OF THE
TIMES

New Poll Says Iranians Like Zarif, Dislike U.S.
A new poll of Iranians taken just before the landmark nuclear deal went into full effect shows strong support for Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and closer ties with Europe, but negative views of the United States
82% had a favorable opinion of Rouhani and 78% liked Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who led the negotiations with the United States and five other nations that culminated in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The poll also found that 59% of Iranians want supporters of Rouhani to win upcoming elections for a new parliament.

Let's not let Flynn forget any of these words. On Syria he has blurted out some similar facts to those Trump has also articulated:It will remain to be seen how well Trump will take advice. But one would think Flynn was offered the position of head of the NSA because his views and those of Trump more or less coincide."Publicly commenting for the first time on a previously-classified August 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) memo, which had predicted 'the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria (...) this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want' and confirmed that 'the Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and [Al Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,' the former DIA chief told Head to Head that 'the [Obama] Administration' didn't 'listen' to these warnings issued by his agency's analysts. 'I don't know if they turned a blind eye,' he said. 'I think it was a decision, I think it was a willful decision.'"Let that sink in. Flynn is taking credit for having predicted that backing fighters in Syria could lead to something like ISIS. And he's suggesting that Obama received this information and chose to ignore it.
Now, here's a question: What impact will "bombing the hell" out of people have? What good will "killing their families" do? Spreading nukes around? "Stealing their oil"? Making lists of and banning Muslims? Is it Flynn's turn to willfully ignore key facts and common sense in order to "advise" against his better judgement a new president who prefers to be advised to do what he was going to do anyway?
Or can Flynn be convinced to apply lessons learned at huge human cost to similar situations going forward even with a president of a different party, race, and IQ?
Comment: This latest setback for the UK child sex abuse inquiry comes just days after ITV News learned that the inquiry had postponed its investigation into the late Labour peer Lord Janner.
What links these stories, and is the real crux of the abject failure in providing justice for the victims, is one of intent.
The inquiry into historic child sex abuse in the UK is "failing tragically" by design. There is NO REAL INTENTION to sincerely investigate these vile crimes against innocent children by the very 'Establishment' that has always colluded to protect the depraved monsters who stalk the Establishment corridors of power.
The inquiry is an illusory smokescreen to create the impression that justice is being served, when in reality it is all part of their modus operandi. For more information, read: UK 'Establishment': Unmasking psychopathic faces - Pedophilia and murder in VERY high places