Refusing to wax a woman's balls is transphobia at its most blatant... and yet here we are, in 2019, still disrespecting trans women's rights by denying them a smooth nutsack.
I'm referring of course to the recent publicity surrounding Jessica Yaniv, a stunning and brave trans woman who has filed
complaints against more than a dozen female waxers with the Human Rights Council in British Columbia. And what is the justification these women have attempted to make in order to disguise their obvious bigotry? Well, among other flimsy excuses, 'religious grounds' (the majority of these women are immigrants) and the bizarre claim from one of them that her husband feared for her safety due to the fact that she works from home and has small children to take care of. What on earth does a woman have to fear from a 200+ lbs trans woman who is simply asking to come round to her home and have the hairs removed from her testicle satchel?
As a trans woman myself, I've lost count of the amount of times I've been misgendered in Dorothy Perkins because of my beard, and so I have skin in the game here, so to speak. I understand all too well the shame that a denial of service can bring.
For the past two years I've been trying to get my doctor to give me a Pap smear which he has point blank refused purely based on his misguided logic of me 'not having a cervix'. As a medical man, I would expect him to understand that biological sex has nothing to do with gender and if I feel that I have a cervix, that should be more than enough for him to throw his anatomy charts into a bin and never refer to them again. These days, doctors know nothing compared to people like myself who have spent six months doing Gender Studies before being forced to quit due to the stress of being made to write essays twice a month.Jessica Yaniv must be going through Hell right now. As from Wednesday, there had been a publication ban on the case, but due to her posting information regarding the proceedings of the tribunal from her social media activist accounts, the ban has been lifted. Of course, this now leaves her open to abuse from people who until now, had not been aware of her struggle to run these transphobic women out of their businesses and make a tidy sum from their bigotry. Some hideous TERFS are even questioning whether or not she really is a woman. I mean, she wore a TIARA and a BALL GOWN to court for fuck's sake. What more proof do these people NEED???
I was appalled
(but not surprised given his track record of hate speech masquerading as 'hugely successful stand-up comedy on a worldwide scale') to see
Ricky Gervais attacking Jessica, simply for taking a group of women, many of whom who don't have English as their first language, to court for refusing to wax her furry spunk pouch. Why he's not been arrested so far is beyond me. His intolerance of progressive feminism is off the charts.
Jessica has also been heavily criticized for supposedly 'racist' comments she has made towards immigrants in the past, along with 'suspiciously obsessive messages' to other women on Facebook concerning young girls, female changing rooms, and tampons. I've not looked into any of these spurious claims and shall not waste my time pampering to the transphobic crowd by investigating any of this any further. All I know is that some great injustice has been brought against a trans woman and that is enough for me to defend her to the hilt. I care not for 'details'.
ALL trans people have to be respected because as an oppressed minority, they are automatically incapable of doing wrong. Identity politics tells us this. If you criticize anyone from a marginalized community, you are an evil bigot. So fellow social justice comrades, please do not be tempted to use nuance. Stay away from judging people as individuals and applying logic and reason based on each circumstance. That's for Nazis and fascists and bigots and transphobes. No, in order to be progressive and tolerant we must group all trans people together as one homogenous mass and treat them all with the same respect, regardless of whether or not as a human being they truly deserve it. Progressives defending Jessica Yaniv can only be good for the trans community. So-called 'biological' women have had it far too good for far too long. The only way we will achieve true equality is if trans women are given more rights than cis women. We need to remove the privilege from cis women, so that men who identify as women can be given the upper hand. That's the beauty of intersectional feminism. That's why this case is so important.
Biological women will never understand the struggles trans women face every day. Have they ever had another woman turn her nose up at the mere sight of their big hairy ball sack? Of course not. Cis women need to learn to know their place.
I stand shoulder to shoulder with Jessica Yaniv and it's clear from the way she's courageously fighting her corner, she is one ballsy lady.
Reader Comments
R.C.
P.s., SOTT's I.T. person (or, at least, one of such?) SCOTT/SCOTTIE: isn't there a way to have hyperlinks not lose their usefulness when placed into a section of text which is R.C.
R.C.
R.C.
(For images, see Avatars of LM, infra, or of "Illusion of" ... {I forget what... I guess I don't care. OH, I've got it, IOFreedom"} - As I've said before, IOF's avatar seems like a bunny in a cage, though it's not.)
R.C.
Whatever. I grant that's a valid point. But given thye true absurdity of modern 'news' (e.g., above), the absurd factor has risen so fast and high, that the ability to recognize humor / satire is becoming the realm of intellectual 'elites' such as SOTTites.
I dunno. It's all just a thought; not a command, but I try to abide by it, so long as it doesn't ruin the 'LOL' factor.
NRN.
R.C.
Roflinggggg my god!!
R.C.
Schlauer Fuchs Hash
And never effing mind that any waxing of any three piece suits would be a wholesale catastrophe. You wanna talk about yer violated whatevers, there's a start you're hard pressed to better . . .
Pubes, dahlinx have deep. roots. and . . . no, I can't even think about it . . .
All these are portrayed as violations of "human rights" when the person denying the service is a non-government body
You Tube, Twitter, Facebook etc banning free speech ... shit, that's okay and no-one rights are being infringed?
Signed the lumberjack-ette hahaha
Mental illness, plain and simple.
Movng on then, you said: First, it's not generally the case that there is 'confusion' as by far the majority of trans people aren't confused in the least. They know how they feel, and well know the associated social costs of expressing themselves congruently with such feelings.
As to 'mutilation'; your sentiments are not shared by the vast majority of post-op people; in fact the most commonly reported feelings are of relief and release, of no longer being societally forced to live what they've seen throughout their lives that point as the living of a fundamental lie. Your view runs contrary to some 50 years of worldwide psychiatric assessment, across tens upon tens of thousands of cases. In fact, pre-op co-morbidities show a strikingly sharp decline thru the post-op years. In other words: people settle, find themselves and get on with newfound vitality in their lives.
Research before mere opinion please.
Feelings change but the body doesn't: A sobering look into transgenderism and medical malpractice
Socially indoctrinating young children toward accepting transgenderism is rampant today in public schools. In Washington state, public schools will begin teaching gender expression to...Apparently not true. Even if it was, doesn't mean it's not a mental illness. We could also treat schizophrenics by going along with their delusions. Some would consider that cruel.
God didn't make you a bitter old tranny either. You did that all by yourself.
Instead, you bully, you badger, you hound and you berate. You attempt to pick fights, you try to beat people down, and you try to make them feel small, unworthy, unwanted, stupid, inconsequential and useless.
And I'm bitter . . .pffff
Just lately you launched into LM on the basis of sheer invention and when she properly told you to go fuck yourself you whined to the editors and whined a moderator.
You whined , you asshole . . .
If you were across the table you'd be wearing a pitcher of beer right now
In this instance we have a perv who gets hard by cross dressing and claiming he is a woman.
You can tell he is just a role playing perv because he still has his pecker and is trying to make women fondle it.
People who pretend they are something they are not to the extent of trying to reshape society to force everyone else to not only agree with, but celebrate their deviant behavior is the real crime.
Truth hurts. Tell me I'm wrong all you want, but it doesn't change a damn thing.
way), (as i see it); [Link] (hmm, well, yes); also known as the old wax-on-wax-oFF-F@%#ING-DIlemma😱 hmm; getting waxed ON is usually not a problem
R.C.
I don't know who here consumes pornography, but mainstream porn has solidified in this trend of infantalizing women. Aside from the possible implications regarding pederasty, my wife simply doesn't do it because it always leads to ingrown hairs and other issues. It's not smart from a health perspective. The hair is there for a reason. Now if I could get her to feel the same way about shaving her legs (thus avoiding extra time getting ready when we go out in warm weather), I'd be happier. I expect she would too.
Learning to be comfortable in one's body isn't always easy though (thus gender reassignment surgeries). But I strongly believe that unless it's malfunctioning or rotting off, it's best to leave your body with the parts it came with. While I fully support those who are transgendered as far as accepting their struggle and feelings as legitimate, I cannot get behind gender reassignment surgeries. Nor can I tolerate pumping children full of drugs which ultimately make them sterile or otherwise unable to procreate. One could argue that transgender surgeries are ultimately an anti-gay agenda, since it seems more and more, being attracted to the same sex leads one to believe they are the wrong gender.
And personally, I really like the way it worked in aboriginal society, before colonists came and tried to erase it from history.
5 Genders: The Story of the Native American Two-Spirits [Link]
That said, Jessica Yaniv is 100% an opportunistic troll targeting already marginalized women in low paying jobs. I hope one of her targets turns around and sues and publicly shames in in a way that hits home.
I imagine you fancy yourself very clever with your repeated 'it' name calling; something you started, let's note, in my absence, whining all the while because I refused to molly coddle and handhold in respect of pages where I'd earlier commented, telling you instead to get off your a** and find them.
You came up with a couple of ridiculous fabrications thru that same time time period, clearly you are stupid enough to 'think' that because I'd dropped off the page for a while I wasn't watching, or, more likely I expect, you didn't care and figured you could get away with it.
At any rate, well down the page here are three links I posted the other day which, let's note, have been ignored.
Question: Why do you guys refer to yourselves as Transgender when, according to you, all you are changing is your sex. And why, if gender, as you define it, is the only truly important aspect, do you have to change your sex? What difference does it make? You do realize that your mind being at odds with physical reality is the very definition of psychosis?
Over the years I've come to refer to the trans situation/phenomena as the Conundrum, which I capitalize in context to indicate that I'm addressing a particular set of issues.
In a post about a year ago I did a deconstruction of the mish-mash terminology used in this area.
For instance: it isn't gender identity disorder dysphoria (opposite of euphoria) it's physical sex dysphoria. No one living the Conundrum is is unhappy with their gender identity, they're unhappy about being unable to freely and wholly express who they feel themselves to be; they're profoundly unhappy with the Lie they live as a means to merely get by in society. Unhappy, and in pain, to the point that a disturbingly high percentage suicide.
It isn't ' gender reassignment' (for God's sake), it's 'apparent physical sex modification', with those two just for starters.
So, a person is post-op and 'all done' and the next issue is one finding one's self a walking cog' dis' generator amoung those from their earlier life. Any expectation that one's historical associations will, or even can, make the leap to a whole cloth acceptance of the new person, and no longer living their previous Lie most post-op people do in fact become 'new people', is a real stretch. Some people can make that leap while others simply cannot and/or will not.
And that often gives rise to the non-starter notion of moving completely away from one's past and and beginning again in stealth, a process that swaps one difficulty for another, one Lie for another. That cannot and does not work.
The Conundrum is a deep, and wide ranging problem with no ideal solution, there is only the living of a best compromise; which, believe it or not, many are capable of doing and go on to live highly productive lives.
Sadly, many cannot shoulder such a burden and bring themselves to their own end.
=========
I have to get myself to work so will take up the rest of your reasonable questions later today.
=========
An aside:
In some way not clear to me I'm sure nonetheless that what we've had going here the last few days is related to this:
The other nite I went out about 1AM and locked the truck, I came back in, tidied things, wrote some mail and got to bed about two. The following morning I was up about 6:30 and noticed my front door halfway open, I don't lock it when I'm home. I closed it and went upstairs into the kitchen to look out over the driveway where my truck was missing; the third time it has been stolen.
A '96 V6 Ranger, it's just my 2nd vehicle beater, wtf is the fascination ?
I then looked across to the counter where I'd left my keys and wallet and they were gone, then down to where my briefcase with iPad had been sitting, also gone, with about 100 pages of highly technical work I'm doing high performance loudspeaker development.
If you go here [Link] and read the entire thread you'll find some disquieting info to do STS 'interventions' and if you then consider the depth of negativity manifest at times in this thread you might come to consider a 'connection'.
Now what it might mean, might be about I don't know but I do know that both this thread and the latest theft has been a huge drain on my time and energy. The former was of course my choice whereas the latter certainly was not.
Who would choose thieves with conjones enough to blow right past the motion detecting lights in the breezeway to prowl a home at 3:30AM and drive away in a stolen vehicle?
the dude the article is about is a cross dresser taking advantage of the social freedoms afforded to transvestite folks to allow himself to be an opportunistic pervert.
He looks to me like a very, and I mean very poor impersonation of a so called drag queen, dressed in a woman's dress, wearing a wig. I mean really!
Then presents to an female unsuspecting esthician, demanding he be waxed, I should imagine it gave her a shock to find out he had a full kit of a male genitalia
What kind or reality are we living in, this could be a sketch from Candid Camera.
Except this is not a sketch from candid camera, it is the reality we are living at this time.
And for a person that had to give up gender studies, because he found it "too" demanding to write two essays a month,
And to post such a flaring essay, not only gives an indication of the person he really is, but the agenda he proposes.
Joan, this is satire. The author didn't actually drop out of gender studies, he's making a point about the sort of people who do choose to study this drivel. Other part of comment is spot on.
Ho deary me, I do love it when teddies are involved.
Keep practicing, as you just might hit the nail on the head one day.
Regards
Children do like to throw their teddies, out of there prams and cots when upset, it's their way of showing how disgruntled they are.
Good Optics, bless the poor soul, did such a thing when retorting to my comments.
Stood up and threw his teddies everywhere.
What is your definition of a teddies?
Teddies, yes are Teddy bears, loved by kids and hurled when upset.
Throwing ones teddy is just a way of describing a situation where someone who should know better(not mentioning any names), loses control and acts like a child.
Hope that has cleared the teddies situation up, no doubt Good Optics will still be scratching his head.
More teddies on the way, duck.
Don't leave, I do enjoy our little chats.
If you manage to go anywhere interesting, send us a postcard.
Regards
Thru those many years I can't recall having seen one as disingenuous, snide, opinionated and vacuous.
So no, I'll be here and so perhaps will you, you simply won't hear for me.
For all your wannabe grace and grade school erudition you're naught but a simple energy vampire . . .
.
Throwing ones teddy is just a way of describing a situation where someone who should know better(not mentioning any names), loses control and acts like a child.
Hmm.. interesting... that means that the whole of the US educational system has lost control?
My reference to "teddies", has absolutely nothing to the with this article.
More the actions of a individual.
As for the educational system?
If your so willing to stand up and support its efforts at educating the youth of today, explain why most teenagers today, do not know where the food on their plate comes from.
I can see some more teddies heading my way.
Regards
"you simply won't hear from me", I just did.
Make your mind up.
I did like and chuckle at your Freudian slip, "simply", about sums you up lad.
So chin up.
Regards
Retired life is much nicer & fuller growing fruit, veggies & fishing.
Kind Regards...Matt
GREAT STUFF!! yes i figured all that.. but still a quick little hello is very nice!! Cheers Bro
So glad you popped in.
Tiresome hey, so why are you so animated, if there's nothing to get upset about?
Bored are we.
Buzz Lightyear is so yesterday.
Have you been keeping an eye on what's been going on?
It's liken to the Gun fight at the O.K Corral.
I'm chuckling my tits off.
"Conflict is a disease, it eats into the soul, it denies some and fills the bellies of others, with a meaningless sense of achievement."
I'll take that as your 'confession'.
Unlike Winternights2, who, like the owner of the worst greasy spoon in town, loves apostrophes so much he's apt to cram one in at every inopportune moment (Burger's! Tea's! Kebab's!), LindaMay just leaves a gap and hopes one will fall from the sky.
"It s actually yours dumbo."
Hoping an apostrophe will fall from the sky is somewhat analagous to expecting to be taken seriously in a text setting when you can't even read and write.
I expect some of the few people who read this will take it that I'm being a rotten meanie for pointing that out, but expecting the world to drop the bar just 'cause you can't be bothered to get up in the morning and tie your shoelaces, just 'cause you can't even be bothered to learn how to read, indicates a huge amount of arrogance on your part.
As far Wn's 'teddy bear' thing went: I called him out on his 'views', shall I say, on the trans phenomena, about which he clearly knows nothing at. all. and instead discussing he launched into his little idiocy, alleging that I had a 'temper tantrum'. If you read my comments it's easily seen I did no such thing.
As one who could seek some understanding of what I generally describe as the 'trans conundrum' Wn has demonstrated a preference for his ignorance and the vacuous, only attempted put down, about which I could go on but won't. Instead I noted that as seen here, he's all hat and no cattle; all pretense and no substance.
Then Joan asked what he meant by a 'teddy' and we came to a little Toys-R-Us taxonomy in respect of the family of 'stuffies', of stuffed animals.
Then we had yet another HFL's personality attacks -- he routinely does that and has been doing so for years on end -- this time about LM's finger error where she hit the space bar rather than the apostrophe. Ridiculous. So in the spirit of teddy bears I went into a little take-off on Winnie the Pooh . . .
At any rate I have to get to work, but if you'd to have an actual discussion about the highly valenced and difficult topic that is the trans conundrum I'm happy to oblige.
I provided a link that's at odds with your statement that surgery, in a great majority of cases, results in relief. Are you saying that the guy is lying, or just misinforming us?
Thank you Good. If you ever need a tour guide in Québec holler!!
I will never, ever forget the smell of the sulphuric acid rain through the Adirondacks at 2AM, or the week I spent in Manhattan one afternoon. I found NY-ers the rudest people I've ever come across.
Back in those days Calgary was still renown for its open hospitality and born and raised, that was my baseline. These days though we have so many furriners the pace has lost its sense for itself; I'm moving to southern BC as soon as I can make it happen.
And not that all them furriners is b-a-d necessarily, they're just not from here and so don't have the born and raised DNA, I guess, or something like that.
As to MAN-ly: well, hi diddle diddle, we're in the middle, both/and, neither/nor . . . :-)
Apart from recent oozings from your dribbling hole on this thread, and the occasional nonsensical kamikaze handbag attack, you hardly ever even talk about tranny business anymore. Could that perhaps be connected to the growing disquiet about the drugging and maiming of children as per the so-called Transgender Agenda? 'Cause it seems to me, whenever that subject comes up, you hide under the bed and play dead.
You are mentioning historical practices, but these people didn't have surgery and there is a lot to say that shamans and the like were, in fact, mentally ill. The whole 5 spirit thing had nothing to do with transgenderism, either.
What they have in Thailand is due to a lack of female children.
Also, I don't know what you think you are, but your new penis/vagina is not real. You can't have kids and you're scamming the people you're dating, since most people want to have kids and are repulsed by your artificial genitals.
I hope it doesn't happens, but you'll most probably develop a whole host of health issues being pumped full of hormones.
I also see you believe this starts early in life, so you are a supporter of puberty blockers and the taking away of children from caring parents.
As for LM, she is the most tiresome, idiotic, vacuous, illiterate cretin with nothing of importance to say on this website. She is also an energy vampire, the sweet talking kind. WN is a different kind and LM loves him. Just check out the article on the Babylonian villa.
And it's no wonder you hail from Canada, the world capital of gender ideology fascism and empty-headed morons like LM.
The amply substantiated fact is that the very young quite frequently express cross identification, "I'm not a girl, I'm a boy ."
Also amply substantiated is the fact that many children outgrow what was only phase in their development, whereas some small percentage do not.
Further, some young people don't come to an awareness of their physical sex/gender identity mismatch until about 8 to about 14.
In other words people are different and develop along different timelines. A simply laughable paralogism, how the fuck did you get there ; miss your med window today,or your ginkgo biloba cocktail, or both ? And beyond that I won't waste my precious time.
If you have any real interest in what are the facts of my feelings in respect of such 'treatments' you'll find them expressed with incontrovertible clarity in other threads on this site.
Now, idiot, you have done zero research, I've done 30 years and not only I logged about 200 hours with the intern of a therapist I saw for a year or two some 20 years ago, while he fulfilled his internship requirements.
In other words, dipshit, I have done the work and done it the point that the selfsame dual Ph. D. therapist worked with me pro bono because as he said one day, "You are the most sophisticated of my clients, I learn a lot from you." That, let me say, greatly surprised me.
You on the other hand have done fuck. all. but run your face providing all the while the most convincing imitation of the south facing end of a northbound horse yet seen.
On the one hand there is sex equality but a kid will see the different roles and different behaviours which the two genders operate under
I do not see any reason why the colours you like, the clothes you want to wear, the toys you want to play with etc. should be determining factors of one's gender ... but this appears to be what society is telling kids
The ones with the mental disorders are those who want to program these kids to think that they need to mutilate their bodies to be who they want to be
Heading North next week RiverRed
"so you are a supporter of puberty blockers and the taking away of children from caring parents.
Good Optics replied to Rincewind...
"If you have any real interest in what are the facts of my feelings in respect of such 'treatments' you'll find them expressed with incontrovertible clarity in other threads on this site. "
I have no recollection of you ever expressing anything on this subject, and it seems to me that whenever it does come up on SOTT, you go and hide under a bed for a month.
Either way, it seems your disingenuity knows no bounds, because as you full well know , if Rincewind "has any real interest" in the alleged "facts of your feelings" (note grandiose verbals), the chances of Rincewind actually being able to find such stuff, if it actually exits, are slim or none, because you haven't provided any links.
So, instead of indulging in three-card-monte-like evasion tactics and hurling your outsize cha-cha heels at everyone in sight, wouldn't it be a bit easier to just answer Rincewind's question?
sorry couldn't help myself.
Moderator, please moderate this person.
Editor, please edit this person.
The kids(HFL, Rincewind and Good Optics)start being naughty and try to act like adults.
You return to see their innocent faces, but there's teddies everywhere, naughty children.
By now, at least one - if not each and all -of you should have said, Just a suggestion in favor of improving communication here at SOTT. (I am not 'preaching from the mount' - my father's phrase from his S.C. Sharecropper's Son's Southern Baptist Church upbringing* - and I realize that there but for the grace of God, goes I, as I have more than once, I know.)
R.C.
*Which inspired his devout agnosticism / atheism; the spiritualistic side of him came 'built in.'
RC
You can forget tarring me with the same brush.
I've made my stance perfectly clear, there's men and there's women, anything beyond that, has a mental illness.
Just liken to trolls you highlighted in your introduction.
Be careful with your address, as in this case, it's back fired.
As for those other child like individuals mentioned in your post, there here and they amuse me.
Finally, as, " I detect a reference to me, I cite to my post dated 7/25/2019, Thursday, @ 10.23a EDT
..I am done with this.
Good day.
R.C.
This nut should be placed in a sack and dropped in the river.
Works for cats, seems the most humane way to rid the planet of this scourge.
I promise Good!!
Jessica needs to spend about a grand with a good therapist and get her head on straight.
That done she'd do well to get on a plane here [Link] and get the work properly done by people who know exactly what they're about
I, for one, look forward to a time where I see it blink....and it's five years hence and links this article, and calls it 'about 5 years ago'.
NRN
R.C.
Me, I was dumb enough, again, to reckon more good sense than less hereabouts and while there are some thoughtful comments the bulk is dross. I'm moving to some of the SOTT forums where I assume the grown ups hang out.
A great deal of it was yours.
"I'm moving to some of the SOTT forums where I assume the grown ups hang out."
LOL. I can just see them now, battening down the hatches, boarding up the windows, rushing around like blue-arsed flies, looking for the "No room at the inn" sign.
Also, did you know Brad Pitt was in that movie as The Vanisher? [Link]
If you listen to the actors voice track that comes on the CD, there's one that no one notices that they point out.
When the Pressmen Hotel shows its welcoming video, as the Narrator sits on the mint candy, Tyler/Pitt is one of those who say 'welcome' and bow.
R.C.
That's new to me about that. Have you ever wondered how they found Marla after the Narrator didn't want to know where she was going?*
R.C.
*The same bus driver had nodded at Ed/Narrator, (with a black eye) earlier in the film...("Is that what a man is supposed to look like?"
RC
In the anti-consumerist Fight Club , there are plenty of consumer pressures placed throughout. Look at the "Starbucks coffee in every shot" piece of trivia. This is Fincher having fun with the audience. Smoking fits this bill too. There is smoke everywhere in Fight Club . Not just cigarettes either, but "No Smoking" signs and ashtrays too. These all create the same pressures.
This was very interesting that I did not know : There's a lot of these kinds of sites for the film, it's crazy loved, and it's crazy good despite :
There is a rhythm of sound and motion in that film that runs from start to finish,, (the tempo of course increasing towards the end) that I wondered how it could have been afforded to have been so tightly edited, both visually and audially.
(Spoilers follow) And then of course, the Towers likewise came down.. and not long after I wondered if they had some 'help' from benefactors to never be acknowledged, as it certainly left the viewer believing that a crowd of loser waiters could bring down big skyscrapers.)
A mere coincidence? I am SO skeptical of ALL 'coincidences' these days, it's frankly sad. It is like they have been stolen from us.
R.C.
*Latin root at least appropriate to the above article.
RC
Bill outlawing Muslim 'instant divorce' passes India's lower house of parliament
A controversial bill banning the practice of 'triple Talaq' divorce among muslims has passed India's lower house of parliament by a resounding margin, amidst a walk-out by members of the...Kindergarten rules all over again.
R.C.
lovely - and I was castigated editorially for using a colourful metaphor in the comments on this site not ten years ago...
do times ever change
I may not understand what it is to be an Other, yet I accept their right to be who and what they are and/or need to be. How could I possibly ever understand, if I am not that.
We'll sort it out, together.
But not speaking like this. Not writing like this. Not respecting each other like this.
disappointed
no red bell necessary - my alarm's already going off - "furry spunk sack".
great news, SOTT, humour or no - wow
P.s., Are you there in Florida?
RC
But one can tell I'm angry about a point when I actually (quite rarely) spell one out; even moreso when ALLCAPS.
R.C.
They don't realise that argument is important, argument is necessary. Maybe they insert themselves into the arguments of other people because they're afraid of what might be revealed as a result of those arguments.
No one is forced to read this stuff. No one is forced to comment. If you haven't got anything to contribute to these arguments, maybe you should just stay out of the way.
In any case, it is obvious that the resident tranny offered nothing in the way of disproving the argument that trannies are mentally ill and finished off with expletives.
It is therefore reasonable to assume, that if you don't hear anymore from him on this subject, the answer to that question is "yes".
We'll sort it out, together."
One thing members of the 'stop arguing' brigade (peacemakers who never actually make any peace) often do, is insinuate, but never actually say right out front...
"You're picking on Good Optics because he's a transvestite".
"You're picking on George L because he's a darkie".
"You're picking on Winternights2 because he's a illiterate".
"You're picking on LindaMay because she's got the mental age of a five year old."
What they fail to consider is that a prominent display to the agora of one's supposed 'weaknesses' is frequently a cover for psychopathic activities, as per the Ted Bundy plaster-cast-and-sling thing.
Other than that, HFL, your comment seems to be entirely on the ball.
Into the basic : "What you are actually physically saying with your words is the equivalent or less (answer less) to having nothing to say , therefore etc, it's the same as not having bother to post at all, obviously, stupid." I actually have nothing to say.
I may not understand what it is to be an Other, yet I accept their right to be who and what they are and/or need to be. How could I possibly ever understand, if I am not that.
Live and let live.
Pretty simple.
No oozing required.
Take good care, and thanks for the opportunity to contribute my position.
something constructive to say...
I guess, it is now becoming a political fine line when one voices an opinion and where the law comes to pass and makes a determination of what is considered the "correct" manner of speech.
But to my mind there is still the what I call civil speak, and the intentions of that speak where one should, read, listen and write to another without profanity, and using adjectives of a gross sexual nature to make a point. and most of all with respect for the others point of view.
And that being said, give somebody enough rope and they will eventually hang themselves, in the arrogance and words, giving insight into the worlds they inhabit, they no longer behave in a civlil way.
So yes I agree with censorship, i this case, seems to me in this day and age, the world and idea of censorship has lost it's meaning.
Just my thought.
methinks, it is about time we had some background music for this thread...
'mommy, where's daddy'? [Link]
R.C.
Madness - Our House [Link]
Madness - Mr. Apples [Link]
Funny I went from one tune to another to the above, thanks
R.C.
*The type of posts that if they were said to the face of myself, and/or sundry other SOTTites, (and here I'm guessing) HFL, Rocky,/cracker, Joe, Brakar, et al., would likely end with pain and blood. (At least in a more reasonable world, such as what I grew up in during the 70s and 80s.)
RC
Maybe just a whole lot of peeps not staying within their boundaries... like...
Your freedom ends there where mine begins
ORIGINAL : Rowan Cocoan · about 5 hours ago
UPDATED : Rowan Cocoan · 2019/07/26 · UTC 14:50 · about 5 hours ago
----------------------
ORIGINAL : Rowan Cocoan · about 5 hours ago
UPDATED : Rowan Cocoan · 2019/07/26 · GMT+2 16:50 · about 5 hours ago
My P.O.V. on this kind of thing is, it's good to know there are responsible people in charge of the building.
'Censorship' and 'keeping an orderly house' are two entirely different things.
Good Optics is the most recent example of that.
God has designed the world so the selfish soul can never be happy.
Three days ago I sent the following mail to the Sott.net address:
Hi:
I've seen Laura mention 'the forum' any number of times but no
amount of digging has turned it up. I'm done with some of the idiots
contribute on the sott.net page and want to be some place where I
can both contribute and learn.
BP
> Hi BP,
> Appreciate your readership. Here is the link to the forum
> Laura refers to: [Link]
>
> Kind regards,
> Beau
Following the link revealed a newly initiated discussion on the STS-created, dark aspects of the transhumanism/transgender societal tidal wave of the last 10 or 15 years, all of which I read to find confirmation of a considerable amount of my own thinking over the past many years and learning a few things in the process.
I then read several more pages of civilized, intelligent inquiry and discourse all of which evenhandedly moderated the extent that even small errors in posted URLs were spotted and corrected by the mods.
Meanwhile I kept an eye on this mess and watched the whining, the two-person lynch mob mentality you and RW worked up, his attempted creation of a new persona for myself and so on, all of which following the comment below, made only two days earlier: whereupon, and true to form, HFL sagely chimed in with: I replied: ==========
To be con't . . .
It seems to me you've got one problem in life, and it ain't me babe.
Wonder how many times you've heard that before?
Probably 'cause I allow my negativity to go where it should go.
Then we can do some post by post deconstructive analysis of the various attacks that have been floated over the last little while.
And the attacks here are not the first I've seen by any means and waiting for a public moment when one or another dipsh*t ran his face on me I've done some evisceration you'd have enjoyed. I haven't heard a squeak in 15 years. Funny how a newfound respect springs from bloodied ground..
In the meantime dig for the Tara Moss production, "CyberHate with Tara Moss". I find all sorts of ABC News and IMDb bits and pieces but I haven't found the Full Meal Deal as yet.
LOL. I seem to remember back in The Casschat days me being castigated for 'attacking' him.
It seems to me, you plunging into the depths of SOTT's backpages is maybe just a way for you to stick your head further up your own *rse.
If you can't solve your problem, maybe you could make a sort of peace with it. One good way of doing that would be to cease trying to further crystallise your 'error'.
You can show them the water, but you can't make them drink.
I've been here since before Laura moved from Florida to France and during those early days we talked on the phone a couple times and swapped some mail.
Realizing that 'The Wave' was something that needed to be published in format better than a web page, and years before The Red pill Press, I downloaded the entire thing and was working thru doing the page formatting and typesetting when the sh*t hit the fan in my life, an occurrence common back then amoung those who set about helping. Fred Iralnd was an STS attack vector, as was Vincent Brdges, et al. Hence, just for instance, the very careful but very firm moderation in the Forum. Maybe you could pull down this little piece [Link] and see item 1, "The Faux Concern Troll"
This is patent nonsense. That article was not Laura's work, she merely commented. And no she's not an 'authority figure' and unlike you earlier and HFL ongoingly she never 'runs her mouth'. She does. the. work. before she ever says a word, there's a lesson there . . . Given the things you've said up the page, I don't buy the 'concerned citizens' shtick but I'm certainly with you on the 'gender ideology agenda' and that is yet another reason why I posted the forum thread link. You two have at times acted like Deep South racists and in my absence a couple days back you got a little two-man lynch mob going. Witness your dehumanizing and repeated use of 'It"; which was just pathetic, you made a fool of yourself. I am 'pushing', nothing by way of any agenda. My central point thru all these discussions is, "If you have zero lived experience with the Conundrum you don't, and can't, know what you are talking about and need to a) starting asking questions, b) do some serious research or, c) shut. up.
That said however, why would you do the work, what might be the point to come to oame/any understanding of a 3rd-4th std. group of outliers, what's an upside?
TG-ism has historically effected a tiny portion of the population, 0.1 to 0.01% yet these days we see an exponential rise in those number and a zillion people demanding acceptance and demanding recognition, and demanding simply bizarre 'human rights' like the asshole at issue here.
My take has always been, and I said this here somewhere, that for the usual person the acceptance of someone post-op is very difficult and on that basis it is simply unreasonable for post-op people to be demanding anything of anyone, anywhere at any time.
Given that, and the need for simple comfort within themselves, male-born people who transition go to often (need to go to) massive expense to have maxillofacial feminization surgeries to bring their appearance where it needs to be so as to be able to get along in society, to fit so well into the fabric that no one's sensibilities are challenged. It's called 'passing'. This is a difficult situation, and let's remember that there are those out there, men in the main, who murder trans people, routinely, and worldwide; and why might we suppose that is ? Ignorance, intolerance, racist 'thinking', challenged sexuality, I give up.
Yet, what I've seen you say here earlier gives me pause, it causes me to wonder if maybe I'm seeing some underlying aspect of character make up that is seen in murderers as well.
Now, read that sentence again and very carefully because it's a near certainty that you've made associations that I I don't intend.
============
And with that I'm signing off.
Apparently I have a life to live, things to do and people with reasonable expectations of me who need to be seen.
You seem to be projecting onto me something that simply isn't there. I never once called for any action to be taken against transsexuals. I was calling you an it because that's neutral. Whatever you were before surgery, you are no longer, and whatever you wanted to be after it, you are not. Hence, it. You know, like babies are it. I feel that's the best way of getting around calling one by the wrong pronoun. I refuse to call that guy that wants his balls waxed a she, but he would be offended if I called him a he, so it works best. Or do you also support language policing?
Beyond that, you are making great big, untested assumptions. Maybe figure out what might be the unasked questions.
I thought for a couple of days about what I said there before I said it, "What are you thinking here, what do murderers think, how do they get that crazy, what underlies that, is there some sort of progression from racist-quality expression to the madness of the murderer, how do racists get to be racists, why do they remain that way lifelong, what's up with their 'othering' of those they consider beneath them, how do they then go mentally about writing them off as people ?"
Given the tenor of the things you said in my absence I'm not going to buy that you were trying for the "right pronoun". I'm the one who coined the phrase 'Pronoun Purgatory', the place where transitioners, and their friends, find themselves for some good long while.
People who violate are violators.... rapists in street language (regardless of what 'element' is raped).
I consider your position in this matter debatable so I Googled [Link] and blew thru this [Link] and it does appear debatable, so I concede the point, But, I'm still going to ask the parents and will never, ever objectify by the use of 'it'.
My car, machine tools, computers and my lab gear, just for starters, are 'it-s'. And once I'm moved to BC and when I buy a boat it'll be and 'it' as well.
Living things, generally speaking, are sexed and some are gendered.
I understand the feeling, and while we have both of those here, I even feel some remorse for killing even those* (not that it's ever stopped me.) But if you want mosquitoes? Flies? "Love Bugs"** AND Roaches? Come to Florida.
You will quickly learn to HATE American Cockroaches! No hesitance, no remorse, to kill them.***
You must live in some insect free Shangrila. (Such as California, as I remember it.)
R.C.
*I tell self 'it's kill or be killed' as mosquitoes kill as many humans as all other animals together.
**(Who have taken over the ecological niche formerly held by fireflies; ('round here called "lightning bugs"), which I still can and do see when biking at dusk in Central Florida above (N. of) Orlando, although they are nowhere near the numbers that they were when we moved here in 1965.)
***Except when outside, (because, as my father would say, 'It's like pissing in the ocean.')
RC
Well maybe that’s one best discussed on a MindMaters show.
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
There is another page I can't locate about a whack job shrink treating kids with puberty blockers out-of-hand where I commented appropriately, if I locate it I'll post.
[Link]
the story behind was that couple met at a festival, fell in love and found they shared two passions; sex and protection of environment. the sex-stunt was performed to create attention from the media in order to collect money for protecting forest; which is actually what they still do.
the link is to a open msm, which few people's around here find offensive. for the stunt they received a symbolic 1000$ fine and collected 15000$ from sponsors.
in short i find it a beautiful story, illustrating even law can be less stiff than some individuals here at sott.
Oh, I get it. You post a link to some guy getting deep-throated by a trout, and 'cause I commented on it, I'm the freak, right?
If you can't see how f*ck*d up that is, you've got big trouble upstairs, mister.
i like persons who test bounderies and do their own things.
it is btw only from hfl and a few others here at sott that i have EVER received comments about my mental health/capabilities. 😚
Wow. How 'challenging', 'groundbreaking', 'edgy' and 'artistically fulfilling', I don't think.
"it is btw only from hfl and a few others here at sott that i have EVER received comments about my mental health/capabilities."
If you get some comfort from that, that's something, I suppose.
A trout , on stage, in front of a slew of people and the gig crowdfunded $15K ?
I don't get out enough . . .
others are content sitting in their sofas pretending guardians of high moral (and spelling)
if i was starting to feel everyone but me had mental issues, i would have been worried.
by curiosity; have you ever been through that thought yourself? (from your comments here at sott; it looks like "everyone" but you have mental issues...)
(i do occationally "kick back" on comments that i do not like, but i have never seen any mean comments from your side 👍)
and for that, I will defer to Bon Scott.
ACDC big balls 1977
[Link]
My points here have to do with whether the mortal coil -- the part that goes in the ground in typically <100 years -- in any meaningful way subsumes the Soul thru a given incarnation; and, the profound differences between those ensouled -- those with the potential for higher awareness, actualized or not -- and those who have not developed any higher faculties.
If you've pulled down, read and begun to absorb the info at this [Link] you'll have come to the notion that humanity is reckoned to be a 50/50 split between the souled and the unsouled, referred in the cited article as 'Organic Portals' or OPs.
I'm won't that lengthy paper for you but will say that OPs are potentially dangerous because they are routinely used as attack vectors of all manner and stripe by 3- and 4D STS.
Because OPs do not reincarnate as souled beings do, still being very much embedded in the 2D group soul structure(s) from which they spring, they are a) afraid of death, b)materialistic, c) focused on their physicality pretty much to the exclusion of any higher order awareness, d) largely unburdened by the soul wounds and the collateral problems that souled beings must deal with and, following on, e) generally physically robust and attractive on that last account.
