The odds of becoming a lightning victim in the U.S. in any one year is 1 in 700,000.
In the brief submitted to the Supreme Court, Texas includes a declaration from Pacific Economics Group member and USC economics professor, Charles J. Cicchetti, Ph.D.
Dr. Cicchetti is the former Deputy Director at the Energy and Environmental Policy Center at Harvard University's John Kennedy School of Government and received his Ph.D. in economics from Rutgers University.
According to Dr. Cicchetti, his calculations show the probability of Joe Biden winning the popular vote in the four states independently given President Trump's early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.
Dr. Cicchetti's analysis calculates that for Joe Biden to win all four states collectively, the odds of that event happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power (1 in 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,0004).
Stop and think about that.
Given President Trump's massive early lead on election night, the odds — according to Dr. Cicchetti — that Biden came from behind and beat Trump in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are so unlikely that it's next to impossible.
Dr. Cicchett's work raises serious suspicions. How did Biden pull off this extraordinarily improbable win?
Given the overwhelming amounts of irregularities now surfacing, the answer is clear: it wasn't luck that propelled Biden to victory. It was fraud.
READ THE TEXAS BRIEF HERE
Reader Comments
Nothing fishy here people
Move along.
go back to sleep.
remain calm all is well
RC
P.s., Joyly, infra: Good one! RC
P.p.s., sottreader, infra: Exactly right on 'reasonable doubt'!
RC
Even in our "justice system", there is no requirement for absolute proof in order to convict and execute someone, merely an assessment that the individual is guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" . I would think that any intellectually honest person has to agree that all of the evidence presented to date far, far surpasses any "reasonable doubt" threshold in order to conclude that the election was rife with cheating and fraud of many different kinds, and to an extent large enough to have changed the results.
Unfortunately, in our political and legal systems, when it comes to matters of ideology, intellectual honesty plays no role whatsoever in determining how things are decided.
Brace yourselves, folks, because no matter if the current "results" are kept or overturned, the wrath of the losing side will be epic.
You are right about even the SC and there is no certainty that the right decision will be the result.
And yes either way the wrath of the left will be unleashed, but Trump will counter with the Insurrection act and unleash the marines.
Jerome Corsi explains the possibilities in the SC
[Link]
[Link]
"One aspect of narcopaths (narcissistic sociopaths) that is important to remember is that they live in their own little world in which their desires and bizarre dysfunctions are normalized. They believe themselves superior to most people because they are predatory, and don’t suffer from annoying hang-ups like empathy and conscience. They generally tend to believe they have pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes the majority of the time. They think that you are a submissive idiot, and that when they bark an order, you will simply jump to attention because you “believe”.
Almost every aspect of the globalists and their behavior indicates they are a club or cult of narcopaths. Their obsessive need to control as well as to corrupt and destroy in order to get what they want is not an extension of mere greed, it is a deep-seated aspect of who they are as beings. It is a defining mechanism at the core of their character. They are real world monsters, like vampires attempting to blend into an unsuspecting population..."
Nicely said!
Have a wonderful day
So yeah, they are the evil that walks among us.