When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.,
disinvited President Trump from delivering the State of the Union on its originally scheduled date, Jan. 29, the White House and Republicans in Congress brainstormed about what to do. Should Trump travel somewhere, such as the U.S.-Mexico border, and give his speech there? Should he show up at the Capitol on the 29th and demand to speak? Should he deliver the address in writing, as it was for many years of the nation's history?
Fortunately for Trump, none of those ideas passed muster. Then, when the partial government shutdown was
temporarily resolved, the speaker relented and invited the president to appear Feb. 5. Trump agreed, which to some Republicans seemed like a surrender but was in fact a wise decision. Trump realized that there simply was no equally good alternative to delivering the State of the Union from the House chamber, with most of the United States government gathered inside and millions watching not only on the cable news channels but the broadcast entertainment networks, too.
That was especially true with the issue that sparked the shutdown - Trump's proposal for a barrier along some parts of the southern border - still unresolved.
A House-Senate conference committee has a little more than a week to come to an agreement over the barrier, or the government could well shut down again. With both sides dug in, the State of the Union was Trump's best chance to make his case to the American people that the barrier should be part of a broader border policy. Trump had already tried a
prime-time address to the nation, on Jan. 8, and failed to move the needle. The State of the Union was his last chance.
But it was also a chance to make a much bigger case - a case for the results Trump has achieved during his presidency and his agenda for the rest of his term. And Trump made the best of that chance.
Comment: If there was ever a time for Europe's citizens to rise up for free speech, it's now.