Puppet MastersS


Oil Well

'Oil is everything': Is Haftar the answer to Western allies US and France?

Haftar
© Reuters/Philippe WojazerGeneral Khalifa Haftar
General Haftar, whose forces are on the move towards Tripoli, is the right man for the West to feed their oil appetites - but he is also the one who can switch sides quickly, analysts told RT.

Forces loyal to General Khalifa Haftar are steadily advancing towards Tripoli, where the UN-recognized Government of National Accord (GNA) calls for help and hastily prepares to defend the troubled Libyan capital. But Western powers, who established formal ties to GNA, are also keeping in touch with their arch-rival - just because he controls an asset that decides almost everything in the war-torn country.

"Securing access to oil and protection of oil - that's what Haftar purports to do," Alessandro Bruno, an independent political analyst and Libya expert, told RT. He explained that this oil is generally high quality, and it is mainly processed at refineries in Italy and France - the two NATO countries heavily involved in the Libyan turmoil since they helped topple Colonel Muammar Gaddafi back in 2011.

"Oil is everything in Libya, it has little else."


Comment: See also:


Magnify

William Binney: NSA has 32 pages of Seth Rich-Julian Assange communications FOIA request reveals

WilliamBinney/SethRich
© Democracy Now!/unknownWilliam Binney • Seth Rich
About six months ago, a blogpost by "Publius Tacitus" appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger's FOIA request regarding Seth Rich:
"But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth's role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that:

Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.

If NSA had come back and said, "No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich," that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen."
At the time this appeared, I felt that it was of high significance, but I wasn't quite sure what it meant. What is meant by "any information regarding Julian Assange and Seth Rich?" Reports generated within the NSA that mention both? Communications in which either mentions the other? Direct communications between the two? What was the actual language of Clevenger's request?

Comment: Check out the two informative interviews above, one of which interviews Julian Assange. The first video below includes a short interview with Craig Murray.






Star of David

US envoy Greenblatt dismisses a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

GreenblattKushNeti
© Amos Ben GershomGPOJason Greenblatt • Jared Kushner • PM Benjamin Netanyahu
US President Donald Trump has long been promising to present his Deal of the Century plan to achieve a lasting peace that would put an end to the Arab -Israeli conflict, but little details about it are known this far.

In an interview with Sky News Arabic, American Special Representative for International Negotiations Jason Greenblatt has called to ditch the use of the term "two-state solution" in discussions devoted to the resolution of Israeli-Palestinian conflict, arguing that each party to the conflict "sees it differently".

He also praised the upcoming "Deal of the Century" plan, which has been in the works by the Trump administration for some time and is expected to be made public in June 2019. Greenblatt noted that both the Israeli and Palestinians "will be pleased from some parts [and] not be pleased with some of it".

Comment: From Mondoweiss, an interview with the outgoing French ambassador to the US, Gérard Araud, offers more insights and biting comments:
Yara Bayoumy: Your career started out in the Middle East. Where do you see the situation there now, especially with the peace process?

Gérard Araud: I'm close to Jared Kushner ... Everywhere in the history of mankind, when there is a negotiation between two sides, the more powerful [party] is imposing terms on the weaker party. That's the basis of Jared Kushner's [peace plan] - it will be a proposal very close to what the Israelis want. Is it doomed to fail? I should say 99 percent yes, but 1 percent, you never forget the 1 percent. Trump is uniquely able to push the Israelis, because he is so popular in Israel.

Bayoumy: But Trump hasn't pushed the Israelis so far.

Araud: Exactly, but if need be, he may do it. Once Trump told Macron, "I have given everything to the Israelis; the Israelis will have to give me something." He is totally transactional. He is more popular than [Benjamin] Netanyahu in Israel, so the Israelis trust him. That's the first bet, Kushner told me. The second is that the Palestinians may consider, it's their last chance to get limited sovereignty. And the third element is Kushner is going to pour money on the Palestinians. Don't forget, the Arabs are behind the Americans. The plan is 50 pages, we were told, very precise; we don't know what is in the plan. But we'll see.

The problem is that the disproportion of power is such between the two sides that the strongest may conclude that they have no interest to make concessions. And also the fact that the status quo is extremely comfortable for Israel. Because they [can] have the cake and eat it. They have the West Bank, but at the same time they don't have to make the painful decision about the Palestinians, really making them really, totally stateless or making them citizens of Israel. They won't make them citizens of Israel. So they will have to make it official, which is we know the situation, which is an apartheid. There will be officially an apartheid state. They are in fact already.

Bayoumy: How do you feel Kushner approached the peace plan?

Araud: He is totally in real-estate mode. He is totally dry. He's extremely smart, but he has no guts. He doesn't know the history. And in a sense, it's good - we are not here to say who is right, who is wrong; we are trying to find a way. So in a sense, I like it, but at the same time he is so rational, and he is so pro-Israeli also, that he may neglect the point that if you offer the Palestinians the choice between surrendering and committing suicide, they may decide the latter. Somebody like Kushner doesn't understand that.
See also:


TV

Noam Chomsky: Democrats' Russiagate fixation is a huge gift to Trump, may hand him 2020

NoamChomsky
© MediumNoam Chomsky
The leftist icon shocked fans by saying it "was pretty obvious" there was no real collusion.

In an interview with Democracy Now!, left-wing author and progressive philosopher Noam Chomsky criticized the Democrats and their base for "investing everything" in Russiagate, and theorized it might cost them the 2020 election.

In the interview from last week, published on Thursday, Chomsky doesn't just say the focus on Russia was a "huge gift" to Trump, but bashes Democrats for ever thinking otherwise.

"It was pretty obvious at the beginning that you're not going to find anything very serious about Russian interference in elections," he said. "I mean for one thing it's undetectable."

He called into question the very premise. "In the 2016 election the Senate and the House went the same way as the executive, but nobody claims that was Russian interference there," he said. "In fact, Russian interference in the election, if it existed, was very slight." He suggested that Israel's Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu speaking to Congress was a bigger impact on elections than "whatever the Russians tried," and added that "anything the Russians might have done is going to be peanuts" in comparison to campaign funding.


X

Russian Embassy's response to Mueller report: End 'smoke and mirrors', heal ties

Mueller's shill game
© OhanianMueller's Shill Game
It was no surprise that the Mueller team, which did so much to prove a "hollow and laughable" Russiagate conspiracy, delivered no tangible result, the Russian Embassy in the US said in its own report on the issue.

The embassy responded to the much-anticipated report by Robert Mueller and his team just two days after it was made public on Thursday. In a massive 120-page paper, the diplomatic mission debunked key Russiagate claims, including allegations of meddling in the 2016 US election, involvement in the DNC hack attack, and Donald Trump's alleged collusion with Russia.

The publication also featured a long list of "groundless accusations" made by US mainstream media, politicians and experts in relation to the Russiagate conspiracy theories. It notes that the tremendous efforts made by the Mueller team to find any sign of collusion had failed.


Comment: See also:


TV

Larry King interviews George Papadopoulos: 'From pariah to linchpin in proving anti-Trump spy scandal'

LarryKing/GeorgePapadopoulos
© Youtube/RT America
"Entrapped" by FBI agents in London, ex-Donald Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos shared the mysterious circumstances that led to his arrest - and to the opening of the Mueller probe - with Larry King on RT's Politicking.

Papadopoulos told King he was snared by the FBI for alleged contact with a Russian operative in London in 2016. Despite pleading guilty to lying to FBI agents, Papadopoulos thinks he was set up in a plot to take down the Trump campaign.

With the Mueller report finally public, Papadopoulos believes future investigation into the FBI's surveillance operation on the Trump campaign will "expose something a lot more sinister than these fake Russian contacts that I apparently had that got me in the middle of the crosshairs."

Watch the full exclusive interview on RT America:


Jet2

China's curiously American arsenal of weapons

china arsenal
Have you seen the PLA Navy's latest whizzbang terror toy? Described as a "tactical laser system," it was recently featured in a PR puff piece on China's state-owned mouthpiece channel, CCTV. According to reports, it will be deployed on the PLA Navy's Type 055 destroyers as a replacement for the fleet's old HHQ-10 surface-to-air missiles.

Which is all well and good, but let me ask you again: Have you seen it? I mean, have you actually looked at it? Because when you do, you might notice something interesting. Namely, it bears a striking resemblance to the U.S. Navy's Laser Weapon System (LaWS).
laser weapon system
The LaWS is on the left and the Chinese laser system is on the right. Or is it the other way around? It's hard to tell the difference.

But it's not just this laser weapon. From drones to stealth jets to railgun prototypes, it seems all of the latest and greatest weaponry in the Chinese arsenal is suspiciously similar to (or is an exact duplicate of) an item in Uncle Sam's arsenal.

Comment: Whether intentional or not, another way American military 'secrets' manage to make their way into China is via Israel. For years Israel has been selling American military secrets to the Chinese. For more info, check out ANC Report's documentary, The Parasite, How Israel sells US tech to America's enemies, or an interview with the filmmakers here:




Dollar

Best of the Web: 60 US mega-corporations not only paid zero taxes last year... the government paid them billions instead!

pocketing money
© Getty Images
Sixty of America's biggest companies from the Fortune 500 list, including IBM, Netflix, General Motors and Chevron, managed to avoid paying a dime in income taxes on their whopping profits last year.

After the explosive report on how Jeff Bezos' Amazon used tax loopholes and paid nothing in taxes for two years in a row, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) revealed that many more US companies did the same thing absolutely legally in 2018.

They include 60 major firms from different sectors of the US economy from retail to oil and gas. For example, Delta Air Lines paid nothing to Uncle Sam despite recording over $5 billion in profits. Energy major Chevron and automotive giant General Motors also paid zero tax, with each having earned more than $4 billion last year.

