E-mail sent to the Washington Post July 23, 2014 about the destruction of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17:
Dear Editor,
Your July 22 editorial was headed: "Russia's barbarism. The West needs a strategy to contain the world's newest rogue state."
Pretty strong language. Vicious, even. Not one word of hard evidence in the editorial to back it up. Then, the next day, the Associated Press reported:
Senior U.S. intelligence officials said Tuesday that Russia was responsible for 'creating the conditions' that led to the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, but they offered no evidence of direct Russian government involvement. ... the U.S. had no direct evidence that the missile used to shoot down the passenger jet came from Russia.Where were these words in the Post? You people are behaving like a rogue newspaper.
- William Blum
I don't have to tell you whether the Post printed my letter. I've been reading the paper for 25 years - six years during Vietnam (1964-1970) and the last 19 years (1995-2014) - usually spending about three hours each day reading it very carefully. And I can say that when it comes to US foreign policy the newspaper is worse now than I can remember it ever was during those 25 years. It's reached the point where, as one example, I don't take at face value a word the Post has to say about Ukraine. Same with the State Department, which makes one accusation after another about Russian military actions in Eastern Ukraine without presenting any kind of satellite imagery or other visual or documentary evidence; or they present something that's wholly inconclusive and/or unsourced or citing "social media"; what we're left with is often no more than just an accusation. Do they have something to hide?
Comment: And to think some many Americans believe they live in "the land of the free" and the home of democracy.