OF THE
TIMES
"The Seventh Circuit has definitively held that retention of an individual's private information, on its own, is not a concrete injury sufficient" to establish standing, the 28-page opinion states.
Further, there are no allegations that hackers have stolen the plaintiffs' information or that there has been other unauthorized access to the Google Photos accounts.
"Plaintiffs cannot show - and do not argue - that Google 'intruded into a private place' by receiving photographs of plaintiffs voluntarily uploaded to Google photos" by themselves or others, Judge Chang said.
He added, "Plaintiffs do not offer evidence to dispute that their faces are public - just that their facial biometrics are. This is consistent with Fourth Amendment case law that rejects an expectation of privacy in a person's face." (Emphasis in original.)
Comment: Well Khan has certainly made it even more obvious that Brexit is a farce intended to pacify the masses whose opinions and needs are clearly unimportant: