OF THE
TIMES
"Camp 1391, also referred to as Unit 1391 or Facility 1391, is an Israel Defense Forces prison camp in northern Israel for "high-risk" prisoners. It is run by Unit 504. The existence of the prison was unknown to the public before 2003, and most information about it remains classified (...)
The location of the camp was accidentally discovered by Kroizer, who found a 70-year-old map drawn by a government architect while researching old British police buildings. On the map were 62 British police compounds in Palestine in the late 1930s and early 1940s where Arab and Jewish militants against the British occupation were interrogated"62! This shows that the trend of the Israeli-torture-prison-for-the-pesky-Palestinians was already in motion and that it's not an Israeli invention. But I do believe that Israel is simply the WW2 winner's baby. Not an "independant state".
Pathocracy is a macrosocial expression of psychopathy. It has no fundamental relationship with either zionism or anti-zionism. In other words, a Jewish pathocracy is just as possible as an anti-Jewish pathocracy, or a pathocracy that has no relation to eitherIt describes zionism as not being the very prime "culprit". Even if unknown and difficult to grasp, I would tend to adhere to what HK says. It kind of puts me out of my comfort zone because I have a whole intellectual setup going by "zionism at the top".
... when your institution adopts the psychological methods of psychopathy, you open it to institutional capture by actual psychopaths...
... If you adopt the psychological techniques of a pathocracy, you’ll probably end up adopting the psychology (and psychological demographics) of a pathocracy...
... When you adopt the means of a psychopathic enemy, you put yourself within the “gravity well” of a ponerogenic telon or attractor...The above are the lights I would be eager to provide to a fellow who reached the stage where he identified Zionism as wrong - but remaining at it. There seems to be a step above. Looks like a generic and foreign body somehow.
Just for reference, since we’re on the topic, here's something Lobaczewski wrote which is relevant: “Appearing in its highest frequency among Jews, and due to the exceptional tenacity and persistent nature that characterizes this pathology [i.e. schizoidia], it marks their whole civilization, worldview, and activity.” He writes this partly in reference to the presence of Jews in the early stages of Bolshevik ponerization, as well as in the creation of communist ideology.From what I understand, Jews are more frequent carriers of psychopathology and so they definitely play a crucial role. Question I am asking myself is what to think. I do believe that Jews who are heavy carriers tend to be used and are given bridges. But not all.
It has no fundamental relationship with either zionism or anti-zionismThis means that the stuff is of a different nature. I do believe then, that we should treat Zionism and other ideologies as "normal human intellectual failings", that we should spot logical flaws - and not give in as a matter of strategy ("because we know it's an attractor"). So the intellectual attitude of criticism regarding ideological specs is correct, after all, but, we need to stop here during the exercise, look around, and see that there is something that does not belong to the whole "intellectual pool exercise" - the real ennemy.
LindaMay The naming of the land as Palestine comes from when King David ruled the land and when Europeans were the wealthy ruler over the area. Then the Maccabean slave revolt drove them out and the lower class took control. The Romans later came in and completely destroyed the area, taking the "mother church" with them to Rome. The area was then known as the Ottoman empire. Ottoman means lower class; people who are below you.How's that? Pretty damn good haha, I learned something new, thanks again. My mind isn't set up to remember all this 🤧 🙃 though but I DO appreciate. You weaved many bits together very nicely which I have read over the years and that does help me but truly this stuff is still way over my head.
Hence it later being used to describe a footstool.
There was a constant changing over of power as the Arabs, Egyptians and Jews fought amongst each other to gain control with the Arabs coming out on top and making the area Muslim. In the mid 1800's the Jewish community started passing around the notion of returning back to the "motherland," which was more than likely started by the British government along with the Catholic church, in order to rid Europe of the spreading Jewish religion. The area then became mixed again with Jews and Arabs. After WWI Britain dismantled the Ottoman empire and broke up the area into smaller states. The British issued in 1917 the Balfour Declaration, which stated the establishment of a national home for Jewish settlers would be established. The League of Arabs which was a regional organization that was trying to establish its power in the area, disagreed with this decision. The Sykes-Picot Agreement, in 1916 had already divided up control of the area between France and Britain. The main goal was to have Palestinians, Jews and Arabs to continue fighting amongst themselves over who ruled the areas in order to keep them weak and under a distant British control. Britain also wanted to win over Jewish communities around the world to add to their power structure. Britain defeated the Ottoman Empire and took control of the Palestine area at the beginning of 1918. Palestinian Arabs call this the "year of catastrophe" and was the last time they had control over the area. Britain and Jews have controlled it the last 108 years.
How's that?
is it like when you call someone who is Fat Slim?Looks like a homemade English expression - what does it mean?!
Do you realize that WWI was happening from 1914-1918?Do you say this because I am using some background going back to 1917? Or it could be that you mean that one has to take WW1 in consideration - something that I did not?
Or that Hitler double crossed Russia and attacked them in WWII which made Russia then take the side of the Allies?This is not mutually exclusive with the scenario I have been laying down; you know, my main point was that regarding "WW2 history", there was that guy, Stalin, and he was a real butcher. The guy matches "the ponerological model" with perfection, which means that this guy matches the top end super psychopath who creates a pathocracy (totalitarism) - its features is "macro scale".
MCsnacks Hello,Excellent!! Communication skills, integrity, and intelligence (I can't judge the theme because my brain, as already mentioned, doesn't know how to compute all that 🙃 but I very much can appreciate nonetheless.
Sorry I don't understand the following:is it like when you call someone who is Fat Slim?Looks like a homemade English expression - what does it mean?!Do you realize that WWI was happening from 1914-1918?Do you say this because I am using some background going back to 1917? Or it could be that you mean that one has to take WW1 in consideration - something that I did not?
Any way:Or that Hitler double crossed Russia and attacked them in WWII which made Russia then take the side of the Allies?This is not mutually exclusive with the scenario I have been laying down; you know, my main point was that regarding "WW2 history", there was that guy, Stalin, and he was a real butcher. The guy matches "the ponerological model" with perfection, which means that this guy matches the top end super psychopath who creates a pathocracy (totalitarism) - its features is "macro scale".
This is why... I won't adhere with "historical scenarios" going by "Hitler the bad guy double crossed on Russia" - aka "he wanted it all" or things like that. There is, of course, but the reasons why can become... understandable. What if Hitler noticed, at the last minute, that Stalin & UK were in cahoot, from the start? That he got fooled?
Germany, early century, notices a very odd strong funding by Rockfeller. Much money - it goes towards "eugenism" and all that nazi mess with genetical breeds etc. And then, Germany goes through very chaotic times. The people are completely ruined, they are a shamble. This is when Hitler pops up. And he's being given a golden bridge. He gets all the power, when he's a nobody with crazy ideas.
I do believe that at some point, during the war, Hitler understood he has been sidetracked and brought there, like a useful idiot. And then went against Stalin.
Very honestly, Hitler did a public service in trying to exterminate the gulag bosses. The guy, that Stalin, really killed too many people. I mean... 40 millions, not in a context of world war?! We have been noticing the recent events in Palestine, where, what, 300'000 to 500'000 people got killed. The guy did 40 millions.
in this aspect, the Allies siding with Stalin becomes a reprehensible act, somehow. The guy, in regard, let's say, of the planet, the cosmos & the Truth, was a negative wart to get rid of. They sided with him... I believe that's something relevant.
I hope this explains my view on the matters. Concept would be: "I mean... Watcha do with Stalin?!" The guy appears to be the nastiest criminal ever. That's blood bath there. I suppose we tend to neglect this spec because of his siding with the allies, and with the fact that he stopped Hitler.
But man, look, this was not "Russia", this was "Sovietism" and the govt was articulated around a revolutionary ideology that got hijacked by a piece of bloody soul-less guy. Somehow it's about deciding to do something with his background, his c.v. and I believe that it actually matters - a lot. See what I mean? We actually got a criminal in free wheels. A true genuine piece of garbage with disregard towards humanity. And he killed. He did what he wanted. And he did. Extermination. Totalitarism.
With the greatest respect, the nicest way I can put it, you are pulling my plonker? And who the hell is Harrison KOEHLi
intending to understand our world better, relaying knowledge and Truth. I am a seer, and don't pretend to know or understand. Just trying to sum up the best I can for others, as I do believe that the ponerology is really a model that provides an objective view of reality.Harrison KOEHLI is part of the Sott network and has been specializing in the study of psychopathy. On Sott, one of the fundational book is "Political ponerology" - you may have spotted some ads in the margins. The book is THE psy book that solves the mind things and which teaches a proper psychology approach. No Freud & stuffs in there.
Yes it is good for getting answers and clearing up peoples misunderstandings. People fail to understand past times because they don't even understand current statistics and data. For example why the marrying age in most religions is 18 for boys and 16 for girls. The reason is that the male/female ratio during reproductive years is 51% male and 49% female. If you were to just look at the overall ratio you would get the wrong impression because statistically the ratio overall is 52% female and 48% male when considering all ages. But people forget women live longer then men so once you get over the age of 36 is when the female ratio starts to take over the trend. So by the time you get to the age of 60 the ratio is around 60% women and 40% men. Just as the younger you go the male ratio increases because there are more males born than females which nature balances with male homosexuality. There is no female homosexuality. Science has found that all females have an evolution based sexuality towards one another. When women see a sexual act their pupils will dilate, doesn't matter if it's a male or female act. The reaction only occurs in straight men when it's strictly female directed. This is more than likely based on the fact that millions of years ago the first living animals would have been females and would have had to produce offspring asexually. There are even 3 or 4 animals that can still do this today if their environment is all male or female which makes it so life is guaranteed to continue. It is the reason that snakes and alligators are the oldest living animals on the planet, having survived several Ice Ages and comet strikes.YES McS!!
LindaMay Remember. Capricorns are the analytic type, so they’re not too wrapped up in their personal feelings. They’re sensible, honest, fearless and realistic. Capricorns traits develop the way they do due to them having to survive the harshest part of the year. This creates stamina and a drive to achieve with patience.Cappy is wise + leader (analytical), CARDINAL Sign that initiates a season. Winter; gifted in austerity stoïcism. The achievement, stamina, patience is part of the Cap-born zodiac's gifted medicine aka make-up and organically repeatedly in use. The gifts, medicines are in the native's spiritual dna. The gifts come innately in the same way the Cheetah knows to exude/express speed and not fly like an eagle or slither along. The healthy Capricorn achieves etc, also depending on which position it holds, which House AND the degree (from 1-30) and all aspectual relationships within not only the Natal but also Progression + Solar Charts (+ their assigned Position, Houses, Degrees, and Aspects). We can precisely pierce into who what where when why is woven in the individual's Natal destiny. TransENDdance means the expression of the SKIES are in synch, in harmony (not creating shadows) by the individual. We either live out our Destiny or create our Fate. For example a young soul has very little or weak Capricorn in their charts... it takes practice to make perfect, over lifetimes. (Btw, same goes for Animal Medicine aka Totem Animals. An insect has lower frequency than Dolphin, and Rabbit or Mouse people are not Leaders, Puma is the ultimate Kingly Leader, people born 17 or year of birth summing to 17 as for example 1925, or peeps who own or owned a white 🐈).
This is why January is known as the deadliest time of the year.
palestine That’s why I said with respect!Talk or WALK.
Now I at my age know there is something in what you say, but again with respect before Freud the subject of Psychopathology and Ponderology was contained in one book for each! Today It has diseases that you cannot pronounce symptoms never seen before and attributes that seem more like excuses or excuses to ignore, because someone is making a fortune. And there are thousands of books.
