Puppet MastersS


Stop

Common sense: 7-step plan proposed by Putin to stop hostilities in E. Ukraine

Image
© Reuters/B.RentsendorjRussian President Vladimir Putin
Kiev must withdraw troops from southeastern regions of Ukraine and rebels must stop offensive to stop bloodshed, Russia's President Vladimir Putin says. He and Ukrainian leader Petro Poroshenko discussed "a ceasefire regime."

President Putin has outlined a seven-point plan to stabilize the situation in the crisis-torn east of Ukraine.

"On my way here from [the city of] Blagoveschensk to Ulan-Bator [Mongolia], I outlined some ideas and plan of actions. It's here, but in handwriting," Putin told reporters.

Comment: This may seem like wishful thinking on Putin's part but there is no one else stepping up to the plate to resolve the Ukraine crises and the killing of civilians.


Dollars

Council on Foreign Relations: Give money directly to the people

Image
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing, after they've tried everything else." - Winston Churchill

When an article appears in Foreign Affairs, the mouthpiece of the policy-setting Council on Foreign Relations, recommending that the Federal Reserve do a money drop directly on the 99%, you know the central bank must be down to its last bullet.

The September/October issue of Foreign Affairs features an article by Mark Blyth and Eric Lonergan titled "Print Less But Transfer More: Why Central Banks Should Give Money Directly To The People." It's the sort of thing normally heard only from money reformers and Social Credit enthusiasts far from the mainstream. What's going on?

The Fed, it seems, has finally run out of other ammo. It has to taper its quantitative easing program, which is eating up the Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities needed as collateral for the repo market that is the engine of the bankers' shell game. The Fed's Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) has also done serious collateral damage. The banks that get the money just put it in interest-bearing Federal Reserve accounts or buy foreign debt or speculate with it; and the profits go back to the 1%, who park it offshore to avoid taxes. Worse, any increase in the money supply from increased borrowing increases the overall debt burden and compounding finance costs, which are already a major constraint on economic growth.

Meanwhile, the economy continues to teeter on the edge of deflation. The Fed needs to pump up the money supply and stimulate demand in some other way. All else having failed, it is reduced to trying what money reformers have been advocating for decades - get money into the pockets of the people who actually spend it on goods and services.

Comment: It is very, very unlikely, that this is going to happen. Because in the end, the destruction of the financial system is a long-term (?) goal of the Elite. That the CFR is chiming in with these thoughts shows that in certain economic circles there is a growing desperation.


Star of David

The real terrorists exposed again: Zionist settlers consume more Palestinian land

Image
© Unknown
Throughout the Occupied West Bank and Occupied al-Quds (Jerusalem), Zionist settlers are digging in.

They are excavating foundations for new settlements, uprooting Palestinian olive trees and smashing Palestinian homes with their bulldozers.

Today there are well over half a million Zionist invaders squatting in al-Quds and the West Bank, stocking up on weapons and " all too often" using Palestinian children for target practice.

Airplane

More hysteria: U.S. sez 11 airplanes seized by Islamist rebels in Lybia could be used to carry out terrorist attack on 9/11 anniversary

Image
© Unknown
U.S. officials fear Islamic militants have stolen nearly a dozen commercial planes in Libya which could be used to carry out 9/11-style terrorist attacks in the region.

Eleven commercial jets operated by two state-owned airlines went missing last month, after militant group Libyan Dawn overtook the international airport in the capital city of Tripoli.

In the past two weeks, the U.S. government has been issuing warnings about the deteriorating state in Libya, drawing attention to the fact that the planes could be used in attacks to mark the anniversary of 9/11 later this month, sources who read the briefs told the Washington Free-Beacon.


Comment: Yes, never mind who's responsible for the deteriorating situation in Libya, or who's funding these terrorists who are supposed to carry out these attacks - 'Anything U.S. touches turns into Libya or Iraq': Top Putin quotes at National Youth Forum


'There are a number of commercial airliners in Libya that are missing,' one official told the Free-Beacon. 'We found out on September 11 what can happen with hijacked planes.'

Comment: With the coming anniversary of 9/11, the psychos in power plan to capitalize on it as much as possible.

See: The Paranoia Switch: How Terror Rewires Our Brains and Reshapes Our Behavior--and How We Can Reclaim Our Courage


HAL9000

Preparing the masses? Homeland Security loses track of 6,000 foreigners on student visas

  • 'Some of them could be here to do us harm,' an ICE official said
  • The Department of Homeland Security has lost track of 58,000 foreigners on student visas but only 6,000 of them are subjects of 'heightened concern'
  • As of last year, the government had lost touch with more than a million total visa holders
  • Image
    © APThe Department of Homeland Security has lost track of roughly 58,000 foreigners here on expired student visas. More than 6,000 of them are considered high-risk for terrorism related activities.
    The federal government has let more than 6,000 foreigners on student visas who represent a national security threat slip through the cracks, according to a news report released Tuesday.

    The Department of Homeland Security lost contact with the foreigners, who ABC News says are of 'heightened concern,' after they overstayed their visas and has been unable to reestablish contact.

    'My greatest concern is that they could be doing anything,' Peter Edge, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official, told ABC News. 'Some of them could be here to do us harm.'

    Comment: Are the psychos in US preparing another false flag attack in order to get the people back in line? Is US being prepared for a false-flag attack on American soil?

    And lest we forget: Government agents 'directly involved' in almost all high-profile U.S. terror plots

    See also: The Paranoia Switch: How Terror Rewires Our Brains and Reshapes Our Behavior--and How We Can Reclaim Our Courage


    Map

    Putin: EU is turning a blind eye to the fact that the Ukrainian troops are "directly targeting" civilians

    Image
    © AP

    Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused the European Union of turning a blind eye to the Ukrainian troops "directly targeting" civilians in the east of the country.


    The Ukrainian military "is directly targeting its fire on residential areas" and "unfortunately many countries, including in Europe, prefer not to notice that," Putin said on Monday.

    He added that the goal of pro-Russia forces operating in eastern Ukraine is "to push back [Ukrainian] armed forces and artillery so they cannot fire on residential areas."

    The eastern parts of Ukraine have been witnessing four months of fighting between the pro-West government and pro-Russia fighters.

    Putin's comments came hours after the European Union threatened to slap new sanctions on Russia. Moscow has already been under European sanctions over its alleged involvement in the deadly insurgency in neighboring Ukraine.


    Comment: Amid all lies and sanctions against him, Putin continues to ask for an end to the slaughter of unarmed civilians in East Ukraine by the Kiev junta army, which is financed and supported by the U.S. and NATO. Who's the villain here?


    War Whore

    US Army preparing to fight shadowy criminals, extremists and influential political dissidents

    Image
    © Anthony Freda Art
    As we've witnessed recently in Ferguson, Missouri, the difference between police and military is already nearly indistinguishable. In other words, the Army is already taking on peaceful citizens in domestic cities. Tank-supported SWAT teams already grenade and raid homes to serve warrants for victimless, non-violent offenses. What more can they possibly train for?

    The U.S. Army is now officially getting into the crime-fighting business. According to the Army Times, the Army is training to fight battles in megacities, not against other armies, but to help local authorities root out shadowy criminals, extremists and, wait for it, wait for it, influential political dissidents.

    The Army Times reports on this year's Unified Quest war games drill:
    When the Army looks to the future, it sees cities. Dense, sprawling, congested cities where criminal and extremist groups flourish almost undetected by authorities, but who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state.

    And the service is convinced that these "megacities" of 20 million or more people will be the battleground of the future.

    Comment: Why militarize the police when you can bring in the military itself?


    Propaganda

    The myth about the Yazidis on that Iraq Mountain?

    Is it at all possible that we're being sold an emotionally compelling story to justify U.S. military intervention in Iraq?

    Image
    © Unknown
    No one wants to see anyone suffer, Yazidi or otherwise. What we do want is to know the truth about what is going on in Iraq even as Obama continues airstrikes, and prepares to send in 130 more American troops.

    U.S. officials said they believed that some type of ground force would be necessary to secure the passage of the stranded members of the Yazidi group. The military is drawing up plans for consideration by President Obama that could include American ground troops.

    So a couple of questions here.

    Long before U.S. airstrikes, the defenseless Yazidi people climbed up that mountain for refuge from ISIS, who supposedly wanted to slaughter them. Why didn't ISIS just also climb up and then slaughter them? We know ISIS had mortars and actual artillery, because the U.S. later bombed those. Why didn't ISIS use those weapons to slaughter the Yazidis from afar?

    Also, after one or two airstrikes, ISIS became so easy to defeat that the Kurds made it possible for 24,000 Yazidis to walk off the mountain, walk into Syria and then U-turn walk back into Iraq and settle in safely. It begs the question about how surrounded by determined ISIS fighters that mountain really was. It takes a long time for 24,000 people to do anything, and they'd need to be walking a long way during which time they would be vulnerable to ISIS. How could ISIS go from being such a threat that U.S. airpower was essential, to be pushed aside by Kurds who otherwise were having their hats handed to them by ISIS everywhere else?

    Comment: According to this article, the whole thing was indeed a pretext to justify a military intervention.
    It turns out there were Yazidis already living on the top of the mountain, and while there were some refugees who fled up there, the humanitarian crisis was never what it was made out to be, and an influx of Kurdish PKK fighters from Syria quickly broke the overblown siege.

    The administration just seems grateful that they got an excuse to start a war they've been chomping at the bit for, and even if the excuse didn't exactly pan out, they'll quickly find another.
    Other sources say that the Yazidis were saved by the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), a group which the US placed on a terrorist list.
    The Yazidis headed for the hills. Some were stranded without food and water. It was certainly a nasty refugee situation and they needed help. When the US finally got on the mountain, they had to admit, "Uh...the situation is not as bad as we thought." That's because the PKK had already saved them. Western media say "Kurdish militias" saved them, because, remember? The Kurds are our new BFFs.



    Light Sabers

    US, European allies can't defeat Putin over Ukraine crisis: Expert James Fetzer

    The US and its European allies would not be able to defeat Russian President Vladimir Putin over the crisis in Ukraine because Moscow has lots of cards to play, an American author says.
    PressTV_Video_1
    © Unknown

    "Russia is not going to allow Ukraine to become a NATO nation or to fall into the hand of extreme anti-Russians," said James Fetzer, an editor at Veterans Today.

    "Russia has lots of cards to play in relation to the pressures from the European nations for more sanctions, including its control of very large proportion of gas that is supplied to those nations," the retired professor from Wisconsin told Press TV on Monday.

    The European Union is seeking to impose further sanction on Moscow over the crisis.

    The author also noted that the United States has "grossly violated" the sovereignty of Ukraine and other Eastern European nations, helping to "destabilize" and install a "puppet regime" in Kiev.

    "The United States has invested some $5 billion to bring about destabilization in the Ukraine," Fetzer said.

    Bad Guys

    Flashback The US State Department's New World Order Agenda

    benghazi2
    © Unknown
    Flag waving Americans want to believe that their government is on the right side of history. Especially in the realm of foreign policy, the myth that the United States saved the world from despotic tyrants, popularly reflected in the victor's account of post World War II, is the accepted viewpoint. Hidden from public education is that the New World Order was the actual winner. The specific inception of the globalist forces that originated the sub rosa directions behind formable institutions and governments dates well back over centuries. However, the modern technocratic era allows for the dramatic acceleration of a one-world system imposition, which was never possible in previous times.

    Loyal citizens of the old republic want to trust that the State Department, commissioned to serve as the guardian and protector of the country, is conducting foreign policy in the best interests of the nation. There is a reason why the Secretary of State is third in line to succeed the President. That purpose, intended to defend diplomatically and promote the public safety and benefit, has served a very different master for a very long time.

    Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg's notorious adage, "politics stops at the water's edge", by no means ever really practiced by the political class a true national defense of the country because it was never the primary goal of the establishment.