• Ukraine Burisma story is massive - involves BILLIONS of IMF and US funds looted, lost, and buried!
• Bombshell admission: Ukrainian MP claims Joe Biden was 'personally paid $900K by Burisma'
• State Dept. official raised concerns about Hunter Biden and Burisma in 2015

Abdullah collected a shred of a child's clothing from the rubble. "As if this shabby house was the house of the head of a rocket launching unit. Rasmi! The chicken farmer! What a poor life you have suffered." Abdullah lamented.

One neighbor told me that the rescue of the impoverished shepherd's family amid the chaos was slowed by the terror that the house would be hit again.

"At the beginning we were paranoid to rescue the slain family from down the rubble, we were forced to wait for fifty minutes until the paramedics reached the area," Meqbel al-Sawarka, 27, said.
...
The attack injured a dozen other members of Sawarka family, mostly children, now being treated at Shuhhada al-Aqsa Hospital.
...
Umm Motaz, 34, Rasmi al-Sawarka's sister, had difficulty in speaking while tending to the surviving children at the hospital.

"Oh God, burning an entire family that lives from hand to mouth and sleeps in a tin shack. They need a stick of match, not four rockets," Umm Motaz told me. "This illogical, irreligious, inhumanity - this unbelievable massacre. These are children who play by sifting sand with a sieve! And today their flesh is collected from that sand. Only God will take revenge."

As for the Israeli investigation, the aunt shook her head.

"If this is happened in any respected state, then the whole world would warm up to an investigation. But it is related to Gaza, so it will be frivolous. Will this silly justification of investigation revive the children? Even if the Israeli army admitted its mistake about the crime, the children will not be more fortunate than the Samouni family or even Razan al-Najjar, whose file is thrown away in the trash."

Motaz referred to two legendary cases in Gaza. In 2008-2009, Israeli forces killed 48 members of one family, the al-Samounis, during the three-week assault on Gaza. In June 2018, al-Najjar, a 20-year-old paramedic was shot dead by Israeli forces while tending to casualties during the Great March of Return at the Gaza fence.

"We just had lunch together yesterday, and all what remain of my brother and his children are the good memories," Motaz said, looking through a window into the intensive care ward. "We are like hostages waiting our turn to be killed at any moment, with no international accountability for the crime."

• Israel 'accidentally' murders family of 8 in Gaza in raid on alleged Islamic Jihad commander

• Targets of mysterious Wikipedia editor Philip Cross report intriguing patterns with Times columnist Oliver Kamm
• 'Reputational assault': Mystery Wikipedia editor Philip Cross targets journalist Rania Khalek
• A deeper look at a Wikipedia editor's long-running campaign to discredit anti-war campaigners and journalists
• Wikipedia's 'front man' revisionist: Philip Cross

I don't know what the hell the Iranian authorities were thinking when they made this move. Subsidies shouldn't be drastically cut, but phased out slowly, while at the same time investing to expand output capacity. Shock therapy will always have pernicious effects. But the major tool the Government operated with was price controls. Price ceilings do not work. Even Maynard Keynes told us that. The Iranian state can go one of two ways, in my opinion. It either adopts military-style rationing measures, or - if it wants a fair market system in which prices are derived from value, not vice-versa - it implements land-value capture.

For the last 18 years, Iran has had a positive current account to GDP ratio, meaning it net saved in foreign currency. After 2018, its consumer price index shot up from below 110 to almost 190. During this year, food inflation spiked to nearly 90 percent, but then came back down swiftly enough to the 30 percent mark. Cost of transportation and utilities shot up as well, and there is no correcting downward trend for these two like for food; the trend remains upwards. The benchmark interest rate in Iran is in the double digits at 18 percent, which means the Government pays more in interest to the private sector. It's not wise to grow demand while you are supply constrained; not to mention the fact that such a high interest rate is a [needless] drag for both firms and households who have debts to service. Rouhani's finance guys should be fired. They've learned nothing from history, including super-recent history [France, Ecuador, Haiti, Chile].

Doubtless, there are foreign-backed elements within the crowds who are seeking regime change. I wrote about such an operation back in September: Deep State MAGA & MIGA [Make Iran Great Again]. But I didn't expect it to be carried out on the heel of such a huge Government blunder. The only way to retain political stability now, I think, is for Khamenei to call for new elections [because this Government is obviously too incompetent to remain in power] and seek emergency aid from Russia and China - hasty deliveries of basic commodities like water, food, and pharmaceuticals. For an oil-rich country like Iran, having to rely on oil price fixing to prevent social unrest [like Egypt subsidizing bread or risking revolution] is humiliating. The Iranian Government telling people they have to pay more for less fuel, otherwise it won't have enough rials [sovereign currency] for the poor is a perfidious lie, and needlessly foments political instability, unrest, and social hardships. Iranian political elites need to take the situation seriously. Stronger states across history have been brought low by such idiotic policies [self-made problems], and not by rival empires or nature's wrath.

