© shutterstock
Even film director Spike Lee was forced by media outcry to
edit out of his documentary mini-series the half-hour dedicated to skeptics of the official version of the event.
Thus the citizenry has been saved from "a bog of heinously dangerous ideas."This phrase comes from Slate.com columnist Jeremy Stahl, for whom the alternative theories of 9-11 are "arguments that have been debunked a thousand times." This, of course, is nonsense. The debate rages to this day. But as with the issue of vaccination against coronavirus, the mainstream media will not brook the least opposition. Stahl puts great stock, for example, in the "three-year-long, $16 million investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center for the
National Institute of Standards and Technology," as if these numbers and a solemn-sounding agency title could not possibly be challenged.
It doesn't seem to occur to him that the U.S. Government is itself the accused party here, and in similar circumstances has been caught fudging facts. The NIST report has actually taken heavy
criticism from
Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, the most important group pushing alternative theories of the attack.
Why do journalists favor the government version so fiercely? The sheer vitriol of their attacks on Truthers
reflects deep personal anger; clearly no Deep State maven stands over them dictating their articles. In theory, the more onerous discoveries of 9-11 investigators — the presence of explosive material in the dust that spread through Manhattan, the dubious cell-phone calls made from the hijacked aircraft, the impossibly high speeds of low-altitude flight by three of the airplanes —
should be red meat to reporters. But all of it is ignored, if not ridiculed.
What has happened to this "fifth column" of democracy?
Comment: See also: