before asking for another date. The good news for Macron is that there's no better time for non-alignment, particularly since going all-in with the Western camp's US-led agenda hasn't worked out too well for the average French citizen suffering from a seemingly endless cost-of-living crisis.

Macron wants a date with the BRICS so badly that the bloc should really do with him and other Western leaders what Macron himself decided last year that the European Union should do with prospective members: set up a 'kiddie table.' The new 'Baby BRICS' summit could be the equivalent of Macron's 'European Political Community' of countries seen as still having to prove themselves for EU membership, but who can still score an invite to a smaller summit alongside the 'adult' one, in the hope of being chosen for cherry-picked special trade relationships and customs arrangements of primary benefit to the EU.

The next BRICS meeting should set up such a kiddie table, like the EU does, not too far from the venue but yet not close enough to contaminate the bloc's multipolar agenda and camaraderie - or to be traumatized by it like the single-minded babies that Western leaders are. Have a clown show up to make some animal balloons for them so they can be distracted from the kind of diversity of views and analysis that has recently sent them into censorship frenzies against platforms like RT.

Just imagine the kind of horror show Macron would have had to endure had he actually been allowed to attend this week's annual BRICS summit. He would have had to listen to Russian President Vladimir Putin speak via video about how the "international economy is seriously affected by illegitimate sanctions," knowing that Macron cheer-led those same sanctions, shoved top-down on EU citizens by Brussels, while Macron stood idly by and failed to defend the French people against the economic devastation that they've caused in the form of skyrocketing costs of living.

He would have also had to put up with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa criticizing "new wave protectionism." It would have been a reminder for Macron of his failure to convince the Biden administration to backtrack on its protectionist Inflation Reduction Act, which effectively favors "Made in America" green vehicles and components to the detriment of the EU's - and primarily French and German - car industries. He could be reminded of how utterly useless he's been as a leader, relegated to merely hoping that either Washington has a change of heart, or that BRICS manages to give France a helping hand by applying some pressure.

He could have sat there listening to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi talk about India's desire to diversify its interests and partners even more - risking leaving France with a smaller piece of the pie at a time when EU sanctions have cut it off from other opportunities.

Macron would have been subjected to a game of Russian roulette on handshakes with African leaders, not knowing whether he'd get a frosty reception from one or more of them in the wake of several West African nations booting out French troops - most recently Niger. Who's next? Macron has no idea. Which is why he reportedly dressed down his own foreign intelligence service (the DGSE) in the wake of the latest coup.

Being an avowed admirer of former French President Charles De Gaulle, who yanked France out of the NATO command and kicked the Americans out of the country in order to guarantee independence post-WWII, Macron missed the opportunity to do the same in France's own best economic interests when NATO picked a fight with Russia over Ukraine by loading the country up with weapons and trainers of Azov neo-Nazis. And now, BRICS, despite having started off as an economic alliance, can rally around Russia in support of a whole new multipolar worldview, thanks in large part to being spooked by the isolationist and punitive treatment of Russia by Washington and its vassals over Ukraine. If Macron is serious about impressing BRICS, then maybe he should first start acting more in line with the independence to which he pays lip-service in the desperate hope of scoring a kiss.

Until then, BRICS should only give him official invitations that feature cartoon characters and promises of "pin the tail on the donkey" fun. He can decide with the rest of his EU pals which one of them gets to be the donkey.



Attention

Kremlin: Accusations it killed Wagner boss Prigozhin an 'absolute lie'

memorial photo Prigozhin
© ReutersWagner mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin's plane crashed on Aug 23 with no survivors.
The Kremlin said on Friday that Western suggestions that Wagner mercenary boss Yevgeny Prigozhin had been killed on its orders were an "absolute lie" and declined to definitively confirm his death, citing the need to wait for test results.

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday sent his condolences to Mr Prigozhin's family, breaking his silence after the mercenary leader's plane crashed on Wednesday evening with no survivors two months after he led a mutiny against army chiefs.

Mr Putin cited "preliminary information" as indicating that Mr Prigozhin and his top associates in the Wagner mercenary group had been killed.

Comment: Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin reportedly killed in plane crash north of Moscow


Eye 1

Neil Oliver: '...they're dismantling our way of life!'

Neil Oliver
Neil Oliver
'...yesterday's conspiracy theory is today's truth!'


Bullseye

Ukraine in the EU will only exacerbate the bloc's growing irrelevance - Timofey Bordachev, Valdai Club Director

zelensky
© AFP / Oleg PetrasyukFILE PHOTO: Ukraine's President Vladimir Zelensky speaks during a press conference after the opening session of Crimea Platform summit in Kiev. Expansion to the East has turned the organization into an economic appendage of NATO.
European integration is one of the most mythologized subjects of modern global politics, which is already full of illusions and legends that have nothing to do with the harsh reality of international relations.

In practical terms, the cooperation of a large group of Western European countries in state regulation of the economy is obvious: it has allowed a relatively fair distribution of the benefits of a universal market. In political terms, however, this cooperation has created such a large, ephemeral superstructure that it is impossible to distinguish truth from deception, or even fiction, when it comes to the European Union.

And we can only guess at the future forms of interaction among Western European states, whose main objective will remain to keep their peoples subservient to the will and whims of their untouchable elites. Therefore, the simplest prediction about the future of European integration is one based on the optimal forms of maintaining social stability. Even if this requires, for example, a shift away from traditional economic activities or a complete abandonment of the ability of countries to manage their own finances. Thus, European integration will take the form necessary to fulfill its primary purpose.

Comment: See also: The West's attempt to create a Ukrainian scenario in Niger is faltering - Timofey Bordachev, Valdai Club Director


Snakes in Suits

US politicians using government funds to 'stimulate the economy', unprecedented deficit looms, Bloomberg analysis reveals

US Budget
This strategy has resulted in rising borrowing costs with implications that may persist even after the current inflation concerns are addressed.

Bloomberg's data suggests that the current scenario for the federal budget is truly unparalleled. Massive deficits loom in the forecast, despite a seemingly healthy economy. This has left investors on edge, evident from the 10-year Treasuries soaring past 4.3%, a peak not seen since 2007. Concurrently, the 30-year fixed mortgage rate has shot beyond 7%, a figure untouched in over two decades.

Investor apprehensions stem from the Congressional Budget Office's projections. Prolonged fiscal imbalances of the current magnitude could escalate rates even more, further straining public finances. Anxiety grew this month when the US Treasury augmented its debt issuance and to the surprise of many, Fitch Ratings downgraded the US sovereign credit rating.

Comment: It's likely that the economic situation will only worsen, and that US will be forced to admit that they've not lost the proxy war in Ukraine but they've wasted over a $100 billion on it, and it's possible that the establishment will soon feel it needs to resort to desperate measures to distract from these facts:


Bullseye

On THAT campaign photo

trump mug shot
© Fulton County Sheriff's Department
What to make of this mugshot? Serious as a heart attack? I'd hate to be you on that fateful day? Table turner? Energy shift? Game on? Daddy's in da house? Good career move? You can run but you can't hide? Please, Br'er Fox, don't fling me in that-there briar patch...!

Good luck trying this case, DA Fani Willis. And by all means roll the TV cameras in the courtroom. You are about to supplant the Scopes trial of 1925 as the most notoriously ridiculous piece of legal work in US history. That one, over in Tennessee, was called "the Monkey Trial" when a high school teacher named John Scopes was charged with teaching the theory of evolution in his biology class. It got the national news spotlight for the duration. The state enlisted three-time Democratic presidential nominee Williams Jennings Bryan as a special prosecutor. Poor Bryan, famously sweating in the southern July heat, was made a fool of by Chicago lawyer for the defense Clarence Darrow. Bryan died of a stroke days after the conclusion of the trial. It also killed what remained of his reputation.

Laptop

Trump celebrates 'blockbuster' interview with Tucker on Musk's 'X' platform - steals limelight from Fox News GOP debate

tucker carlson trump interview
© X/Tucker CarlsonTrump gave extended answers without interruption in the interview from his private club in New Jersey
Donald Trump has praised his own 'BLOCKBUSTER' interview with Tucker Carlson on Elon Musk's 'X' platform, which had reached over 150 million views by early Thursday morning and stole the spotlight from Fox News' Republican presidential debate.

The former president's 45-minute sit-down on X, formerly known as Twitter, aired as his GOP rivals bickered on stage in a crucial night for the 2024 White House race.

The former president boasted about the success of the broadcast in a post to Truth Social Thursday morning: 'The Tucker Carlson Interview with me was a BLOCKBUSTER. Could hit 200,000,000 Views, and more! Thank you! I hope it was enjoyed by everyone.'

The Trump-Carlson face-to-face has already eclipsed the most-watched TV interview of all time - Oprah and Michael Jackson's 1993 hit, which garnered over 62 million views. It also trumped Tucker's Andrew Tate interview from July, which drew in 107 million views.

