Puppet MastersS


Airplane Paper

MoD accidentally reveals British drones fire thermobaric missiles in Syria

Drone and missile test
© UnknownAn RAF reaper drone • Test of thermobaric missile warhead
The Ministry of Defence has revealed for the first time - seemingly accidentally - that British drones are firing thermobaric weapons in Syria. The disclosure comes in an Freedom of Information (FoI) response to Drone Wars detailing the use of Reaper drones over the previous three months.

In the response, officials give a breakdown of the type of Hellfire missiles fired, stating that 19 AGM-114N4 and 44 AGM-114R2 had been used. The 'N' version of the missile uses a Metal Augmented Charge (MAC) warhead that contains a thermobaric explosive fill using aluminium with the explosive mixture. When the warhead detonates, the aluminium mixture is dispersed and rapidly burns. The sustained high pressure explosion is extremely damaging, creating a powerful shock wave and vacuum. Anyone in the vicinity is likely to die from internal organ damage.

Thermobaric weapons, sometimes called 'vacuum' weapons have been condemned by human rights groups and, as the Times reported in 2008 , "the weapons are so controversial that MoD weapons and legal experts spent 18 months debating whether British troops could use them without breaking international law." The 'debate' came to an end when a 'Yes Minister' solution was offered - they "redefined" the weapon as an 'enhanced blast missile'.

Comment: When under controversy, change the definition and reframe the debate. A banned product doesn't produce profits.


Megaphone

SOTT Focus: Joe Quinn on Sputnik: 'Skripal Affair Part of Anglo-American Ideological War Against Russia'

sputnik radio joe quinn
London says it still considers Moscow to be the perpetrator of the attempted poisoning of the Russian ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury. This comes despite the statement by Czech President Milos Zeman, who said that a small amount of A230 toxic substance, similar to Novichok, was produced at the Czech Defense Ministry's Research Institute in 2017. The toxin was then reportedly destroyed. According to the Czech president, his country's intelligence service did not consider the A230 nerve agent to be Novichok, because this name is contributed to A234 agent. However, its military intelligence service reported that A230, too, is named Novichok.

Radio Sputnik discussed London's attempts to convince the world that Russia is the perpetrator of the attempted poisoning of Skripals with Joe Quinn, Sott.net editor, internet essayist, researcher, author.


Bad Guys

Out with the shamed and in with the same: Tax evasion, neo-liberalism and Grenfell, meet the UK's new Home Secretary Sajid Javid

Sajid Javid
© Toby Melville / ReutersSajid Javid
Sajid Javid arrived outside his new place of work at the Home Office with a sense of purpose but he is already being asked questions about his dubious links to a known tax-evading bank.

The UK Supreme Court ruled in 2016 that Deutsche Bank and UBS had set up a "contrived" scheme to allow the banks and their bankers to escape £135mn ($192mn) in tax on bonuses, which was unlawful, according to a Reuters report.

Javid is said to have worked for Deutsche Bank, US President Donald Trump's bank of choice, as a director in 2000 and then as a managing director in 2004. He left the bank in 2009, when his salary would have been around £3mn ($4.1mn) a year, according to Bloomberg, to start a career in politics.

Comment: Sajid is replacing former Home Secretary disgraced Amber Rudd who praised arm sales to Saudis and whose involvement in the Windrush scandal saw her finally lose her position. With current PM's help, she oversaw deportations of people who have lived in the country for decades because they could not provide proof of their citizenship - because the Home Office destroyed the evidence.

He'll feel right at home with the current infestation of duplicitous and rotten members of Parliament: Also check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Perfidious Albion: If Russia is a Rogue State, What is the UK?


Nuke

Israel, not Iran, has an illegal nuclear arms program - here are the details

Dimona nuclear reactor
During an internationally-televised speech, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Iran of lying about its nuclear program after signing the 2015 deal - his remarks have prompted speculations over Tel Aviv's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction.

Israel is widely suspected of possessing weapons of mass destruction, supposedly developed in 1948-1949, with an estimated arsenal of up to 400 warheads. Despite the fact that Mordechai Vanunu, a former worker at the Israeli Dimona nuclear reactor, blew the whistle on Tel Aviv's nuclear program in 1986, Israel still maintains a policy of "nuclear ambiguity" - never denying or admitting to having nuclear arms.


Comment: Sputnik is being polite. Israel's nuclear program is widely, if not officially, acknowledged.


Israel Lied Too?

In the 1950s and 1960s, the Israeli government under Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion reportedly lied to the United States and stonewalled Washington's requests for information on weapons development and refused to accept visits from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Tel Aviv reportedly referred to its Dimona reactor, provided by France, as a "textile plant" and a "metallurgic research installation," allegedly in a bid to hide the truth from American nuclear inspectors.


Comment: Kennedy was adamant about inspections. Then he was assassinated. Israel experienced no more roadblocks after that convenient death.


"I do not know of any other nation, whose neighbors declare that they wish to terminate it, and not only declare, but prepare for it by all means available to them. We must have no illusions that what is declared every day in Cairo, Damascus, Iraq are just words. This is the thought that guides the Arab leaders," Ben-Gurion said after his resignation as prime minister.

Comment:






Info

Abbas says Jews' role in banking and usury got them massacred - apologizes

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
© Eduardo Munoz / ReutersPalestinian President Mahmoud Abbas
Jews in Europe were massacred for centuries because of their "social role related to usury and banks," Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday.

Abbas made the statement in a speech at the beginning of a meeting of the Palestinian National Council, a top PLO body that is convening in Ramallah this week to elect members to two other PLO institutions.

The comments marked the second time in several months that the 83-year-old Palestinian leader spoke about his take on Jewish and Zionist history. In a speech in January at a meeting of the PLO Central Council, Abbas discussed his perspective on Jewish and Zionist history, arguing Israel is a "colonial project with no relationship to Judaism."

His comments in January were met with a highly critical response and accusations of antisemitism by Israeli government officials and Jewish organizations and overshadowed other remarks he made about coexistence and nonviolence.

Abbas's remarks on Monday appear to reflect that the PA president has become less concerned with the ramifications of making comments that Israel and much of the international community likely reject.

"From the 11th century until the Holocaust that took place in Germany, the Jews - who moved to Western and Eastern Europe - were subjected to a massacre every 10 to 15 years. But why did this happen?" Abbas said on Monday, before interjecting, "The Jewish issue that was widespread in all European countries... was not because of their religion, but rather their social role related to usury and banks."

Comment: Theodor Herzl wrote in The Jewish State (p. 91):
"When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties; and at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse."
herzel jews finance
Abbas has since apologized for his remark:
"If people were offended by my statement, especially people of the Jewish faith, I apologize to them. I would like to assure everyone that it was not my intention to do so, and to reiterate my full respect for the Jewish faith, as well as other monotheistic faiths," Abbas said on Friday.

He went on to "reiterate our long-held condemnation of the Holocaust as the most heinous crime in history, and express our sympathy with its victims... Likewise, we condemn anti-Semitism in all its forms, and confirm our commitment to the two-state solution, and to live side by side in peace and security."

The gesture was rejected by Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who responded by calling Abbas a "wretched Holocaust denier."



Briefcase

Latest reshuffle of White House legal team signals more combative approach

ty cobb trump
Ty Cobb (L) President Donald Trump (R)
With Cobb's departure, "the number of people who think the president should talk to Mueller has gotten to zero"...

Another senior member of President Donald Trump's legal team is stepping down, the latest high-level turmoil as the White House grapples with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III's efforts to interview the president - and to subpoena him if necessary.

The shake-up Wednesday was seen as another sign that Trump is seeking a more combative approach to the Russia investigation, which has clouded his presidency from the start and led to criminal charges against several former aides so far.

Red Flag

Proposed bipartisan bill could give any president the power to place US citizens in military detention forever

guantanamo
© Alaa Faqir / Reuters
One of the most outrageous acts of Barack Obama's presidency was his failure to veto the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2012.

The fiscal year 2012 NDAA included provisions that appeared to both codify and expand a power the executive branch had previously claimed to possess - namely, the power to hold individuals, including U.S. citizens, in military detention indefinitely - based on the Authorization to Use Military Force passed by Congress three days after 9/11.

The New York Times warned that the bill could "give future presidents the authority to throw American citizens into prison for life without charges or a trial." Not surprisingly, Obama's decision generated enormous outcry across the political spectrum, from Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, on the right to Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on the left.

However, the NDAA did provide some weak restraints on the executive branch's ability to use this power. In theory, the NDAA's provisions only apply to someone involved with the 9/11 attacks or who "substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces."

But now, incredibly enough, a bipartisan group of six lawmakers, led by Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Tim Kaine, D-Va., is proposing a new AUMF that would greatly expand who the president can place in indefinite military detention, all in the name of restricting presidential power. If the Corker-Kaine bill becomes law as currently written, any president, including Donald Trump, could plausibly claim extraordinarily broad power to order the military to imprison any U.S. citizen, captured in America or not, and hold them without charges essentially forever.

Comment: See also: Senators launch a resolution limiting presidential war powers after Trump's Syria strikes


Attention

Big help! Giuliani effectively says Trump (while President) paid Cohen a $420K slush fund to handle 'things of a personal nature'

Rudy Giuliani
© Fox NewsRudy Giuliani on Fox and Friends
What Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City and Donald Trump's latest legal fixer did last night was to effectively tell Trump's mortal enemy, the Washington Post, that Trump paid his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, a $420,000 slush fund last year to clean up dirt on the President. Cohen is the target of a criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York. Cohen's home, office, hotel room and safety deposit box were raided by the FBI on April 9.

In an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News last evening, and then later with the Washington Post, Giuliani buried both himself and the President deeper into a web of half truths or outright lies while managing to taint the legal work he does at his law firm, Greenberg Traurig, a corporate law behemoth with 2,000 lawyers in 38 offices on three continents.

By the end of the evening one thing was clear - Giuliani had concocted such a shifting, nebulous alibi for Trump that it didn't even hold up to a few hours of media scrutiny let alone a future interview with a Federal prosecutor.

Comment: See also:


Magic Hat

Flashback Down the rabbit hole: Blaming Iran for 9/11

9-11 11 septiembre
© ReutersA firefighter works in rescue operations after the 9/11 attacks in New York.
Largely unreported and unknown to almost everyone is the recent push to re-establish an Iranian role in the 9/11 attacks. To be more specific, some in Washington are currently trying to allege that Iran played a larger role in the 9/11 attacks than the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Why this assertion about Iran- that has been lying fallow for years-is so recently being resurrected raises questions, bears scrutiny, and begs an examination.

Prior to delving into the Iranian revelations, some background is needed to best understand the rather inorganic evolution of this Iranian evidence. As many know, the 9/11 Families have spent the past 16 years trying to hold the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks accountable for the mass murder of our loved ones. First, we fought for the 9/11 Commission so that we might have an independent investigation into the attacks, learn lessons, fix problems, and hold those in government accountable for their failures that contributed to the vast devastation of that horrific day. Next, as an expressly granted right given to us by Congress in the creation of the 2001 Airline Stabilization Act (more commonly known as the 9/11 Victims' Compensation Fund), we attempted to hold all the co-conspirators of the 9/11 attacks accountable in a federal court of law. Notably, to the 9/11 Families the definition of "co-conspirators" was always a "both-and" situation, not the more exclusionary "either-or" scenario. In other words, we wanted any and all of those who played a hand (however large or small) in the murder of our loved ones held accountable.

Trying to hold co-conspirators of the 9/11 attacks accountable in federal court is not as easy as the public might think. First, the U.S. government plays a large role with a strong hand in determining who can be qualified as a "co-conspirator." Notably, this decision historically hinges upon who is "in favor" or "out of favor" with the U.S. government. It can also depend on the foreign and domestic policy agendas of the U.S. government. (Ironically enough, both of these things-domestic and foreign policy agendas -are what created the 9/11 attacks in the first place but that is a much larger topic in need of a tome not a blog.)

Comment: See: Delusional New York Judge orders Iran to pay billions to families of 9/11 victims


Propaganda

Mainstream media uses disinformation to accuse Russia of spreading disinformation

media manipulation disinformation propaganda
© Garzon
The Grauniad is slipping deeper into the disinformation business: Revealed: UK's push to strengthen anti-Russia alliance is the headline of a page one piece which reveals exactly nothing. There is no secret lifted and no one was discomforted by a questioning journalist.

Like other such pieces it uses disinformation to accuse Russia of spreading such.

The main 'revelation' is stenographed from a British government official. Some quotes from the usual anti-Russian propagandists were added. Dubious or false 'western' government claims are held up as truth. That Russia does not endorse them is proof for Russian mischievousness and its 'disinformation'.