If I may make a few examples they will all link to my theory! Take those with. Something that was never seen before the MMR! Dare you say that on open forum! But, you speak to any nurse that’s served mental hospitals, they are concise with their replies. But too many corrupt people are making too much money, at least £2300.00 for a week for one of these people in a place in the “community”, But look into the facts, autistic children from none to hundreds if not thousands! Let’s look at depression, we have mental hospitals full of people, again some there for our safety, and their but again many there as sad broken people. What government strategies and policies ! Lives destroyed by the state with the destruction of family, the destruction of the family unit ! The military brutality for the political class! Tthe Police creating a money supply by those who live by those that conform. The lack of social, education producing only those unable to think for themselves unable to critical think, the welfare of families being destroyed by poverty lack of social cohesion and margilisation by class and the lack of opportunity!
Every one of these are man made, they know the MMR has created the problem but it’s your kids, They stopped the MMR in Japan. To increase the MMR sales, they give children who are Breast fed and fully immunised from said milk, for a year at least, 18-20 injections within the first 16 weeks!
You use quite poetic words, you discuss abstract thoughts, you place various theories together and let your mind create various scenario's. But you never ever come to a full stop. A certainty! I have rambled here because I have so much to say with so much facts it’s the time needed to prioritise it all and logically organise it all! Start with solid fact solid problems and instead of abstract thoughts….take it to a logical conclusion. I’m certainly not saying your wrong , I don’t ponder over a problem my family may have, I look at the facts look at what’s causing the problem what’s the impediment the result of the impediment, and with logic resolve the problem. But you cannot say some one needs a cot, if they have just had an abortion!
Highlander SauerKrautORGANization means happy ORGANS. Organization equates to HEALTH. Simple.
(1 word)
Stalins party had more support so he took over the Soviet Union.I believe there is a bit of "interpretation" in this - which tends to lessen Stalin's responsibility and in the end portrays him as a common person.
Stalin was just a poor leader and because of him lacking these skills had to make terrible and despicable decisions in order to maintain power. This was probably due to him having a need for control after being raised in his younger years without any. You also have to understand the environment that he was surrounded with. There were millions of people starving, which they blame on leadership and in turn makes leadership their enemy. The decisions he made are no different than any person that leads a nation. Every leader of every country in the history of the world have the same exact mentality. In order to lead a nation you must be willing to decide who lives and who dies which is based on your perception of what's most important to you.
That’s why I said with respect!I felt & spotted that, thank you. I tried to remain cautious and to as well preserve a good communication (as much as I could when things start to go towards some dead-end - glad we are getting out of it!)
You use quite poetic words, you discuss abstract thoughts, you place various theories together and let your mind create various scenario's. But you never ever come to a full stop. A certainty!Yes I know. There may be something I am trying to say and it transpires. But overall, "thanks for giving me a chance".
Start with solid fact solid problems and instead of abstract thoughts….take it to a logical conclusion.Thanks for pointing this out to me. I will try to keep this in mind. Will help me to get heard/understood when required!
Now I at my age know there is something in what you say, but again with respect before Freud the subject of Psychopathology and Ponderology was contained in one book for each! Today It has diseases that you cannot pronounce symptoms never seen before and attributes that seem more like excuses or excuses to ignore, because someone is making a fortune. And there are thousands of books.This is something very important that I may solve in a finger's snap, as follows: thinking for a moment that "Political Ponerology" is THE book.
...was contained in one book for each!B ooks, esoteric & spiritual knowledge has been one of the most tampered-with stuff. We may wander for a whole existence and exclusively stumbling upon false teachings / layered teachings.
Highlander You don't even know historical facts. I'm surprised you can even read. There is no second coming of Jesus Christ mentioned in the Torah. So I don't know why you think that's what Jewish people believe. The Torah instead speaks only of the first coming of the messiah."I'm surprised you can even read."
Some argue of a second exodus but that still isnt directly mentioned in the Torah and can only be assumed.
(Joe) Did we ever ask what the general cause of autism in kids is?[Link]
(L) What is the general cause of autism?
A: Vaccines.
Q: (L) So in other words, a large number of kids are being made autistic by vaccines
You use a dictionary rather than a sentence!I have an intellectual background & trajectory - and I am French native. This taints my writings twice - sorry when it sounds like that
Highlander Yea a nurse can. The one you are talking about didn't do that! So they are giving medical advice without the knowledge of a doctor. It doesn't have to be googled. It is simple. He didn't go to medical school so he's not a medical doctor.
Where do you think the term Pale comes from? This is why pale means white.WHITE means PURE 'transPARENTcy aka light💡🕯🔦 not manipulated nor manipulating one's ego/shadow.
Palestinian was always a derogatory term meaning slave of the white people until recently.Only by the 'small people' manipulators. Still as today.
LindaMay Have you ever read John Dee's works? He was alive during Nostradamus time. An astrologists who worked with the Queen of England. And he is where Ian Fleming got the agent 007 from because that was Dee's secret call sign in letters he wrote to the queen which he would also write "For Your Eyes Only."Just finished, he was considered a spy, typical Scorpio gift. You know he was born July (007).
I cannot find any reference to Britain not recognising Palestine, only rhetoricDo you mean, "at the time" or today? Because as for today I can find the following:
The United Kingdom does not recognise Palestine as a stateI would say that when Britain allocated Palestinian lands for the settlement of a Jewish state, it goes by "we decide to do some cooking with our belongings".
until the British surrendered the Mandate in 1948So what we had until then was
British-ruled Mandatory PalestineSo
The war saw Britain occupying Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, where it set up Mandatory PalestineIn so it was colonization and occupation.
the region of Palestine was ruled by various empires and experienced (...)Could be, technically, that Palestine, at the time, was not much of "a country", somewhow, but " a region from the Ottoman empire" . Could be there was no question regarding "state recognition" actually.
In 1920, the League of Nations granted Britain the mandate to govern PalestineIt means "to govern the region of Palestine"
The League of Nations approved the British Mandate for Palestine in 1922Could be that all those efforts & stuffs were articulated around "a region", "an area". I suppose we today automatically imply "the country Palestine", when actually it could be that on paper, no such thing exists.
The Uk recognised Palestine in 1917You may want to refine your idea if you think that this implies a state recognition, lets' say, "in international terms", "on paper" etc
1. Acknowledges the proclamation of the State of PalestineWhat does not follow is then this recognition by several UN members. I have no clue what to do in such situation.
You mean the entity with more information and knowledge of the people involved than you.MCsnacks, I'll probably get back to you on this comment when I have more time, but for the moment yes they would have more knowledge and info since they (Satan & little Satan) are behind most of the BS and nefarious happenings around the world, leaves me kind of stranded but not stupid as you are alluding to my friend!
MCsnacks Your first interaction with me includes a too high level of disrespectExpressing oneself frankly is actually the opposite, an extension of RESPECT aka love. Sentimentality colours perception aka truth. That is on you.
Adding to this that some of your answers are wrong & off track to such an extent that the whole lays down an equation hinting at what to do: does not look productive or objective to pursue any form of basic interaction
We are not on the same tuning so let it be good luck all the best
For someone named Palestine you have absolutely no knowledge about it. (...) I would suggest reading history books before commenting on said history.That's pretty harsh - objectively and technically speaking for a "hey hello I have another tak / I would like to react to your post"
an extension of RESPECT aka love
That is on youDid you smoke crack or what?
LindaMay His very first interaction with me was the following answer:Being direct + frank is a sign of RESPECT, something only about 22 people worldwide innerstand ...For someone named Palestine you have absolutely no knowledge about it. (...) I would suggest reading history books before commenting on said history.That's pretty harsh - objectively and technically speaking for a "hey hello I have another tak / I would like to react to your post"
Now a second thing:an extension of RESPECT aka loveThat is on youDid you smoke crack or what?
Does anyone Know for sure. could they point it out for me? I would be most grateful.I doubt you expected such rapid & profound generosity and collboration.
July 22 1946 King David Hotel bombing where the British administration along with American citizens were set up and their families. 91 Men, women, and children blown up by the Palestinians.Oh Pious one, would you care to revisit your position on the above statement.
July 22 1946 King David Hotel bombing where the British administration along with American citizens were set up and their families. 91 Men, women, and children blown up by the Palestinians.
April 25 1946 7 British guards are ambushed and killed by Palestinians.
Civil War began in 1947 between the Arabs and the Jews. Which like all civil wars ends with a loser and a winner.
March 1 1920 Palestinian Arabs attack a Jewish camp killing 13-Men, women and children.
April 1920 Neba Musa riots 9 killed
May 1921 Jaffa riots 95 killed
August 1929 Palestine riots 249 killed
Riots in 1932, 1933, 1936.
Palestinian Arab strike in 1936 kills 314.
200 more killed from 1940-1945.
MCsnacks Lolll
Seriously,,, you should see the paragraphs written on other threads. It's called OCD
Use it or loose it so they say.... what a waste of life!!
Trump is attempting to remove his military from direct contact with Russia.Don't you think it's great that he makes the whole troops out of Ukraine?
" Who killed Soleimani?"It lessens the idea of Trump being a warmonger & randomly eliminating people he does not like
Trump, but likely with the tacit approval of the Ayatollah. Soleimani had become powerful enough to challenge the Iranian state authorities. He was a threat to them, and was likely planning to start a major offensive against Israel and the US which would have ended badly for all concerned. At the time, Trump said that he ordered the assassination of Soleimani to "stop a war". He probably did.
Buffalo_Ken No Ken, Linda needs no help, the lady manages all by herself to put those limited by bias or limited of humanity to inform them in a manner best suited to their capabilities!💣💥
Acceptance of the legitimacy of the State of Israel is fundamentally different from the acceptance of the legitimacy of any other State in the world because, in the case of Israel, it implies acceptance of the basic claim of the Zionist Jews that God gave Palestine to them as an "ever-lasting possession.You were initially asking about Palestine's recognition as a state if I remember correctly.
When you sleep what do you dream about?I'll try to answer both honestly:
or
May a soul sleep in the afterlife? and why?
"The sheer balls it takes to try to make yourself out as being right by lying about how you are the sole person who followed the rules and didnt try to service oneself,"despite me clearly stating it, you don't accept it
Ponerology is nonsense.It could be that Sott may actually not be the best place for you - or the right place, after all (and simply put)
MCsnacks Quoting you:I pray you get a dictionary and study the meaning of respect.Ponerology is nonsense.It could be that Sott may actually not be the best place for you - or the right place, after all (and simply put)
And so, I would pray you to respect the place which is actuallyy based on ponerology. The basics is leaving if the place is not your cup of tea.
I am not the only one with whom you go frictional
Somehow you would go friction with 100% of Sott
MCsnacksAnd... who are you to ego talk about spiritual boundaries & FREEWILL ??!?"The sheer balls it takes to try to make yourself out as being right by lying about how you are the sole person who followed the rules and didnt try to service oneself,"despite me clearly stating it, you don't accept it
"No your will is not based upon an STO idea"
My... Who are you? You seem setting things at the origination level of free will... Not that respectful of another's spiritual boundaires isn't it?
If a person tells you something, get along with it and then see if there is a discrepancy. Even if you find my comments not apropos, at least my attitude features "answering the question, sincere efforts"
the day you have something tangible come back to the thread - your narcissist structural theory won't be enough as you have to answer for you overridding my free will statement...
On that one, hey you don't have my okay to do so. Should be enough, stated boldly.
"you-dont-have-my-permission-to-act-on-my-behalf"... Any form of
And... who are you to ego talk about spiritual boundaries & FREEWILL ??!?a human being operating out of spiritual boundaries and free will, to start with
LindaMayState of Affaires? You speak from your mind, ego, not your heart. Very simple. It is called DISCERNMENT, until then all we do is yakkkAnd... who are you to ego talk about spiritual boundaries & FREEWILL ??!?a human being operating out of spiritual boundaries and free will, to start with
are you disagreeing with such basic state of affairs? Seems from reading you that I wouldn't be entirely entitled to such principles
what the heck
MCsnacks you will still have to adress that there exists a fundamental issue between you and ponerology - so the immediate environnment. I don't need to feel concerned by your sayings as you have been stopping way before reaching meTheory vs LOVE
Bypass, first, the ponerology spec, then you will meet me
Til then good bye
LindaMay heyI'll always be a lousy polite.Tic.ian, I am mire concerned with LIFE + doing my best to keep humanity from extinction. You? You like to talk... and get external validation.
you intervening into two people's discussion does not become a normal way just because you do - not enough
it's actually 100% not the norm - you know ... basic communication processes... "hello" then "if I may"
there is no "putting your feet in another's plate"
please stop interfering - if I want your takes on something I'll ring you ok? Til then it becomes interference (and objectively, disrespect)
why not be a bit more British? Some basics are missing here - I am not your kid. nobody talks to me like that ok?
palestine Is that theologian ponerology or political ponerology?Aho
Was Ponerology the word of the week or something because you can just reference it as evil?
See you try to make the rules in order to have control over a conversation but that is not how it works no matter how much you victim play. And the only person you are fooling is yourself.
proof is in the puddingassessing another person's psychology with the word "pudding" is not really serious
palestine - for sure the data is in - and there comes a time when it is pointless to even acknowledge or respond - and that point has been reached.Yes and you are our In-House PSYCHE AUTHORITY eh?
~
Let the chips fall where they will - uncertainty is part of life and unstoppable - it is the reason we have free will - cause think about it - without uncertainty any system is completely defined and then it is sort of like being a cog in the machine - or equivalent to the self-fulfilling calvinist ideology of "pre-destination" which to somebody been deep in the rabbit hole - tis MOST offensive - I refute it.
Let the chips fall where they will and don't waste time is my advice responding to entities already subsumed.
LindaMayI live in a FREE WORLD.proof is in the puddingassessing another person's psychology with the word "pudding" is not really serious
I guess that I am... done with this
really it's the second big red flag that you have been featuring - in my perspective those are very mattering occurences. I attach much importance and the reaction is proportionate
I will thus watch you go on with "your perspective" ... and see how it works out in the end
palestine So you are the quality police or is it someone else because I would love to see your quality ranking?🙌
Your lack of empathy and obsession with control over everything is seriously worrisome. It points to one feeling completely powerless in their life so they look for a place where they can try to assert their power.
I believe you when you say you are triggered but this is the real world and not a safe space.
The first step toward change is awareness. The second step is acceptance
MCsnacks your innumerous posts are triggering a high signal ratioNormal people ?
their quality have been consistently low - with a few rare exceptions - this represents an additional signal ratio
the latter hints at a conscious process - concealement is not at the menu of normal people
Buffalo_Ken - it ain't. But it is "evidence" - and that is reality.Here dreamboy loll
A word in your ear - you asked about dreams and souls - and I asked you a question in response after I responded and I await your response to my honest answers - cause dreams are important - are they not?
MCsnacks the objective useability of one's overall comments is measurable - yours as well💩 get a hold of yourself 🙈
this can be used in order to reasonably assess one's liability, polarity and much more - hidden psychopathology for example
it is possible to detect psychopathology
step by step process
too low overall useability leads to eligibility for psychopathology detection
Buffalo_Ken What is your obsession with time limits? Where does it say a time limit predicts anything besides in your head? What are you using as a reference? Because I am thinking nothing except your jealous and disdain for people who prove you wrong. Which then causes you to attack their credibility by saying they aren't real because how could there be people that don't agree with you and do as you tell them. Do you need a hug?Bingo
LindaMay You know why Ken responds to me but doesn't do it by my name? Because he fears my responses. He knows how intelligent I am and he knows the only way to beat me in argument is for me to not know he is responding to me. Also he knows his best bet against me is for me to not be real either because there couldn't be a person smarter than he thinks he is, that is only possible if it's AI and deception being used.I know McS, he's mostly always neurotic.
LindaMay Ken actually said this:Intellectual. Not smart.
"if at one time they behave all congruous but then later go 180 degrees opposite - well that is telling and indicative."
Is that being a hypocrite? All they do is try to get me to make a 180° turn around and be on their side but when someone does it the opposite way all of a sudden it's wrong and telling. Indicative of their character.
How can they not see their own hypocrisy? It is mind boggling. Maybe he isn't that smart. Or theres so much bad karma he is producing it's flowing out into this lifetime from his next. 😆
Bsotted Believe I know. Because I had to contact the admin thru emails after not 1 ban. Not 2 bans. But 3 bans. Yes I was banned 3 times. And I am still talking the same way I was then. With people saying way worse and attacking me way more and always first. Lucky after investigating they deemed the bans as being targeted and were unfounded and lacked evidence of wrong doing. Now Ken(at least under that name) wasn't all of those but he knows who else.
Linda was there. She knows. And can remember how surprised they were when I showed back up.
MCsnacks Do you know how many times he reported me to get me banned?Thank God for testers
I didn’t know one could actually do that, I have trouble believing Ken would do that, I never would, I really do believe in free speech and that applies to you MCsnacks (although you do test the limits) and Linda as well and Ken and all who come here except trolls of course.
I’m sure as always youl’ll have some annoying uber clever response.
MCsnacks I see🤪
Now an energy feeding loop flow grafts itself to "let's digress on the concept of reporting to the admins"
It's my fault to have been said the words "reporting-to-admins" lol
Am I to start a new one with ... let's say... your avatar change for example?
You may actually be constantly triggering the next feeding loop each time and each time - let's pick up this and let's alternatively provide one - "one should get a hold"
this may not be the whole story or even part of it but it seems a bit matching
palestine M snacks like to bully, if you think your opinion is right, don’t bend! If someone replies to you factually, check the facts, if it’s mcsnacks, you’ll find it has no basis in your reply or the subject, he deflects!.None of that is true. Opinions are subjective and more from our personal perceptions + parental programming, most dysfunctional.
Do not become a sheeple, or bow to any bully!
LindaMay Oooh Linda….. opinions are only opinions if not back up with facts or history! If one reads history one finds repetitive lies are told and retold in various ways to attain the same outcomes! Do not delude yourself because you have a good heart! Oooh yes, I have sometimes a lack of self control, I’m human! In my younger days I’d see no one marginalised in front of me. But I try, I always try and see both sides, there is always the outside chance I might be wrong! Now I know that’s difficult to believe but it could happen! I’m a man!Highlander you are never arrogant nor opinionated. Those whom I meant by that post know who they are and known for a long time.
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience has shown, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature; a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing, with manly firmness, his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies, without the consent of our legislatures.He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us;For protecting them, by a mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states;For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;For imposing taxes on us without our consent;For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury;For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses;For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies;For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments;For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection, and waging war against us.He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.He has constrained our fellow citizens, taken captive on the high seas, to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.In every stage of these oppressions, we have petitioned for redress, in the most humble terms. Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.Nor have we been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that, as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.blah blah blah!
palestine Is that theologian ponerology or political ponerology?Aho
Was Ponerology the word of the week or something because you can just reference it as evil?
See you try to make the rules in order to have control over a conversation but that is not how it works no matter how much you victim play. And the only person you are fooling is yourself.
Europe must defend itself from 7 million plus Palestinians being displaced and sent to Europe like in Syria and Iraq migrations that destabilised Germany and finished Merkel politically. See Sweden ditto.
Withdrawing Support from Ukraine to fight for Israel might have killed Nato anyway. The greater Israel plan threatens Egypt,Lebanon.Syria,Jordan and Saudi Arabia. That plan could produce over twenty million refugees.
It is time for the first Nations movement to be born and the best way is to show respect to the first Nation that stood up to thieving Israel and the internationals stealing their birthright, Palestine.
The Uk recognised Palestine in 1917 and 1922with the League of Nations 'Brirtish mandate for Palestine.' It continued that recognition until withdrawal in 1948. The United Nations handed the mandate to the USA when Israel declared independence, however I cannot find any reference to Britain not recognising Palestine, only rhetoric.
Does anyone Know for sure. could they point it out for me? I would be most grateful.
I believe the UK governments are being economical with the truth.