Puppet MastersS


Stock Up

SOTT Focus: Are Syria and Russia more democratic than the US?

assad
© SANA / ReutersSyria's President Bashar al-Assad
"Assad is a dictator." I hear it a lot, in the news, in conversations with people in person and from callers to the radio show I co-host. But I'm still taken aback every time I hear it. To be fully honest, I guess I should start out with a shocker: I don't necessarily think a dictator is a bad thing. Take a moment to compose yourself before I continue.

The word 'dictator' comes from ancient Rome, where the office of dictator was filled by an individual for a period of 6 months originally, and for the express purpose of performing a specific task. Gaius Julius Caesar modified the office to full-year terms, before being voted dictator perpetuo - dictator for life.

Like any public office, the position can be abused, as it was by Sulla in ancient Rome. But that's not always the case. If a leader is genuinely well-intentioned towards the people and has their support, a 'benevolent dictatorship' has several advantages over a system where the head office changes every 4 years or so. For example, a short-term system favors short-term goals. What's the use of long-term planning if you'll be booted out of office in just a few years? That's the problem Caesar faced: his enemies in the reactionary aristocratic oligarchy could simply rescind any laws or projects he had initiated while in office. What's the point in even trying to make beneficial, lasting changes in a government like that? As long as a leader continues to live up to the standard of making wise decisions that benefit the state, why not keep them in power as long as possible, rather than have them replaced after a few years by some mediocre, corporate shill.

But even if the term had a very specific meaning in ancient Rome, nowadays it tends to conjure up images of the "evil dictator": usually a man who rules for life (or at least decades), wields a lot of power, and, most importantly, oppresses his own people. If that's how you define it, sure, a dictator would be a bad thing, simply because by definition that person would be evil. But is there anything wrong, in theory, about serving for life or wielding a lot of power?

Star of David

The "Evil" that men do - Israel's killing machine: "Bloody Friday" in Palestine

Palistinian Repression
© Unknown
Israel's killing machine raged on Friday, continuing into Saturday. The Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) said Israeli forces wounded over 290 Palestinians yesterday alone, many seriously - 48 from live fire, 44 using rubber-coated steel bullets.

Hundreds suffered from toxic tear gas inhalation. Maan News said "Israeli forces used Palestine TV reporter and cameraman Sira Sarhan and Hadi al-Dibs as human shields...forcing them at gunpoint to remain in front of their Jeep and tell protesters to stop throwing rocks."

French journalist David Perrotin was brutally assaulted by Jewish Defense League Zionist zealots outside AFP's Paris headquarters. He was beaten with batons.

Arrow Up

Shifting power balance: More countries supporting Russian attempts at defeating terrorism

russian airstrikes syria
© Sputnik/ Dmitriy Vinogradov
Much to Washington's discontent, more countries are supporting Russia's efforts to help Damascus defeat terrorists, who are threatening to overrun Syria, El Mundo observed.

Earlier this week, Russia and Jordan, a member of the US-led anti-ISIL coalition, agreed to coordinate military activities in Syria and share counterterrorism information though a newly created center in Amman.

Jordan has taken part in airstrikes targeting the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria since September 2014.

Comment: More former allies are seeing the writing on the wall; the balance of power has shifted in favor of Russia. Putin has been competently forging global alliances, showing willingness to share power with other nations, rather than dictate to the world as the US has done for decades.


Quenelle - Golden

Putin will not let West drag Russia into nuclear war, will always find diplomatic solution

Putin
© Sputnik/ Alexei Druzhinin
Vladimir Putin sent a clear message to warmongers all over the world: Russia will not be dragged into a nuclear war and will always look for a diplomatic solution, Marco Maier wrote for Contra Magazin.

"The West is always trying to demonize the Russian leader and present the country as hostile but, for his part, Putin is always expressly diplomatic, he is always defusing tensions. Above all, it is clear that Putin is not interested in getting Russia entangled in a war with the West," he noted.

Let alone a nuclear war.

Comment: Another example of leadership the world needs to see, as opposed to the snakes in suits in the West:


Bomb

Russian airstrikes in Syria have nothing to do with migrants fleeing to Europe

refugee migrant
© REUTERS/ Dimitris Michalakis
The airstrikes conducted by the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria against Islamic State militants have not caused any significant refugee exodus to Europe, Amin Awad, the Middle East director for the UN refugee agency UNHCR, told a briefing in Geneva.

According to Awad, Russia's airstrikes and increased fighting near the Syrian city of Aleppo contributed to the "dynamic of displacement", but did not contribute much the refugee influx.

"The latest fighting, whether ground fighting or airstrikes have not contributed too much to the exodus... across the international border to make them refugees. That did not happen," Awad was quoted as saying by Reuters.

Comment: Of course Russia's mission in Syria is to defeat the forces causing this mass exodus. Also see:

The simple truth: The U.S. caused Europe's refugee crisis


Gold Coins

The Islamic State meets the laws of economics

ISIS gold coin
The Caliphate faces an enemy more deadly than the bombs being dropped upon it. It has not been able to construct a viable economy to provide all of the necessities that a society requires and people will not wait forever to fill their stomachs or for the lights to work.

A film released at the end of August by the Islamic State heralds the coming of a new gold Dinar currency. Najeh Ibrahim, a former member of the Islamist Gamaa Islamiyah says that this tells the world that the Islamic State is a sovereign state and tells Moslems that their dignity and economic power is being restored.

In November of 2014, the idea of the gold Dinar was first announced. There was a debate within the leading circles of the Islamic State if it was a sound economic plan. In spite of the doubts by some, the accumulation of gold and silver for the coins was undertaken, but little more was said of the new currency, until the film The Rise of the Caliphate: The Return of the Gold Dinar presented the issue as a part of the strategy of the Islamic State to destroy the United States and the West and to create an independent caliphate economy.


Comment: And how exactly did they manage to acquire enough gold and silver to make enough coinage to allegedly support this independent economy?


"Return of the Gold Dinar" continues the IS practice of tying every action to the Abbasid Caliphate that ruled much of the Middle Eastern region from 750 to the middle of the thirteenth century. What was an Islamic Empire not much different from the Persian and Egyptian Empires before it minted its own coinage. The new coins are to display religious symbols like those on the original coins. Baghdadi would like his followers to imagine that they are a continuation of the long ago caliphate with only a mere seven hundred and fifty years disruption.

Comment: Considering how much ground the Syrian Army has made with the help of Russian intervention, it's not likely to be long before ISIS is wiped off the earth and all their dreams of grandeur blow away in the wake of Russian bombers.


Snakes in Suits

According to Hillary, VA scandal wasn't that big of a deal

Now comes the next test for Hillary Clinton's inevitability as the Democrats' nominee. During an appearance on MSNBC's Rachel Maddow show (and really... where else would it be) Hillary got into a conversation with the host about the VA scandal. That should be a fairly easy one to handle, right? You condemn the awful, systemic failures of the agency, critique the "fixes" put in place thus far, suggest what else you would do to take care of our wounded warriors and move on.

But in Maddow World, nothing is every that simple. She quickly trapped Clinton into blowing the entire scandal off as not that big of a deal.
Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton says the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) scandal is not as "widespread" a problem as coverage of the incident would indicate...

The former first lady blamed Republicans for using the issue as part of an "ideological agenda" and said they want the VA to "fail."

"Now nobody would believe that from the coverage you see, and the constant berating of the VA that comes from the Republicans, in - in part in pursuit of this ideological agenda that they have," Clinton said.

"They try to create a downward spiral, don't fund it to the extent that it needs to be funded, because they want it to fail, so then we can argue for privatization."

Senate Democrats blocked a bill to fund the VA earlier this month in order to negotiate a larger budget deal.

Clinton said veterans often report having a positive experience with the VA when they get treatment through the agency.
Assuming you can stand it, here's the video of that portion of the interview.


Comment: Seems like Hillary was trying to downplay the corruption and ineptitude of her fellow psychopaths, and at the same time blame it on Republicans to try and make herself look better as a Presidential candidate. Problem is that her wishful thinking has caused her to come off as both totally aloof and uncaring when it comes to the people that has been affected by the mismanagement within the VA.


Attention

Genocide case against Bosnian Serb Ratko Mladic: Defense witness found dead in hotel room

Image
© Martin Meissner / Reuters Former Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladic appears in court at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in the Hague, June 3, 2011.
A defense witness at the genocide and war crimes tribunal against Bosnian Serb General Ratko Mladic has been found dead in a hotel room in The Hague. The Dutch police say nothing suspicious or criminal in his death ahead of giving testimony in the ICTY.

Dusan Dunjic, 65, was a forensic pathologist from Belgrade who was due to speak before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), which accuses Mladic of orchestrating a massacre and attempted genocide during the Bosnian war of 1992-1995, especially in the case of the Bosnian-Muslim town of Srebrenica in 1995.


Dutch police immediately launched an investigation on Thursday, but despite the suspicious circumstances of the death, authorities say they have "no reason to suspect that a crime had been committed." A police spokesman declined to give further details on Thursday.

The Bosnian-Serb General spent 14 years in hiding, as many Serbs, including his former lieutenants - as well as his family - aided him in evading capture. In his time as general, Mladic oversaw the war, including being at the helm of the siege of Sarajevo, which took three years, and the Srebrenica episode of 1995, which is what forms the core of the accusations of genocide.

Comment: The truth about the Srebrenica 'genocide', 20 yrs later:
It is quite obvious that neither Radovan Karadzic nor Ratko Mladic ever gave any orders to commit massacres. Had they wanted to issue such orders, they would have kept away from the scene and not done what Mladic did that day: bring in several bus loads of reporters and then go on TV to publicly promise the Bosnian-Muslim civilians that he personally guaranteed their safety. It is absolutely clear to me that Mladic and the Bosnian-Serbs walked into a trap carefully laid by the USA.
...
While it might be comforting for them to see Karadzic and Mladic in jail at the Hague, they might not be so happy at the idea that the real culprits are still free, especially if some of these culprits include Bosnian-Muslim officials from the Sarajevo government.
...
Even though the ICTY had just deemed Erdemovic "unfit to be questioned," the "unverified and unchallenged (and unchallengeable) testimony of this sick man and mass killer still facing his own trial and sentencing" (Prof. Edward Herman) was used to issue arrest warrants for Karadzic and Mladic.
...
To justify the indictments of Karadzic and Mladic, it has been a singular goal of the ICTY to support and prop up the original estimate of 7,000 - 8,000 despite the lack of hard evidence and some breathtaking inconsistencies in official documents and indictments. There is unmistakable evidence that the Bosnian government and the ICTY conflated casualties from across Bosnia with those from Srebrenica to arrive at the inflated official figure.
Given the politically driven nature of the ICTY, the death of this witness is very suspicious, to say the least. Dead men tell no tales.


Bomb

Baghdad allows Russia to bomb ISIL running from Syria Into Iraq

Russian bomber pilot
© Sputink
As Russian airstrikes push ISIL terrorists from Syria into Iraq, Moscow and Baghdad agreed to hit the militants in Iraq, said Hakem al-Zameli, the head of the Iraqi Parliament's National Security and Defense Commission, according to Fars News Agency.

ISIL militants aren't going to find a safe haven from Russian airstrikes in Iraq after the country's parliament gave Russia the green light to conduct airstrikes against ISIL targets in Iraq.

"Iraq agreed with Russia, which leads the joint data center, to hit the ISIL militants heading from Syria into Iraq," al-Zameli said, highlighting the fact that the move would also cut off ISIL supply routes from Iraq into Syria, as cited by Fars.

Star of David

Prime Minister Netanyahu and historical revisionism: Hitler & the Mufti - (Official transcript November 28, 1941)

Hitler & The Mufti
© Unknown
The following is the official record of the conversation between Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin al-Husseini in Berlin. You may note that while the Leader of National Socialist Germany seems to be committed to the battle against world Jewry, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem is only concerned with Arab and Palestinian's interests as one would expect him to be. In the entire text there is not a single reference to 'Jew burning' as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu suggested yesterday.


Comment: As a brief reminder, this article 'Mask is slipping: Netanyahu says Palestinian mufti inspired Holocaust', quotes Netanyahu's words:
"Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, 'If you expel them, they'll all come here [Palestine].' "

According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: "So what should I do with them?" to which the Mufti replied: "Burn them."
As the old saying goes, "ya just can't make this stuff up", unless you are Benjamin Netanyahu that is, who makes stuff up all the time, especially when it is to lay the blame and guilt on the victims.