In total, the listed companies zeroed out federal income taxes on $79 billion in US pretax income, according to ITEP findings. And instead of paying $16.4 billion in taxes, these corporations enjoyed a net corporate tax rebate of $4.3 billion.

Comment: They literally are the government now, directly subsidizing themselves from the public treasury.


X

Zelenskiy camp optimistic as Ukrainians head into second round of presidential vote - UPDATE - Zelensky victory

Poroshenko Zelensky
© UNIANPetro Poroshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Voting appears to be proceeding smoothly in Ukraine's presidential runoff, in which incumbent President Petro Poroshenko is facing a strong challenge from political outsider Volodymyr Zelenskiy.

The Central Election Commission reported that turnout by midafternoon on April 21 was just over 45 percent in the second-round election.

No serious violations or incidents had been reported, and commission Deputy Chairman Oleh Konopolskiy told journalists that voting was "going normally."

A 41-year-old comic who shot to fame playing an accidental president in a TV sitcom, Zelenskiy joked with reporters as he voted in Kyiv early on April 21 that his wife had put him in a good mood ahead of time by playing him a song by American rapper Eminem.

Comment: The eve of the Ukraine election has seen a spate of violence and threats, plus an attempt to attempt to disqualify Zelensky:
On the eve of Ukraine's presidential runoff, authorities have been overwhelmed by dozens of bomb threats, just as a court in Kiev was forced to hear a last-ditch lawsuit demanding that the frontrunner's registration be annulled.

The second round of the Ukrainian election takes place on Sunday, with Volodymyr Zelensky having an overwhelming advantage over incumbent president Petro Poroshenko, according to the latest polls. But a lawyer and election observer, Andrii Khilko, has claimed that the leading candidate's invitation of his supporters to a final debate between the contenders somehow amounted to bribery of the electorate.

Forced to convene overnight, an appeals court in Kiev has dismissed the lawsuit, ruling that Zelensky's reminder to supporters that they needed tickets to attend the event could in no way be considered as bribery or illegal election campaigning.

In the meantime, police in Kiev received numerous calls about explosive devices allegedly planted in at least 18 malls all across the capital on Saturday night. Earlier in the day, authorities had to sweep Kiev's central railway station following a similar bomb threat, which turned out to be fake.


In Odessa, bomb squads had to evacuate hundreds of patients from two hospitals, as well as check an airport, a mall and a movie theater following nearly a dozen tip offs - but also gave the all-clear, after finding nothing suspicious.

UPDATE 21/04/19:
Zelensky celebrates win over Poroshenko
The high turnout in the second round of the presidential election in Ukraine reveals an enthusiasm for the promise of change brought by Zelensky. He's leading with some 72-74 percent of the votes, according to the latest exit poll figures. Incumbent President Petro Poroshenko secured only around 25-28 percent of votes, suffering a crushing defeat at the hands of Zelensky.


Zelensky's team celebrated victory as soon as the first official exit polls were out, even reciting a rocket launch-like countdown. The soon-to-be president didn't waste many words, simply thanking his parents, his wife, his team and Ukrainian citizens who voted for him. He also jokingly thanked the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) for "keeping him in shape" during the campaign.

In contrast, Poroshenko held a lengthy speech and a Q&A, vowing to remain active in politics and to protect the "achievements" of his presidential term, including sanctions against Russia. Yet he accepted the defeat and said the election was fair.


Not too graciously it seems.



Zelensky's campaign apparently outmaneuvered that of Poroshenko's, culminating in the comedian's idea to turn the public debate into a massive show hosted at a Kiev stadium. The Friday debate sealed Zelensky's lead, despite the incumbent's attempts to portray his opponent as a Moscow stooge and a puppet of oligarch Igor Kolomoysky.


By securing the presidential office Zelensky's political party - called Servant of the People, after his own TV show - gets a head start in the upcoming parliamentary election, scheduled for October. He will need to secure a support base in the legislature to be able to implement his policies, and a failure to do so may easily undermine his landslide win.



Arrow Down

Mueller report a study in propaganda regarding WikiLeaks role in fueling Seth Rich 'conspiracy theory'

Seth Rich
© LinkedInSlain Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich.
Special counsel Robert Mueller focused a portion of his final report on WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange making false statements about slain Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich and the theft of emails from Democratic officials.

Rich was killed in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2016, in what police have described as a botched robbery. But Rich's death quickly became the subject of conspiracy theories claiming he was killed in a politically motivated hit job for leaking stolen emails to WikiLeaks.

The redacted Mueller report, released Thursday, said WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, "made several public statements apparently designed to obscure the source of the materials that WikiLeaks was releasing."

Comment: Read the Washington Times article here. The retraction should never have been forced, nor an apology given. The WT brought forward facts deserving further investigation that have been conveniently forgotten.