© SOTT
Running Time: 01:06:46
Download: MP3 — 61.1 MB
Running Time: 01:06:46
Download: MP3 — 61.1 MB
Harrison Koehli co-hosts SOTT Radio Network's MindMatters, and is an editor for Red Pill Press. He has been interviewed on several North American radio shows about his writings on the study of ponerology. In addition to music and books, Harrison enjoys tobacco and bacon (often at the same time) and dislikes cell phones, vegetables, and fascists (commies too).
Born and raised in New York City, Elan has been an editor for SOTT.net since 2014 and is a co-host for MindMatters. He enjoys seeing and sharing what's true about our profoundly and rapidly changing world.
Corey Schink was born and raised in the Midwestern United States, where he worked on farms and as a welder, musician, and social worker. His interests in government, philosophy and history led to his writing for SOTT in 2012 and to becoming a SOTT editor and SOTT Radio co-host in 2014. He now resides in North Carolina, where he enjoys the magnificent views of the Appalachian Mountains.
Reader Comments
cracker
2019-07-13T17:33:33Z
Words as weapons, funny sounds like a lot of people here on sott. They don't like what someone else says they cdondemn them as being wrong even if it is only their opinion. Heaven forbid someone doesn't think like you. What about grammer, or punctuation, or maybe spelling. I've noticed lately these are all reasons to ridicule another person, even the so called editors do it. Reminds me of being in kindergarten STICKS AND STONES CAN BREAK MY BONES BUT WORDS CAN NEVER HURT ME.
cracker I don't know if your below post was posted before or after HFL's; they both say "about an hour ago."*
I believe HFL's comment of simply the spelling of "grammar" is being* facetious** as there are few if any posts that are grammatically perfect; although I have been so accused recently of so posting. (For example, he did not point out "cdondemn" as it's obvious you meant "condemn." and part of me is being facetious in pointing that out at all.)
Beyond all that, I agree with your point - especially, "Sticks and stones...". Indeed, I know I have here, at some point, posted the same words, and, as a general guideline for life, I often quote/paraphrase the title of the book. "Everything I Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten."
R.C.
*Hey, SOTT I.T. GUY SCOTT/SCOTTIE: I say bring back the UTC dates and times rather than "about a year ago"; "about a week ago", etc.! It far better helps in the communications. (I am aware of the fact that IF cracker had 'properly' posted his follow up words as a reply, than as a new comment, I could at least then tell the order of things, but how much harder is it to have the exact dates and times of posts?)
My own opinion is that the use of "about x ago" is a change for the worse (wherever it first came from) reflecting, or at least consistent with, the generalized 'dumbing down' of society. "And dis hyar home boy beez not down witchat!"
** *IMHO, improperly, as I always believe that when dealing with written communication, ALL facetiousness, sarcasm, et al. should be declared in a fashion like this footnote.
R.C.
I believe HFL's comment of simply the spelling of "grammar" is being* facetious** as there are few if any posts that are grammatically perfect; although I have been so accused recently of so posting. (For example, he did not point out "cdondemn" as it's obvious you meant "condemn." and part of me is being facetious in pointing that out at all.)
Beyond all that, I agree with your point - especially, "Sticks and stones...". Indeed, I know I have here, at some point, posted the same words, and, as a general guideline for life, I often quote/paraphrase the title of the book. "Everything I Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten."
R.C.
*Hey, SOTT I.T. GUY SCOTT/SCOTTIE: I say bring back the UTC dates and times rather than "about a year ago"; "about a week ago", etc.! It far better helps in the communications. (I am aware of the fact that IF cracker had 'properly' posted his follow up words as a reply, than as a new comment, I could at least then tell the order of things, but how much harder is it to have the exact dates and times of posts?)
My own opinion is that the use of "about x ago" is a change for the worse (wherever it first came from) reflecting, or at least consistent with, the generalized 'dumbing down' of society. "And dis hyar home boy beez not down witchat!"
** *IMHO, improperly, as I always believe that when dealing with written communication, ALL facetiousness, sarcasm, et al. should be declared in a fashion like this footnote.
R.C.
Rowan Cocoan I tend to think people's ability to think and communicate clearly has rapidly declined in tandem with their continued exposure to man-made EMF's. I think that's also key to people's predilection for sloganeering rather than expressing original thought.
Rowan Cocoan You're right R.C. on both counts our replies were posted at the same time mine should have been first and the word condemn. One thing I'm proud of though is I spelled Kindergarten right although I think it should be garden. LOL
Highland Fleet Lute That is an astute observation, and sociological tests would probably prove it out, but:
- No one could ever get funds for such a study;
- And if the study proved that, the study's author(s) would be careerless.
R.C.
- No one could ever get funds for such a study;
- And if the study proved that, the study's author(s) would be careerless.
R.C.
Rowan Cocoan It's a common perception amongst the few of us who don't own mobile phones.
Highland Fleet Lute I will ask my one friend who doesn't have one what he thinks. (FWIW: I have the battery taken out of mine about 40% of the time.)
NRN
R.C.
NRN
R.C.
LindaMay
Cute RC
LindaMay Gesundheit! (Or however one says 'gratzi' in German. Is it 'danke'? Or am I thinking about doughnuts?
R.C.
R.C.
Rowan Cocoan Gesundheit is a response to someone sneezing ... seems like a good one word response to many a diatribe
The 'isn't-it-great-that-none-of-us-is-capable-of-forming-a-coherent-sentence-why-not-let's-splash-a-load-of-emoticons-all over-the-place-and-let's-all-be-dumb-asses-together' thing is entirely corrupt and is a port of entry to further corruption
"Can't make a Utopia without cracking a few heads." Yes, so true. Thanks for the great show, just finished it, and a lot to digest there. Peace.
Words?
Said, then received.
Intention, motivation, direction and audience.
There is more to the spoken word that meets the eye.
Before you all go jumping up and down.
The mastery of something, is not to be taught it, but to understand it.
So learn your craft.
Said, then received.
Intention, motivation, direction and audience.
There is more to the spoken word that meets the eye.
Before you all go jumping up and down.
The mastery of something, is not to be taught it, but to understand it.
So learn your craft.
Great show chaps, and on how the ponerogenic process plays into the postmodern "movement".
That those of lesser ability and lower intelligence are seeking power, and are supported by those in the shadows, is a situation that cannot end well. The SJWs etc, are to me anyway, psychologically still at the toddler stage, as they cannot reconcile reality even in its basic forms. These movements do attract all types of abnormal people.
Anyway, the quote of the day does shine a light on this: "Intelligence is the capacity to receive, decode and transmit information efficiently. Stupidity is blockage of this process at any point. Bigotry, ideologies etc. block the ability to receive; robotic reality-tunnels block the ability to decode or integrate new signals; censorship blocks transmission". - Robert Anton Wilson
That those of lesser ability and lower intelligence are seeking power, and are supported by those in the shadows, is a situation that cannot end well. The SJWs etc, are to me anyway, psychologically still at the toddler stage, as they cannot reconcile reality even in its basic forms. These movements do attract all types of abnormal people.
Anyway, the quote of the day does shine a light on this: "Intelligence is the capacity to receive, decode and transmit information efficiently. Stupidity is blockage of this process at any point. Bigotry, ideologies etc. block the ability to receive; robotic reality-tunnels block the ability to decode or integrate new signals; censorship blocks transmission". - Robert Anton Wilson
You can’t have Heaven on Earth... my dreams are dashed. You guys are mean.
Well, with the levels of hysteria that can be generated sometimes over words, I wouldn’t be surprised if militant grammarians didn’t take to the streets demanding tighter controls on prose, and like all things these days it would ultimately descend into an all-out punctuation situation, full stop without a question.
Some grammarians have gone so far as to let loose their terrible thesaurus on innocent commentators, and robbing them of any verb, such is the state of the world these days.
It’s the same with Antifa, I just don’t know the epistemological significance of it all, as somebody stole my dictionary and my thesaurus has gone for a walk.
Anyway, thanks for the talk.
Well, with the levels of hysteria that can be generated sometimes over words, I wouldn’t be surprised if militant grammarians didn’t take to the streets demanding tighter controls on prose, and like all things these days it would ultimately descend into an all-out punctuation situation, full stop without a question.
Some grammarians have gone so far as to let loose their terrible thesaurus on innocent commentators, and robbing them of any verb, such is the state of the world these days.
It’s the same with Antifa, I just don’t know the epistemological significance of it all, as somebody stole my dictionary and my thesaurus has gone for a walk.
Anyway, thanks for the talk.
The proper response to the radical post-modernist attempt to use language to attack reality is disdain rather than outrage. Avoid the outrage that arises from antipathy (Nietzsche's 'ressentiment') because it just ends up inflating narcissistic egos and leading to pointless, energy-depleting conflict. Those who indulge in outrage just end up feeding the underlying power goals being pursued through untruth. Don't give it them that food. Instead, give them disdain. A calm denial of lies is adequate. The lies will inevitably consume the liar, and will do so more quickly when they have nothing external to feed upon.
In sentiment one could go along with that, although watch out for bicycle lock carrying post-modernist professors, you can be calm they might be hiding in wait.
And some seem a bit like this SJW, where Snow Flags caused Feminist SJW Outrage at the mall [Link]
The girl seems as if she’s suffering from some sort of psychosis that might have been induced by postmodern studies and maybe if you were the person responsible for the snow flags then a calm denial of lies might be adequate and it might just result in embarrassment for the young girl, although it seems unlikely.
In the real world reasonable people would think rightly that those were snow flags end of... although when it comes to lies, one could laugh at the idea that you were placing symbols of male domination to mark out areas defining space spaces for cars.
And that saying, ‘sticks and stones...’ is bollocks because people can get fired, lose their homes, family... all depending on the specific situation.
And some seem a bit like this SJW, where Snow Flags caused Feminist SJW Outrage at the mall [Link]
The girl seems as if she’s suffering from some sort of psychosis that might have been induced by postmodern studies and maybe if you were the person responsible for the snow flags then a calm denial of lies might be adequate and it might just result in embarrassment for the young girl, although it seems unlikely.
In the real world reasonable people would think rightly that those were snow flags end of... although when it comes to lies, one could laugh at the idea that you were placing symbols of male domination to mark out areas defining space spaces for cars.
And that saying, ‘sticks and stones...’ is bollocks because people can get fired, lose their homes, family... all depending on the specific situation.
Was doing some recursive journalling/thinking earlier today on this. Here are some notes/observations (not absolutes) from the POV of a designer for inventing a "concept":
· Institutions/Universities seem to teach you what to think not how to think
· Concepts are just ideas and are not absolute/grounded; need constant "testing"
· Principles are more grounded/weighted because constructive criticism can be applied based to historical observation; consistent results for constant evaluation
As for postmodern corp "hubris" I saw good example of a photo posted with an Indian man holding a nicely designed card that reads Google Go. When I first read it I thought he was making a commentary on google and telling them to get out, but quickly realized, no it is for a new app called Google Go >.<
Anyways...look forward to listening and thanks for putting this together!
· Institutions/Universities seem to teach you what to think not how to think
· Concepts are just ideas and are not absolute/grounded; need constant "testing"
· Principles are more grounded/weighted because constructive criticism can be applied based to historical observation; consistent results for constant evaluation
As for postmodern corp "hubris" I saw good example of a photo posted with an Indian man holding a nicely designed card that reads Google Go. When I first read it I thought he was making a commentary on google and telling them to get out, but quickly realized, no it is for a new app called Google Go >.<
Anyways...look forward to listening and thanks for putting this together!
He said, she said, they said, and who to believe.
The spoken word is truly ambiguous.
Is it those who spoke it, or those who heard it, that are right?
The purists will persecute you for any error in deliverance, the strong minded will try trample all over it, yet, whilst you can speak, speak.
For as of tomorrow, that might be banned too.
The spoken word is truly ambiguous.
Is it those who spoke it, or those who heard it, that are right?
The purists will persecute you for any error in deliverance, the strong minded will try trample all over it, yet, whilst you can speak, speak.
For as of tomorrow, that might be banned too.
Mr Reynard
The power of such a device is limited, it doesn't forge friendships, help to overcome indifference, foster a air of trust, no, most certainly not.
It's the barbaric means of silencing those who have a right to speak.
Would you call me "glib", and then shoot me down.
You only go to show why gun control is necessary.
The power of such a device is limited, it doesn't forge friendships, help to overcome indifference, foster a air of trust, no, most certainly not.
It's the barbaric means of silencing those who have a right to speak.
Would you call me "glib", and then shoot me down.
You only go to show why gun control is necessary.
