OF THE
TIMES
"We have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction."
~ US State Department, 1948
I would take this info with a pinch of salt if the Russian admin didn't know too much about the supposed assassin. There really isn't any worth in...
That headline pic may be from Medvedev’s telegram but the pic itself is altered, clearly, and automatically alerts the reader to the...
They claim 12 in the photo however I see only 10, if 12 than 60% means they supposedly have a total of 20.
The NWO are desperate to keep a lid on the 'covid' injuries and deaths until they can organise a world war. Lots of EU members had signed...
These old women won't be around to see the error of their ways or the fruits of their work. Their children and their grandchildren will. Grandma's...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
R.C.
Just seen this - [Link] - a review of the 37th book, Asterix and the Chariot Race from 2017
Scroll down to the image of the two Kush females and there's that word "Coronavirus"
One of the best places to learn that truth is from learning about the C's. Totally cool stuff. I know that there are others here, but in particular, I'd recommend that the next time you read a comment by Good Optics that you ask G.O. about it.
I've meant to bookmark that website, and thanks to your request, I just did! [Link] *
LKJ is my Florida Heroine. She has been so unfairly sullied that it breaks my heart. (And there are likely few of the earliest SOTTites (those with registration #'s in triple digits or less - just double click an name and the registration # appears in address) who haven't suffered in and from that fact also.) The PTB's toadies and lackeys really went hard on that but I like to think that they just instead proved the Streisand Effect.
One part of those slanders (which caused me ~2004? to literally seek out who it was that some power did not like so obviously so damn much - it turned out to be LKJ) relates to the issue of the C's [Link] and its at least superficial rational implausibility. LKJ & SOTT's facts and results speak truth as far as I can see. Again, ask G.O. (and lots of others with the low registration #'s) for more details and, more specifically, where to start.
*A critical point: IF one posts a link to a SOTT article, it will automatically provide all sorts of extra details, such as, I'm going to link this article:
The virtual book burning continues: eBay bans listings of 'offensive' Dr. Seuss books
Online action site eBay has banned users from selling copies of the Dr. Seuss books that the left found "problematic." The company is now messaging users saying that their listings have been...Note, however, that the above link to the C's does not do that. IF SOTT and the C's were all part of some big scam (as they are uniformly and maliciously scuffed as by PTB toadies and lackeys), well, you could rest assured that a link to the C's would do the same, larger display. It doesn't! It just does the standard autohyperlink. I rest that case.
Good luck and enjoy. I know you will.
RC
Now I'd bet that has been said before, but if so, I don't believe I've read it.
RC