Puppet MastersS

USA

Is a federal coup to overthrow the states and nix the 10th Amendment underway?

damged us flag
This is a wake-up call.

What is unfolding before our very eyes โ€” with police agencies defying local governments in order to tap into the power of federal militarized troops in order to put down domestic unrest โ€” could very quickly snowball into an act of aggression against the states, a coup by armed, militarized agents of the federal government.

At a minimum, this is an attack on the Tenth Amendment, which affirms the sovereignty of the states and the citizenry, and the right of the states to stand as a bulwark against overreach and power grabs by the federal government.

If you're still deluding yourself into believing that this thinly-veiled exercise in martial law is anything other than an attempt to bulldoze what remains of the Constitution and reinforce the iron-fisted rule of the police state, you need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid.

This is no longer about partisan politics or civil unrest or even authoritarian impulses.

This is a turning point.

Comment: Where does re-establishing "law and order" begin - and where does it end? While we can support the intentions and efforts by Trump to re-establish some semblance of law and order in American cities being overrun by rioters and leftist extremists, we should also be wary that the police state infrastructure doesn't move in and trample on the public as it is well known to do.

Trump is caught between a rock and a hard place - by design one might argue; do nothing and he can well be accused of not living up to his responsibility to protect Americans as the country continues to burn. Employ federal agencies and troops to said cities - and he runs the risk of unleashing the most pathological elements of the established police state infrastructure - and be accused by the opposition of being a Nazi, a dictator, etc.

There are no easy answers here.


Jet5

NATO 2020: A Coalition of the Unwilling

NATO 2020
The problem with alliances is that they ultimately either become victims of their own success, or cannot figure out what to do with themselves once the original rationale disappears. The original Cold War-era NATO was a relatively cohesive entity led by one of the two superpowers, with most of its members being the industrialized democracies of Western Europe, with West Germany being its eastern-most European member, and alliance planning revolving around USSR. But even then there were cracks in the alliance. Italy, for example, had nearly no role to play as it did not border any Warsaw Pact country and did not practice deploying its forces to West Germany to practice its defense against the anticipated Warsaw Pact invasion. And while Greece and Turkey were ostensibly part of that alliance as well, in practice they spent more time clashing with one another than planning for joint action against USSR.

The end of the Cold War made the problem of alliance cohesion far worse, for two reasons. One, it quickly added as many members as possible thus greatly expanding its geographical extent, and two, it lost that single unifying factor in the form of USSR. Today's NATO is a patchwork of mini-alliances revolving around the United States which is determined to replace the alliance aspect of NATO which assumes that all members have interests that are to be taken into consideration, by patron-client relationships.


Comment: But is Trump really on board with the US/NATO agenda of world hegemony? Other information suggests differently and hints that Trump would rather do away with NATO altogether if he could.

See also:


Jet1

Iranian airliner swerves to avoid US F-15 jet in Syrian airspace 4 passengers injured UPDATES

Israeli Jet
© Sputnik Screenshot/IRIB NewsUS F-15 Eagle over Syrian airspace
An Iranian airliner was intercepted over Syrian airspace on Thursday by at least one US Air Force F-15 Eagle fighter jet, making what Iranian media characterized as an "aggressive" close pass that caused the passenger plane to take evasive action.

According to Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), Mahan Air Flight 1152 on its way to Beirut, Lebanon, from Tehran, Iran, was approached closely on Thursday by two aircraft, which identified themselves as American.

IRIB initially reported just one aircraft, which was purported to be Israeli. The news outlet noted that after the "dangerous action" by the jets, the airliner pilot quickly reduced altitude to avoid a collision. Al-Hadath reported four wounded passengers, and Lebanese authorities said there were 150 passengers on board.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) released a statement later on Thursday refuting claims the aircraft was Israeli. Meanwhile, Syrian media has reported there were two intercepting aircraft, which were part of the US-led international coalition, and that the intercept happened near the remote at-Tanf base in extreme southeastern Syria, which the US controls.

Comment: Was this encounter an act of terrorism (an attack) by the Americans or a routine flyby that startled the pilot, given Mahan Air's proximity to a US base? Iran has its theory and is not shy in saying so:

UPDATE: 24/7/2020 Air Probe
Iran is demanding that the US be held accountable for scrambling a fighter jet to shadow a packed commercial plane in Syrian airspace, calling it an act of terrorism that deserves a probe by the UN-led civil aviation authority.

Minister of Roads and Urban Development Mohammad Eslami went to great lengths to condemn the mid-air incident that saw an Airbus A310, flown by the private Mahan Air, perform an emergency maneuver after a close encounter with an American F-15 fighter jet.

"How could a passenger plane flying along a commercial route according to aviation protocols be attacked and threatened by some country's fighter jets? Attacking a passenger plane is a terrorist act."

Tehran reserves the right to "pursue legal actions" over the US' conduct, Eslami pledged, encouraging Syrian and Lebanese authorities to follow suit.

According to Captain Bill Urban, spokesman for CENTCOM: "The visual inspection occurred to ensure the safety of coalition personnel at Al Tanf garrison." He didn't explain what danger could have been posed by a commercial plane passing tens of thousands feet above the ground.

Meanwhile, Iran's Civil Aviation Organization said the harassment of the Mahan Air jet "constitutes clear violation of international law as well as aviation standards and regulations," as cited by Tasnim. The agency has urged the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to investigate the mid-air encounter.
Iranian PM Zarif pulls no punches in slamming the US with accusations including 'compounding lawlessness' amid confusing reports on the incident in the context of US illegal occupation in Syria.

UPDATE: 24/7/2020 Zarif's reactions

UPDATE: 24/7/2020 Tehran has now submitted a complaint to the ICAO stipulating the close encounter as an act of terrorism by a war plane and claims the right of legal pursuit:
Transportation Minister Mohammad Eslami stressed Tehran expects the US's "terrorist move" to be condemned by the organization. He also called on Lebanon and Syria to file their own separate complaints against the US in the ICAO in relation to Thursday's incident.

Iran is also expected to submit a letter of protest to the United Nations Security Council and to Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

Mahan Air announced that its plane was flying in full compliance of international air navigation rules when Thursday's incident took place, and added that its commercial aircraft have been flying the same Tehran-Beirut for over a decade. The company confirmed that the intercept took place during a stage of the flight when passengers were allowed to unbuckle their seatbelts, and revealed that the plane's pilot had to abruptly lower the plane's altitude after receiving an alert on a possible collision.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi called the latter CENTCOM claim a "mockery."

Laya Joneydi, vice president of legal affairs in President Hassan Rouhani's administration, said that "the explanations provided so far [by the US side] are unjustified and unconvincing. The harassment of a passenger plane on the territory of a third country is a clear violation of aviation security and freedom of civilian aircraft."





Camcorder

Dave "Walter Cronkite" Portnoy interviews Donald Trump at the White House

barstool sports trump interview
This was truly one of the most surreal days of my life. From delivering newspapers out of my astrovan to interviewing the leader of the free world at the White House. What a long, strange trip it's been. I don't care what your politics are this was an opportunity that couldn't be turned on. I still can't believe it happened to be honest.

PS - I obviously know Dan was mad that I didn't consult him about this interview first and if I had to do it over again I obviously would have told him I was going beforehand. That was a mistake by me. But we've talked about it and we're fine. This is a 10 year marriage with him, KFC and Kmarko. This wasn't our first disagreement and it won't be our last. But guess what? Big Cat, Barstool and I are all trending globally right now. The entire country is talking about us. That's exactly how I like it.

Pageviews Out.

Boat

Flashback 'Vile people-smugglers'? Farage films French and British navies trafficking migrants across English Channel


Comment: We missed this scandalous report at the time (although we did notice that illegal migrant crossings spiked under cover of the lockdown). Shortly after lockdown ended in May, Brexit activist Nigel Farage personally sailed in the English Channel to observe dinghies full of illegal migrants being escorted from France to the UK by both the French and British navies. Only then did the media report on it, reluctantly...


farage english channel migrants
Scandalous Brexiteer Nigel Farage has reported on what appears to be a French-British operation to escort illegal migrants west across the Channel. That's something we all deserve to know about - even those of us who hate Farage.

Just because you don't like the messenger, it doesn't mean you should dismiss what they're saying.

Nigel Farage has blown the lid off what appears to be a scandalous operation happening out on the high seas.

His videos and reporting have uncovered French state ships shepherding migrants packed onto a dingy from their coastline, all the way out until they reached British waters in the Channel.

The French then performed a U-turn and British official vessels took over, taking the people into the port of Dover in the south east of England.


Comment: Since then, the UK and French govts have made a public show about 'fighting vile migrant traffickers':

The problem thrown up by Farage's reporting, however, is that the 'vile criminals trafficking migrants' are effectively the British and French govts. It certainly clarifies the role then UK Home Secretary Sajid Javid had in mind when he announced in January 2019 that "the Royal Navy would patrol the English Channel for migrant boats..."

See also: UK's illegal migrants scandal makes a mockery of 'Take Back Control'. Officials haven't estimated how many there are for 15 YEARS


Hardhat

Irish Foreign Minister unaware his department is in talks with Hong Kong tycoon to 'build city in Ireland for HK half a million migrants'


Comment: Ireland's current population is 5 million, by the way...


irish countryside
"Oh look, there's 'nothing' here. Let's build a city and ship in half a million people!"
Simon Coveney, the foreign affairs minister, was unaware that Irish officials had preliminary discussions with a Hong Kong property tycoon about the possibility of putting a new city in one of six locations around Ireland.

Reacting to the publication yesterday of internal departmental records about the project by The Times, Ireland edition, a spokesman for the minister said the talks were at "officials level only" and never progressed to Coveney for input.

Records released under the Freedom of Information Act by the department show it has been in contact with Victoria Harbour Group (VHG), an international charter city investment company, since December about a plan to create a city that would be home to tens of thousands of Hong Kong residents.

A series of meetings have been held in Ireland and Hong Kong in recent months about sourcing a 500 sq km area of land for a new city. The locations discussed were between Drogheda and Dundalk in Co Louth; to the east of Galway city; an area just north of Limerick city; a plot outside Waterford city; a site to the east of Cork; and an area near Killarney and Tralee in Co Kerry.

Ivan Ko, a Hong Kong property tycoon who founded VHG, is searching the globe for potential sites for a new international charter city for Hong Kong residents ahead of 2047, when the 50-year guarantee of having a separate governance system from Beijing expires.

Comment: This is indicative of the extent to which national govts have lost power/influence in recent times, particularly since the boom of Covid-19 was lowered on the world. The world has bifurcated into an international archipelago of 'sanctuary cities' which the elite classes treat as their own 'green', 'liberal' playgrounds, oases in a 'desert' of 'backward' masses of 'nationalists' who hold onto such antiquated notions as tradition, stability and family.

Voting is utterly redundant in this new reality; the internationalist cosmopolitan-urban classes just do as they see fit, and this attitude of theirs is succinctly articulated here by a consortium of investors planning to effectively create an 'autonomous zone' in the middle of someone else's country. It's imperialism on steroids, though of course they will paint it as 'the height of liberal freedom'...


Megaphone

Rand Paul calls for Cuomo to be impeached over coronavirus response

Rand Paul
© Bonnie CashRand Paul calls for Cuomo to be impeached over coronavirus response
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) called Wednesday for the impeachment of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) over his handling of the state's coronavirus outbreak.

"The people we are lauding are actually making catastrophic decisions," he said.

"I think Gov. Cuomo should be impeached ... for the disastrous decision he made to send patients with coronavirus back to nursing homes. ... Virtually half his people who died were in nursing homes," Paul said on Fox News's "Rundown" morning podcast.

According to data from the New York Times, the state of New York reported nearly 6,500 fatalities due to COVID-19 stemming from residents of long-term care facilities.

Earlier in the show, Paul called in to question the pandemic lockdown imposed in New York in March, referencing the surge of cases across the state despite the shelter-in-place orders.

"New York had a lockdown and had 30,000 people die. New York had the worst death rate of any place in the world amidst a lockdown. So perhaps a lockdown didn't do any good, and perhaps a lockdown killed our economy but didn't do anything to stem the tide of a virus."

Comment: See also:


Control Panel

Best of the Web: Kiev foreign ministry: 'Black boxes confirm illegal interference with Ukrainian Airlines plane downed in Iran'


Comment: Well, well, well. Among other things, what does this mean for Iran's official stance that no foul play was involved in downing the Ukrainian Airlines plane?...


The flight recorders from a Ukrainian plane shot down by Iran confirm illegal interference, Ukraine says.
ukrainian airlines tehran funeral
The transcript from the black boxes from a Ukrainian jet accidentally shot down by Iran on January 8 confirms the fact of illegal interference with the plane, according to Ukraine's deputy foreign minister.

Yevhenii Yenin's remarks came on Friday, a day after an international team examining the flight recorders from the jet had completed a preliminary analysis of the data in France.

"Grateful to all partners who helped bring this moment closer. Black boxes from #PS752 were read out and deciphered successfully. The transcript confirmed the fact of illegal interference with the plane," Yenin wrote on Twitter.

He also said Kyiv was expecting an Iranian delegation to visit Ukraine next week for talks.


Comment: Other media outlets are spinning the Ukrainian official's comment at him saying simply that 'Iran illegally downed the plane'.

Obviously!

But that isn't what he implied. He implied that interference took place which contributed to causing Iran to down that plane. Whether, by that, he means to suggest that Iran deliberately shot it down, or that she was tricked into doing so, remains open. However, given high levels of Iranian-Ukrainian cooperation on this matter, such an accusation is unlikely.

As we speculated at the time, it appears that Iran's air defense system operator was 'tricked' into reading the UA flight as an incoming US 'retaliatory' missile, part of which may have involved altering the radar signature of the UA plane.

And yet, within days of the incident, Iran 'ate the fault'. Why?

Well, the Iranian govt was riding on its 'propaganda victory' of successfully targeting US bases in Iraq. The accidental downing of the UA flight put a dampener on that, so they apparently decided it was best to 'make the problem go away' rather than protest innocence and imply that some third party bested their air defenses.

Was Iranian Missile Operator Tricked Into Shooting Down The Ukrainian Airlines Plane Over Tehran?


Propaganda

British Justice System: Probe into 'novichok' death of Dawn Sturgess can blame Russia, UK judges say, but 'no trial will realistically happen'

perfume package of novichok
© Handout via REUTERSPackaging for a perfume bottle allegedly containing novichok nerve agent, in a photo by Metropolitan Police London dated September 5, 2018.
The probe into the 'novichok' death of Dawn Sturgess in Amesbury should be expanded to look at the Russian government, but an actual trial is unlikely to happen, two UK high court judges have admitted in a ruling.

Sturgess, 44, died in Amesbury in July 2018, four months after the alleged chemical attack on Sergei and Yulia Skripal in nearby Salisbury, which the UK government said Russia was "highly likely" to have been responsible for. While the Wiltshire coroner said the investigation would look into the culpability of two alleged Russian spies, her family pressed to expand it to the Russian government as well.

On Friday, two judges at the High Court in London ruled there was "acute and obvious public concern" over the alleged assassination by Russian agents with a prohibited nerve agent, sending the case back to the coroner. Their decision summarized the "belief" of the UK government that Alexander [sic] Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov used the nerve agent and acted on behalf of the Russian government, but it noted that evidence to that effect has yet to be presented.

Comment: See also:


USA

Democrats are now the riot party

portland protests american flag
© Getty Images
For almost two months, Portland has been under siege from antifa and other extremists. These troops of the left terrorize the downtown area every night. They with paramilitary precision. As organized anarchists, they deploy a wide array of less than lethal weapons to wound police, ranging from bats and bricks to lasers shot in the eyes of officers to permanently damage their sight. All of this is to further their goal to overturn our society and radically transform the country.

If the news media cared to tell the public the truth, it would have been a top story on nightly broadcasts for weeks. The antifa rioters even tried to break into and burn down a federal courthouse in the city. The campaign of intimidation and destruction is plainly domestic terrorism. But the one reason the siege on Portland has become a major news story is because the administration is trying to restore law and order to the beleaguered city, and Democrats hysterically oppose any such action.

President Trump has rightly sent in federal reinforcements to Portland, while many Democrats have circled the wagons on behalf of anarchism. Speaker Nancy Pelosi referred to federal agents deployed to Portland as storm troopers. Other members of her party have spoken of federal law enforcement officers as some sort of invading army unwelcome in urban centers. New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, deep into his campaign to utterly ruin that city, declared that he would take Trump to court if any federal officers were deployed to address the surging violence there.