Puppet MastersS


Red Flag

Washington's False Flag: United Nations Confirmed that US Supported Syrian "Rebels" Were Using Chemical Weapons in 2013

Head of UN Mission Carla del Ponte
Head of UN Mission Carla del Ponte

Washington is Lying.


Both Trump and Obama have blood on their hands. The Chemical Weapons Attack is being used as a "False Flag", a pretext and a justification to wage an illegal war of aggression.


The United Nations in a 2013 report confirms that Syrian opposition "rebels" (supported by Washington) "may have used chemical weapons against [Syrian] government forces."

The UN report refutes Washington's allegations that the government of Bashar al Assad was using chemical weapons against his own people.

What the UN mission findings confirm is that the US sponsored opposition "rebels" largely composed of Al Qaeda affiliated groups, financed and supported by the Western military alliance were responsible for these 2013 chemical weapons attacks.

Comment: See also: Sources ramping the propaganda: SAS mission to destroy Syria's sarin stockpiles called off in 2013


SOTT Logo Media

Best of the Web: Joe Quinn on Press TV: US airstrikes weak response to defuse globalists' warmongering and relentless pressure on Trump

Joe Quinn on Press TV
© Press TV / You Tube
US airstrikes in Syria on 7 April targeted an airbase in the western province of Homs. The US claims the attack was in response to a 'chemical attack' allegedly carried out by Syrian government forces in Idlib earlier this week. Damascus has rejected the allegations and called the US attack a blatant aggression, which makes the US "a partner of the terrorists." Washington's move could further escalate tensions in the war-ravaged country. Sott.net's Joe Quinn recently weighed in on PressTV...


SOTT Logo

SOTT Focus: Fallout from U.S. attack on Syria: Trump loses popular support, congratulated on 'becoming president' by CNN

Shayrat air base
© Mikhail Voskresenskiy / SputnikThe wreckage of destroyed planes on Shayrat air base in Syria
Continuing our coverage of the yet-to-be-investigated chemical attack in Idlib, and the yet-to-be justified U.S. attack on a Syrian airbase by the U.S., here are the most important developments since our last update (available here).

First of all, confirming reports from on the ground at the airbase, and from the Russian Defense Ministry's press conference, that the damage caused by the U.S. Tomahawks (the 23 of 59 that actually hit their target, that is) was not very extensive - the Syrian air force has resumed use of the base. That's a good thing because, as Qusai Nasr, a relative of one of the 14 victims of the Tomahawk attack, told RT, it has been, and will continue to be, actively involved in the fight against ISIS in Syria. Now they can continue to fight the war on terror that the U.S. under Bush and Obama (and now, increasingly, under Trump) has only pretended to fight.

The Syrian Army confirmed their special forces fired at a US reconnaissance plane flying over northwestern Syria. Since the US is flying there illegally, who can blame them?

The U.S. claims the plane that allegedly launched the alleged chemical weapons attack in Idlib came from the targeted base. If so, there would be stores of chemical weapons at the base. And since the ammunition storehouses were targeted, you'd think some of those WMDs would've been hit. Nope. Journalists were at the scene in the immediate aftermath of the strikes - no hazmat suits required... because the Syrian military doesn't have any chemical weapons. It's really that simple.

Info

DPR intelligence identifies arrival of 500 'Islamist radicals' in Mariupol

Islamist radicals in Mariupol
According to the intelligence of the Donetsk People's Republic, an "Islamist battalion" numbering up to 500 men has arrived in Ukraine's Mariupol. This was announced today by the deputy commander of the DPR, Eduard Basurin.

"We've identified the arrival in Mariupol of an Islamist battalion of up to 500 people which will operate in the operations zone of the 36th marines brigade. The battalion is stationed on Bakhchivandzhi Street. The battalion's advisor is a company commander of Ukraine's national guard, Major Karpenko," Basurin reported.

According to him, the unit's tasks include guarding artillery stockpiles and taking control of the Mariupol port. As Basurin reported, the Mariupol port itself has become a hub for illegal weapons trading, including chemical weapons and ammunitions with Middle Eastern countries.

Comment: See also: Turkish mercenaries arrive in Ukraine to plot subversive activities against DPR and Russia


Bad Guys

Putin convenes Security Council meeting, talks U.S. attack on Syria

russian security council putin
President Putin convenes meeting of Russia's Security Council as Russia resolves to beef up Syrian air defences after US missile strike.


Yesterday, within hours of the US missile attack on Syria's Sharyat air base, President Putin met with Russia's Security Council to discuss the US attack.

Russia's Security Council, for those who don't know, is the highest decision making body of the Russian government. It meets regularly every week under Putin's chairmanship, and its remit covers every aspect of Russian policy. This includes domestic and economic policy as well as foreign and defence policy.

All the most important people who make up Russia's political leadership - including Prime Minister Medvedev and the speakers of the two houses of Russia's parliament (the Duma and the Federation Council) - are members, and its membership is not confined to the heads of Russian defence and national security agencies, though of course all of them are members.

Comment: See also: Killary crawls out of her hole, calls for U.S. to "take out Assad's airfields", Trump obliges, bombs Syrian airbase with 50+ Tomahawks


Newspaper

'I never rush to accept anything US says': Former London mayor doubts official Syrian chemical attack story

Ken Livingstone
© Justin Tallis / AFPKen Livingstone
US claims about the alleged gas attack which saw US President Donald Trump launch cruise missiles against a Syrian military facility should not be taken at face value, former London Mayor Ken Livingstone told RT.

Trump launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase in the northwest of the country in retaliation for what the US claims was a regime gas attack against civilians in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun days previously.

No investigation into the gas incident has been carried out and the Syrian government has claimed a conventional bomb hit a rebel chemical weapons depot.

Rocket

Syrian special forces fire at US aircraft

Syrian forces
This is the first military engagement between Syria and the United States since yesterday's US missile attack.

The Syrian Arab Army have confirmed that a Syrian special forces unit fired at a US reconnaissance plane flying over Syian military base in Al-Qamishli in north-western Syria.

Comment: See also: Ron Paul slams Syrian airstrikes: 'Neocons terrified that peace was going to break out'


Cow Skull

Sorry, Democrats - The Obama spying scandal isn't going away

Nunes
Devin Nunes stepped away from the Russia probe. But he's still investigating the Obama administration's leak campaign against the Trump administration.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Devin Nunes on Thursday stepped aside from the probe of Russian actions during the 2016 campaign, saying he needed to deal with a congressional ethics inquiry into claims he improperly disclosed classified information.

Democrats rejoiced at the news. "The White House made a fool of Chairman Nunes, and he has deeply tarnished his credibility as Chairman and the credibility of his Republican colleagues," declared Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi. There is no question that this was a blow for the chairman, following his revelation that Obama administration officials had collected information of Trump transition members incidentally, unmasked it, and widely disseminated it. But the victory for Nunes' critics could be pyrrhic.

Heart - Black

Robert Fucilla and Adrian Eyre Charged With Fraud

Robert Fucilla
Robert Fucilla
Two men have been charged with fraud offences and are due to appear in court.

Adrian Eyre, aged 62, of Irvine Close, Stenson Fields, Derbyshire and Robert Fucilla, aged 40, of High Road, Whetstone, Barnet have been charged under the Fraud Act 2006 with false representation and money laundering offences.

Comment: Check out Sott.net's in-depth investigation into Fucilla et al.

Corruption in Science: Francesco Fucilla and the Telesio-Galilei Academy of Science


Bizarro Earth

The man who promised to 'drain the swamp' has been drained by the swamp

tump swampt
There were only three reasons that a rational person might have considered going out to vote for Donald J Swamp. The first was that he wasn't the psychopath, Hillary Clinton. The second was that he looked to be the least likely of all the candidates to start a war with Russia and therefore WWIII. And the third was that he said he was going to "drain the swamp". They were always very thin reasons. As I wrote back here and here:
"People have elected a loose cannon, and although I will hold my breath and give him a chance, nothing about his character, his temperament, not to mention some of the more stupid statements he has made, gives me much confidence that America in four years will be a whole lot better than the America of 2016."

"Granted, one of the candidates appears, at least on the surface, to be marginally less likely to lead us to a global war than the other. Isn't that a rational reason to vote for him? Possibly, until you consider that the "marginally-less-likely-to-lead-us-to-global-war-candidate" often appears to decide his foreign policy by the use of a roulette wheel, and so whether trusting in the wheel can be counted as rational is a moot point ... The swamp that needs draining is far bigger than the one Mr Trump locates in D.C., and it will take national repentance, not another politician making grand promises, to achieve that."
And so it has proved. Despite being elected on promises of discontinuing America's heinous policies of regime change and fighting hegemonic wars in countries thousands of miles from its borders, Mr Swamp has now broken all of these promises. It is not yet clear whether these promises were always hollow, or whether he has simply caved in to enormous pressure from the neo-Trotskyist Deep State (laughably known as neo-"conservative" (what do they conserve?)).