OF THE
TIMES

"I have personally reviewed the intelligence, and there is no doubt the Syrian regime is responsible for the decision to attack and for the attack itself" on the town of Khan Sheikhun on April 4, killing 87 people, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said.Further reading: Faked news: White Helmets handle deadly toxic 'sarin gas' without gloves, masks and having a smoke
While some U.S. officials have said they believe Russia played a role, noting it had forces stationed at the same air base where Syrian planes allegedly launched the attack, Mattis said the United States does not have any proof of Russian involvement.
"It was very clear that the Assad regime planned it, orchestrated it, and executed it, and beyond that we can't say right now," he said.
Mattis warned that if Syria uses chemical weapons again, it will "pay a very, very stiff price."
But he insisted that the United States remains focused on its primary mission in Syria: defeating the Islamic State group.

"The main objection to the resolution is that it apportioned blame prior to an objective outside investigation of the incident... The outcome of the vote was predestined, because we disagreed categorically with a document that was fundamentally misconceived," said Vladimir Safronkov, Russia's deputy envoy at the Security Council, who also accused other states and international organizations of making "no effort" to inspect the site of the alleged attack.
Accepting the resolution would also "legitimize" the April 7 air strike carried out by the US on the Shayrat airbase in northern Syria, from which Washington claims government planes carrying the deadly sarin nerve gas took off, Safronkov said.
Unlike the earlier drafts of the resolution on the alleged incident, the final document did not lay the blame for it on Damascus. It also referred to the incident as the "reported use of chemical weapons" rather than stating that such use did take place as a fact.
However, the draft leaned heavily on the Syrian government in terms of demands to submit to an investigation of the incident. It said inspectors chosen by the UN and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) must be given prompt and unrestricted access to "any and all sites" they choose, provided with flight plans and logs they request, and given the names of military officers "in command of any aircraft" they probe. Damascus would also have to "arrange meetings requested, including with generals or other officers, within no more than five days of the date on which such meeting is requested."
Appearing on Channel 4's The Last Leg to discuss the Syria crisis in September of 2013, Johnson, who was then mayor of London, claimed that "not even Hitler used chemical weapons, as far as I can remember," seemingly forgetting about the several million Jews, homosexuals, Romani people, dissidents, and people with disabilities that were gassed to death in extermination camps.Technically, they're right. The Germans didn't engage in chemical warfare. Winston Churchill would've liked to, in contrast. And the Americans had no problem with Saddam Hussein when he was doing so during the Iran-Iraq war. But regardless. Bad comparison. Godwin's law prevails. And now that the media has skewered Spicer for "going there", maybe they'll self-reflect a bit and stop calling Trump Hitler. We'll see.
Mindful of the use of Zyklon B in the concentration camps, the host said: "There is an argument to say that he did use chemical weapons at some point."
Gaffe-prone Johnson backtracked, saying: "In the theatre of war, as far as I can remember, and I stand to be corrected on this, I don't believe that even the Nazis used chemical weapons."
"In light of recent statements made by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center, encourages him to visit the Yad Vashem website to learn about the Holocaust and its period in history," the museum said in a statement published on its website.Spicer wasn't having the best day. While trying the explain himself, he made another gaffe, saying the U.S. is trying to "destabilize" Syria (i.e. "the conflict there").
It expressed "deep concern" over "inaccurate and insensitive use of terms related to the Holocaust" in Spicer's comments, adding that such statements reveal his "profound lack of knowledge of events of the Second World War."
The Jerusalem-based center also stressed that the press secretary's comments actually play into the hands of those who are willing to "distort history."
Comment: The press conference is quite informative as to the positions of Lavrov and Tillerson on various issues and the willingness of both statesmen to create opportunities to cooperate between the two countries. They also respectfully and carefully articulated their differences and expectations regarding such. However, proof will be what they respectively do and what is actually achieved.
Some additional excerpts of the press conference: