Puppet MastersS


Attention

The Angel of History as a symbol of Resistance

Huge Crowds
© Public Domain
It's one of the most mesmerizing passages in the history of knowledge. In the 9th of his Theses on the Philosophy of History, Walter Benjamin - Jewish, tragic figure, solitary genius - dissects Paul Klee's haunting painting Angelus Novus and graphically explains to posterity the drama facing the Angel of History:
"His face is turned toward the past. Where we perceive a chain of events: he sees one single catastrophe which keeps piling wreckage and hurls it in front of his feet. The angel would like to stay, awaken the dead, and make whole what has been smashed. But a storm is blowing in from Paradise; it has got caught in its wings with such violence that the angel can no longer close them. The storm propels him into a future to which his back is turned - whilst the pile of debris before him goes even higher. This storm is what has been called progress."
The time has come to go beyond what may be read as a very apocalyptic Christian parallel between divinity and violent retribution. As Alastair Crooke detailed in his astonishingly perceptive 2010 book, Resistance: The Essence of the Islamist Revolution, it was the need to restrain the furies of "divinely inspired" violence that led Hobbes to conceptualize Leviathan, where he called for a social contract between the individual and a necessarily strong, implacable government.

Moreover, it was the Hobbesian version of a social contract that laid the basis for John Locke to assert a dubious "natural goodness" of humanity, complete with a - very private - "pursuit of happiness" and the general welfare gleefully coalescing via the work of an invisible hand.

This fallacy/fairy tale shaped Western thought for over the next 300 years.

Now it's a completely different ball game. We have been prisoners of Hobbes and Locke for too long: such a seductive pole dancing of legitimacy around which the Western-conceived nation-states grouped to protect and legitimize themselves and their plunder of the rest of the world.

Lately, the contemporary specter of "divine violence" was marketed to everyone from Africa to Asia as armed Islamist resistance. But now this mask has also fallen. The "new" Syria shows to everyone how al-Qaeda R Us - and always was.

Putin

Russia's surprising role in the Israel-Iran conflict that you might not know about

Putin/Abbas Araghchi
© Alexander Kazakov/SputnikRussian President Vladimir Putin • Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi • Kremlin • Moscow, Russia
Moscow's subtle influence in the Middle East standoff reveals how diplomacy works when great powers don't take sides.

During a recent visit to Turkmenistan, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held talks with his counterparts and addressed students at the Institute of International Relations in Ashgabat. Among the central themes of his remarks was the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel - a confrontation that not only affects global geopolitics but also directly impacts the security dynamics of Central Asia.

For Turkmenistan - which shares over 1,100km of border with Iran and has its capital just miles from that border - the growing tension poses serious risks. Beyond humanitarian concerns, the prospect of a wider war could awaken dormant radical networks and destabilize fragile domestic balances. These risks extend beyond Turkmenistan to other southern former Soviet republics that maintain close political and military ties with Russia.

Against this backdrop, Lavrov's call for de-escalation and regional stability carried added weight. For Moscow, Iran is not just a partner - it's a pillar in the buffer zone securing Russia's southern flank. Instability in Tehran could ripple across Central Asia, threatening Russia's near-abroad.

Nuke

Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say

CNN headline
© CNN
The US military strikes on three of Iran's nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it.

The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command in the aftermath of the US strikes, one of the sources said.

The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings are at odds with President Donald Trump's repeated claims that the strikes "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said on Sunday that Iran's nuclear ambitions "have been obliterated."

Two of the people familiar with the assessment said Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely "intact." Another source said that the intelligence assessed enriched uranium was moved out of the sites prior to the US strikes. "So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops," this person added.

The White House acknowledged the existence of the assessment but said they disagreed with it. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN in a statement:
"This alleged assessment is flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked to CNN by an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community. The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program. Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."

Comment: The 'theater' of war has many interpretations with results specific to preferred speculation.


Explosion

Ukraine in NATO would mean WWIII - Orban

Orban
© Zhao Dingzhe/Global Look PressHungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban
The Hungarian prime minister has also warned that the EU's rush to admit Ukraine would bring conflict to the heart of Europe.

Ukrainian accession to NATO would lead to an immediate all-out war with Russia and World War III, according to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. He has also cautioned against hastily admitting Ukraine into the EU.

Budapest has long opposed Brussels' policies on the Ukraine conflict, including weapons deliveries and sanctions on Russia. It has also urged against integrating Ukraine into NATO and the EU.

In a post on X on Saturday, Orban wrote that Ukrainian membership in NATO "would mean war with Russia, and World War 3 the very next day." He added that the "EU's reckless rush to admit Ukraine would pull the frontlines into the heart of Europe."

The Hungarian prime minister described the EU leadership's approach as "insanity," vowing not to "let them turn Europe into a battlefield.

Attention

US and Israeli strikes on Iran violate international law - Lukashenko

Lukashenko
© Sergey Bobylev/SputnikBelarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
Such attacks could pose a danger to people all over the globe, the Belarusian leader has said.

The US and Israel have brazenly violated a host of international agreements by striking Iranian nuclear facilities, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has said. He warned that consequences of such actions could have been catastrophic.

Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear and military infrastructure on June 13, a day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) passed a resolution declaring Iran to be in breach of its Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) obligations - something that Tehran has denied. Last week, the US carried out airstrikes targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities as well.

"The recent strikes on the Iranian nuclear facilities under the control of the IAEA are violating the norms of the international law in the most dangerous way," the Belarusian leader told a summit of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) on Friday.

Minsk is particularly aware of the potential consequences of such actions, the president said, citing the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, which caused vast territories to be contaminated with radioactive materials thrown into the atmosphere following an explosion at a Soviet nuclear power plant.

"Radioactive fallout was registered even in the UK, Germany and Sweden at the time," Lukashenko noted. The US and Israel apparently believe they would be spared the same fate for some reason.

Comment: More than nuclear damage done:
According to Maria Zakharova:
The US and Israel have undermined the credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) by using the agency's information to plan attacks on Iranian nuclear sites.
"The fact that Iranian nuclear facilities under the control of the IAEA have become targets for American and Israeli missiles is an open challenge to the NPT. The attacks posed real obstacles to implementing agreements between the IAEA and Tehran.

"The credibility of the agency's global verification system, which was used as a source of information for planning the bombing, is in question.

"The UN nuclear watchdog's own resolutions declare attacks on nuclear sites illegal under international law.

"The attacks posed "real obstacles" to implementing agreements between the IAEA and Tehran.Therefore, the US and Israel are "responsible for colossal damage to the IAEA's activities, no matter how hard they try to blame Tehran."
According to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov:
"European leaders pressured IAEA chief Rafael Grossi into publishing a negative report on Iran, which was later used to justify an IAEA Board of Governors resolution accusing the Islamic Republic of breaking the NPT. The West exerts very serious influence on international organizations, and most of these bodies are no longer unbiased."
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said:
"Twenty years of transparency and trust-building regarding Iran's peaceful nuclear program have not yielded results, and this issue will be addressed."



Putin

Ukraine conflict settlement, future of US-Russia relations, NATO's 'lies': Highlights from Putin's Q&A

Russian President Vladimir Putin, Minsk, Belarus, June 26, 2025.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, Minsk, Belarus, June 26, 2025.
The Russian president spoke about a wide range of topics at the Eurasian Economic Union summit on Friday

Moscow will no longer play a "one-sided game" with the West, Russian President Vladimir Putin told journalists on the sidelines of the Eurasian Economic Union summit in Minsk on Friday.

During his press conference, Putin fielded questions on a wide range of issues, including the state of the economy, sanctions, and negotiations with Ukraine.

Comment:
Regarding the comment from Vladimir Putin on France and Germany:
"They're about to drop dead, yet they're still trying to write our obituary,"
The Euro is at the moment a reserve currency also Russia has used. In Putin explains what will happen if West 'robs' Russia's reserves, there was:
Around €200 billion ($209 billion) is held by Euroclear, a Brussels-based clearing house. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has repeatedly called for the funds to be tapped for Ukraine's reconstruction, although some member states have pushed back on the idea.

There's constant talk in the West "about how they are going to steal our money," Putin said at the Eurasian Economic Forum in Minsk on Thursday. "As soon as it happens, the shift toward regional payment systems will accelerate and undoubtedly become irreversible," he said, adding that ultimately that would be a good thing for the global economy.
The above is said assuming a steady Euro, but a similar migration to regional payment systems might happen if the Euro looses value due to the failure of internal policies in the leading EU countries like Germany and France.


Attention

What comes next following the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran?

Situ Room WH
© The White HousePresident Donald Trump • White House situation room • June 21, 2025 • Preparation for US attack on Iran
The 12 days of fighting between Iran and Israel, along with the U.S. intervention, left a deep impact on all three countries. Where do each stand now that the fighting has stopped, and what comes next?

The fighting between Israel and Iran, sparked by an illegal and entirely unprovoked attack by Israel, has abated for the moment. After the United States did what Israeli Prime Minister hoped it would do and bombed Iran's underground nuclear facilities, including the one at Fordow with bunker buster weapons, U.S. President Donald Trump told Israel to stop its attacks and reinforced that order when Israel sent dozens of bombers toward Iran shortly after the ceasefire was enacted, claiming a response to two Iranian missiles.

The entire battle, fought on the basis of a fictional threat of Iran being close to acquiring a nuclear weapon, demonstrated how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can manipulate intelligence, politics, and ignorance in the U.S. to provoke American action. But it also demonstrated that the United States cannot be forced to act when it is unwilling to do so and, more importantly, that when it decides to stand firm, the United States absolutely does have the power to rein Israel in.

Comment: An excellent distillation of unusual and unanticipated actions challenging the 'laws' and 'norms' of international gravity.


Vader

Germany's dangerous submission: Atlanticists don't care about the national interest

TrumpMerz
© Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty ImagesGerman Chancellor Merz, while publicly critical of US President Trump, is in fact executing Trump’s vision.
At the Nato summit currently underway in The Hague, Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, is expected to present his plan to transform the Bundeswehr into "the most powerful conventional army in Europe". This dramatic announcement represents more than a shift in policy — it signals a rupture with the fundamental strategic identity Germany has maintained since 1945.

The idea of rearming the German military dates back to Olaf Scholz's 2022 Zeitenwende speech — the so-called "turning point" announced in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Scholz promised a €100 billion fund for the military and pledged to meet Nato's then 2% spending target. Yet that "turning point" largely failed to materialise. Two years later, the German Council on Foreign Relations bluntly concluded that little had changed.

Now, Merz is determined to deliver what Scholz only gestured towards. He has made defence and security the cornerstone of his chancellorship, launching the most ambitious rearmament campaign since the Second World War. The scale is staggering: a proposed €400 billion in defence and security investments, including a plan to raise annual defence spending to 5% of GDP — as demanded by Nato. That would represent nearly half of the federal budget — around €225 billion — a transformation with sweeping political and social consequences. On Monday, Berlin confirmed that its military spending will reach 3.5% of GDP by 2029, with the 5% target to be reached in the years to come.

Comment: 3D: Dangerous, Destructive and Delusional. Merz is promoting an agenda that circumstances do not support nor should the German people allow.


Arrow Up

Who's your daddy? NATO elites pimp Europe's economy for U.S. military racket

Nato Scumbags
© Public Domain
Mark Rutte, the civilian figurehead chief of the NATO alliance, sparked viral headlines and memes this week after he referred to U.S. President Donald Trump as "daddy".

Even Western news media were taken aback. Reporters questioned whether the former Dutch prime minister was going too far in his obsequiousness and demeaning himself. Without any shame, Rutte doubled down, ladling more compliments on Trump, and praising him for achieving what no other U.S. president has done - forcing European states to ramp up military spending.

The NATO secretary-general's weird choice of words was not merely abject sycophancy. It was a Freudian slip revealing the sinister and abusive relationship that the United States has with its so-called allies.

At one point, the American president joked that if Rutte doesn't like him sufficiently, he would "hit him."

The occasion was the annual summit of the NATO military bloc, which this year was held in The Hague, Netherlands. It wasn't just Rutte who was scraping and bowing. Most of the leaders from the 32-nation alliance were bending over backwards to appease Trump.

Trump has been relentlessly browbeating the Europeans to spend more of their economies on the military. He has scoffed at them for being "freeloaders" on American security and demanded that they increase their annual military budgets up from 2 percent of national economic output to 5 percent.

This week, the NATO alliance declared a "historic transformation" by announcing a formal commitment to reach the 5 percent target by 2035. That translates into trillions of more euros allocated to militarism, inevitably to the detriment of the civilian economy and social development, as well as inflaming geopolitical conflict.

Most of this new military expenditure will be used to purchase U.S. weapons, such as the F-35 fighter jet and Patriot air defense system, both of which are overpriced and overrated in performance. A new study published this week by the Bruegel and Kiel Institutes found that European nations are heavily dependent on the United States for the manufacture and supply of military equipment. That means that the gargantuan increase in NATO budgets will primarily benefit America's military industry.

Pistol

SOTT Focus: "It's a Killing Field": IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid

IDF officers and soldiers told Haaretz they were ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near food distribution sites in Gaza, even when no threat was present. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed, prompting the military prosecution to call for a review into possible war crimes
gaza food aid israel
Israeli soldiers in Gaza told Haaretz that the army has deliberately fired at Palestinians near aid distribution sites over the past month.

Conversations with officers and soldiers reveal that commanders ordered troops to shoot at crowds to drive them away or disperse them, even though it was clear they posed no threat.

One soldier described the situation as a total breakdown of the Israel Defense Forces' ethical codes in Gaza. According to the Hamas-run Health Ministry in Gaza, 549 people have been killed near aid centers and in areas where residents were waiting for UN food trucks since May 27. Over 4,000 have been wounded, but the exact number of those killed or injured by IDF fire remains unclear.

Haaretz has learned that the Military Advocate General has instructed the IDF General Staff's Fact-Finding Assessment Mechanism - a body tasked with reviewing incidents involving potential violations of the laws of war - to investigate suspected war crimes at these sites.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid centers began operating in the Strip at the end of May. The circumstances of the foundation's establishment and its funding are murky: it is known to have been set up by Israel in coordination with U.S. evangelicals and private security contractors. Its current CEO is an evangelical leader close to U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.


Comment: Read the above-linked investigation and it's clear this grotesque parody of a 'humanitarian aid organization' emerged from the bowels of the CIA, the Mossad, and Switzerland.