Puppet MastersS


Gear

Why is Israel silent on Qatar isolation?

netanyahu illegal settlements
Relations between Israel and Qatar have long been frosty - while Jerusalem has cordial dealings with other major Gulf monarchies, Doha's funding of Hamas is a major bone of contention between the pair. However, the country's leaders haven't welcomed the recent isolation of Qatar by its neighbors. This may surprise - but it shouldn't.

Oil-rich Qatar has funded Hamas to the tune of billions of dollars over the course of the group's existence, offered it diplomatic support, and provided asylum to its various exiled leaders and members. Such is the close connection between the two, Hamas opted to launch its revised charter in Doha in May.

Snakes in Suits

'Peculiar move': Merkel attacks new US anti-Russia sanctions

Angela Merkel
© Ralph Orlowski / Reuters
German Chancellor Merkel makes clear through her spokesman that she opposes the anti-Russian sanctions bill passed by the US Senate, which threatens Germany's vital economic interests.

Shortly after the joint statement of the German and Austrian foreign ministers angrily denouncing the new sanctions against Russia voted on by the US Senate, Angela Merkel has added her voice to the protest and is making her opposition to the latest sanctions clear.

In her usual Sphinx like way Merkel avoided making a statement herself. However her views have been made known by her spokesman Steffen Seibert in a briefing earlier today:
There is considerable assent to the contents of this statement. The chancellor shares fears listed in the text......the case in hand are sanctions for Russia's steps but which affect European companies. It is inadmissible.

Comment: And here are some more German and French politician reactions:
On Friday, Merkel joined Austria and France in criticizing the move, and expressed her disapproval with the new package of sanctions specifically targeting EU-Russia energy projects, such as Nord Stream 2, a Gazprom-run flagship pipeline being built to deliver Russian gas to European customers.

"The US Senate's decision raises exactly the same questions for her as it did for [Austrian Chancellor Christian] Kern and [German Foreign Minister Sigmar] Gabriel. It is, putting it mildly, a peculiar move by the US Senate," the chancellor's spokesman, Steffen Seibert, told reporters.

He stressed it was "strange" that European companies would be affected by the sanctions relating to the alleged Russian interference in the US elections.

"That must not happen," the spokesperson said. "We generally reject sanctions with extra-territorial effects, meaning an impact on third countries," he added.

On Thursday, German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel and Austrian Chancellor Christian Kern lambasted the bill, saying in a joint statement: "Europe's energy supply is a matter for Europe, and not the United States of America!"

"Sanctions as a political instrument should not be linked to economic interests," the statement said. It added that "threatening German, Austrian and other European enterprises, which take part in the gas supply projects such as the Nord Stream II together with Russia or finance them, with penalties on the US market would add an absolutely new and highly negative aspect in relations between the US and Europe."

The Austria-Germany statement noted the US bill is deceptive, as Washington wants to force Russian energy supply companies out of the European market. "The actual goal [of such sanctions] is to provide jobs for the US gas and oil industry," the statement said.

Other statements by German officials suggest the Senate's bill is being treated seriously in Berlin. "I regret that the joint approach of Europe and the United States on Russia and sanctions has been undermined and abandoned in this way," Brigitte Zypries, the economy minister, told Reuters.

In Paris, the sanctions bill provoked similar concerns. Alexandre Giorgini, spokesman for the French Foreign Ministry, said the US should coordinate such moves with its G7 partners, taking into account their defense and economy interests.

"It is important for possible new measures to be coordinated between international partners to ensure their impact internationally and to maintain unity among partners on the sanctions," a spokeswoman for the European Commission told Reuters, commenting on the same issue.

European companies are now studying the legal framework under which the US would be able to levy sanctions on them, according to the Financial Times. "This is about creating a threat," said an executive at a company affected by the sanctions. "They have opened their toolbox again."



