OF THE
TIMES
And there’s only one us telling the other to eat s***Im not telling you to eat shit. Im asking you not to swallow it, or even put it in your mouth!
"The difference between you and me is vast"Yeah i don't get hung up on rhetorical propaganda so easily and can see a bigger picture.
"In what universe have you seen one political party in America use the power of the state (weaponize) the DOJ/FBI against other before now? It’s never happened before."It's too hard for some people to realize they are just being divided and conquered and that a two party political system plays perfectly into illustrating the "differences" between everyone so they don't work together and instead fight themselves into disunity.
I see western humanity’s very existence at stakeYes, I do as well, but as long as it's left vs. right, Dems vs. Republicans, the elites have already won.
even quoting John Adam’s as if you live by his creed floating in the lotus position under the fig tree, practicing your Gyan MudraWell it seems at least neither Adams nor i believe in 2 party politics. All I was saying. Again you inferred much about me (feeling superior, floating in a lotus position) while all I observe about you is you seem to be into 2 party politics.
Aren’t you above it all, you transcend the binary bs, correct?No, unfortunately I'm stuck in the middle of it because society is dominated by people who think as small as you seem to.
Brœðr muno beriaz ok at bǫnom verðaz
muno systrungar sifiom spilla.
Hart er í heimi, hórdómr mikill
—skeggǫld, skálmǫld —skildir ro klofnir—
vindǫld, vargǫld— áðr verǫld steypiz.
Mun engi maðr ǫðrom þyrma.
I think we can leave the conversation where it is atOh yeah and I did answer your question about a Republican administration.
BluLiteDancing [...] unprecedented [...]I tried to address the wider aspects in America. Since you're stuck on your premise, Democrat vs. Republican, and I won't go into the denial of premise fallacy, here is specific supporting information.
[...] slander, lies, misinformation [...]
WASHINGTON (CN) - The Department of Justice under the George W. Bush administration took off the blindfold and aimed the sites of prosecution on Democratic officials, a panel of experts has concluded. The report announced Friday was filled with examples of a justice department that had become little more than a weapon with which to pursue political opponents and those not sufficiently on board with the right-wing policies of the administration.Zero proof and blanket statement on 1,000s? Your read like someone punced you in the head.
Federal prosecutors "were focused on the man and not on the crime," said the Chief U.S. District Judge in Alabama, U.W. Clemens.
During a press conference at the National Press Club, Project Save Justice Executive Director Gail Sistrunk displayed a report by professors Donald Shields and John Cragan of the University of Minnesota that shows 85 percent of the indicted locally elected officials under the Bush administration were Democrats.
Of the 309 indictments of local elected officials, 262 were Democrats, 37 were Republicans, and ten were independents.
Elliot Mincberg, chief counsel for oversight investigations of the House Judiciary Committee said the chances of this happening randomly would be one in ten thousand.
On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush Administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]At least 919 people have been charged in the Capitol insurrection so far. This searchable table shows them all.
BluLiteDancing However can you point to a Republican administration that weaponized the DOJ against it’s political opponents, parents and patriots?Yes, I can point because I too have fingers. I can also fashion a valid argument instead of coming off like a rabid, deranged ideologue.
TurdBurger or Shit Sandwich Hey zigzag you specifically said that the Bush Reich “targeted” 1000’s of Democrats NO? That’s a blanket statement with zero proof but hey whatever.No.
Maybe it was Temporarily Disturbed Senses?That sounds cool. Much better than Alcohol Induced Coma ...
Ellingson's mother told officers that her son had called her that night and said that Brandt had been following him. He asked if she could pick him up, but by the time she arrived, it was too late. Brandt, she said, was known to her and Ellingson's father, but not to their son.That bold section is the weirdest part of the story. In other places it's reported that Brandt asked Ellingson who his parents were and Brandt told him he knew them. It sounds like he knew who Ellingson was beforehand but not the other way around.
Brandt admitted that, following a "political argument," he slammed into Ellingson with his vehicle in an alleyway before fleeing the scene.
Police soon caught up with Brandt, who had admitted to having consumed alcohol prior to the incident, and arrested him for driving under the influence. A chemical test later confirmed that he had, in fact, been over the legal limit.
These outrageous things creep into the modern world are anchoring the narrative of our reality.