The COVID-19 coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has a telltale "fingerprint" that means it is highly likely to have been made in a lab, new
research has found.
Mathematical biologist Dr. Alex Washburne and colleagues Valentin Brutte and Antonius VanDongen have published their research in a
preprint that found "a high likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated as
an infectious clone assembled in vitro".
They explain that this evidence, which they term
an "endonuclease fingerprint", is independent of the evidence relating to the
Furin Cleavage Site, which others have suggested is a 'smoking gun' for a lab origin.
Dr. Washburne stresses that he is not alleging malign intent or even gain-of-function work in this paper. He
writes: "We find no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 being a bioweapon (on the contrary, this looks like an accident) or any gain of function work. We find evidence suggesting SARS-CoV-2 may have been synthesised in the lab with known methods, probably for normal pre-Covid research purposes."
Professor Francois Balloux has given the study his imprimatur
on Twitter, writing: "This is an important piece of work. To me, it looks solid both conceptually and methodologically.
I was given advance warning and was able to replicate the key findings. To the best of my knowledge, I confirm the reported patterns are genuine."
Comment: