
© Anti Hillary blog
The intense anti-Russian campaign in the West is a sign of weakness rather than strength. The Russian air defence system in Syria has
closed down the US's military options. Hillary Clinton knows it and her policies in Syria
if she is elected President will be simply a continuation of Obama's.October 2016 will one day be recognised as one of those months - like
October 1962 and
October 1973 -
when the world passed through a period of great danger. The cause of the danger was the
collapse in September of the Kerry-Lavrov agreement and the resulting stand-off this October between the US and Russia in Syria. This culminated in high level discussions within the US government about possible attacks on Syrian army bases, followed by public threats from Russia to shoot down US aircraft if such attacks took place. As The Duran reported - but as the Western media has conspicuously failed to do -
following these threats from Russia, the US backed down.These events have been
barely reported in the West. Instead what we have witnessed is a
deafening cacophony of abuse of Russia for its actions in Syria, with the country baselessly accused of war crimes, and with things written and said about its political leadership which go far beyond what was written and said even during the height of the Ukrainian crisis in 2014.
At one level this abuse is an
attempt to embarrass the Russians to call off the Syrian army's offensive on the Jihadi held districts of eastern Aleppo. However it undoubtedly also
reflects the huge anger and sense of humiliation in Washington and in certain other Western capitals caused by the US climbdown earlier in the month. The intensity of the media campaign against Russia is however creating something of
a climate of fear, with most people unaware that the most dangerous moment of the crisis has in fact already passed.Much of this
fear is centred on the personality of Hillary Clinton, now widely expected to be the next US President. Based on her record and her statements, she is widely
supposed to be a hardline foreign policy hawk who has never seen a war she didn't like or want to join, and who is widely
expected to escalate dramatically the confrontation with Russia in Syria and elsewhere. Many also point to Hillary Clinton's known previous
support for a no fly zone in Syria, and her comments on the campaign trail, which many see as suggesting that she plans one still.
Is all this however true? Is the greatest moment of confrontation between the US and Russia in Syria still to come? Will things really get far more dangerous if Hillary Clinton becomes President? Are we really looking at World War III? In my opinion
these fears are wrong. The great confrontation has already taken place, and it took place this October. A direct clash between the US and the Russian militaries in Syria
was avoided, and there is now no possibility that it will happen.
Comment: Synopsis of the Russian report to the UN Security Council: Russian UN mission finds over 16,000 Syrians killed by US-backed rebels since February