• The OPCW and Douma: Chemical weapons watchdog accused of evidence-tampering by its own inspectors
• Syria: OPCW whistleblowers merely confirm what we already knew
• OPCW whistleblower's Syrian gas attack hoax testimony casts doubts about similar incidents
• Veteran journalist exposes OPCW Douma chemical-weapons evidence suppression on BBC
• The US has a history of controlling the OPCW to promote regime change
• OPCW skewed key evidence in Douma chemical incident towards a particular outcome, claims watchdog
• Russian envoy says OPCW report on 2018 Syria chemical 'attack' was politicized, new probe may be needed

• A third of Britons want Tony Blair tried over illegal invasion of Iraq
• Tony Blair and the real war criminals: Will they ever be tried?
• Iraq: 'Devastating' dossier alleging British war crimes lodged with ICC

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch arrives to testify to the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill

U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch earlier this year urged the ouster of Ukraine's top anti-corruption prosecutor amid a heated national election, raising concerns that the U.S. embassy was meddling in Ukraine's internal affairs.

In a speech on March 5, Yovanovitch called for the firing of Ukraine's special anti-corruption prosecutor, Nazar Kholodnytsky. Yovanovitch issued the demand just six weeks prior to Ukraine's presidential election.

"To ensure the integrity of anti-corruption institutions, the special anti-corruption prosecutor must be replaced," Yovanovitch said.

In March 2018, Kholodnytsky was accused of coaching the subjects of criminal investigations. The accusations stemmed from tapes of conversations in Kholodnytsky's office recorded using a bug planted by the National Anti-corruption Bureau of Ukraine. By July 2018, an inquiry into the tapes concluded Kholodnytsky deserved a reprimand but should keep his job.

"Nobody who has been recorded coaching suspects on how to avoid corruption charges can be trusted to prosecute those very same cases," Yovanovitch said. "Those responsible for corruption should be investigated, prosecuted, and if guilty, go to jail. And in order for that to happen, all of the elements of the anti-corruption architecture must be in place and must be working effectively."

Kholodnytsky has argued that he did not commit wrongdoing and remained in his post after the election victory of President Volodymyr Zelensky on April 21. In response to Yovanovitch's comments, Kholodnytsky said it was unacceptable for the ambassador to meddle in Ukraine's internal affairs.

"You know, what the ambassador of another state allows herself is on her conscience. Interference in the internal affairs of another state is unacceptable. I will not comment on this statement; I will refrain from commenting for now," Kholodnytsky told LB.ua at the time.

Yovanovitch testified on Nov. 15 before lawmakers conducting the Democrat-run impeachment inquiry. The impeachment probe is examining allegations that President Donald Trump sought to boost his 2020 reelection prospects by delaying military aid to Ukraine in order to force an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

Yovanovitch admitted that she had no first-hand knowledge of the events leading to the impeachment inquiry. On the day prior to her testimony, Ukraine's foreign minister said he was never aware of a tie between the delay in military aid and the request for investigations.

While Yovanovitch did not offer any evidence for the allegation that Trump sought Ukraine's help in the 2020 election, her appearance served as a reminder that U.S. officials actively meddled in Ukraine's internal affairs even during the politically sensitive period of a presidential election.

Kholodnitsky was appointed on Nov. 30, 2018, by Viktor Shokin, Ukraine's prosecutor general. Months later, Shokin was fired due to pressure from Joe Biden, who threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees unless the Ukrainian president at the time, Petro Poroshenko, removed Shokin.

At the time of his firing, Shokin was investigating Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian gas giant which paid Hunter Biden tens of thousands of dollars a month to sit on its board of directors. Notably, Shokin's prosecutors seized Zlochevsky's assets on Feb. 2, 2016, just two weeks before Shokin was forced to resign.

Yovanovitch told lawmakers on Nov. 15 that she first became aware of Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma in the lead-up to her June 21, 2016, Senate confirmation hearing. She said the Obama-Biden administration included a question about Biden and Burisma in a binder of preparatory questions for the hearing. Yovanovitch said the suggested answer was to refer the matter to the vice president's office.

Yovanovitch's colleague, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent, told lawmakers that he inquired with the vice president's office about the potential appearance of a conflict of interest regarding Biden's position on the Burisma board, according to the transcript (pdf) released by the House Intelligence Committee. A representative from Biden's office said the vice president's capacity to deal with family issues was limited since his other son, Beau Biden, was battling cancer.

The episodes confirm that the Obama administration was aware of the potential conflict of interest but took no action to correct it.

Hunter Biden joined Burisma in April 2014, one or two weeks after British prosecutors seized $23 million in assets held in London by Zlochevsky. The asset freeze was celebrated weeks later at an international conference dedicated to the recovery of assets allegedly stolen by Ukrainian oligarchs and officials. Despite the celebrations, the case stalled for months as the Ukrainian prosecutor's office slow-walked a request from London for additional evidence. In January 2015, a British judge dismissed the case.

According to Kent, the U.S. State Department spent $500,000 in taxpayer money in an effort to help recover the $23 million from Zlochevsky. In an attempt to chase down the loose ends after the case was closed, Kent visited the prosecutor general's office in Ukraine on Feb. 3, 2015. Kent said he spoke to a "deputy prosecutor general named Donylenko," who told him that the Zlochevsky case was closed after someone at the prosecutor's office took a $7 million bribe in May 2014. Kent told lawmakers he did not know at the time that Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma but learned about the issue shortly after.

Follow Ivan on Twitter: @ivanpentchoukov

• Joe Biden and Ukraine: A Quick Reminder
• Envoy Yovanovitch's 'feelings' that Trump 'threatened' her on Twitter are impeachable, says Democrats
• Ukraine: Prosecutor who led probes into Burisma Holdings to be fired
• The real collusion story: Ukraine conspired with Hillary Clinton to meddle in US elections