Mr. Potato

Two Russian "opposition" Navalny party members seek political asylum in Ukraine

Alexei Navalny
Two Russian opposition figures from Aleksei Navalny's party asked for political asylum at the Ukrainian border on June 15, Ukraine's Border Guard Service said.
"Men arrived at the checkpoint and after showing foreign passports of the Russian Federation, immediately expressed their intention to seek protection on Ukrainian territory due to political harassment in Russia," the service said.
Border agents screened the two men along with Ukraine's SBU security service and determined that they belonged to the opposition bloc led by Navalny, which has been persecuted for its political activity.

Both men were allowed to cross the border and were sent to the migration service, Ukrainian authorities said, without providing the men's names.

Comment: Ukraine? Seriously? No wonder these clowns are so unpopular in Russia. That would be like two American Green Party members seeking asylum in North Korea. If anything, this just shows how out of touch Navalny's so-called opposition is. Ukraine is a failed state, an American vassal, and way more corrupt and repressive than Putin's Russia. And Russians know it - Ukraine is killing ethnic Russians in the Donbass and has been for years now. But then, maybe all these things are why it makes such an ideal destination for the American-backed Russian "opposition"?


Bad Guys

From tactics to strategy to political decision - generals make policy backwards

Gen Mattis
© Press TVUS Secretary of Defence James ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis
June 13, 2017 - Mattis promises new Afghanistan strategy by mid-July
Defense Secretary James Mattis on Tuesday promised to deliver a new military strategy for Afghanistan to lawmakers by mid-July, ...
June 15, 2017 - About 4,000 more US troops to go to Afghanistan
The Pentagon will send almost 4,000 additional American forces to Afghanistan, a Trump administration official said Thursday, hoping to break a stalemate in a war that has now passed to a third U.S. commander in chief. [...]

The decision by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis could be announced as early as next week, the official said. It follows Trump's move to give Mattis the authority to set troop levels ...
The U.S. has a problem with the former Marine General Mattis as Secretary of Defense. Mattis thinks tactics, not strategy.

It makes little sense to send additional troops when one does not know what strategy they will have to serve. There is so far no other way to end the war in Afghanistan other than to simply pull out of it. The racket that the war has become can only be stopped by such a grand strategic decision. Sending troops before deciding on the strategy practically guarantees that the choice of a pull-out will be excluded from the evaluated possibilities. The tactical decision of sending more troops will drive the strategy.

Bad Guys

UN report on Ukraine blames both sides, yet all civilian casualties are in Donbass

Significant screen captures from the 43-page PDF, UN Commission on Human Rights: Ukraine Feb. 15- May 15
Ukraine UN map
The "Report of the UN High Commission for Human Rights, Ukraine, February 16- May 15" blames each side, but when the casualties are placed on the map, screen-captured above, we see that all the civilian casualties and almost all the civilian injuries are on the contact line or inside it.

Eye 2

Theresa May clings to power with DUP dirty deal - stain her party may never wash off

Theresa May
© rbwm.govTheresa May at Maidenheadpolling station
Theresa May called the general election claiming it was a referendum on her plans for Brexit, and her leadership of the country. The results were resounding: no, thank you. But instead of standing down, May is doing a deal behind closed doors. And with one of the most regressive political parties in the UK.

The DUP

The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) of Northern Ireland won just 1.5% of the vote. But they have been made kingmakers by Theresa May, who has won their backing to keep Jeremy Corbyn from forming a government. With the Conservatives on 318 seats and the DUP on 10, DUP backing gives the Conservatives the necessary votes to put their Queen's speech through parliament and form a government.

But who are the DUP? What do they stand for?

Star

Tucker Carlson's Oliver Stone interview a fair and balanced discussion of Putin documentary

tucker carlson Oliver stone
© Fox News
Tucker Carlson interviews Oliver Stone about his Showtime documentary The Putin Interviews.

Oliver Stone's interview of the Russian President airing on Showtime has received liberal left condemnation due to its humanization of Vladimir Putin, which for the radical liberal left is a major no-no.

Beta male champion, and Russia hater, Stephen Colbert took the opportunity to treat Oliver Stone with extreme rudeness when he had the Academy Award winning director on his late show, to the pleasure of the propagandized audience who hate anyone Rachel Maddow and Hillary Clinton deem "evil".

Tucker Carlson took a more balance approach to his interview of Stone, allowing the director to give his insights on Vladimir Putin and the current hysteria surrounding Russia, for which Stone notes is the making of (and to the benefit of) the US Deep State.


Comment: Stephen Colbert's Late Show censors Stone comment on Israel's influence in US politics


Arrow Up

Pepe Escobar - The west can't smell what Eurasia is cooking

World map
© pixabay
A tectonic geopolitical shift happened in Astana, Kazakhstan, only a few days ago, and yet barely a ripple registered in Atlanticist circles.

At the annual summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), founded in 2001, both India and Pakistan were admitted as full members, alongside Russia, China and four Central Asian "stans" (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan).

So now the SCO not only qualifies as the largest political organization - by area and population - in the world; it also unites four nuclear powers. The G-7 is irrelevant, as the latest summit in Taormina made it clear. The real action now, apart from the G-20, also lays in this alternative G-8.

Permanently derided in the West for a decade and a half as a mere talk shop, the SCO, slowly but surely, keeps advancing a set up that Chinese President Xi Jinping qualifies, in a subdued manner, as "a new type of international relations featuring win-win cooperation."

That's the least one can say when you have China, India and Pakistan in the same group.

The SCO's trademark, under the radar game is quite subtle. The initial emphasis, as we were entering the post-9/11 world, was to fight what the Chinese qualify as "the three evils" of terrorism, separatism and extremism. Beijing - and Moscow - from the beginning were thinking about the Taliban in Afghanistan, and their Central Asian connections, especially via the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU).

Attention

Stephen Colbert's Late Show censors Stone comment on Israel's influence in US politics

stone Colbert putin interviews
Stephen Colbert (L) and Oliver Stone (R)
Oliver Stone said Israel had more involvement in the US election than Russia. But the mainstream media kept this statement from the public.

Reports have surfaced that during his heated exchange with Stephen Colbert, Oliver Stone responded to statements from Colbert repeating the tired narrative about Russia interfering in the US election by bringing up an elephant in the room that many media outlets have totally ignored.

Stone said of alleged and thus far totally unproved Russian interference,
"Israel had far more involvement in the US election than Russia, why don't you ask me about that?"
Colbert, quick to end that part of the discussion replied,
"I'll ask you about that when you make a documentary about Israel"
This section of the interview was edited out of the final broadcast, but multiple sources, including many pro-Israel sources testify to the existence of the in-studio exchange.

Few could reasonably deny that the pro-Israel lobby in the US is extremely power, well funded and influential.

Oliver Stone touched on a deeply important issue, one that clearly did not fit the anti-Russia stance of Stephen Colbert and his producers.

Laptop

Facebook security lapse exposes identities of moderators to suspected terrorists

Facebook exposes moderators to terrorist
© Dado Ruvic/Reuters
A security lapse that affected more than 1,000 workers forced one moderator into hiding - and he still lives in constant fear for his safety

Facebook put the safety of its content moderators at risk after inadvertently exposing their personal details to suspected terrorist users of the social network, the Guardian has learned.

The security lapse affected more than 1,000 workers across 22 departments at Facebook who used the company's moderation software to review and remove inappropriate content from the platform, including sexual material, hate speech and terrorist propaganda.

A bug in the software, discovered late last year, resulted in the personal profiles of content moderators automatically appearing as notifications in the activity log of the Facebook groups, whose administrators were removed from the platform for breaching the terms of service. The personal details of Facebook moderators were then viewable to the remaining admins of the group.