Comment: The psychologists had previously asked the court to interview CIA agents to prove that they were just following orders, but that motion was denied on the grounds that questioning the agents would reveal important national security information.
U.S. District Judge Justin Quackenbush refused to immediately rule in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the lawsuit on the behalf of three former detainees and argued the psychologists were the architects of what became the CIA's torture program following the Sept. 11 attacks. The men were subjected to physical assaults and sleep deprivation, forced to stand for days in diapers with their arms chained overhead, doused with icy water and stuffed into boxes.
Quackenbush said the evidence warrants a trial on the issues. The trial is set for Sept. 5.
The case will move forward for the representatives of the estate of Gul Rahman, who was "starved, sleepless and freezing" before he died of hypothermia while chained in a prison cell following extended interrogation. Quackenbush, however, said he has reservations regarding the evidence as it applies to the two living detainees: Suleiman Abdullah Salim and Mohamed Ahmed Ben Soud.
The judge said he would review the case and issue a written ruling regarding his position on the other two men. He also granted the ACLU's request to use at trial the Senate Intelligence Committee Study on the CIA Detention and Interrogation Program, completed in 2012 and made public in 2014.
Quackenbush closed the hearing by urging the lawyers to try to settle the case and avoid a costly trial. He noted that the contract psychologists James Mitchell and John Jessen had with the government indemnified them for any judgments. The psychologists' lawyers [are] being paid out of a pot of money provided by taxpayers and established in an indemnity contract.













Comment: "This is a classic example of being left holding the bag," Balderdash! The "architect" psychologists researched, designed and implemented 'the bag' and were present at torture sessions for multiple detainees.
The judge has the following options: 1) find the psychologists guilty of aiding and abetting torture, 2) limit the claims against the psychologists, 3) dismiss ACLU's suit. There does not seem to be any repercussions attributable to the CIA, a "protected" agency above the law.
RT further reports: See also: