OF THE
TIMES

President Donald J. Trump is grateful to Chairman [Bob] Goodlatte, Chairman [Mike] McCaul, Congressman [Raul] Labrador, and Congresswoman [Martha] McSally for introducing immigration legislation that would accomplish the President's core priorities for the American people. The President looks forward to advancing legislation that secures the border, ends chain migration, cancels the visa lottery, and addresses the status of the DACA population in a responsible fashion.How very obscure. Because Trump campaigned, at least implicitly, on the promise of ejecting all illegal immigrants and other undesirables from American society.
...the Detroit Free Press reports that women activists in Michigan and elsewhere are making a conscious effort to move away from the hat out of fear that it "excludes and is offensive to transgender women and gender nonbinary people who don't have typical female genitalia and to women of color because their genitals are more likely to be brown than pink."Yeah, there's something wrong, but I don't think it has to do with the hats. At the same time, there is nothing as entertaining as left wingers eating each other.
"I personally won't wear one because if it hurts even a few people's feelings, then I don't feel like it's unifying," said Phoebe Hopps, the founder of Women's March Michigan. "I care more about mobilizing people to the polls than wearing one hat one day of the year."
Hopps said it is not just her, and that national Women's March organizers "are not making it the cornerstone of our messaging because ... there's a few things wrong with the message."
The Facebook page for the Women's March in Pensacola agreed, lecturing followers that "The Pink P*ssy Hat reinforces the notion that woman = vagina and vagina = woman, and both of these are incorrect."
LaShawn Ebly, co-chair of Black Lives Matter-Lansing, told the Free Press that she intends to make the hats the cornerstone of her speech at an upcoming rally. "I will say this one thing: It is a problem," she said by way of a preview.
Comment: This is the real abomination about the Sandy Hook crime scene, not all that nonsense about it having been a staged setting with crisis actors.
A sloppy investigation was a boon to the FBI in covering the tracks of whoever really carried out this atrocity, compromising any evidence of there having been multiple operatives, and facilitating the framing of a patsy.
If the FBI wanted this scene to be kept pristine, it would have done so. See also: