Puppet MastersS


Russian Flag

Kremlin: European 'war party' hindering Ukraine peace process

moscow russia buildings
© Sputnik / Maxim Blinov
Several leaders are attempting to derail US president Donald Trump's efforts to resolve the Ukraine conflict, Dmitry Peskov has claimed

A European "war party" is trying to sabotage the diplomatic process launched by the US and Russia to end the Ukraine conflict, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have for months floated the idea of sending a joint military contingent to Ukraine in a so-called peacekeeping capacity if Kiev and Moscow reach a truce or peace deal. Moscow has strongly opposed the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine in any role.

On Sunday, Peskov said the stance of the "European war party" is "in stark contrast to the approach pursued" by Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Attention

'EU warmongers sabotaging' Trump's Ukraine peace efforts - Putin envoy

DmitrievWitkoff
© Vyacheslav Prokofyev/SputnikRussian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev • US special envoy Steve Witkoff • St. Petersburg • April 11, 2025
Kremlin aide Kirill Dmitriev has accused European leaders of prolonging the conflict with "impossible demands".

Russian President Vladimir Putin's special economic envoy, Kirill Dmitriev, has accused the EU of deliberately undermining US-led peace efforts in Ukraine, following media reports that Washington increasingly believes European leaders are obstructing negotiations.

In a series of posts on X, Dmitriev said Brussels is "sabotaging a real peace process" by encouraging Kiev to pursue what he called "impossible demands." His remarks came after reports in Axios and The Atlantic that the White House is growing frustrated with EU governments for undermining US President Donald Trump's peace initiative.

"EU warmongers exposed... Even Washington now sees it - EU leaders are prolonging the conflict in Ukraine with impossible demands," Dmitriev wrote, urging the bloc to "drop Biden's failed logic" and "stop sabotaging a real peace process."

"I warned about these efforts to sabotage the Trump peace plan before," he added in a separate post.

Comment: The price of war is the cost of peace.


Light Saber

Putin calls for international focus on 'traditional values'

Vladimir Putin
© Sputnik/Sergey BobylevRussian President Vladimir Putin.
Russia earlier said the West is using propaganda on gender relations to undermine its statehood

Traditional values are being sidelined internationally and must be brought back to the center of the global agenda, Russian President Vladimir Putin has told leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin.

Speaking at the expanded session of the gathering on Monday, the Russian leader stressed that the SCO's strength lies in its traditional "respect for historical events, cultural values, and civilizational diversity." He added that these principles form the basis for cooperation in science and education, healthcare, and sports.

Putin noted that in the cultural sphere, Moscow is organizing the Intervision song contest, to be held in Moscow on September 20. Portrayed as an alternative to Eurovision, from which Russia has been excluded due to tensions with the EU over the Ukraine conflict, Intervision is expected to feature performers from Latin America, Africa, and Asia.

Skull

Germany: 4 AfD candidates have died 'suddenly and unexpectedly' before key state election - 'statistically almost impossible'

afd right wing party germany tee shirt alternative for germany
© Ying Tang/NurPhoto via Getty Images
Election officials are racing to print new ballots after the "sudden and unexpected" death of 4 AfD candidates right before North Rhine-Westphalia votes

Four Alternative for Germany (AfD) candidates died "suddenly and unexpectedly" in Germany's largest state, North Rhine-Westphalia, right before state elections. Anger and theories are running rife on social media about the sudden deaths of the AfD candidates.

"According to WDR, four AfD candidates who were not excluded have died immediately before the NRW municipal election: Blomberg, Rheinberg, Schwerte, Bad Lippspringe. Statistically almost impossible," wrote Stefan Homburg in a post that received 1 million views.

Comment: The AfD (Alternative for Germany) was originally considered a dangerous, fringe group that promoted ultranationalism, with all the scary echoes that implied. Unfortunately, Germany's lunatic open-door policy for "refugees" which have shredded Germany's social fabric has brought the ideas of the AfD into approving prominence among the general population. They can SEE what is happening to their country. The AfD is tapping into that fury, which terrifies the globalist EU elites currently running the country. Bring on the antifa foot soldiers.


Attention

Psy-Op Alert: The Dundee dagger girl

Mayah Sommers
© Off-GuardianScottish girl (middle) and just some of the AI art depicting her as a hero (left and right, link for more).
She's all over American 'alt-right' media: the 12-year-old girl in Dundee who brandished a dagger in one hand and an axe in the other, apparently to stop a migrant from harassing her younger sister. Outrage on social media escalated when police arrested the girl instead of the alleged predator. Elon Musk contributed to the viral heroine on X.

But did this really happen as presented, or is this another 'psy-op'; to manipulate public opinion in pursuit of problem-reaction-solution?

It may be proven that a 12-year-old girl was pestered, and that her older sister, Mayah Sommers, intervened in an unlawful manner. Yet there are signs of stage management in this case, which arose in the context of heightened concerns about large numbers of male migrants housed in hotels across the UK. Scotland is getting its share of the influx, and noisy protests have erupted in Aberdeen and Falkirk.

The video was produced by the person confronted by the 12-year-old. He is not a recent migrant from one of the hundreds of dinghies crossing the English Channel. Fatos Ali Dumana, aged 21, told the Daily Mail that he came to Britain legally from Bulgaria four years ago, and that he is married and has a young baby. He was merely going to a local shop, he claimed, and never touched or approached the 12-year-old girl. The police are not investigating him for any offence.

If true, this would suggest that the girl described as 'Queen of Scots' by uncritical right-wing pundits was acting on malicious stereotyping of migrants rather than an actual threat. A child caught up in an atmosphere of fear and anger, in a council estate inhabited by white working-class folk uneasy about their new Muslim neighbours (Lochee is a rough area of a city that has seen better days). The incident is then exploited by the authorities to convey a message against 'far-right' agitation.

Attention

The Tianjin Show: Let's dance to the multipolar groove

SCO Leaders in Tianjin
© Public Domain
Oh, what a show that was. A pan-Asia, pan-Eurasia, crossover Global South ball, with glittering dynamo Tianjin as backdrop, enjoyed as such by the overwhelming majority of the planet, while predictably generating cascades of sour grapes among the fragmented West - from the omnipotent Empire of Chaos to The Coalition of the Toothless Chihuahuas.

History will register that as much as BRICS finally stepped into the limelight at the summit in Kazan in 2024, the SCO replicated the move at the summit in Tianjin in 2025.

Among a feast of hightlights - hard to top Putin and Modi walking hand in hand - this was of course M.C. Xi's ball. The original RIC (Russia, India, China), as conceptualized by the Great Primakov in the late 1990s, were finally back in the game, together.

But it was Xi who personally set the main guidelines - proposing no less than a broad, new Global Governance model, complete with important ramifications such as a SCO development back, which should complement the BRICS's NDB, as well as close AI cooperation in contrast with Silicon Valley's techno-feudalism.

Global Governance, the Chinese way, encompasses five core principles. The most crucial, no doubt, is sovereign equality. That connects with respect for the international rule of law - and not a shape-shifted, at will, "rules-based international order". Global Governance advances multilateralism. And also inevitably encourages a much-lauded "people-centered" approach, away from vested interests.

Putin for his part detailed the role of the SCO as "a vehicle for genuine multilateralism", in tune with this new Global Governance. And he crucially called for a pan-Eurasian security model. That's exactly the "indivisibility of security" that the Kremlin proposed to Washington in December 2021 - and was met by a non-response response.

So taken together, BRICS and SCO are totally engaged in burying the Cold War-era mentality, a world divided by blocs; and at the same time they are visionary enough to call for the UN system to be respected as it was originally conceived.

Now that will be the Mother of Uphill Battles - including everything from taking the UN out of New York to completely revamping the Security Council.

Brick Wall

Fed judge blocks Kari Lake from firing VOA president

Michael Abramowitz voice of america chief
© Voice of AmericaMichael Abramowitz, Director of Voice of America (VOA)
Ensures taxpayers keep paying him six figures to do nothing

Kari Lake's effort to fire Voice of America Director Michael Abramowitz has been blocked by a federal judge.

Lake has been trying to oust Abramowitz as she reduces the staff of the agency, but Abramowitz has fought back, saying the only way to fire him is to go through an advisory board that requires Senate confirmation, according to The Washington Post. He has been on paid leave since March.

President Donald Trump removed everyone on the board in January. Replacements are not yet in place.

Comment: American Greatness provides some background as to why there is such a turf war over the VOA
Deep Throat for the Deep State

How a sleepy federal media agency became a bunker for partisan power — and why it matters.

By any normal standard, Monday's filing from Voice of America (VOA) Director Michael Abramowitz — alleging the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) is trying to fire him illegally — should have been a Beltway bombshell. Instead, it barely rippled the news cycle. That's convenient for the people who prefer the U.S. government's vast international broadcasting complex to remain a black box, opaque, unaccountable, and — most importantly — under their control.

I remember the last time a VOA director was shown the door. On January 20, 2021, less than two hours after Joe Biden took office, Robert Reilly told me over the phone, "The guards are escorting me out of the building right now." That same day, the new administration swept out Trump appointees across the USAGM — VOA, RFE/RL, RFA, and MBN — leadership, included — and dissolved boards on the spot. Media outlets applauded, framing it as a restoration of "experienced journalists." The subtext was unmistakable: the right people were back in charge.


So it's all good when the "right people" clean the house to their liking. Got it.


Here's the problem. "Back in charge" at VOA under Biden did not mean neutral, mission-driven journalism beamed to the world. It meant a taxpayer-funded megaphone that echoed the ruling party's priorities while targeting Donald Trump and his voters. Programming celebrated progressive policies, blurred the line between reporting and advocacy on immigration, and, in multiple languages, provided content that critics say veered into how-to guides for navigating U.S. benefits. When your transmitter reaches 45 language services, the line between domestic influence and foreign broadcasting doesn't just blur — it disappears.

At the center of the current drama is Michael Abramowitz, a former Washington Post editor tapped by then-USAGM chief Amanda Bennett. To Trump supporters, Abramowitz represents continuity with Washington's media-political nexus; to his defenders, he's a credentialed professional trying to keep politics out. Both can be true in Washington — and that's precisely why the structure matters more than the personality.

Donald Trump understood VOA's strategic value. After his 2024 victory, he named Kari Lake, an experienced broadcaster, to lead VOA and redirect it to its core mission: telling America's story credibly, not carrying any administration's water. Instead, she ran headlong into a new maze of "reforms" installed during Biden's tenure. Agency directors could no longer be removed by the CEO; ultimate authority now rested with a seven-member International Broadcasting Advisory Board (including the Secretary of State), whose members meet sporadically and require Senate confirmation — a process famous for taking forever when the minority decides it should. Another tweak eliminated the ability to appoint an interim CEO; the VOA director — inevitably a holdover — would automatically act in the role.

Translation: permanent government beats elected government every time.

This wasn't a policy debate about programming standards. It was a procedural encirclement — belt-and-suspenders bureaucracy designed to outlast elections. If you think that's too cynical, ask Michael Pack, Trump's first-term USAGM nominee, who waited three and a half years for confirmation. Or ask Kari Lake, who arrived in Washington prepared to lead VOA and discovered she first had to run the gauntlet of a never-ending confirmation calendar.

Trump adjusted. If the front door was barricaded, he'd use a side entrance — naming Lake a special adviser with a mandate to unwind a "defunct" agency (Hillary Clinton's word, not his). That move triggered the present standoff with Abramowitz, who, according to staff accounts and his own legal filing, decided he would not step aside, would not facilitate reforms, and would instead force a legal-political confrontation that keeps the old machine humming.

This is not a small fight. USAGM's $1-billion apparatus shapes how hundreds of millions abroad understand America. If it becomes a domestically resonant propaganda arm — soft power turned inward — then we've crossed a line the charter was designed to prevent. And suppose its leadership can be insulated from electoral accountability by clever rule changes and Senate slow-walking. In that case, the "administrative state" has discovered yet another pressure point where it can outlast voters.

The fix is simple in principle: restore electoral accountability while preserving the VOA Charter's editorial independence, set firm timelines for Senate confirmation so nominations can't be buried by delay, and re-center VOA on its core mission of telling America's story abroad — measured annually by independent audits. Elections must have operational consequences, and the public should be able to see if the agency is living up to its mandate.

Critics will object that giving a president more control risks politicizing coverage. That objection arrives decades too late. The choice isn't between politicization and purity; it's between politicization hidden inside an unaccountable bureaucracy and politicization constrained by law, sunlight, and elections. I'll take the latter.

