OF THE
TIMES
North Korea's air defenses are so weak that we had to notify them we were flying B1 bombers near their airspace - they didn't even know our aircraft were coming. This reminds me of the "fearsome" Republican Guard that Saddam had in the Persian Gulf. Turns out we had total air superiority and just bombed the crap out of them and they surrendered in droves. We have already seen what happens when an army has huge amounts of outdated Soviet weaponry versus the most technologically advanced force in the world. It's a slaughter. Also, there has to be weaponry up the USA's sleeve that would be used in the event of an attack. Don't forget our cyber warfare abilities that would undoubtedly be implemented as well. This writer seems to always hype Russia's capabilities and denigrate the US's capabilities. Sure, Russia has the capacity to nuke the US into smithereens, and vice versa. But if its a head to head shooting war, the US and NATO would dominate. FACT.

"Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the U.K. needed U.S. support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded."The Shah's subsequent reign and stranglehold over Iran sowed the seeds of anti-Western discontent. The Iranian people overthrew the Shah in the historic 1979 revolution, and have almost completely rejected Western influence ever since. Shortly afterward, the U.S. backed Saddam Hussein in Iraq to take out Iran in a nonsensically brutal conflict that lasted close to a decade, nearly killing off an entire generation. Further, the U.S. knew Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons against the Iranian people and enabled him to do so - all the while secretly selling arms to the Iranians in order to maximize the death toll.

Navalny addressed the commission with a heated speech asking them "to do the right thing once in their lives" but the head of the body, Ella Pamfilova, harshly replied that she and her colleagues had the same right to hold a political position as everyone else, but the registration procedure was regulated by a clear and unambiguous law.
"You are raising funds illegally and you are turning young people into morons. You can dress me in a uniform or paint a beard on my face in pictures, but I am still ready to meet your voters, despite all insults that you are allowing yourself to make," Pamfilova said at the Central Elections Commission session.
The official was referring to Navalny's practice of fundraising through the internet in which the activist claimed that he had the right to run for presidency. In late November a court in Moscow ruled in favor of a man who demanded that Navalny's elections headquarters return his $860 donation and pay $30 more in court fees. The plaintiff claimed he had donated the money to Navalny's presidential campaign, but after the transfer was completed he learned that Russian law precludes the activist - or indeed any person with an unserved criminal sentence - from becoming a presidential candidate.
At the Sunday convention, Navalny threatened that the rejection of his application for the election would trigger a "voters' strike" and on Monday he called upon other would-be participants of the 2018 race to quit as a sign of protest. In a video message posted on his web-site the activist said that he and his allies would not dissolve the election headquarters but will use it for promotion of ideas seeking to undermine voter turnout as well as general trust in the country's political system. He added a promise to contest the rejection in court. "Definitely, unconditionally we will appeal this decision in a court. In the Constitutional Court and everywhere in the world where it is possible," Navalny told reporters.
Fishing Expedition (def)- any inquiry carried on without any clearly defined plan or purpose in the hope of discovering useful information....dictionary.comAfter more than a year of incriminating media coverage, less than half of Americans (49 percent) believe it's "likely" that Donald Trump committed a crime connected to Russia's alleged meddling in the 2016 election. That's according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll that was released in December. And, while a mere 19 percent of the people surveyed think there's "solid evidence" to support the allegations, 30 percent believe it's "just a suspicion". (Another 44 percent think it's unlikely Trump committed a crime.)
Comment: Behind the Headlines: 'Containing' Russia-China and Global Economic Collapse