Puppet MastersS


Magnify

Syria invites UN Security Council, OPCW inspectors to airfield - representative to UN

Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)
© AP/Peter DejongOrganization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)
Syrian Arab Republic's Permanent Representative to the UN said that Syria is inviting members of the UN Security Council, as well as inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons into the country.

Syria is inviting members of the UN Security Council, as well as inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) into the country to inspect both the airfield hit by US missiles and the town attacked by chemical weapons to discover who was responsible for the chemical attack, the Syrian Arab Republic's Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar Jaafari said on Wednesday at a Security Council meeting.

"My country has sent to you and to other members of the council a letter inviting you and inviting the Director General of the OPCW, inviting him to send a technical mission to Khan Sheikhoun and to Ash Sha'irat airbase to uncover the truth," Jaafari stated.

Jaafari noted the government has extended the invitations because it wants to know who was responsible to the chemical attack last week in Khan Sheikhoun.

Magnify

Lavrov to Tillerson: To avoid Idlib 'attack' probe means international community does not seek the truth

LavrovTillerson
© Sergei Karpukhin / ReutersUS Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
If an international inquiry into the chemical attack in Syria's Idlib is not instituted, it will mean that the international community is not interested in establishing the truth about the matter, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after talks with his US counterpart in Moscow. "I would like to stress that we are 100 percent sure that, if our colleagues in the UN or in The Hague will steer away from this investigation, it will basically mean that they do not want to find out the truth," the Russian Foreign Minister said, adding, that Russia "will insist on" launching the investigation.

At the same time, Lavrov noted that Moscow is ready to support the idea of launching an international inquiry into the alleged chemical weapons attack in Idlib. He also stressed that any UN Security Council resolution that focused on solely blaming Damascus and not on investigating the Idlib incident would be counterproductive.

During the joint news conference, the US State Secretary Rex Tillerson repeated his claims that the US had information which "confirms that the US strikes against the Syrian troops were justified."

"The perspective from the US, supported by the facts that we have, are conclusive that the chemical weapons attack carried out in Syria was planned, directed and executed by the Syrian regime forces and we are quite confident of that," the top US diplomat stated. Tillerson underlined, however, that the US had "no information that indicates that there was any involvement by the Russian forces into this attack."

The Russian Foreign Minister went on to say that President Vladimir Putin is ready to return to implementing the memorandum of understanding on flight safety in Syria with the United States; if Washington reaffirms its commitment to the goal of fighting terrorism. He emphasized, however, that Moscow still considers the US claims concerning the chemical weapons being used by the Syrian government forces "unfounded" and "lacking evidence."


Comment: The press conference is quite informative as to the positions of Lavrov and Tillerson on various issues and the willingness of both statesmen to create opportunities to cooperate between the two countries. They also respectfully and carefully articulated their differences and expectations regarding such. However, proof will be what they respectively do and what is actually achieved.

Some additional excerpts of the press conference:
Lavrov: Moscow's calls for an "independent and thorough investigation" in both Idlib and Sha'irat incidents. "We have other affects available to us, and we are not trying to impose anything on anyone" but Moscow doesn't believe it is fair or just to place all blame on Damascus prior to an objective probe of the chemical attack. Lavrov expressed that a UN security council resolution would be counterproductive and may only legitimize accusations against Damascus.

Lavrov and Tillerson discussed the "special responsibility" Moscow and Washington bear for maintaining "strategic stability." This will include "business-like, pragmatic" discussions on arms reductions, Lavrov said. Business interests in both nations want to reverse the trend of negative relations between Moscow and Washington, he added.

Lavrov: "We are open to this dialogue..and not just dialogue, but [to] working together," in areas of mutual interest. "We understand each other better after today's talks."

Tillerson: "There's a low level of trust between our two countries. The world's two foremost nuclear powers cannot have this kind of relationship." He then stated Moscow and Washington should end tit-for-tat strategies which can provoke tensions. Moscow and Washington have agreed to create a working group dedicated toward solving low-level problems. "We both believe in a stable and unified Syria,"

Tillerson: "They have brought this on themselves" (regarding international pressure against Assad). "We think its important that Assad's departure is done in an orderly way. The final outcome in our view does not provide a role for Assad or the Assad family. We will not accept that, we don't believe the world will accept that,"

Lavrov: "Daesh is a much bigger threat than Assad's regime. If we change the regime, it is very possible we cannot defeat Daesh and that we will be defeated."

Lavrov said the US and Moscow are not "world's apart" on many issues, as one reporter had suggested. "We need to learn the lessons of the past, otherwise we cannot be successful in the present," he said.

Tillerson said cybertools have "emerged" to influence elections as well as interfere with the software systems relied on by weapons systems.

Lavrov: "I can only confirm that we are interested in having close cooperation on cybercrime. The Obama administration turned down..and did not respond" to a proposal from Moscow to work together on cybercrime.

Lavrov said that he had requested evidence that Russia interfered with the US elections, but that he has seen nothing resembling fact. Some parties want to "torpedo" US-Russia relations whether to achieve political goals or foreign policy gains. But there has not been anything resembling bulletproof evidence that Russia actively meddled in America's 2016 election.

Lavrov still thinks an accord can be reached: "We would welcome this kind of cooperation." With regards to the working groups, the group would respond to issues as they arise, especially "artificial" problems that may emerge.



Arrow Down

Australia beckons a war with China

China & Australia
© Bowen Press
Australia is sleep-walking into a confrontation with China. Wars can happen suddenly in an atmosphere of mistrust and provocation, especially if a minor power, like Australia, abandons its independence for an "alliance" with an unstable superpower.

The United States is at a critical moment. Having exported its all-powerful manufacturing base, run down its industry and reduced millions of its once-hopeful people to poverty, principal American power today is brute force. When Donald Trump launched his missile attack on Syria — following his bombing of a mosque and a school — he was having dinner in Florida with the President of China, Xi Jinping.

Trumps attack on Syria had little to do with chemical weapons. It was, above all, to show his detractors and doubters in Washington's war-making institutions — the Pentagon, the CIA, the Congress — how tough he was and prepared to risk a war with Russia. He had spilled blood in Syria, a Russian protectorate; he was surely now on the team. The attack was also meant to say directly to President Xi, his dinner guest: this is how we deal with those who challenge the top dog.

China has long received this message. In its rise as the world's biggest trader and manufacturer, China has been encircled by 400 US military bases — a provocation described by a former Pentagon strategist as "a perfect noose".

This is not Trump's doing. In 2011, President Barack Obama flew to Australia to declare, in an address to parliament, what became known as the "pivot to Asia": the biggest build-up of US air and naval forces in the Asia Pacific region since the Second World War. The target was China. America had a new and entirely unnecessary enemy. Today, low-draft US warships, missiles, bombers, drones operate on China's doorstep.

In July, one of the biggest US-led naval exercises ever staged, the biennial Operation Talisman Sabre, will rehearse a blockade of the sea lanes through which run China's commercial lifelines. Based on a Air-Sea Battle Plan for war with China, which prescribes a preemptive "blinding" attack, this "war game" will be played by Australia.

Red Flag

FBI obtained secret FISA warrant to investigate Trump advisor Carter Page last year

carter page
As part of its investigation into possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, the FBI reportedly obtained a secret FISA warrant last summer to monitor the communications of President Donald Trump's former campaign adviser, Carter Page.

On Tuesday, the Washington Post reported through unnamed sources that, last July, the FBI and Justice Department convinced the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court that there was probable cause to believe Page had acted as an agent for Russia and "knowingly engaged in clandestine intelligence activities on behalf of Moscow."

No criminal charges ever arose as a result of the FISA warrant, the report said.

Page is the only American to have his communications targeted by a FISA warrant in connection with the Russian probe in 2016, officials told the Washington Post.

Bad Guys

White House 'evidence' confirms Assad wasn't behind Idlib chemical attack

White helmets terroristen
The rock solid evidence that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack is weak and heavily relies on social media.

The White House has finally released some "evidence" they claim shows Assad carried out last week's chemical attack, and the "evidence" was mostly derived from social media accounts, sprinkled with the standard..."we have more intelligence, but we cannot release at this time" rhetoric.

For his part, Secretary of Defense James Mattis looked to quickly quash doubts over which party was responsible for the "sarin gas" attacks, saying there was "no doubt" that the Assad regime "planned it, orchestrated it, and executed it."

Comment: The fake news circus continues. RFE/RL reports that 'Mad Dog Mattis' insists the Pentagon has proof of Assad's guilt, but that Russia did not play a role and the US should 'maintain its focus on defeating ISIS in Syria':
"I have personally reviewed the intelligence, and there is no doubt the Syrian regime is responsible for the decision to attack and for the attack itself" on the town of Khan Sheikhun on April 4, killing 87 people, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said.

While some U.S. officials have said they believe Russia played a role, noting it had forces stationed at the same air base where Syrian planes allegedly launched the attack, Mattis said the United States does not have any proof of Russian involvement.

"It was very clear that the Assad regime planned it, orchestrated it, and executed it, and beyond that we can't say right now," he said.

Mattis warned that if Syria uses chemical weapons again, it will "pay a very, very stiff price."

But he insisted that the United States remains focused on its primary mission in Syria: defeating the Islamic State group.
Further reading: Faked news: White Helmets handle deadly toxic 'sarin gas' without gloves, masks and having a smoke


Bad Guys

Flashback War's 'Prince of Darkness' or untouchable useful idiot? John McCain illegally travels to Syria, meets with "rebels" - Not a peep from the MSM

John McCain
© Unknown

Comment: McCain visited Syria less than two months ago, i.e. just two months before the jihadists' false-flag chemical weapons attack. Oh to be a fly on the wall for this heartfelt reunion of ideological blood brothers.


Shortly after the mainstream media erupted in hysteria and neo-McCarthyistic attacks against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn for having a routine conversation with the Russian Ambassador and for once having dinner with the President of Russia as part of an event, aging warmonger Senator John McCain recently announced that he had traveled illegally into Syria to meet with U.S. troops illegally stationed there as well as to meet with ISIS supporter and President of Turkey, Recep Tayip Erdogan. McCain also met with the Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz and crown prince Sheikh Mohammad bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. In addition, McCain also met with Kurdish fighters on the ground in Syria.

On February 22, McCain's spokeswoman, Julie Tarallo, confirmed that McCain had made the trip, saying it was a "valuable opportunity to assess dynamic conditions on the ground in Syria and Iraq."

Question

Trump's North Korea reframe?

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and China's President Xi Jinping
© Carlos Barria / ReutersU.S. President Donald Trump (L) and China's President Xi Jinping
Prior U.S. presidents framed the North Korean nuclear program as a problem between the United States and North Korea, with China as an unhelpful third party with its own interests. That framing was weak and useless. North Korea did whatever it wanted to do.

President Trump recently changed the frame. Now it's not so much a problem between the United States and North Korea as it is a branding battle between China and the U.S., with North Korea being the less-important part of the equation. President Trump has said clearly and repeatedly that if China doesn't fix the problem in its own backyard, the USA will step in to do what China couldn't get done.

See the power in that framing? China doesn't want a weak "brand."

Comment: Trump may be trying to apply his negotiating tactics to the various situation he faces, but there is a world of difference between politics and business.. And the "controlled chaos" it is said he functions well in, can easily spiral into real chaos. Only time will tell if Adams' optimism is justified. More bad news. He also appears to be falling more and more under the influence of the military junta that really runs the White House:

On the way out? Trump kneecaps Bannon


Jet4

Trump "withholds" proof he likely doesn't have on bogus Syrian gas attack claims

mattis saudi prince
© DoD photo by Sgt. Amber I. SmithDefense Secretary Jim Mattis welcomes Saudi Deputy Crown Prince and Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman to the Pentagon, March 16, 2017
Despite President Trump's well-known trouble with the truth, his White House now says "trust us" on its Syrian-sarin charges while withholding the proof that it claims to have, reports Robert Parry.

After making the provocative and dangerous charge that Russia is covering up Syria's use of chemical weapons, the Trump administration withheld key evidence to support its core charge that a Syrian warplane dropped sarin on a northern Syrian town on April 4.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis welcomes Saudi Deputy Crown Prince and Defense Minister Mohammed bin Salman to the Pentagon, March 16, 2017. (DoD photo by Sgt. Amber I. Smith)

A four-page white paper, prepared by President Trump's National Security Council staff and released by the White House on Tuesday, claimed that U.S. intelligence has proof that the plane carrying the sarin gas left from the Syrian military airfield that Trump ordered hit by Tomahawk missiles on April 6.

Light Sabers

Russian and Syrian UN ambassadors dispense with pleasantries, blast hypocrisy and dishonesty of US/UK/France resolution against Syria

russian un envoy
Russia is set to veto a UN Security Resolution jointly proposed by the US, UK and France. The resolution is a slightly revised version of the one proposed last week which essentially calls for an investigation into the infamous chemical weapons attack in Idlib Governorate, while pre-assigning guilt to Syria, a party that by any objective means does not and could not bear responsibility for the attack.

Russia by contrast, calls for a full, independent investigation which does not put an undue burden of proof on the Syrian government, while simultaneously failing to question the acts of terrorists groups who are known to have used chemical weapons in Syria.

In a heated session of the UN Security Council, acting Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Vladimir Safronkov blasted the hypocrisy, duplicity and dishonesty of the countries who have authored the latest resolution on Syria.

Safronkov said that the statement from the UK shows that Britain wants to complicate the political process by acting confrontational rather than cooperative. He said that Britain harbours a fear that the US and Russia might be able to cooperate and seeks to disrupt such a process.

Comment: (UPDATE:) Russia vetoed the resolution (along with Bolivia - China, Ethiopia and Kazakhstan abstained).
"The main objection to the resolution is that it apportioned blame prior to an objective outside investigation of the incident... The outcome of the vote was predestined, because we disagreed categorically with a document that was fundamentally misconceived," said Vladimir Safronkov, Russia's deputy envoy at the Security Council, who also accused other states and international organizations of making "no effort" to inspect the site of the alleged attack.

Accepting the resolution would also "legitimize" the April 7 air strike carried out by the US on the Shayrat airbase in northern Syria, from which Washington claims government planes carrying the deadly sarin nerve gas took off, Safronkov said.

Unlike the earlier drafts of the resolution on the alleged incident, the final document did not lay the blame for it on Damascus. It also referred to the incident as the "reported use of chemical weapons" rather than stating that such use did take place as a fact.

However, the draft leaned heavily on the Syrian government in terms of demands to submit to an investigation of the incident. It said inspectors chosen by the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) must be given prompt and unrestricted access to "any and all sites" they choose, provided with flight plans and logs they request, and given the names of military officers "in command of any aircraft" they probe. Damascus would also have to "arrange meetings requested, including with generals or other officers, within no more than five days of the date on which such meeting is requested."



Biohazard

Spicer's "Hitler didn't use chemical weapons" gaffe grows wings

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer
© Joshua Roberts / Reuters
The Anne Frank Center has demanded US press secretary Sean Spicer be fired after he claimed Adolf Hitler "didn't even sink to using chemical weapons" in a comment overlooking Nazi Germany's use of gas chambers during World War II.

In the midst of Genocide Awareness Month, the White House spokesperson appeared to skip over major facts about the Holocaust. Asked during a briefing on Tuesday about the relationship between Russia and Syria, Spicer brought Hitler and his apparent 'lack' of chemical weapons use into the equation.

"We didn't use chemical weapons in World War II. You had someone as despicable as Hitler, who didn't even sink to using chemical weapons. So you have to if you are Russia, ask yourself is this a country and a regime that you want to align yourself with," he said.

Spicer then sought to clarify the Hitler remark in a rambling, sometimes incoherent, answer to the press: "I think that when you come to sarin gas, he was not using the gas on his own people the same way that Assad is doing.


Comment: Boris Johnson said something similar in 2013.
Appearing on Channel 4's The Last Leg to discuss the Syria crisis in September of 2013, Johnson, who was then mayor of London, claimed that "not even Hitler used chemical weapons, as far as I can remember," seemingly forgetting about the several million Jews, homosexuals, Romani people, dissidents, and people with disabilities that were gassed to death in extermination camps.

Mindful of the use of Zyklon B in the concentration camps, the host said: "There is an argument to say that he did use chemical weapons at some point."

Gaffe-prone Johnson backtracked, saying: "In the theatre of war, as far as I can remember, and I stand to be corrected on this, I don't believe that even the Nazis used chemical weapons."
Technically, they're right. The Germans didn't engage in chemical warfare. Winston Churchill would've liked to, in contrast. And the Americans had no problem with Saddam Hussein when he was doing so during the Iran-Iraq war. But regardless. Bad comparison. Godwin's law prevails. And now that the media has skewered Spicer for "going there", maybe they'll self-reflect a bit and stop calling Trump Hitler. We'll see.

In the meantime, the Israeli Holocaust museum has joined the chorus:
"In light of recent statements made by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, encourages him to visit the Yad Vashem website to learn about the Holocaust and its period in history," the museum said in a statement published on its website.

It expressed "deep concern" over "inaccurate and insensitive use of terms related to the Holocaust" in Spicer's comments, adding that such statements reveal his "profound lack of knowledge of events of the Second World War."

The Jerusalem-based center also stressed that the press secretary's comments actually play into the hands of those who are willing to "distort history."
Spicer wasn't having the best day. While trying the explain himself, he made another gaffe, saying the U.S. is trying to "destabilize" Syria (i.e. "the conflict there").


Then he said it AGAIN to Wolf Blitzer: