Johnson was attached to the 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment. The US army's 2nd Cavalry Regiment was directly involved in the appropriately-named 2007 'Operation Imposing Law' (O.I.L.) that aimed to 'take back' Baghdad from, well, Baghdad residents. By the time the operation came to an end in Nov. 2007, thousands of Iraqis civilians had been killed as 'collateral damage', most of them as a result of US military fire and bombings falsely attributed to 'al-qaeda'. Sergeant First Class Randy Johnson was just one of those killed, but he wasn't a civilian, and as a member of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment, he clearly played his part in the slaughter of Iraq civilians.
According to media reports, British national of Iraqi parents Anis Abid Sardar's fingerprints were allegedly found on fragments of a road side bomb that was linked to the one that killed Johnson, and Sardar is therefore standing trial for Johnson's murder. Some choice comments by the clearly deluded prosecuting 'Queen's Counsel', Max Hill, include:
Sardar "was involved in offenses of the most serious imaginable". Yes, fighting against an occupation force that had, by that time, killed 600,000 Iraqis is serious business, and understandably 'offensive' to the British and US elite.
He was "directly involved in making bombs for use in Iraq during 2007, several years after the 2003 war" (apparently this pompous ass of barrister thinks the Iraq war ended when that other ass - Dubya Bush - pronounced 'Mission Accomplished'.
Sardar was a "guilty participant in this deadly trade, making bombs so large that they could and did cause significant damage to heavily-armoured US military vehicles, killing the unfortunate Sergeant Johnson". Indeed. War tends to be a 'deadly trade' including the making and detonating of explosives with the intent of causing significant damage to the military vehicles of the invading forces and, if possible, killing the invading troops.
Common sense does not, however, appear to form part of what is shaping up to be a kangaroo court trial. All that is necessary in this case is a new definition of justice and international law whereby a member of an invading force that is responsible for the deaths of thousands of civilians can be wrongfully killed by one of those civilians in an effort to defend himself and his people.
This court case is therefore the latest attempt to rewrite the history of the US and British invasion of Iraq. In the new, even more heavily abridged version, not only was the genocidal attack on Iraq an altruistic bestowing of "freedom and democracy" on the Iraqi people, but the actors in this benevolent drama weren't even soldiers, but rather something like humanitarian relief workers who could, therefore, be "murdered" by backward and ungrateful Iraqis like Anis Abid Sardar.
This is but one small example among many of the increasingly putrid state of our global society as it has been shaped by the toxic influence of psychopaths in positions of power around the world. The recent murder of Freddie Gray is another.
Cop-Assisted Accidental Suicide
Gray was unlawfully detained by police in Baltimore who fabricated evidence that he had a switch-blade knife. He was then beaten (a common part of arrests of black males in America) and had his hands and feet shackled before being bundled into a police van without being secured by a seat belt. Police then took him on a 'nickle ride', for fun presumably, where the van was driven at high speed with sharp turns in a deliberate attempt to injure Gray as he was thrown around the interior. As a result, Gray broke his neck. When officers stopped to check on him, he was unresponsive. Rather than take him to hospital, they proceeded to pick up another prisoner and take both men to the station. When they arrived, Gray was in a coma. He died a week later.
When members of the black community protest against these kind of blatant, racist murders by member of the police, the mainstream media focus on the inappropriateness of the very justified anger in black communities and demonize them as 'thugs'. The truth, that the vast majority of these protests are peaceful, is ignored. The other truth, that 'professional protestors' are used to turn protests violent, is also ignored.
These examples of egregious injustice, and many more that we document on a daily basis on Sott.net, are but symptoms of the fundamentally anti-human nature of our global system of social 'values'. When that system was built, and is today maintained, by the fundamentally inhuman psychopathic elite, how can it be any other way? But rule by a psychopathic 'elite' should not be taken as an opportunity to absolve ourselves of responsibility. Through their active participation or passive ignorance, almost every single person on this planet today has participated in the creation and maintenance of the system under which we all live.
They say that the people of any given nation get the rulers they deserve, but on a broader scale, it is equally true to say that humanity gets the future they deserve, and our future is predicated most immediately on this planet's viability as a host for human life. On both the social and environmental levels, that viability is in serious peril. Psychopaths rule, society disintegrates. Society disintegrates, the planet follows suit and society plunges further into chaos. As chaos reigns, psychopaths reassert their authority and give vent to their destructive natures, provoking more social and environmental chaos. There's nowhere to go but down. Enjoy the ride.
As an essayist and print author, Joe has been writing incisive editorials for Sott.net for over 10 years. His articles have appeared on many news sites and he has been interviewed numerous times by Sputnik News and Press TV. His articles can also be found on his personal blog JoeQuinn.net.
Reader Comments
Thanks for the article, Joe.
I've read that Freddie Gray was not in fact, DOA at the police station, he was in hospital for a week before dying. His spinal cord was 80% severed and his voice box crushed. Charges were brought today against the 6 or so officers involved, so that is some slightly good news, although we all know convictions of cops are extremely rare.
This new prosecutor in Baltimore shocked the main stream media earlier today by handing out 5 charges of homicide & 1 charge of 2nd degree murder against those police officers responsible for killing Freddie Gray. She is only 35 years of age & comes from a family of police officers herself. But most of all she is not afraid to stand up for the truth & what is right. Maybe things are not quite going as planned for the psychopaths in power after all. We can only hope & stand behind those leaders unafraid to stand up for the truth.
the big media splash results in what appears to be a win for the people's rights actually is, with the passage of time and the workings of justice, a shadow win. Often there must be multiple trials, dimming the people's outrage, a minor sentence, shaking the people's faith, and a pardon/reduced sentence/free on appeal/conviction set aside/time served/ qualifier that hollows out the claims of people's rights under democracy.
There is nothing so fearful (and horrific--HELLISH) as authoritarianism and its ardent desires and strenuous efforts to sustain itself, INDEFINITELY.
And there always seems to be 'new' recruits.
But hey, we have a choice, don't we?
signed,
'sophie'
What do we do about this?
It's all fine and dandy to determine that the world is back-asswards, I think we can all agree on that point now. What are we going to do about it?
It's one thing to sit back and watch a situation unfold while one consolidates their resources, but there comes a point when judiciously waiting for a situation to unfold becomes narcissistic self-preservation.
It is time that the soldiers of the light make themselves known. It is time for those of us with the courage to put themselves in harm's way to show themselves, regardless of the consequences.
It is time that the world sees a group of people who are only interested in truth, whatever that truth may be, with no hidden agendas standing up for the sake of truth alone.
We, as learned individuals, have a responsibility to future generations to prove that, even though it may be ineffectual, there is merit to standing for a cause that is in the best interest of all people on the planet.
I am ready to make my voice heard and I am willing to stand by the outcome regardless if that outcome is what I desire or not.
I choose to stand for the truth, I choose to stand for righteousness, I choose to stand for all of those without the ability to make their voices heard.
SOTT, you have an audience that I am sure feels the same way as I do, for the most part, and there is an opportunity here that is being wasted, in my opinion.
Very simple. Chances are high that you already figured out: speak your mind, when in a group of shocked people.
If you wish to remain anonymous you can do it on forums / facebook / discussion groups that are organizing rallies. Sow your seeds of thought there, add your thoughts to the conversation that is going on, what people should protest about and what should be put on the signs and most importantly: What that protest is going to request from the government.
Here is an example, what we did in our country:
Tens of thousands of people on the streets in bigger cities via peaceful protests making a point with their presence and also communicating on official channels: requesting not only an immediate cease of a planned decree of a new internet tax, but investigation requests about corruption in governmental circles as well, where does taxpayers money disappear?









Well, we 'Americans' learned from our British parents, who as imperialists, carried our the usual policies of rape, pillage, murder and theft of the local population, so none of today's actions should be surprising if we know even a little bit of our history, such as: "how British colonizers used to humiliate local people and break their pride: in the villages, they would hunt down the tallest and the strongest man; they would shackled him, beat him up, and then the British officer would rape him, sodomize him in public, so there would be no doubts left of who was in charge.
In the Middle East, people still remember those savage chemical bombings of the “locals”, the extermination of entire tribes. Winston Churchill made it clear, on several occasions: “I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas,” he told the House of Commons during an address in the autumn of 1937. “I am strongly in favour of using poisonous gas against uncivilised tribes.”
In Malaya, as the Japanese were approaching, British soldiers were chaining locals to the cannons, forcing them to fight and die.
Wherever the British Empire, or any other European empire, grabbed control over the territory – in Africa, Caribbean, the Middle East, Asia, in Sub-Continent, Oceania – horror and brutality reigned."
Sound familiar? [Link]
"The British Empire was actually based on enforcing full submission and obedience on its local subjects, in all corners of the world; it was based on fear and terror, on disinformation, propaganda, supremacist concepts, and on shameless collaboration of the local “elites”. “Law and order” was maintained by using torture and extra-judiciary executions, “divide and rule” strategies, and by building countless prisons and concentration camps.
The British Empire was above the law. All rights to punish “locals” were reserved. But British citizens were almost never punished for their horrendous crimes committed in foreign lands.
When the Nazis grabbed power in Germany, they immediately began enjoying a dedicating following from the elites in the United Kingdom. It is because British colonialism and German Nazism were in essence not too different from each other.
Today’s Western Empire is clearly following its predecessor. Not much has changed. Technology improved, that is about all."