Puppet Masters
The two pictures -one showing Gaddafi while still in power, the other showing the Libyan leader being tortured minutes before his brutal murder- were posted by Sen. Rubio (R-FL) on Twitter without any caption. Yet, given his open calls for an armed insurrection in the Latin American country to depose President Nicolas Maduro, the message was clear.
Openly threatening a head of a foreign country with a brutal death at the hands of US-propped militants was, apparently, just a tiny bit off: while a few Twitteratti supported Rubio's vision of Maduro's demise, the majority blasted the senator over an extreme lack of taste or decency.
Branson hoped to attract 250,000 people to the concert and raise $100 million to "buy food and medicine for Venezuelans suffering widespread shortages."
The original version of the article, written by WaPo's South American bureau chief Anthony Faiola and two other journalists, can still be seen at the Mercury News, which aggregated it before the changes were made (including a headline change).
Comment:
- Sir Richard Branson feeds narrative to overthrow Maduro with Venezuelan-border PR stunt "Venezuela Aid Live"
- 'Nothing to do with aid or democracy': Roger Waters rebukes Richard Branson's 'humanitarian' concert for Venezuela
- Caitlin Johnstone: Anyone buying this Venezuela bullsh*t is a complete moron
The Trump administration's coup against Venezuela culminated on February 23 with US-backed opposition attempting to ram several trucks loaded with boxes of USAID "humanitarian aid" across the previously unused Francisco de Paula Santander bridge (also know as the Puente Binacional Tienditas) connecting Colombia to Venezuela.
The trucks failed to reach the other side - but that was never really the point of the stunt. As Father Sergio Munoz, a right-wing Venezuelan activist posted on the Colombian side of the border, explained to journalist Dan Cohen, the humanitarian "aid" was a purely symbolic provocation aimed at discrediting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in international eyes and generating waves of destabilizing violence.
By the end of the day, the trucks lined up on the Francisca de Paula Santander bridge were flanked by gangs of guarimberos.
Comment: Other tweets from the event are surfacing to confirm Blumenthal's reporting

Constitutional norms for thee but not for me:
“If Trump gets away w this border emergency declaration, then a Dem President can declare a gun violence emergency and institute universal background checks and an assault weapons ban by executive action.”
As soon as Trump declared a national emergency to fund the building of a wall on the Mexico-U.S. border-a clear attempt to circumvent the legislative branch and one that I hope leads to the Supreme Court overturning the abused National Emergencies Act (NEA)-the first thing Democrats did was promise to use the law for their own partisan ends, immediately exposing any supposed apprehensions about executive overreach as a fiction.
"Once we beat Donald Trump, we promise the word and spirit of the Constitution will be upheld, because the proper checks and balances are far more important than any fleeting political gain" said not a single Democrat ever. Instead, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Michael Bennet, Chris Murphy, and a slew of others senators threatened to use the same emergency powers for "real" crises like climate change and gun violence. Because it's not the abuse of power they find problematic, but the objectives Trump wants to use that power for that bother them.
Comment: See also:
- Trump declares he'll veto any attempt to block his 'national emergency' declaration
- Democrats introduce resolution to block Trump's emergency declaration to build border wall
- 16 states are suing to halt Trump using emergency powers to build border wall
- Top Trump adviser predicts 'hundreds of miles' of border wall by 2020

A man hurls stones at the Venezuela border in Pacaraima, Brazil February, 23, 2019
Self-proclaimed "interim president" Juan Guaido had called on his followers to create a "human wave" and bring the "avalanche" of humanitarian aid across the borders from Brazil and Colombia on Saturday. He'd crossed into Colombia unmolested the day before, to attend a concert extravaganza in support of regime change and organized by British mogul Richard Branson. Rather than lead the charge across the bridges himself, however, Guaido was nowhere to be seen on Saturday afternoon, RT correspondent Dan Cohen reported from Cucuta, Colombia.
Comment: Branson's aid concert was a flop. Out of a hoped-for 200 to 300,000 attendance, only around 10 to 20,000 people showed up.
Rocks, fire & tear gas
Opposition supporters clashed with Venezuelan border security forces in several hotspots on Saturday, pelting police officers with rocks and setting tires on fire. In one instance, protesters ripped up a tree and used it as a battering ram against Venezuelan police vehicles.
Comment: John Wight's comments to RT on the aid stunt are on point:
The battle over 'humanitarian convoys' is just a big PR operation designed to provoke scenes of violence and justify further US intervention to oust Nicolas Maduro from power in Venezuela, political experts have told RT.Speaking of gangsterism, here's Pompeo's latest display of pomposity:
"This is an attempt to set out a pretext for some kind of intervention," political analyst and journalist John Wight told RT. "The Red Cross and all the other international aid agencies are refusing to touch this because they know that this is a Trojan horse, deployed to try to foment the kind of scenes we're seeing at the border."
Considering the US history of regime-change operations in Latin America, in particular how the hawkish US envoy for Venezuela Elliott Abrams helped smuggle weapons into Nicaragua, William Mallinson, a professor at Guglielmo Marconi University in Italy, warned that "leopards don't change their spots."We're seeing a very big PR operation... US doesn't care about welfare of Venezuelan people.The crisis in Venezuela was to a high degree "directly caused by the United States' sanctions and embargoes," Mallinson said, asserting that opposition leader Juan Guaido was simply picked by the US to do their bidding, selected to secure Washington's political and economic interests.
While Mallinson stressed that the US-led 'humanitarian' intervention might be aimed at keeping the country "as much as possible away from Russia and China," Wight slammed the American policies as a pure form of "gangsterism."
"Does anybody really think that Donald Trump, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton Elliott Abrams care one bit about the welfare of the Venezuelan people?" he wondered, rhetorically. "These are thugs in tailored suits whose views are far closer to Al Capone than to Thomas Jefferson."
The US is "going to do the things that need to be done," Pompeo told Fox News Sunday, speaking about the potential use of military force against Caracas. The state secretary also denounced Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro as a "tyrant" and said he believes that the Venezuelan people see it too.See also: "Yankee, go home": Venezuela expels Colombia's diplomats, US 'aid' trucks sent back - Bridge border standoff rundown
Washington will not stop until it "makes sure" that "there is a brighter future for the people of Venezuela," Pompeo said, adding that the US would continue to support the self-proclaimed interim president, Juan Guaido.
"We're very hopeful in the days and weeks and months ahead the Maduro regime will understand that the Venezuelan people have made its days numbered."
While blowhards like Bolton are using the burning aid truck as a means to attack Maduro, it's looking as if it was opposition activists who started the blaze - hardly Maduro's fault or the fault of the Venezuelan troops on the border. First of all, as Fort Russ points out:
Imagine the response if Venezuela tried to drive a caravan of "humanitarian aid" across the border in McAllen, Texas, Nogales on the Arizona border, or the crossing in California at Mexicali. It would likely resemble Bush the Elder's Highway of Death in Kuwait.Fort Russ also provides the evidence showing that opposition members planned and started the fire:
In the first video you can hear the Venezuelan opposition talking about using gasoline and making Molotov cocktails literally just minutes before the aid convoy was set on fire.Venezuela's Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza challenged US Secretary of State Pompeo and his 'hitmen', saying they were searching for the pretext for war.
"Gas has arrived!" can be heard in this video moments before some aid trucks were burned. Of course the media blamed Maduro.
This video, it is straight forward - you can see the opposition prepare Molotov cocktails - the same Molotov cocktails used to set the aid trucks on fire.
In the photo you can even see where the Venezuelan forces are located (circled in green) and where the cockroaches are (circled in blue).
These idiots cannot even make a hoax correctly but they want to remove an entire elected government from power?
"The CIA expert in false flag operations, Pompeo, thinks he can fool the world with a truck set ablaze by his own agents in Colombia," Arreaza tweeted on Saturday in response to recent clashes along the Venezuelan-Colombian border. ...And as Moon of Alabama argues, the aid stunt failed to achieve any of its objectives:
In his tweet, Minister Arreaza posted several photos which appear to show the burnt truck on the Colombian side of the bridge, where it was set on fire after failing to cross the border.
"If you want to find those who burnt the truck with fake humanitarian aid, look among your own employees," Arreaza wrote.
Yesterday's "humanitarian aid" stunt at the Colombian-Venezuelan border was supposed to achieve four points:Point 1 was clearly not achieved. A few hundred young men attacked the Venezuelan National Guard force that closed off the border. Attempts were made to ram "aid" trucks through. Random Guyaido was nowhere to be seen. The whole thing ended in a minor riot. The violent attackers received gasoline and made Molotov cocktails to attack the guards and set the "aid" trucks alight. The riots continued (vid) until about midnight but neither any rioters nor the aid passed through the border.
- to breach the border and thereby open venues that could later be used for the passage of arms and fighters,
- to incite large scale defections from the Venezuelan army and police forces,
- to demonstrate to the outside world that the Random Guyaido, who declared himself president, has a large following and is thereby legitimate enough to support him,
- to deliver justification for further steps against Venezuela.
...
The attempt to incite defections of Venezuelan security forces largely failed. A handful of National Guard foot soldiers went over to the Colombian side. But the National Guard lines held well even under a hail of stones and fire and the units were quite disciplined in taking and holding their positions. The military of Venezuela stays firmly on the side of the state.
The "aid" nonsense did not help to brush up Guaido's legitimacy. Defying a court order Guaido left Venezuela and entered Colombia. If he ever goes back he will have to go to jail. The large mobilization inside and outside of Venezuela he had promised completely failed to appear. The melee at the border crossing only showed that his followers are a gang of brutal thugs.
Guaido also lost his original legal position. He claimed the presidency on January 23 under this paragraph of article 233 of the Venezuelan constitution:When an elected President becomes permanently unavailable to serve prior to his inauguration, a new election by universal suffrage and direct ballot shall be held within 30 consecutive days. Pending election and inauguration of the new President, the President of the National Assembly shall take charge of the Presidency of the Republic.That the "elected President becomes permanently unavailable" was never the case to begin with. But if article 233 would apply Guaido would have had 30 days to hold new elections. The 30 days are over and Guaido did not even call for elections to be held. He thereby defied the exact same paragraph of the constitution that his (false) claim to the presidency is based on.
...
The next steps the U.S. will take will "soften up" its target for an upcoming invasion. They will include further measures to make Venezuela ungovernable and to starve its people into submission. One possible step, even while legally unjustifiable, is a sea and air blockade. The "soften up" phase will take many month, if not years, to achieve some noticeable changes on the ground. Only then will further action be merited. The actual point in time will depend on how it may influence Trump's domestic standing.
Would launching a war on Venezuela help him to get reelected or will the war have to wait until he wins his second term?
If you did, and had a voice in the media, the chances were you'd be branded a 'Saddam apologist'- or worse, by Establishment gatekeepers.
It was gas-lighting on a massive scale as basic common sense told us that Iraq did not possess WMDs. Because if it did, then Bush and Blair would not be so keen to invade- and do the one thing that would provoke Saddam into using his deadly armoury.
The 2019 equivalent of 'Iraqi WMDs' is the claim that the British Labour Party, under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, is 'awash with anti-Semitism'. And guess what? It's being pushed by much the same pro-war crowd.
Comment: See also:
- Is There a Hidden Hand Behind The 'Clash of Civilizations' in Europe?
- More fake anti-Semitism? 'Spike' in neo-Nazi graffiti on streets of Paris blamed by French government on Yellow Vest protesters
- Israeli diplomat recorded plotting 'take-down' of UK MPs
- "Funny tinge": UK MP quits 'racist' Labour party, hours later makes bizarre reference to skin colour
- 'Those seven dwarfs date back to Tony Blair, good riddance': Rundown of Labour MPs' defection
It's clear that to me now that Merkel's priorities for what is left of her term in office are as follows:
- Carve out an independent path for EU foreign policy from the U.S. through the creation of an EU army, obviating the need for NATO and...
- End U.S. occupation of Germany.
- Secure Germany's energy future, which also secures its political future as the leader of the European Union, by stitching together the continent with Russian energy arteries - Nordstream 2, Turkstream.
- Manage the shift away from NATO as a controlling force in Europe's relationship with Russia which doesn't serve Europe's long term purposes.
The recommendation from Mueller, who is investigating Russia's role in the 2016 U.S. election and whether Trump's campaign conspired with Moscow, increases the likelihood that Manafort will spend the rest of his life behind bars.
Manafort pleaded guilty in a federal court in Washington last September to conspiracy against the United States - a charge that includes a range of conduct from money laundering to unregistered lobbying - and conspiracy to obstruct justice for attempts to tamper with witnesses.
He can be sentenced up to five years for each count, for a statutory maximum of 10 years.
While Mueller did not recommend a specific sentence he portrayed Manafort as a "hardened" criminal who was at risk of repeating criminal behavior if released from prison.
Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett claimed on Sunday that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump were planning to establish a Palestinian state in the West Bank and divide Jerusalem "a day or two after election day" on 9 April.
"Netanyahu and President Trump have agreed to come out with the plan to establish a Palestinian state on 90 percent [of the West Bank]. They've agreed not to present the plan before election day so that it doesn't hurt Netanyahu, but a day or two after election day the plan will be presented, and will include the division of Jerusalem", Bennett, who heads the New Right party, said at a cabinet meeting.
Comment: Bennett is a rival of Netanyahu, so it would make sense that by saying this, he is hoping that it does hurt Netanyahu. The upshot of this is that when the plan is finally released, we'll be able to see if Bennett is just lying. Not that his popularity would at all be affected if that were the case...
In order to implement such a peace plan, Netanyahu would turn to the centrist Blue and White party of Benny Gantz in hopes to form a national unity coalition, Bennett went on to say.
"[Blue and White no. 2 Yair] Lapid and Gantz will join [the Likud-led government] and establish a 'national peace government'", he said, adding that the only way to stop that is a "strong and authentic New Right".
Netanyahu was quick to react to the claims, dismissing them as "unfounded":
"It's natural that he is stressed and he's a bit confused. It's obvious that small parties do all sorts of strange things during the election, including saying things that are unfounded".
France has complained that joint arms manufacturing projects are being stalled by Berlin's refusal to authorize future arms export licenses to Saudi Arabia, a major buyer.
It has not formally banned previously approved deals but has urged industry to refrain from such shipments for now.
Comment: While some in the US want the Saudi's to have nuke capabilities, whatever could go wrong? Trump accused of seeking to sell US nuclear 'secrets' to Saudis
See also:
- 'Unconstitutional': Austria wants no part of European army proposed by Macron, Merkel
- UK's billions in arms deals to Saudi Arabia make it "utterly complicit in the destruction of Yemen" (VIDEO)














Comment: What a deranged specimen.