© YouTube
John Batchelor • Stephen F. Cohen
John Batchelor • Stephen F. Cohen
Stephen F. Cohen, professor emeritus of Russian Studies and Politics at NYU and Princeton, and John Batchelor continue their (usually) weekly discussions of the new US-Russian Cold War. (Previous installments, now in their fourth year, are at TheNation.com.)
Cohen explains that President Putin's speech to both houses of the Russian parliament on March 1, somewhat akin to the US president's annual State of the Union address, was composed of two distinct parts. The first approximately two-thirds was pitched to the upcoming Russian presidential election, on March 18, and to domestic concerns of Russian voters, which are not unlike those of American voters: stability, jobs, health care, education, taxes, infrastructures, etc.
The latter part of the speech was, however, devoted solely to recent achievements in Russia's strategic, or nuclear, weapons. These remarks, though also of electoral value, were addressed directly to Washington. Putin's overarching point was that Russia has thwarted Washington's two-decade-long effort to gain nuclear superiority over -- and thus a survivable first-strike capability against -- Russia. His attendant conclusion was that one era in post-Soviet Russian-American strategic relations has ended and a new one has begun. This part of Putin's speech makes it among the [most] important he has delivered during his 18 years in power. (It is on the ACEWA website eastwestaccord.com.)
Comment: To effect US' strategic aspirations and negotiate a working agreement with Russia, Trump would have to miraculously redirect the MIC and recalibrate America's current political climate. Chances, anyone?