
© Sputnik / Vitaliy BelousovRussian and Chinese flags.
Three - interlocked - dates ahead of us could not be more crucial in shaping the next configuration of the currently incandescent geopolitical chessboard.1.August 31/September 1st. Tianjin - half-an-hour by high-speed rail (120 km, roughly $8) from Beijing.
The annual summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), with all 10 member-states, two observers (Afghanistan and Mongolia) and 14 dialogue partners (plenty from Southeast Asia). Crucially, Putin, Xi and
Modi (his first visit to China in 7 years) will be on the same table, as well as Iran's Pezeshkian. That's a compounded BRICS/SCO heavyweight show.
This summit may be a turning point for the SCO as much as the summit in Kazan last year was for BRICS.2.September 3. The Victory Day Parade in Tian'anmen Square, officially celebrating the 80th anniversary of "the Victory of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War". No less than 26 heads of state will be present, including Putin (on a 4-day state visit). They come from all over the Global South, but none from the Global North.
3.September 3. Vladivostok. The start of the 10th
Eastern Economic Forum (EEF), a must-go to understand the finer points of the Russian national strategic priority to develop the Arctic and the Russian Far East, including vast tracts of Siberia; that's a mirror policy of the Chinese effort to "Go West", which started in 1999, to develop Tibet and Xinjiang. A who's who of corporate and business circles from all latitudes across Eurasia will be present in Vladivostok. Putin addresses the plenary session right after his return from China.
Taken together, these three dates span the whole spectrum of the Russia-China strategic partnership; the increasingly interlocked geopolitical and geoeconomic aspects of Eurasia integration and Global South solidarity; and the concerted push by Eurasia actors to accelerate the drive towards a
multi-nodal, equanimous system of international relations.
Comment: USAID was a longtime front for infiltration. Humanitarian 'aid' was the cover and excuse.