Abramowitz's lawsuit is not the story — it's the symptom. The disease is a governing class that prefers to win by rule change rather than persuasion. If the people cannot change the direction of their own government media through the ballot box, then the "deep state" isn't a conspiracy theory. It's a workflow.

Kari Lake promised to make VOA programming fairer, sharper, and more recognizably American. Let her try — or defeat her vision in the open, not by burying it in process. Sunlight, not stalemate, is the real test of confidence. If USAGM's defenders believe in their product, they should welcome both.



Light Sabers

The old world order was buried in China. Here's why it matters

SCO meeting in China 2025
Participants of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit pose for photos at the Meijiang Convention and Exhibition Center in Tianjin, China, Sept. 1, 2025.
The victory over Japan remains one of the most overlooked yet decisive chapters of the war

On September 3, China will celebrate Victory Day - the anniversary of Japan's capitulation in 1945. This year marks the 80th anniversary of that historic moment. The country is commemorating the milestone with a series of events, culminating in President Xi Jinping's speech at Tiananmen Square, followed by a military parade in the heart of Beijing.

For China, the Second World War holds as much significance as it does for Europe or Russia. Yet in the West, the Asian battlefield is poorly understood and often overlooked. While everyone knows about Pearl Harbor, the Normandy landings, the Battle of Stalingrad, Auschwitz, or the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, far fewer have heard of the Mukden incident, the Marco Polo Bridge incident, the Nanjing Massacre, or Unit 731.

And yet it was the Chinese people who paid one of the heaviest prices of the war. Just as the world has rightly learned about the horrors of the Holocaust, it must also confront the reality of Japan's war crimes - and how, after 1945, the United States and its allies shielded many Japanese perpetrators, even exploiting the results of their atrocities for Cold War objectives.

Comment: See also:


Bizarro Earth

NATO's Anschluss

Medvedev
© UnknownDmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Russian Federation, 3rd president of Russia
The countries of the Old World are intoxicated by militaristic frenzy. Like spellbound moths, they flock to the destructive flame of the North Atlantic Alliance. Until recently, Europe still had states that understood: security could be ensured without joining military blocs.

Now reason is giving way to herd instinct. Following Finland and Sweden, Austria's establishment - egged on by bloodthirsty Brussels - is fueling public debate about abandoning its constitutionally enshrined neutrality in favor of NATO membership. Austrian society is far from enthusiastic about the idea. The New Austria liberal party, led by Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger and eager to embrace the bloc, won less than 10% of the vote in the last election.

By contrast, the opposition Freedom Party of Austria, which firmly opposes blindly copying Brussels' militaristic agenda, received support from 37% of citizens. But in today's Europe, when has the will of the people truly stood in the way?

Eiffel Tower

France's recognition of Palestine - Macron's Rubicon

NetiMacron
© UnknownIsraeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu • French President Emmanuel Macron
Macron has crossed his Rubicon and now cannot withdraw; he must see this through to the end.

Last year, four Caribbean states coordinated their recognition of Palestine as a sovereign and independent state. Barbados was first on April 19, followed by Jamaica on April 22, Trinidad and Tobago on May 2, and finally the Bahamas on May 7. On May 28 a joint recognition of Palestine by three significant European countries — which understandably attracted much more media attention — followed: Ireland (a member of the EU), Norway (a member of NATO), and Spain (a member of both organizations). Shortly afterwards, encouraged by that series of recognitions, Slovenia acknowledged the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and the establishment of a national state on June 4, while Armenia did the same on June 21.

The main motives of the small Caribbean states for joining the majority club — which by mid-April last year comprised 137 of the United Nations' 193 full members — were frequent calls from that organization and the wider international community to recognize the State of Palestine, together with genuine solidarity with the Palestinians. As for Ireland, Norway and Spain, their recognition of Palestinian statehood came to a large extent as a result of strong public pressure, visibly alarmed by the absolute humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Spanish society as a whole has long been highly critical of what it sees as Israel's arbitrary actions and mass crimes, while at the same time nurturing sympathy for the Palestinian struggle for freedom.

Comment: Author's assumptions - regarding Macron as Savior and Liberator of Palestine - flesh out a potential scenario slim on reality. Should he attempt, Macron will do this for Macron. He had years to initiate a 'diplomatic operation' while thousands of Palestinians were, and continue to be, murdered under the worst circumstances imaginable. The 'point of no return' happens daily. Where has he been?