Now let's move to the trans Conundrum, which I'm going to suggest is much more an issue for souled beings than for OPs who, as with almost all other considerations having to do with higher order awareness, do not have the 'soul machinery' to enable them to perceive and/or act on the basis of such considerations.
Given this, and given that souled beings reincarnate with a clearly delineated Life Purpose, or Intentionality, from and thru which they make manifest their state of being in all its aspects and agencies, thoughtful consideration gives rise to the observation that it is possible -- not likely, but certainly possible -- for a soul Intending an incarnation thru one or another of the two possibilities in 3D physicality, male or female, to find them self in a 1/2 ton Ford with gun racks rather than a sedan with a sun roof and cloth upholstery.
And, given the very real possibility of 4D STS interference, it's handily seen that a soul could find itself in literally the 'wrong body'.
So what then: does that soul endure a life lived -- of socially enforced necessity let's remember -- professing a false personality and bearing up under that stupendous burden.
Or, does that soul find best compromise recourse, consequences be damned, deconstruct the false personality and move into a state of being in far better alignment with it's intended Life Purpose and consequent path and get on with it ?
Do the math please and get back to us . . .
Do the math please and get back to us . . ."
The math....
"Anyone who doesn't swallow Good Optics hopelessly dysfunctional, life-negating horse crap is an organic portal."
Did I get that right?
Makes sense! ... in the end, our purpose is to transcend. To make due with the meal on our plate, as absolutely best as we each can.
(I will reference, The Four Agreements 'Ruis')
Also The Matrix I
We have human beings, humans, and whatever. Human beings can be trusted, blindly.
The fact you stereotype males as driving around in Ford trucks with gun racks and females in sun-roofed sedans (paid for by hubby) suggests that you are being dictated to by social narratives
My argument is that the objective should be to remove those stereotypical narratives as opposed to mutilating bodies to fit the narrative
I second LM's comment - make due with the meal on our plate
You should know, Optics: Your soul chose your body to learn from, and they are lessons of the soul that can only be learned from an imposition of constraints that comes of 3D physicality limitation. You knew this. And... You may well have chosen this particularly difficult body-soul juxtaposition mix to fast-track a particularly pertinent karmic debt to be paid off double-time! But, you've gone and got lost and absorbed in physicality (again?). And blown it.
Though, I don't think it's ever too late... What's done is done and it's a lesson in and of itself... It's just gonna be a near-impossible mountain to climb because you're too far into this life now.
"If you can't solve your problem, maybe you could make a sort of peace with it. One good way of doing that would be to cease trying to further crystallise your 'error'."
I think the most telling thing about your post is that LM was trying to agree with you by saying something completely contradictory. Make due with the hand you've been dealt. Exactly. Just freaking live with it, especially if you are such an elevated soul. Why is physicality so important to you? It sounds that people with this disorder are more likely to be OPs since they are so obviously obsessed by the physical, probably because nothing is going on in the soul department.
1. Mean-Spirited are the only to de-volve.
2. I agree with most you write (and yess the energy body has imprints and story-lines and this constructs our physical experience) but i hold off in trying to suppose what or who Good is portraying. That is his business only.
3. Not all souls have karma to pay. Some souls, albeit do also choose, in other words volunteer as VictimSouls which is not the same as a victim personality.
4. Ultimately, wherever n whatever, inner peace is what we are here to exude. (Good has expressed that magnificently.)
Yes Hash... it is a toughie. Cause ultimately the meal on the plate refers to the present moment elements and not the pasts' 🏆🍾 however; meaning he person's reality now. So in the end PEACE is the only KEY (and only he /she who walks the shoes can say if they fit or not). PEACE is the only answer. PEACE is the expression of integrated healing.
6. BC the are your projections.
I don't think I have a particularly male or female soul / mind ... just a body which one of those genders
The 'stereotype' thing I deliberately did as a silly way of poking fun at stereotypes. You however want your butt kicked for the little " . . . (paid for by hubby) . . . " stereotypical slag I think you'd better re-read what she said.
It seems to me you though that you are genuinely struggling to understand, even somewhat , and I thank you for the expressed grace.
And, just ditch this notion: it's bogus.
This: should read:
This AM I upped a few things into this already extensive directory [Link] the entire contents of which can be downloaded from this [Link]
The pieces I mean to point out are "20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths and Psychopaths Use To Silence You" at this [Link] and "Spotting_Classic_Diversionary_Tactics" at this [Link]
I highlighted a few things in the first piece that have been seen here of late but really, in order to get a good picture you'll have to read the whole piece, then with it fresh in your mind wade thru this entire thread. The numerous instances are plainly seen.
There is something from Hater For Life I found particularly galling/illuminating that had to do him taking something I'd written, chopping it short, thereby rendering it out of context whole cloth and then in his typical fashion setting about trashing it.
I replied with the whole paragraph and to further flesh out the picture went on to add another paragraph or so.
My correction of his earlier 'editorializing' incontrovertibly made my point, whereupon he commented on the extra text saying something to the effect that, "Yeah, that's the sort of thing pedophiles say to justify themselves".
Because that little screed so perfectly makes my points in respect of the newly posted materials linked above I wanted to copy and paste it here, but an hour spent searching turned up nothing.
Now I am -good- at searching, I do it as a major part of my extensive research work and know what I'm doing.
Even a Google site search for the term term "good optics" "highland fleet lute" "conundrum" "healer" sott.net fails to pull a hit.
An extesvie search for another stupid, accusatory comment from lsjarvi also fails to pull hit.
So, by way of a lengthy and detailed e-mail I've contacted Beau at SOTT and we'll hear back in due course.
I have read what LM said, and it's a matter of what you wish to see in that, but "deal with it" is pretty simple, in my opinion, if you don't engage in mental gymnastics. It doesn't matter what she meant, it's what came out. Call it a Freudian slip.
Elevated soul? Of course that's garbage, but that's what you keep implying about yourself, whether you know it or not.
Also, if I'm 6'1" and comfortable in my body, I'm very possibly a ln OP? What hogwash.
Nope. You fail your sums seven days a week and twice on Sundays when you go once more unto the breach like a syphilitic Sisyphus, attempting to create the world in your own image, or the world in your own labyrinthine-fantasy-super-dysfunctional-impossible-dream-nightmare, or whatever it is a person is supposed to call that mess.
It's interesting that you should pull that 'organic portals' thing out of your toolkit, 'cause back in the olden days, that was my issue with Montalk: rushing to create his own customised identikit definition of what an organic portal is to suit his own agenda. It seems to me now, just as it did at the time, that's exactly what a sociopath, psychopath, 'attack vector' or whatever would do, and here we have you slyly attempting to do the very same thing, utilising it to delegitimise the arguments of others. Flashing it like a get-out-of-jail-free-and-destroy-all-those-perceived-as-opponents card.
"Anyone-who-doesn't-yield-to-my-wishes-must-be-an-organic-portal".
What a pathetic attempt at a coup de grâce.
More food for thought that won't be heeded...[Link]
That won't make him a woman either.
Re: Good Optics comment about ossified blah-blah.
I said...
"Yeah, that's the sort of thing pedophiles say to justify themselves".
That is the kind of thing pedophiles say to justify themselves.
"The world is a cruel nasty place full of horrible mean straight people who do not share my off-kilter, pervy and damaging compulsions."
LOL. What is this? Russiagate II?
Do your worst, ar*ehole.
I don't know why HFL's screw up of a comment was trashed, I never bothered to take it up because it was one of those energy suck gambits where a one sentence bit of halfway convincing complete BS takes two or three good sized paragraphs to deconstruct. Not going there. At any rate clarification will be forthcoming soon enough Well OK, nice try but yet again you are far off the mark and I'm not going to waste energy on saying anything more than that because no matter what I might say you'll turn it ass-about-face into something it certainly is not. I am just astonished by the 'thinking' around here. You have come up with the damnedest streams of illogic I've seen in a long, long time; and you've been doing so throughout this thread. Sometimes, if you've been actually thinking you're more on point and sometimes farther off.
You clearly haven't even so much a glanced at the linked article and if you had you'd have learned that OPs are surpassingly difficult to identify because they've long since learned how steal energy from souled beings and that they do by adsorbing (the spelling is correct) energy then radiating it back to the source. In that way they achieve a sort of 'bond' because the almost always unsuspecting souled person has no idea what's going on and takes things at seeming face value. Gurdjieff, of whom I'm no great fan, Boris Mouravieff [Link] , the Cs and maybe Casteneda have all commented on the manifold, unbridgeable differences between souled and unsouled humans. It's a worthwhile study, teaches you just how unaware you actually are because the differences ought to smack one right upside head every time and they don't. Rather, they appear, maybe, as uncertain little glimpses that across an extended period of careful observation one might be able to arrive at an accurate assessment, maybe.
So, and yet again, you are assuming I've done, or intended to do, things I certainly have not. I have never, nor would I ever, say such a thing. What I will say is that I think well (there's a button for you HaterFL) and think a lot, and question everything and on a daily basis drill into myself by study of many, many things I do not yet understand just how little I can actually say I know. On the other hand, what I've learned about several people here is that they'd sooner simply react than actually think carefully. Which, sad to say, is a pretty common observation from those whose thought processes I can and do respect.
That said, a while back, three years maybe, Laura wrote a good series on the differences between the souled and the OPs' very different points of view and how the OPs get more or less rabid about their, "Materialism is the Only and the All" ostensibly all inclusive vantage.
As to some coup de grâce, the very notion is absurd. I said what I said to illuminate a possible reason for the very great gulf between the >99.9% of the population for whom the very notion of a physical transition is repugnant to an extreme and those who find in the process the release and relief they need.
You give sh*t about how anyone might go away from an encounter with you.
I have never, not once in all the years, seen you extend a warm or consoling hand, never once seen you try patiently to explain anything to one who isn't getting it.
You hijack wholesale threads that might be heading into a nuanced discussion of the subtleties, of the finer points, of anything.
You, and you alone, are the only one whose opinions are worth anything.
You don't ask questions, you don't listen, others comments to you about your misbehaviours are trashed, along with those will the galling temerity to have said such things in the first place.
I am fed. up. with watching you try to steal from others any self-respect they might bring here.
You are vicious in ways and to extents I've never seen before and I am done with watching you get away with it, year after year after year.
You are a vitroil vector and you are proud of it what's more.
==========
Here's a snip from from my note to SOTT: Send me an e-mail and I'll forward the whole mail. An address for me is up the page under a post to LindaMay, about whom I said the following:
You're tedious.
No matter how many new column miles you will have written on this thread by the time I look at it next, it's time for you to understand that your victory over reality is a train that is not late, it's a train that isn't coming.
"send me a mail and I'll fwd some mail to you."
LOL. F*ck that.
Yep, I'd say that's pretty much it.
Sisyphus: Excellent analogy!
I find it interesting Good Optics often brings up his days of early Cassiopaea involvement... I wonder if on some level its a cry for help?
Dirty laundry... lovely to recognize your.face in the mirror BC.
[Link]
... one of my absolute favs
Big Shot!
Ego is the mouthpiece of the physical. Man some of yous really need to get "IT"
... call it 'négligé' por favor
Teeny note, there comes a time when all has been said... it is a little like this.
1. We have many roads to Rome
2. Many will never go to Rome
3. Many have never heard of Rome
HaterFL has been kind to me twice. Told me about Blue Light glasses (which i immediately purchased AND wear)
And when my ma killed my dad he shared his dad's 🏆rip 🏆memory.
Maybe there was one other time
In other lives I've twice watched our older daughter murdered. once for alleged witchcraft and once during the times when the Native Indian populations were being overrun.
Such things are difficult . . .
Those boundaries restraining sexual gratification need to be pushed further and further out to satisfy that orgasmic 'hit' like an addict. Roll on 20 years of constant 'even more sex' and the next thing you know you're needing to take furtive stop-offs to the back alleys of Thailand to quench your insatiable 'hits' no longer duly satisfied back home.
First level testing is discerning when to mind your speech. That, in other words, comes before speaking your mind.
(maybe she is a witch )
And look into the world of reality,
I am remindedd of Plato, by TED, is it real, or is it just in the mind of the creator., like this vido clip from TED, it is a caricature of the real meaning, along with the cartoon nature of the video..
[Link]
Get a life. I am tired of getting these red bell notifications, of nothing more than a social club discourse that has no real meaning or substance.
What has Boris Mouravieff got to do with you? If you turned up on the doorstep of the big, butch, ZZ Top-bearded monks on Mount Athos, they'd probably have you deported.
"Or, does that soul find best compromise recourse, consequences be damned, deconstruct the false personality and move into a state of being in far better alignment with it's intended Life Purpose and consequent path and get on with it ?"
G.I. Gurdjieff said...
"Only a person who is completely normal as regards sex has any chance in the work."
LGB vs. T: How the transgender issue is dividing a movement
Today there are tensions between a second-wave feminism that is worried about people who were born men co-opting their movement and a younger feminism that embraces all people who self-identify as...Unfortunately, it seems that I do.
Every kind of depravity, conscious as well as unconscious
The feeling of self-satisfaction from leading others astray
The irresistible inclination to destroy the existence of other breathing creatures
The urge to become free from the necessity of actualizing the being-efforts demanded by Nature
The attempt by every kind of artificiality to conceal from others what in their opinion are one’s physical defects
The calm self-contentment in the use of what is not personally deserved
The striving to be not what one is.
Sounds like a tranny to me
[Link]
[Link]
Just the one sentence about what happened in her family makes me very sad.
And Hater For Life, you lately said she has the mental age of a five year old and even so, she defended you.
RW you said things almost as bad, with IncenDiary chiming in along similar lines.
============
Here's a Google about the lives of a great number of people who, by the "definition", I suppose, repeatedly put forth here must be mentally ill [Link]
Comment as you see fit, I have no interest.
I have many, many projects, commitments and obligations in life that have come up short during this waste of time. I've said what I have to say and am logging out.
The red ringy-dingy can ring itself clear off the hook
Ive been around haters my entire almost 6 decade life. I have shared what follows several times here @Sott. My ma was/is a hater, after 55 yrs marriage, she killed my dad almost 4 yrs ago now. My sibling was/is a hater. He bribed my dads' lawyer (which got the lawyer canned but my dad strapped away for over 2 yrs) ... with only me to visit almost daily. My hub of 25 yrs kidapped our extraordinary son 9 yrs ago last week. Erik had just turned a fresh 13. My ma helped my hub keep Erik hidden. She gifted him a hunting rifle of dad's at 14 and his pa paid for Shooting School. My hub became a porn addict and cross-dresser (irony) and sleezed around $$ n sluts.
Healing is a powerful journey of many ups and obstacles. My father and I never kept ourselves from shining. We celebrate life when we accept the sweetness that greets us, however fleetingly, to share profoundly to be compassionate, when lucky we find giggles n fun. The walk of the path is the space of/in the present moment . A surrender of the past and surrender, trusting what will, trusting the Bigger in our experience of it; it is the only way to keep growing, to shine our best light as truly as we can, it is the only way to BE the change we wish to see in our world.
Life for us is a human pilgrimage of letting go and welcoming newness simultaneously. A continuous exchange of freedom and abundance, without judgement. An exchange, the wholehearted embodiment of kindness and generosity.
BE Good
I'll have to read this thru a couple more times, my eyes got blurry, my nose started to run and I had to take off my glasses to use the Kleenex.
Take care Sweet Soul . . .
I can't wait to get to Creston BC and pick up my grandson in Nelson for the weekend [Link] Teach him about a million things; like five years hence, how to drive an inboard runabout up and down the lake.
but there might also be a time to give the f$#@;
the closest i have ever come to a religious belief is more or less this;
i feel we are here to learn to accept/behave. (even under difficult circumstances). then we might be accepted "somewere else". (in the lack of better words, think; free form/skydiving).
one snag; "jumping off"=jumping back to square one.
HFL man bad!!!
"Oh-if-only-it-would-all-blow-over-and-everyone-would-go-back-to-being-dishonest-with-me!!!!".
Which is not, was not, nor ever will be a kindness to you.
Could it be that these HATERS are more proof that... HFL man bad!!!!
Idiot.
You evince the emotional sensitivity of a ten-pin bowling ball and, mixing metaphors, would do well to learn the difference between a bludgeon and an artist's paint brush.
I am the one calling you out on your vitriol vectoring, your throwing of 15 mole sulphuric in people's faces. If you don't like being busted Hater For Life, quit being an asshole.
His views aren't that of an asshole, or even an asshat.
They are comments that are meant to make you think about some under discussed element of the story.
You pretty just admitted that you have very poor reading comprehension skills.
The times he pokes fun at someone, shit, if you can't take a joke I don't know what to tell you. I have been in the firing line, and it still made me laugh.
This whole attitude of "everyone has to be a good little drone" "no one can say anything offensive" "if i read something that bothers me I have to debate the person who posted it to show them the error in their ways and how I am right, the only right"
is the real problem.
All these progressive, supposedly diversity loving asshats want a dictator who will edict to their wishes and desires. They are not for inclusion and tolerance.
They are most bigoted people I have ever seen.
You ever notice how 1%ers are hardly ever called out if they are a democrat? It is only the pigs in the republican world who should be forced to give their money away.
Little kids be blaming the ills of the world on the rich, but they want to get rich themselves. If you ask them "should you have to give away all your money?" they will say "no".
Just one example of how the entire social movement and EVERYTHING related to it is complete rubbish as now they feel the need to weaponize their own children with blatant cognitive dissonance. They are raising a generation of warrior children built off of self righteous ignorance with the belief that those edicts they wish to push on the world are should not apply to themselves as they are the righteous ones.
The children are being weaponized and indoctrinated in all kinds of shit ways. Worse than I can ever remember. It makes me long for the days when it was a simple indoctrination by the pledge of allegiance.
Please don't try and debate me, this was not a debate opener. Merely a statement of how I perceive the world. That is something that no one will change because I have my own life experiences which are no less important to me than yours to you.
Tell me how big of a pig and problem I am if you wish, that is your right and I don't mind, but don't try to start a debate.
I do not intend it to be a personal attack on you at all. Just pointing out that you may be missing the reason for what a lot of HFL says from time to time. I actually think he must have a gonzo ass IQ, I mull over what he posts a lot looking for threads to pull on.
I apologize if the reading comprehension thing was taken as an insult. I should have phrased it differently. No disrespect meant to you or yours.
"Yeah, I was just thinking that. His philosophy is so at odds with the fourth way teachings, it's ridiculous that he would be referring to them for anything."
Clearly, Good Optics has decided that he doesn't want to talk about Gurdjieff and Mouravieff after all.
He was probably just name dropping. That's something fake humans like to do a lot.
"The calm self-contentment in the use of what is not personally deserved
The striving to be not what one is."
It's funny, I'm aware of that whole Mouravieff schtick about 'the knight and his lady', but nowhere in Gnosis I, II and III could I find anything about 'the knight who liked to wear Laura Ashley dresses, chopped his todger off, and thought he was the fairy at the top of a Christmas tree.
Before you go all nuts, GO and LM, I'm very sad about all the crap that's happened to you, truly am. Terrible stuff.
Funny enough to give me cause to observe with another trip two thru the washer, and the wringer, and some time in the sun and the breeze on the laundry line outside you might , at some point, actually be worth having a beer with -- a pint at a time; no pitchers.
SMFH in disgust.
Just wanted to tell you love much love and respect.
How many times have you said words to those effect during this thread, and you can't even stick to them even once.
For that reason alone, not a snowball's chance in hell would a person like you be any good in The Work. You shouldn't even talk about The Work.
As per 'toxic individuals', you've chosen this life in which you scare small children, dogs bark at you in the street, and people 'out of kindness' have to make excuses for you all the time wherever you go, and no 'toxic individual' apart from you had a hand in that. And had you ever considered how much of a burden you are on those around you because of those choices you've made? I doubt it.
I have no idea what you're doing here, but if you can't take straight up stuff from me, Rincewind and whomever else. maybe you and that other SJW toxic-vampire-bat-that-thinks-she's-a-butterfly LindaMay should leave the building and find yourselves a 'safe space' to protect you from 'haters'*
*people who have the temerity to state the obvious.
Just my opinion.
You don't have to believe me. But its true, the everyone's perspective bit.
If the world was all alike, every one of us it would suck dirty goat ass in many ways, but compromise is a must for people who are not alike.
On any political topic, if any group of people say "screw compromise" they are mental. I don't give two shits where they stand or what topic it is.
Again, just my opinion.
he gave me a date as well
"he gave me a date as well."
You're going on a date with him?
I hate to be the one to have to break it to you, but that's probably not such a great idea, sbc.
LOL.
So....
There was The Zodiac Killer, The Alphabet Bomber. What's this one? The Only 365 Shopping Days 'Til I Get To Be The Fairy At The Top of The Christmas Tree Murderer?
Realistically, as regards Good Optics' central concern, the only date likely to be on his calendar is The Twelve of Never.
You're gonna go on a date with two Good Opticses?
This is just getting weirder and weirder.
You're a brave man.
Don't do anything I wouldn't do.
besides that, they are lucky i got two dates, i usually never let them score on the first one.
"besides that, they are lucky i got two dates, i usually never let them score on the first one."
Oh, the 'I don't pop my cork for just any old thing in a skirt', 'treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen' M.O.
Sounds like a plan. Don't forget to have the Instagram account, YouTube vlog, and cook book/ball shaving kit/general merchandising initiative at the ready.
R.C.
[Link] Article and video
[Link] Video with video commentaary.
Hilarious, but, at the same time, tragic.
R.C.
You've seen what happens when everyone is coerced into "recognising the right for Israel to exist", I guess this is what happens when everyone is coerced into "recognising the right for The Sugar Plum Fairy to exist." If people on the, what can now only be called, so-called Left, or ersatz Left had anything remotely realistic about them, they'd take a felt pen to their 'iconic' Che Guevara T-shirts and daub "HATES FAGS" at the bottom.
In the first 50 seconds he's already said: “Although they appear to not have the elevator going to the top floor, or they’re a few fries short of a happy meal ” (The ugly truth!) we can't afford to ignore these deranged idiots. I agree.
Hm mm....I can picture me, R.C., th ere.... . . As ABL well states, in these f’d up times, we can’t afford to sleep on this type stuff; especially if/when these idiots get into power.
R.C.
*[Paraphrased from ‘Hayduke Lives!’ by Edward Abbey. (RIP)]
RC
A) Between you, you just woke up the neighbourhood three times without an apparent reason.
B) You're incapable of ignoring a little red bell icon, which when you click on it, gives you an option as to whether you want to read the "Every Woman Has a Right to Have Her Scrotum Waxed" thread, and you clicked your mouse to the affirmative regarding that.
No one forced you to.
No one forced you to comment, either.
What's the problem?
FYI, this is the ONLY website I actually allow notifications for, because SOTT isn't trying to sell me anything.
Listen, I think you need a holiday, mate.
Fishwives who aren't bright enough between them to have yet realized that my posting simply the date is my way of saying, "I came, I saw, I walked . . . "
EFFECTS OF COLOURED LIGHT AND COLOURED PLASTIC
It has been noted that work areas lit by the pink fluorescents for a "warm" effect have the opposite effect with the staff. Tempers flare, everyone becomes irritable and generally difficult to control.
When the pink fluorescents are removed, within a week, congeniality and a spirit of working together redevelops. These results seemed quite in line with the preliminary reports on mink kept behind different coloured glass.
Mink exposed to natural daylight through a deep pink glass became increasingly aggressive, difficult to manage, and in many instances actually vicious.
Mink normally are quite fierce, but when some of the mink were placed behind deep blue plastic they became friendly and docile. The same results can be applied to coloured eye-glasses; pink tinted glasses can cause personality disturbances
Putting your other foot in someone else's shoe.
If you saw someone else doing this...
"I came, I saw, I shrieked "I'm done with this thread" and slammed the door behind me, then I came, I saw, I shrieked "I'm done with this thread" and slammed the door behind me, then I came, I saw, I shrieked "I'm done with this thread" and slammed the door behind me", etc, etc, loop ad infinitum.
Would you not think that person was a bit mentally ill?
The bell ain't broke. It's the Pavlov's dogs who respond to it that are.
In the background, and while our two, penny-ante wanker, fishwives in drag were illuminating All Creation with their insights, a 30 year friend of mine and I were to spend this week havin' a hang, some fun, some wine, some music in a couple of clubs where they just waive the door for me and get him re-connected into Calgary as he has been in Saskatoon for some years.
We were going to make the baby steps to do with him moving to southern BC, getting seniors accommodation and getting to know the man from whom I'll buy a business and move in the spring of 2020.
Once there, and amoung many, many other things, I was going to light up a colloidal mineral business for which I have the exclusive Western Canadian distribution, with him handling by far the bulk of the sales work and travel.
Years ago he was the western regional sales agent for a large natural foods distributor in western Canada and so could have easily re-established his earlier contacts to the benefit of all concerned.
A good run thru one's Golden Years in other words.
Instead, and out of the clear blue, this happened [Link]
==============
Over the last many years we've all read many, many such stories which, in the Age of Too Much Info, tend, I suppose to settle into the general calamity. My noise-blunted sensibilities have been rather sharpened.
==============
BC: I saw your comment a couple of hours ago and it could be said it's well that I waited, our Poseur in Chief is yet again in fine form.
You can't really get more of a poseur than a geezer with Officer Dibble five o' clock shadow, size thirteen clodhoppers and legs like tree trunks who spends his entire life trying to flip the world on its head in order to pass himself of as a lady (with returns entirely as expected).
No wonder...
"Trust me, I'm a transvestite"
... occupies such a lowly position on the hierarchy of all remotely possible likelihoods.
20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths &and Psychopaths Use to Silence You [Link]
How to Spot 10 Classic Diversionary Tactics and Not Get Derailed [Link]
Both are worthwhile reads . . .
It's never nice to eat your own sh*t, but maybe you should look over all of your frenetically off-kilter posts using the linked material as a guidebook.
I think this is about the third time out for this....
"In the fight between you and the world, back the world.” - Franz Kafka.
When you read "The Metamorphosis", WHAT? Did your mind's eye see? Some beetle on its back? . . . or a 2.5" Cockaroacha Americana?*
For folks 'round here; there t'werent no option t'all. The whole feeling like an upside down tortoise (a point he could well have made but didn't as I recall) of how ALL 'large' roaches, like pharoahs, apparently hope to die in.
(First, please realize that there is truly an art form in the killing of large roaches. The LAST thing you want to do is 'STOMP on them with a Heavy Jackboot (borrowed from Orwell's placement on the neck. As the above should show, if ye overstrike, the innards will "splash, and bounce, and roll across the wet street" (Soul Asylum, Let Your Dim Light Shine, {GREAT album}; Song: String of Pearls.")
So you use the velvet flyswatter with an Iron Hand.. Hydraulic shock kills 'em, yet gives them the final strength and dignity to at least . . . roll over on their back.
R.C.
I 'killed' a typical such the other day. on a carpet. When I got rid of him - about an hour later - despite the overstrike his stillness and side guts exploded - he'd rolled over on his back in what was likely a Sir Edmund Hillary on Everest effort!
R.C.
*As Tony Montana would say it.
RC
So, in my alleged but non-existent 'fight' with the 'world' which 'world' might we be talking about 'backing' here ?
Now, I can easily tell you who and what I do back but of course you already know all that don't you ?
"which 'world' might we be talking about 'backing' here ?"
The world in which a person who has a dick is generally understood to be a man.
No one 'ran away' from anything. I said going in that I was no fan of Gurdjieff and brought him up only because he too has made points regarding OPs.
I refer you to a Cs session a few months ago where we were told that some 70% of Gurdjieff's 'work' was derived from the 'output' of mediums.
Further, a recent reading of an essay on my iPhone regarding G's sexual exploits, and exploitations, revealed that he fathered some 10 bastard children.
And, TG-ism isn't per se about the act(s) of physical sex and has nothing whatever to do with 'sexual perversion'. And do run with that as well. During one of my absences from this long-running shit show you boys got to gossiping old fish wives and were seen running various slags, none of which I'm about to waste more time to dig up, and during the interval Richard was murdered.
The contrast between the two activities was, and remains, worth illuminating; but you are much, much too busy being all too clever to have discerned the point. "generally understood" being the operator there.
======================
On page 9 of the thread following the latest Cs session [Link] Laura quoted 'Anka' who said: To which I'll add that hereabouts it has all been rather strange. My house was broken into at 3-4AM with my keys, wallet, briefcase and tablet stolen then my old beater ford Ranger stolen out of the driveway, for the third time; Richard was murdered (and there's more to that than meets the eye by far and which I won't go into here) and this mess with you performing as always.
Maybe you want to stop pouring half-liter beakers of lab-grade HCL to throw in peoples' faces, put the carboy back in fume cabinet where it belongs and study the meaning of such as 'civilised demeanour'.
That being surpassingly unlikely here's a [Link] to Dr. Anne Vitale's site where she talks about her experiences with her MtF clients 5+ years post-op. Wonderful fuel for your superheated boiler I am sure . . .
OK, rightly understood then, if you prefer.
Now that the insanity has settled somewhat it is perhaps possible to have some civilised discourse in respect of the rare and difficult matter at hand. A matter in which there no perfect resolve to be attained because, as I've said over and over, there is only the living of a best compromise.
And something I've never said is that modern day surgical interventions are experimental medicine. On which topic there is room for civilised discussion that spares all involved any belabouring of the obvious reality of a person's natal 'XX' or 'XY' while including the inescapable fact the Creation creates diversity.
I refer you to the [Link] link posted immediately above for some very good observations of post-op life; one summation of which might be that trans people are not and cannot be either-this , or-that . We are always in the middle, it's that name of game and as such we are, as I've said before, cog' dis' generators whether we like it or not. Some cisgender people can handle that, some even enjoy it, while others get on self-fuelled hater rolls that sometimes end in murder..
There's no such thing as 'cisgender'. Cisgender is a perversion of language used by perverted people for perverted ends.
"But that devolved into RW taking things personally and claiming I'd somehow accused him of being an OP; which I certainly did not. In fact i went to some length to illuminate the extreme difficulty in identifying the OP."
OP's had nothing to do with the subject matter. If you didn't wish to imply RW was an OP, why 'introduce' it into the conversation?
"I said going in that I was no fan of Gurdjieff and brought him up only because he too has made points regarding OPs."
Well not quite. He used the term 'compost'. Anyway, why cite Gurdjieff when it's convenient, i.e. 'cause you think it makes you look good, then slag him off when it's convenient 'cause what he says makes you feel bad? Do you really think that Boris Mouravieff or whoever else you cite, quote, or wish to associate yourself with in full view of the peanut gallery at any given moment would feel any differently as per sexual perversion and esoteric work?
To which I'll add that hereabouts it has all been rather strange. My house was broken into at 3-4AM with my keys, wallet, briefcase and tablet stolen then my old beater ford Ranger stolen out of the driveway, for the third time; Richard was murdered (and there's more to that than meets the eye by far and which I won't go into here) and this mess with you performing as always.
Oh right. So it's now implied that somehow I'm part of this vast negative hit squad that murdered your friend, stole your car, your wallet, your briefcase, etc. No doubt, I'm also the one who supplied Nero with the matches, Hitler with the swastika and Jim Jones with the kool aid. Only a bombastic narcissist would resort to this Everest-sized heap of toxic crap you've expunged in this thread, but then I guess you've probably got so good at training people to lie to you, and to lie for you, that this massive release of bubonic spew has now become your standard response to anyone who refuses to comply with the programme.
"TG-ism isn't per se about the act(s) of physical sex and has nothing whatever to do with 'sexual perversion'."
On what planet is a geezer dressing up in a ladies bra-and-panties not a sexual perversion?
There's no such thing as TG-ism. Mainly 'cause there's nowhere to 'T' to.
So-called 'transgenderism' is a sly manouevre to legitimise, objectify, and further push the boundaries of 'transvestism' , which is a sexual perversion. As you know, it's also something that Sick Pharma can make a big bunch of huge industries and plenty of $$$$$$$$$ out of.
"Here's a [Link] to Dr. Anne Vitale's site where she talks about her experiences with her MtF clients 5+ years post-op"
Dr Anne Vitale? Oh, the woman sounds like a complete angel. WTF is an MtF client? Muthaf*cker client? You damn transvestites never get enough of butchering language. When a persons inner-gyroscope has gone, they will generally resort to anything or anyone that looks like a port in a storm. Hence you, at great expense, winding up throwing your sausage to the dogs in Frankenstein's Castle, which I guess gives you all the more reason to add more sand and ballast to your extremely pervy case of Stockholm Syndrome.
Whatever dude, I have a difficult funeral to go to, the second in Saskatoon, and many and by far more important things to deal with than wasting more energy into this mess.
You have your mind up, the world is the world according to Hater for life and that's the end of it.
So you just carry on with your hyphen-concatenated-adjectival-slag driven theatrics, recruit as many as possible into your racist-quality thinking and maybe work up a proper little lynch mob.
Fill. your. boots.
You're full of hate. You are the Hater for Life and you are a Hater of Life. Starting with your own male body and working outwards.
"Racist-quality thinking"
I don't give a flying shit about your false allegations. Everything about you is false.
Don't you f**king get it, yet?
What are the best three things about alzheimer's?
1) You get to hide your own easter eggs.
2) You get to meet new people every day.
3) You get to hide your own easter eggs.
Go back and back all the long way to the beginning of this thread, and from there on, count how many times you've said words to that effect.
It's clear you are not in control of your own head.
And if you're not in control of your head, who is?
THEREFORE; R.C. HEREBY DECLARES THAT THIS NOW-OLD TOPIC IS CLOSED!
In order to kill the comments here; both wise and foolish, I, RC, hereby declare this article dead for new comments.
If anyone has a NEW comment, I welcome it. But if it’s a redux of any of the above topics, I trust my fellow SOTTites to quickly atomize it.
R.C .
B.C.
R.C.
R.C.
The bell comes up red whether your comments are 'discreet' or not.
SPEAKINGTYPING! Anyone who posts a comment, OR! merely a reply, will suffer REASONABLE consequences!WTF;
R.C.
Surfers will NEVER ask the waves to stop flowing to the beach!
NRN.
R.C.
I wish they'd I.D. the surf spot/locale. Believe it or not, my best guess is New Smyrna Beach, as discussed in Today's SOTT:
3 shark attacks at the same Florida beach within 24 hours
Three people were bitten by a shark within a 24-hour span at a Florida beach on Sunday. It happened at New Smyrna Beach. The community is known as the "shark bite capital of the world." A...R.C.
I've got an ancient guitar in my flat: It's a 1960's salmon pink Vox Spitfire. The strings on it are as heavy as piano wire. That's how I like it, so it sounds like you're hitting a bell, since we're still more or less on the subject of bells.
If anyone tried any of that squeemy licks business on that guitar, they'd probably end up in the A&E.
To cut to the chase, my father was en route to pro baseball but volunteered for Korea. In his two years there with the USAF on B-26 invaders (upgraded A-20's from WWII for close ground support et al. Same function as A-10 warthogs) that led to space work in California. We were all born there (my dad was born on a S.C. sharecropper farm to a midwife in 1931 - couldn’t afford a hospital.)
His father was a USMC Vet of pre WWI Banana waars & France in WWI. (He was 20 years older than my grandma.) PTSD and great depression in S.C. hit him hard, and left the family when my father was 7? My Grandma then drove the family to California ~1942? so she could play Rosie the Riveter. She was 5'0" and one of the only ladies small enough to get into the distal parts of the wings to rivet from the inside out.
But you wanna talk ‘ancient’ gitfiddles? My Pops was a GREAT poker player and via a 1952? poker game in Korea he won a 1948 Epiphone Dreadnought Rounded back guitar. I dragged it out of the closet at 11 and never looked back. I’ve still got it.
Also a 1974 Gibson L6-S, (like new); a 1974 Takamine acoustic/classical, et al.
Gotta go.
Look forward to meeting you someday - and you too, most SOTT folk!
R.C.
Still has phenomal acoustics/resonance, and more than a little bit of my Pops (RIP) in there.
NRN.
R.C.
By one year from now!
R.C.
to the main participants (hfl): how is the SCROTUM WAXING going??? THAT IS WHAT EVERYONY IS WONDERING RIGHT NOW! (why not take your dirty chats over to some dark and muddy chatroom where you will more likely find likeminded a$$ho£€$)
We talked about the splatters of weirdness in our lives, hers thru the year to date and mine just of late. We hung up with the resolve to catch each other on the upside, and to make an upside. We're each other's best dance partner and have been for years so we determined to get out and do some serious honky-tonkin', of which there's lots hereabouts and of which we've both been a part for many years.
So with that preamble out of the way; there will be nothing further from me vectored into this mess. I've said everything I have to say and too much more besides -- for which I offer apology for burdening everyone's time and energies.
In closing it can be said Creation Creates Diversity.
Hangin' with Hank and Swirlin' with Merle
As your sole contribution to this thread has led to you being forever renowned on SOTT in the following way...
"Oh it's that a$$ho£€ that doesn't use capital letters and posts links to videos of guys having sexual intercourse with salmon"
"why not take your dirty chats over to some dark and muddy chatroom where you will more likely find likeminded a$$ho£€$"
.... seems a bit more of an appropriate request when directed towards you rather than anyone else.
"In closing it can be said Creation Creates Diversity."
How at odds with creation is self-mutilation? How at odds with creation are you?
"So with that preamble out of the way; there will be nothing further from me vectored into this mess. I've said everything I have to say and too much more besides."
How self-unaware must you be? That's gotta be about the 225th time you've said during this thread.
Listen, Mister, if you can't stand the heat coming from every gas ring/hob/oven that you yourself have had turned up to max all the way throughout this thread, then get out of the damn kitchen. No one's keeping you here.
btw; how is the scrotum-waxing going?
"Do you not have anything better to do than spamming sott-threads?"
Well, by your own criteria that's exactly what you're doing now.
I won't bother asking the same question of you though, just to say: it would be entirely reasonable of me to expect you to show up here morning/day/night from now on in, obsessively trying to pour cat litter over the distinctly piscatorial aroma you left on your last visit, and the visit after that, and the visit after that, ad nauseum.
"btw; how is the scrotum-waxing going?"
'Why not take your dirty chats over to some dark and muddy chatroom where you will more likely find likeminded a$$ho£€$.'
Blaire White Vs Jessica Yaniv...[Link]
Entirely predictable tranny 'community' class war/civil war/handbag-mash-up between expensive op-jobs and Ugly 'Sisters' in pound shop Rod Stewart wigs.
Thank you for waking the whole street up to deliver that very worthwhile contribution. It's much appreciated.
Although 'spelling' has zip all to do with 'grammar'. LOL.
Forgot to put a hyphen in "zip-all".
LOL.