Comment: Left-leaning Yahoo! goes into more detail dunking on the numbers:
"Anyone who is logged into Twitter who views a Tweet counts as a view, regardless of where they see the Tweet (e.g. Home, Search, Profiles, etc.) or whether or not they follow the author. If you're the author, looking at your own Tweet also counts as a view," the company says.

In other words, a view is counted even if you didn't actively look at the post (formerly known as "tweets" before Elon Musk changed the site's name to X) even if all it did was cross your screen while you were scrolling. Which by the way is a very likely occurrence on X's algorithmic "For You" tab... especially if that tweet features content by users Twitter owner Elon Musk personally wants to boost.

[...]

As of this writing, Carlson's interview with Trump has been reposted (formerly "retweeted") 171,800 times, quote-posted (formerly "quote-tweeted") 14,500 times, liked 578,100 times, bookmarked 46,500 times, and has been replied to around 47,000 times. Not especially low numbers. It's undeniable that Trump has a lot of supporters, many of whom swarm on Twitter.

But these days, Fox averages about 1.7 million viewers during its primetime broadcast. And notice the specificity of the word "viewers." Because none of the numbers tracking engagement on a X post tell you if someone actually watched the video.
What is not being grasped is the persistence of viral tweets. The debate has aired and is over. The retweets and presumably a certain amount of actual viewings of Trump's interview will continue to accumulate.
tucker trump interview
© Tucker Carlson/TwitterTwitter stats as of August 25, 22023



Briefcase

Giuliani scoffs at Georgia vote case as he prepares to surrender

RGiuliane
© unknownRudi Giuliani onetime personal lawyer of US President Trump
Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday dismissed Georgia charges that he helped former president Donald Trump try to overturn the 2020 election as politically motivated as he headed to Atlanta to surrender for booking.

Trump, Giuliani and 17 other co-defendants face a Friday deadline to turn themselves in after being charged for election subversion in the southern US state.

Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, told reporters outside his New York residence:
"I'm a big boy. I can take it. I have fought battles much worse than this. It's not accidental that they've indicted all his [Trump's] lawyers. Never heard of that before in America. The system of justice was politicized and criminalized for politics."
Giuliani mocked the idea that authorities at the Fulton County jail would likely take his photo, lauding his own history as a Mafia-busting prosecutor in New York.
"I get photographed. Isn't that nice? A mugshot of the man who probably put the worst criminals of the 20th century in jail. They are going to degrade themselves by doing a mugshot of me. I'm the same Rudolph Giuliani that took down the mafia, that made New York City the safest city in America."

Comment: The prosecution is on a seek and destroy mission for all who served with Trump.

See also:


USA

Elephants at a Circus

GOP Candidates
© Objectivity is the Objective
If you are older than 50, you'll probably remember the line, "I served with Jack Kennedy; I worked with Jack Kennedy; Jack Kennedy was friend of mine; Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy." People went absolutely crazy when Senator Lloyd Bentsen delivered that line to Dan Quayle in the 1988 Vice Presidential debate. It was considered the greatest mic drop moment in modern political debates. But what does uttering a line like that have to do with governing our nation? Absolutely nothing. That line was well scripted by Senator Bentsen's handlers. It was practiced and rehearsed over and over again by Lloyd Bentsen, and the only challenge was finding a place to fit it into the debate. It had nothing to do with who was more capable, more worthy or more deserving of becoming Vice President. But ever since that line was delivered, candidates have been searching to deliver their own "you're no Jack Kennedy" line. Unfortunately, too often the American voting public gets caught up and influenced by charged but irrelevant moments like that.

Watching the GOP debate last night, I couldn't help but wonder, at what point are we going to stop doing these so-called "debates"? Last night's GOP "debate" was not a debate, it was eight people yelling, talking over each other, trying to get their scripted soundbites in, trying to humiliate their opponent, searching for ways to deliver their well-scripted "you're no Jack Kennedy" line as if they just made it up off the cuff. Last night was embarrassing. It was embarrassing for the GOP. It was embarrassing for the country. That debate had nothing to do with finding out who is the best candidate to become President of the United States. Even when the candidates did state their policy positions, it showed nothing about how they would govern. Their stated policy positions are a result of polling and focus groups designed to find out which positions, which words, which talking points resonates best with the most voters. They all have managers, handlers, speech writers who tell them what to say, how to say it, when to say it, in order to attract the most voters.