OF THE
TIMES

Alexei Arestovich, born in the Soviet Republic of Georgia, a former soldier, who became an influencer and adviser to the Head of the Office of the Ukrainian Presidency, was forced to resign for having dared to affirm in front of the cameras that the 44 dead and 77 injured during the he collapse of the building in Dniepropetrovsk is not due to the missile fired by Russia, but to the Ukrainian air defense system, which hijacked this missile. All fanatical regimes devour their children, Arestovich just fell.
[...]
After this recognition of the direct responsibility of the Ukrainian air defense system in the tragedy in the building in Dnepropetrovsk, Arestovich was the object of a very large-scale attack. The Ukrainian Military Command denied, saying in passing that their air defense is incapable of protecting against these Russian missiles anyway ... Arestovich tried to go back on his words, then apologized to the victims and finally resigned on January 17 : " I made a serious mistake, I'm leaving. »
[...]
This error is actually twofold. First of all, it led the Ukrainian army to publicly recognize the fallibility of the Ukrainian air defense system, which was nevertheless presented as infallible. Then, he questions the dominant Atlanticist discourse, according to which Russia is aiming at civilian targets. In times of warrior fanaticism, it is unforgivable and it has not been forgiven him. The Office of the Ukrainian Presidency accepted his resignation.
[...]
Thus, Russia is not a war criminal, if it comes to terrible "collateral damage"... When RFI recognizes that Russia's "real targets" are legitimate targets, "as dramatic and revolting as they are ". It's not just a question of "good words", but of political will: not everything can be said in time of war, because you have to construct the figure of the enemy, a figure without nuances. He was reckless, believing himself to be above the general rules of survival in these puppet regimes. And it's not the first time - these days, Arestovich also began to criticize the repressions of the SBU (the Ukrainian KGB) against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which makes the headlines of Fox News.
Below is my column in The Messenger on how the second indictment could prove damaging for President Joe Biden. Ironically, both Trump indictments have blowback potential for Biden on the retention of classified material and the dissemination of false claims. Notably, the New York Times has reported that Biden has had his own Thomas Becket moments in telling aides that he wanted Trump indicted and criticizing the Attorney General Merrick Garland for the delay. It is not clear if Smith will "rid [Biden] of this meddlesome president," but his theory of criminality could prove costly to Biden himself. Indeed, it could be used as a basis for an impeachment inquiry.After last week's indictment of former President Donald Trump relating to the 2020 election, CNN declared that the charges were "personal" for President Joe Biden, who previously said Trump's words sounded like "sedition."

Comment: Sounds like Amsalem wants to enshrine an Israeli version of the government-industry regulatory revolving door. Same old, same old. Netanyahu needs all the friends he can get, and will back Amsalem, one corrupted crony to another.