OF THE
TIMES
"It's crazy how nobody questions anything anymore.Sam has witnessed a surge in numbers of young people experiencing severe health problems after receiving Covid shots.
"NONE [OF THE DOCTORS] QUESTION WHETHER THE VACCINE CAUSES MYOCARDITIS, PERICARDITIS AND THE STROKES THAT ARE COMING IN. IF THEY DON'T TOE THE LINE, THEY COULD LOSE THEIR MEDICAL LICENSE."
"We've been having a lot of younger people come in. We're seeing a lot of strokes, a lot of heart attacks."One 38-year-old-woman came in with occlusions (blockages of blood flow) in her brain.
"They [doctors] were searching for everything under the sun and documenting this in the chart, but nowhere do you see if she was vaccinated or not. One thing the vaccine causes is thrombosis, clotting. Here you have a 38-year-old woman who was double-vaccinated and she's having strokes they can't explain. None of the doctors relates it to the vaccine. It's garbage. It's absolute garbage."
"The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of The Amistad Project and Fulton County, Pennsylvania, allowing the county to send its Dominion voting machines to the State Senate for inspection on January 10."Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project, said:
"The court recognized that it was improper to demand that the county - which owns the machines, and has the responsibility of running the election along with the legislature - can't determine whether the machines worked properly. As the judge noted, there's no justification for preventing the county from looking at their own machines."Pennsylvania's attorney general and secretary of state had sued to prevent the inspection, the press release notes. It was originally scheduled for December 22, but the judge determined that it must be allowed to proceed, "with a short delay to allow experts from both sides to come up with a formal protocol for the inspection."
"The families of those who have lost their lives to COVID-19 have gone through so much. This settlement will hopefully allow them to move forward without years of protracted and uncertain litigation."Nearly 200 veterans died at two of the state's veterans homes in Paramus and Menlo Park after the pandemic erupted in 2020.
"Virginia citizens should realize the extent that Mexican cartels have continued to increase their activity nationwide. Our detectives have purchased kilos of drugs as well as firearms in our region for many months. I often say every county is a border county and our southern border has been much more wide open since the end of January this year."Jenkins' comments came after "Detective J. Vazquez conducted a two-month investigation, as a member of the Blue Ridge Narcotics Task Force, into the illegal sale of firearms by Dulier Jimenez Barrera, 41, of 517 1st St. in Culpeper, near Yowell Meadow Park," the Culpeper-Star Exponent reported.



Citing the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments, plaintiffs argued that forcing their children to wear masks in school violated their rights as parents, including the right to make medical choices for their children, and said they were unconstitutionally excluded from "the decision-making medical process" behind the mask policies.So all the media attention as to the uselessness of masks is down the memory-hole. These people are morons. Or many they aren't?
"But these perceived wrongs don't violate any constitutional rights," Dorsey wrote, noting that the Constitution "does not require an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process for such broadly applicable policies." Parents' rights, she said, do not "include the prerogative to dictate school health and safety policies."
Her 22-page ruling also dismisses plaintiffs' claim that there is no scientific evidence to support mask mandates, noting plaintiffs' counsel in court "denied the existence of a pandemic, though the World Health Organization, the White House, and the United States Supreme Court have all consistently acknowledged it."
Dorsey compared the state mask mandate to state laws on seat belt and helmet use, smoking bans, and shirt-and shoes-requirements in public places. She found similarities and precedents in the 1905 Massachusetts case, where the Supreme Court upheld the state's smallpox vaccine mandate, and in COVID-era mask mandate challenges arising in California and elsewhere that courts similarly rejected.
The prior rulings "compel the conclusion that the right to parent as one sees fit does not entitle parents to undermine local public-health efforts during a global pandemic by refusing to have their children comply with a school mask requirement, particularly when they've affirmatively chosen that option over the maskless, distance-learning alternative that (the Clark County Schools) also made available," Dorsey wrote.
Comment: See also: Tel Aviv sees protests against vaccine coercion, 'green passes' to live normally